Scribd
Upload
73 views2 pages

One Way Anova For Gender and Attrition H0: There Is No Sig Diff Bet Gender ND Att H1: There Is Sig Diff

The document reports on several statistical tests examining the relationship between various factors and attrition. An one-way ANOVA found a significant difference in attrition between gender groups. However, an ANOVA found no significant difference in satisfaction based on level of experience. A chi-square test found a significant difference in satisfaction based on qualification level. Finally, a Friedman test ranked various factors based on their influence on attrition, finding that statutory benefits had the strongest influence while job security had the weakest.

Uploaded by

Uvasre Sundar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
73 views2 pages

One Way Anova For Gender and Attrition H0: There Is No Sig Diff Bet Gender ND Att H1: There Is Sig Diff

The document reports on several statistical tests examining the relationship between various factors and attrition. An one-way ANOVA found a significant difference in attrition between gender groups. However, an ANOVA found no significant difference in satisfaction based on level of experience. A chi-square test found a significant difference in satisfaction based on qualification level. Finally, a Friedman test ranked various factors based on their influence on attrition, finding that statutory benefits had the strongest influence while job security had the weakest.

Uploaded by

Uvasre Sundar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

One way anova for gender and attrition

H0: there is no sig diff bet gender nd att


H1: there is sig diff

ANOVA
gender
Sum of Squares
Between Groups

df

Mean Square

3.617

1.206

Within Groups

13.933

76

.183

Total

17.550

79

F
6.576

Sig.
.001

Infer
P <0.05 , der is sig diff bet gender nd attrition

H0: there is no sig diff bet exp and satisfaction


H1 there is sig diff bet exp nd satisfaction
ANOVA
experience
Sum of Squares
Between Groups

Df

Mean Square

2.756

.919

Within Groups

67.994

76

.895

Total

70.750

79

p>0.05 there is no sig diff between exp nd satisfaction

F
1.027

Sig.
.386

Chi square for qualification and satisfaction


H0 no sig bet qualification nd satisfaction
H1 sig diff bet

Chi-Square Tests
Value

Df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

12

.000

Likelihood Ratio

108.821

12

.000

Linear-by-Linear

57.786

.000

Pearson Chi-Square

152.512

Association
N of Valid Cases

80

a. 16 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .26.

P<0.05 there is sig diff bet qualification nd satisfaction

Freidman test

Ranks
Mean

Rank

realtionship

2.65

achivements

6.05

facilties

7.02

work schedule

5.68

job securities

1.91

statutory benefits

7.78

motivation level

2.43

performance

7.19

relatioship

4.28

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy