0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views2 pages

Three Qubit Entanglement Polytopes

This document summarizes a lecture on three qubit entanglement. It discusses two classes of three qubit entanglement - the GHZ state and W state. It also discusses the quantum marginal problem of determining possible reduced density matrices ρA, ρB, ρC that are compatible with a pure state |φ>ABC. For the W class, the set of compatible spectra is given by the inequality λAmax + λBmax + λCmax ≥ 2. The document proves that a closest point to the origin exists in the SLOCC class G.|φ>ABC if and only if there exists a state in the class with ρA = ρB = ρC = I/
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views2 pages

Three Qubit Entanglement Polytopes

This document summarizes a lecture on three qubit entanglement. It discusses two classes of three qubit entanglement - the GHZ state and W state. It also discusses the quantum marginal problem of determining possible reduced density matrices ρA, ρB, ρC that are compatible with a pure state |φ>ABC. For the W class, the set of compatible spectra is given by the inequality λAmax + λBmax + λCmax ≥ 2. The document proves that a closest point to the origin exists in the SLOCC class G.|φ>ABC if and only if there exists a state in the class with ρA = ρB = ρC = I/
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

The Mathematics of Entanglement - Summer 2013

30 May, 2013

Three Qubit Entanglement Polytopes


Lecturer: Michael Walter

Lecture 10

Last time we talked about SLOCC (stochastic LOCC), where we can post-select on particular
outcomes
Given a class of states that can be interconverted by SLOCC into |i other by SLOCC, C =
{|i : |i |i}, a result by Dur-Vidal-Cirac says that
C := {(A B C)|i/k . . . k : A, B, C SL(d)}

(1)

For three qubits there is a simple classification of all possible types of entanglement. Apart
from product states, and states with only bipartite entanglement, the two classes have the following
representative states:
1
|GHZi = (|000i + |111i)
(2)
2
and
1
|W i = (|001i + |010i + |100i)
(3)
2
The class of SLOCC operations forms a group:
G = {A B C : A, B, C SL(d)}.

(4)

A easy to check fact is that SL(d) = {eX : tr(X) = 0}. Therefore


G = {eA eB eC = eAII+IBI+IIC : tr(A) = tr(B) = tr(C) = 0}.

(5)

We denote CABC by G.|iABC .

Quantum Marginal Problem for Three Parties

What are the possible A , B , C compatible with a pure state |iABC CABC ? We say before
that this only depends on the spectra A , B and C , as one can always apply local unitaries and
change the basis.
For example, for the W class the set of compatible spectra is given by the equation A
max +
B
max + C

2.
max
Let us start with a simpler problem, namely given a state |iABC , does there exist a state in
G.|iABC with A = B = C = I/d? This is equivalent to
tr(A A) = tr(B B) = tr(C C) = 0,

(6)

for all Hermitian traceless matrices A, B, C, which in turn is equivalent to


tr(A A) + tr(B B) + tr(C C) = 0,

(7)

for all Hermitian traceless matrices A, B, C. We can write it as


hABC |A I I + I B I + I I C|ABC i = 0.
10-1

(8)

Thus the norm of the state |ABC i should not change (to 1st order) when we apply an infinitesimal
SLOCC operation.
Let us look at
tA

ke etB etC |ABC ik =


hABC |etA etB etC |ABC i
t
t
= 2hABC |A I I + I B I + I I C|ABC i.

(9)

So from Eq. (??), if |ABC i is the closest point to the origin in G.|ABC i, then A = B =
C = I/d.
What happens when there is no point in the class with A = B = C = I/d. That seems
strange, as it implies by the above that there is no closest point to the origin. But indeed this is
the case for the |W i class, for example. Consider
(0; 01/) (00 01/) (00 01/)|W i = |W i
and when  goes to zero, one approaches the origin. However the limit is not in G.|W i.
Theorem 1. The following are equivalent:
There exists a closest point to 0 in G.|ABC i.
There exists a quantum state in G.|ABC i with A = B = C = I/d.
G.|ABC i is closed.

10-2

(10)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy