Negotiation Skills Training: Negotiation Techniques For Sales, Contracts, Debts, Buying, Selling and Training
Negotiation Skills Training: Negotiation Techniques For Sales, Contracts, Debts, Buying, Selling and Training
negotiation techniques for sales, contracts, debts, buying, selling and training
These negotiation techniques are primarily for sales, but apply also to other negotiations, such as debt negotiation, contracts negotiating, buying negotiations, salary and employment contracts negotiations, and to an extent all other negotiating situations. Negotiation is vital for an organization's overall effectiveness. Organizational effectiveness is a product of activities within a system - internal and external. Negotiation is critical to establishing the internal system (structure, people, functions, plans, measures, etc), and the organization's relationship to the external system (markets, suppliers, technology, etc). Negotiation is also critical to optimising the performance of activities internally and externally (principally through communication, by people). Good sales negotiation - the rules of which feature below - can easily add 10% to sales revenues, which arguably goes straight to the bottom line as incremental profit. Good purchasing negotiation can easily save 10% of the cost of bought in products and services, which again arguably goes straight to the bottom line as extra profit. Good negotiation by managers in dealing with staff can easily reduce staff turnover by 5-10%, which reduces recruitment and training costs by at least the same %, as well as improving quality, consistency and competitive advantage, which for many companies is the difference between ultimate success and failure. Good negotiation by executives with regulatory and planning authorities enables opening new markets, developing new technologies, and the choice of where the business operates and is based, all of which individually can make the difference between a business succeeding or failing. Successful debt negotiation with creditors enables a business to continue trading. Failure to negotiate debts often leads to business closure. See the notes on debt negotiation for business creditors and personal debts such as credit cards, in the debt negotiation article below. Salary negotiation affects individuals and organizations, and good negotiation skills on both sides produce positive outcomes for all. See also the tips on asking for a salary rise, and dealing with salary increase requests on the pay rise page. These negotiation techniques deal mainly with sales negotiation and are written from the point of view of the 'seller'. If you are 'buying', or want to know how buyers tend to behave look at the note alongside the headings. Sales negotiation is an increasingly important part of the sales process. Negotiation starts when buyer and seller are conditionally committed to the sale (not sooner if you are the sales person; the sooner the better if you are the buyer). Negotiation generally results in a price compromise between seller and buyer - ie., the seller reduces and the buyer increases from their starting positions. Clever buyers will attempt to negotiate before giving any kind of buying commitment. Clever sales people will resist this. Here are the rules of sales negotiating, which imply also the rules for successful negotiating when buying.
2. negotiate when the sale is conditionally agreed, not before (if buying the opposite applies)
Negotiate when the sale is conditionally agreed, and no sooner (buyers tend to try to negotiate before giving you any commitment - don't let them) Or, put another way, don't get drawn into negotiating until you've got agreement in principle to do business. If you start to negotiate before receiving this commitment you'll concede ground and the customer will attain a better starting point. This would put pressure on you to find more concessions later, and ensure a better finishing point for the customer. If you are not sure that the customer is conditionally committed to the sale, then ask (a conditional closing question), eg "If we can agree the details will you go ahead?"
If you're buying, then the opposite applies: start to negotiate for concessions before agreeing you want to buy (try this when you next buy something - you'll be amazed at what you can secure without giving any commitment in return).
3. aim high
Aim for the best outcome (buyers aim low, and they tend not to go first either) (If you're buying, aim very - even ridiculously - low - but do it politely.) Whatever you're doing, your first stake in the sand sets the limit on your best possible outcome. There's no moving it closer to where you want to go; it'll only move the other way. Your opening position also fixes the other person's minimum expectation, and the closer your start point is to the eventual finishing point the more difficult it is to give the other person concessions along the way and ultimately arrive at a win-win outcome. Many negotiations are little more than a split-the-difference exercise. They shouldn't be, but that's often the underlying psychology and expectation. So it's logical that to achieve the best possible finishing position you should start as ambitiously as you can (without losing credibility of course). If you have the option to hear the other person's offer first, then do so. It's a fact that whoever makes the opening offer is at a disadvantage. If you go first, the other person can choose to disregard it and ask for a better offer. And the other person avoids the risk of making an offer themselves that is more beneficial than you would have been prepared to accept. It's amazing how often a buyer is prepared to pay more than an asking price, but avoids having to do so because they keep quiet and let the seller go first. Vice-versa, the seller can often achieve a higher selling price than he anticipates if he hears what the buyer is prepared to offer first.
Letting the other side go first on price or cost also enables you to use another tactic, whereby you refuse to even accept the invitation to start negotiating, which you should do if the price or cost point is completely unacceptable or a 'silly offer'. This then forces the other side to 'go again' or at least re-think their expectations or stance, which can amount to a huge movement in your favour, before you have even started.
This is a matter of discipline and control. It's simple. Never give anything away without getting something in return. If you do you are not negotiating you are simply conceding. A commitment from the other person can be a suitable concession to get in return for something of relatively low value. The simplest and most elegant concession to secure is agreement to proceed with the deal now - use it to close.
8. prepare and keeping looking for variables (tradable concessions for both sides)
Keep searching for variables, concessions, 'bargaining chips', incentives. (Buyers will look for your concessions but will tend not to offer their own) A variable or tradable is any factor that can be altered and which has a real or perceived value. You are not a mind-reader and the other person may not be totally open, or even fully aware of all the possible variables that are of interest, so keep looking for them. Prepare and estimate values of real and perceived variables before the negotiation, and keep looking for new ones during the negotiation. If the other side is cooperative involve them in looking for variables too - for both sides. The more variables you find the less you will have to give on price, and the more added-value you can build into the deal. The buyer will not offer his own concessions normally, so you can look for his possible concessions as well as your own (ie variables within the buyer's situation as well as your own).
very good negotiating skills commercial understanding (to appreciate the value and implications of each element within a deal, and for giving justification and explanation, etc.)
very good communication skills - empathy - (so as to able to communicate a commercial position whilst maintaining a good relationship) a consistent corporate policy and authorisation structure covering discounting and giving concessions
Organizations that have several points or people through which negotiations can take place must perform well in these areas. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. Organizations with inconsistent or vague negotiation practices are vulnerable. Customers are able to find and exploit weaknesses and precedents to drive prices down, force concessions and discount levels up, resulting in erosion of margins for the company. This happens because the company loses control over its starting positions (first stance), and unwittingly provides precedents for generous finishing positions. Negotiating a deal, whether you are buying or selling, is a strange business. In a selling role for a company, good negotiation requires a careful combination of empathy for the other person's situation and feelings, with our own responsibilities to secure the best possible commercial outcome for the company. On occasions there can be a personal dilemma, particularly if our selling style is one that uses a lot of relationship-building and trust. We can feel torn between the interests of the customer - with whom it is of course essential to build an understanding - and the needs of the company. So it is essential to remember our fundamental responsibility as a sales person, which helps to avoid being drawn into the dilemma territory; remember: You work for your company, not for the customer. By the same token, the customer is out to secure the best possible deal for themselves and their organization, not for your company. (Have you ever known a customer refuse a discount or concession on the basis that it isn't in the best interest of the supplier? Of course not.) Another factor is our responsibility to existing customers. We undermine our relationships with existing customers if we offer preferential terms to new customers, just to get the deal. Giving too much away, or referring a negotiation to a higher authority has a demoralising, undermining effect, and customers don't respect it - they take advantage of it. The urge to sustain a friendly, highly amenable relationship with the customer above all else is a trap that we must be alert to, it's human nature, but lots of customers will use it to their advantage. It is entirely possible to maintain a friendly helpful relationship while at the same time being very firm in negotiating the business.
Deep down we all respect someone who takes a firm approach to business, as long as it is delivered in an understanding and empathic way, with proper explanation and justification for the stance taken. Good negotiating builds our own confidence and natural authority, not to mention the fun we can have outside work, when we are the buyer. It's extremely important to make an assessment of where the other person is coming from; what the real and perceived issues are, and to separate the psychological factors from the practical ones. A person's need to feel that they've succeeded in squeezing out a good deal is far different from the practical issue of simply whether they have enough money to afford the transaction, or whether the timings and availability can possibly fit together. The purpose of negotiation is to reach a fair and reasonable compromise, not to try to do the impossible. If a reasonable and commercially acceptable compromise is within reach we must use all our skills to achieve it through negotiation. If the other person's demands are not reasonable, commercially acceptable, or if any aspects of each side's position do not fit, negotiation is not the answer. This is why at times the most important word to use in any negotiation is 'NO'.
If the demand or request is not possible, too commercially demanding, or not reasonable for any reason we must kill it there and then, or it will come back to haunt you. Do not negotiate if there are unrealistic demands being made at any stage. This is for three reasons.
It prevents you having to concede substantial ground unnecessarily. It avoids raising false hopes, which would make it difficult for us later to satisfy later. It stamps your personal authority and professionalism on the situation.
A clear and honest "No, I'm afraid not," with suitable explanation and empathy for the other person's situation is all it takes.
negotiate!
Amazingly many people who find themselves confronted by personal or business debts and pressure from creditors fail to think of negotiation as an option. Understandably fearful or embarrassed, people and businesses with debt problems usually fail to confront the situation until it's too late. Fear not - most people and businesses get into serious debt at some stage in their lives. Many of the most successful business owners and tycoons have been bankrupt or presided over insolvent businesses at some time - getting onto debt is part of experience and risk-taking in business, and it's part of life in the process of growing up. You are not alone. The important thing is what you do about it. When you know you have a problem, start negotiating. Debtors often think there's no point, that negotiation isn't an option, but it is, and here's why: Creditors most fear losing their money and having to write off the debt altogether. That's why creditors generally are very happy to begin the negotiation process when debts have become a problem for the debtor. To a creditor, negotiating a debt means that they have a chance of recovering some or all of the debt. If a creditor fails to begin a debt negotiation with the debtor, the creditor faces costs of debt recovery (solicitor's letters and debt collection agency fees, etc), and a real risk that the debtor will for whatever reason be unable to pay any of the debt (insolvency, bankruptcy, deliberate avoidance, etc), which leaves the creditor no option other than to write off the debt, losing everything, and having to pay debt recovery costs. Where there is negotiation there is hope of partial or complete debt recovery, and the
avoidance of debt collection costs, which is why creditors generally welcome the offer to negotiate from a debtor in difficulty.
renegotiated credit and supply terms, enabling the business debtor to continue to trade. extension of the period by which the debt has to be settled. price, product and supply arrangement review, to determine whether future economies can be found for the debtor, to avoid increasing the debt any more than absolutely unavoidable. debtor stock-holding review, to assess possibility of returning stock to the creditor, and reducing the debt. Creative creditors may come up with more ideas - the important thing is to talk and work together to resolve the problem constructively.
debt recovery people can be firm and aggressive. You will reduce the creditor's need to be aggressive if you co-operate and build trust.
A negotiation story (light relief for negotiating training sessions or debt negotiation meetings)
A sales-woman is driving home in the rain when she sees a little old lady walking by the roadside, heavily laden with shopping. Being a kindly soul, the sales-woman stops the car and invites the old lady to climb in. During their small talk, the old lady glances surreptitiously at a brown paper bag on the front seat between them. "If you are wondering what's in the bag," offers the sales-woman, "It's a bottle of wine. I got it for my husband." The little old lady is silent for a while, nods several times, and says ........ "Good trade." (ack C Byrd)