Impact On Student Learning Study
Impact On Student Learning Study
Nicole Ruggiero
Rider University
EDU 465
1 Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2001). Guiding Readers and Writers: Teaching
comprehension, genre, and content literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Pre-Assessment
Pre-Assessment Accuracy
100%
100%
90%
92%
80%
100%
93%
76%
72%
80%
60%
Rationale
The purpose of this study is to help M develop the phonemic
awareness skills that he needs in order to become a more competent
and confident reader, writer, and speller. According the Common Core
State Standards, students should be mastering these skills by the end
of first grade2. In order to help M master these skills, I will be
implementing various instructional strategies in the form of engaging
and interesting lessons and activities to help foster phonemic
awareness skills based upon his areas of weakness. My goal is that by
the end of the study M will be able to use word-solving strategies to
help him read and write. As shown in the pre-assessment data, M
experienced the most difficulty in hearing separate words in speech,
recognizing rhyming words, orally manipulating phonemes, and
isolating final and middle sounds. So, taking these areas into account
my objectives for M during this study are as follows: 1) Given words
with a certain number of phonemes, M will be able to distinguish each
of the sounds, the position of each sound within the words, and the
total number of sounds in the words with 80% accuracy, 2) Given
phoneme manipulation activities, M will be able to create new words by
removing a phoneme from the beginning, middle, or end of a word with
80% accuracy, and 3) Given rhyming activities, M will be able to
2 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State
School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington,
DC: Authors.
10
Instructional Activities
How Many Sounds?
Subject/Topic/Activity: Literacy
1. Standards:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken
words, syllables, and sounds (phonemes)
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.1.2.D Segment spoken single-syllable
words into their complete sequence of individual sounds
(phonemes)
2. Objectives: Given a sorting activity, the student will be able to
identify the number of sounds in each of the words with 80%
accuracy.
3. Materials: How Many Sounds picture sorting pockets, picture cards
(see Appendix D), Record Keeping Chart (see Appendix M)
4. Procedures
Introduction: All words are made up of sounds. If you say the sounds
in words slowly, you will be able to count the number of sounds
in each word. Some words have more sounds than others. For
example, the word dog. Dog: /d/ /o/ /g/. The word dog has
three sounds. What about the word plane. Sound it out with
me: /p/ /l/ /a/ /n/. The word plane has four sounds. (Make sure
student realizes that /pl/ is not an individual phoneme.) It is
important to listen to all of the sounds in a word so that you can
tell which letters are in them.
Body: Today we are going to do an activity in which we have to sort
picture cards based upon how many sounds each word has.
Remember to sound out the word slowly so that you hear all of
the sounds. As you sound out the word, you should count how
many soundsnot syllablesyou hear and then you may put the
picture card into the pocket with the correct number of sounds
written on it. Allow student to sort the cards and record where
he sorts each word on the record-keeping chart.
Closing: Go through the students answers and go over the correct
answers with the student. For each word that the student sorted
incorrectly, have the student say the sounds in each word slowly
2 or 3 times and re-sort it.
11
5. Assessment
The student will be assessed based upon the number of correctly
sorted picture cards. I will be recording where each picture card was
sorted using the Record Keeping Chart. The student will meet the
objective, if he is able to sort the words with 80% accuracy.
6. Differentiation
This activity is very hands-on and multimodal with tactile,
kinesthetic (putting the cards in the pockets), and visual (the
picture cards) components.
I also want the student to be saying the words as he sorts
them, which includes an auditory component.
I will tell the student the word on the picture card if he is
unable to figure it out
I model in the beginning so that the student knows what is
expected of him during the activity.
12
14
15
16
17
18
20
22
24
Post-Assessment
The first activity, How Many Sounds? served as introductory lesson to
get M used to orally segmenting words. According to Ms pre-test, he
was able to orally segment words with 93% accuracy. However, during
this activity, M was only able to sort the words based on the number of
sounds with 33% accuracy (see Appendix M). So, I decided that I would
return to this activity again after a few weeks of phonemic instruction.
After about 3 weeks, I had M complete this lesson again and he did it
with 86% accuracy, thus meeting his first learning objective. The first
objective also states that M will be able to recognize the position of
phonemes in words. There were two activities that focused on this skill:
Doggie, Wheres My Bone: Doggie Sound Switch and Phoneme Swap. In
the first part of Doggie, Wheres My Bone: Doggie Sound Switch, I had
M simply locate the specific phoneme in the words. He completed this
with 96% accuracy. In the second part of Doggie, Wheres My Bone:
Doggie Sound Switch and Phoneme Swap, M was asked to identify the
position of the phoneme that was changed. M completed Doggie,
Wheres My Bone: Doggie Sound Switch with 85% accuracy and
Phoneme Swap with 88% making his total accuracy in this area about
87% (see Appendix M). So M has met his first objective.
Ms second objective was that he be able to create new words by
removing a phoneme from the beginning, middle, or end of a word with
25
Post-Assessment Accuracy
100%
90%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
97%
100%
100%
100%
88%
80%
81%
70%
60%
Perecent Accuracy
50%
Area
26
in
all
areas
that needed
improvement.
In
the
pre-
27
28
Reflection
I believe that this phonemic awareness focused unit truly had an
impact on this student. I tailored the lessons to this student, taking his
learning style, learning needs, and areas of weakness and strength into
consideration. This really helped this unit to be appropriate for M. He
was able to complete all of the activities with minimal prompting,
which shows that I was able to use the pre-assessment data and the
background about this student to plan lessons that were challenging
enough to promote growth and yet not too challenging that he became
frustrated. The results of the post-assessments show that these
lessons had a significant impact in raising Ms academic progress both
in phonemic awareness and in spelling.
Even after the instruction, the one area that was lower than the
rest was the recognition of rhyming words. I did not have as much time
as I would have hoped to work with this student. Had I been given
more time, I would have gone deeper into rhyming. Even though M
seemed to understand the concept of rhyming during the instructional
activities and when he was asked to generate rhymes on the pre- and
post-assessments, however, when he was asked whether two words,
let and leg, rhyme in the post-assessment he answered that they did.
He received 81% accuracy in rhyme recognition and this meets his
goal, however, the concept of rhyming is something that M should
29
30
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Words Their Way Spelling Inventory (pre)
31
32
APPENDIX E Rhyming
33
34
APPENDIX H Whats
35
APPENDIX K
Phonemic Awareness
(post)
36
37
38
39