Scribd
Upload
2K views2 pages

Panel Zone and Rigid Offsets

The document discusses four models of steel frames in ETABS with varying rigid offset and panel zone assumptions: 1. Default rigid offsets, no panel zone - Provides conservative deflections but unconservative moments. 2. Fully rigid offsets, no panel zone - Provides unconservative deflections and conservative moments. 3. Default rigid offsets, panel zone from column - Provides extremely high deflections due to flexibility duplication. 4. Fully rigid offsets, panel zone from column - Best modeling assumption with deflections between bounds and good moment results. A fully rigid zone is not recommended for steel frames.

Uploaded by

ALMTF
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views2 pages

Panel Zone and Rigid Offsets

The document discusses four models of steel frames in ETABS with varying rigid offset and panel zone assumptions: 1. Default rigid offsets, no panel zone - Provides conservative deflections but unconservative moments. 2. Fully rigid offsets, no panel zone - Provides unconservative deflections and conservative moments. 3. Default rigid offsets, panel zone from column - Provides extremely high deflections due to flexibility duplication. 4. Fully rigid offsets, panel zone from column - Best modeling assumption with deflections between bounds and good moment results. A fully rigid zone is not recommended for steel frames.

Uploaded by

ALMTF
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Panel Zone and Rigid Offsets

5 Added by Truly Guzman, last edited by Truly Guzman on May 26, 2011

ETABS has the capability to model both, rigid offsets and Panel zones. In order to illustrate the correct use of both options the following simple examples have been created, all frames have the same steel frame sections and a lateral load of 10kips applied at the top floor, the rigid offsets and panel zone have been modified as follows:

Model 1.- Default rigid offsets , rigid zone factor 0, No panel zone

Model 2.- Default rigid offsets, rigid zone factor 1, No panel zone

X-Deflection= 0.133in This model is the simplest one, and represents the higher bound for deflections (conservative) but the lower bound for moments.

X-Deflection=0.104in This model assume fully rigid offsets, reports the smallest deflection which is generally unconservative and is not recommended. Results for moments are the highest of the four models (conservative)

Model 3.- Default rigid offsets, rigid zone factor 0, Panel zone from column

Model 4.- Default rigid offsets, rigid zone factor 1, Panel zone from column

X-Deflection=0.152in This model assumes no rigid zone and panel zone modeled based on column properties. Deflections are extremely high due to the fact that flexibility is being duplicated at joints. Moment is the smallest of the four models, and is also not recommended due to unconservative results.

X-Deflection=0.128in This model has fully rigid offsets, and panel zone modeled based on column properties. In this case flexibility of joint is correctly modeled. Results for deflections report a value in between the upper and lower bound. Moments as well indicate a good fit in between extreme bounds. Therefore; this is generally the best modeling assumption.

NOTES: If the first model would be modeled using the user defined lengths option as 0,0 for rigid offsets instead of default based on connectivity, results will be identical except for the fact that moments will be reported at end of elements (not a column/beam face) A fully rigid zone should never be used in steel frames, usually for concrete frames a value of 0.5 is recommended. Which I turn indicates that 50% of the actual offset will be consider rigid Rigidity will only affect bending in the 3 axis of the frame, not torsion, not axial properties.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy