Scribd
Upload
18 views2 pages

LP Banach

The document summarizes theorems about p spaces being Banach spaces. Theorem 1 proves that the space l∞ of bounded sequences is a Banach space by showing that a Cauchy sequence in l∞ converges to a limit in l∞. Theorem 2 proves that the space lp of p-power summable sequences is a Banach space for p ≥ 1 by using Minkowski's inequality to show a Cauchy sequence in lp converges.

Uploaded by

Mela Samy Ignacio
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
18 views2 pages

LP Banach

The document summarizes theorems about p spaces being Banach spaces. Theorem 1 proves that the space l∞ of bounded sequences is a Banach space by showing that a Cauchy sequence in l∞ converges to a limit in l∞. Theorem 2 proves that the space lp of p-power summable sequences is a Banach space for p ≥ 1 by using Minkowski's inequality to show a Cauchy sequence in lp converges.

Uploaded by

Mela Samy Ignacio
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

MATH 41001: LINEAR ANALYSIS

Chapter 2: The `p spaces are Banach

Theorem 1. ` = (xi )
i=0 : sup0i< |xi | < +, xi R with the norm k(xi )i=0 k =
sup0i< |xi | is a Banach space.
(n)

Proof. Suppose that {(xi )


i=0 }n=1 is a Cauchy sequence for k k . Then, given > 0,
there exists N 1 such that, for n, m N and any i 0,
(n)

|xi

(m)

xi

(m)
)i=1 k

(n)

| k(xi )
i=0 (xi

< .

()

(n)

In other words, for each fixed i, {xi }


n=1 is a Cauchy sequence in R and so, since R is
complete, it has a limit xi R, say. We may now let m + in () to obtain, for n N ,
(n)

|xi

xi | =

(n)

lim |xi

m+

(m)

xi

(n)

(m)
)i=0 k

| lim sup k(xi )


i=0 (xi
m+

()

Then, in particular, for each i,


(N )

|xi | |xi

(N )

| + |xi

(N )
)i=1 k

xi | k(xi

+ ,

so, taking the supremum over i, k(xi )


i=0 k < +, i.e., (xi )i=0 ` . Furthermore, taking
the supremum over i in (), gives that, for n N ,
(n)

(n)

k(xi )
i=0 (xi )i=0 k = sup |xi
i0

xi | ,

(n)

so limn+ k(xi )
i=0 (xi )i=0 k = 0, as required.

Theorem 2. For p 1, `p = {(xi )


i=0 :

k(xi )
i=0 kp =

i=0

|xi |p < +, xi R} with the norm

!1/p
|xi |p

i=0

is a Banach space.
Typeset by AMS-TEX

(n)

Proof. Suppose that {(xi )


i=0 }n=1 is a Cauchy sequence for k kp . Then, given > 0,
there exists N 1 such that, for n, m N and any i N,

(n)
|xi

(m)
xi |p

(n)

|xi

(m) p

(n)

(m) p
)i=0 kp

| = k(xi )
i=0 (xi

xi

< p .

( )

i=0
(n)

So, for each fixed i, {xi }


n=1 is a Cauchy sequence in R and thus has a limit xi R, say.
Next, note that, for any M 1 and n, m N , we have
M
X

(n)
|xi

(m)
xi |p

i=0

(n)

|xi

(m) p

xi

| < p .

i=0

If we let m +, this gives


M
X

(n)

|xi

xi |p p ,

( )

i=0

for any M 1 and n N . By Minkowskis inequality,

M
X

!1/p
|xi |p

i=0

M
X

!1/p
(N )

|xi

xi |p

i=0

M
X

!1/p
(N )

|xi

xi |p

M
X

!1/p
(N ) p

|xi

i=0

!1/p
(N ) p

|xi

i=0

i=0
(N )
)i=0 kp .

+ k(xi

P
1/p
(N )
M
p
p
Letting M +, we see that
|x

x
|
is finite, so (xi )
i
i=0 ` .
i
i=0
Finally, letting M + in ( ) gives

(n)

|xi

xi |p p ,

i=0
(n)

for all n N , so that limn+ k(xi )


i=0 (xi )i=0 kp = 0, as required.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy