Study On ERP System Selection & Implementation
Study On ERP System Selection & Implementation
System Selection:
An ERP system selection methodology is a formal process for selecting an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. Existing methodologies include:
SpecIT Independent Vendor Selection Management. Kuiper's funnel method. Dobrin's 3D decision support tool. Clarkson Potomac method.
Objective decision process "Choosing which ERP to use is a complex decision that has significant economic consequences, thus it requires a multi-criterion approach." There are two key points to note when the major decision makers are agreeing on selection criteria that will be used in evaluating potential vendors. Firstly, the criteria and the scoring system must be agreed in advance prior to viewing any potential systems. The criteria must be wide-ranging and decided upon by as many objective people as possible within and external to the enterprise. In no circumstance should people with affiliations to one or more systems be allowed to advise in this regard. Full involvement by all personnel The decision on the system must be made by all stakeholders within the enterprise. "It requires top management leadership and participation it involves virtually every department within the company". Representatives of all users should:
Be involved in the project initiation phase where the decision making process is agreed; Assist in the gathering of requirements; Attend the Vendor Demonstrations; Have a significant participation in the short-listing and final selection of a vendor.
System Implementation:
ERP covers the technique and concepts employed for the integrated management of business as a whole, ERP packages are integrated software packages that support the above ERP concepts. ERP lifecycle is in which highlights the different stages in implementation of An ERP.
Package Evaluation
Package Evaluation process is one of the most imp phase of the ERP implementation , because the package you select will decide failure or success of project. There is little room for error in this as ERP packages are so expensive once purchased can not switch to another. While making the analysis the imp point is nothing is perfect , imp here is whether it is a perfect fit or good fit.It is impossible to get a system which will perform exactly as the company does business but aim is to get least no of differences
The committee will be headed by the ERP in-charge (i.e. the CIO or COO). The committee will meet periodically to review the progress & chart the future course of action.
GAP ANALYSIS
Gap analysis is a phase in the ERP implementation, where the organization tries to find out the gaps between the companys existing business practices & those supported by the ERP package. This is the process through which companies create a complete model of where they are now & where they want to head in the future.
RE-ENGINEERING:
It is in this phase that the human factors are taken into account. Two different connotations 1st one is the controversial, involving the use of ERP to aid in downsizing efforts. There have been occasions where high level executives have invoked the reengineering slogan & purchased an ERP package with the aim of reducing number of employees. While every implementation is going to involve some change in job responsibilities, so it is the best to treat ERP as an investment as well as cost-cutting measure, rather than a downsizing tool. Downsizing is a business practice that may have its place, but it should not be cloaked within the glossier slogan of reengineering. The 2nd use of the word re-engineering in the ERP field refers to an ERP implementation model initially designed & used.
TEAM TRAINING:
When the configuration is taking place the implementation team is being trained not how to use the system, but how to implement it. This is the phase where the company trains its employees to implement & later run the system. The ERP vendors & the hired consultants will leave after the implementation is over. Good in-house team For the company to be self sufficient in running the ERP system, it should have a good in-house team that can handle the various situations. Thus, it is very vital that the company recognizes the importance of this phase & selects those employees who have the right attitude- people who are willing to change, learn new things & are not afraid of technology- & good functional knowledge.
TESTING:
This is the phase where you try to break the system. Here we reach a point where we are testing real case scenarios. The system is configured & now we must come up with extreme case scenarios- system overloads, multiple users logging on at the same time with the same query, users entering invalid data, hackers trying to access restricted areas & so on. The test case must be designed specifically to find the weak links in the system & these bugs should be fixed before going live.