0% found this document useful (0 votes)
259 views61 pages

A Study On Equity Analysis

The document provides a table of contents for a research project on equity analysis with reference to stock picking strategies. It lists 15 chapters and the page numbers. Some of the chapter titles include introduction, literature review, research methodology, analysis and interpretation, findings, recommendations and conclusion. The table of contents provides an overview of the structure and scope of the research project.

Uploaded by

Ritika Khurana
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
259 views61 pages

A Study On Equity Analysis

The document provides a table of contents for a research project on equity analysis with reference to stock picking strategies. It lists 15 chapters and the page numbers. Some of the chapter titles include introduction, literature review, research methodology, analysis and interpretation, findings, recommendations and conclusion. The table of contents provides an overview of the structure and scope of the research project.

Uploaded by

Ritika Khurana
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 61

Table of Contents

S.N o
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ". '. ). 1.1 A&out t(e *ndu$try 1.2 A&out t(e *ndian Stock +arket. 1.3 A&out t(e %opic 1, 2 "

Title
Student Declaration... Certificate from Company Certificate from guide. Acknowledgement. !ecutive Summary #i$t of %a&le$ #i$t of C(art$. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION..

Page No.
i ii iii iv v vi vii 1-3

-. 1,.

CHAPTER

: !ITERATURE RE"IE#.

33-3$ 3(-3) 3' 3' 3'

CHAPTER 3 : RESEARCH %ETHODO!O&' 3.1 .urpo$e of t(e $tudy.. 3.2 /&0ective of t(e $tudy... 3.3 Scope of t(e $tudy

3.4 1e$earc( met(odology.. 3' 3.5 1e$earc( De$ign. 3." Sample De$ign 3.' Source of Data 3.'.1 .rimary Source. 3.'.2 Secondary Source. 3.) %ool$ for Data Collection 3' 3' 3) 3) 3' 3'

11. CHAPTER * : ANA!'SIS + INTERPRETATION... 12. CHAPTER $ : -INDIN&S... 13. CHAPTER ( : RECO%%ENDATIONS + CONC!USION. 1ecommendation$ Conclu$ion$......

3,-*$ *(-*. *)-$/ 45,

0I0!IO&RAPH' 14. Anne!ure

$1-$ 52

STUDENT DEC!ARATION
%(i$ i$ to certify t(at t(e .ro0ect titled 1A st234 on e52it4 anal4sis 6it7 s8e9ial :efe:en9e to Sto9; Pi9;ing St:ategies< (ave &een completed under t(e guidance of 1=ani9a 0at7la< in t(e partial fulfillment of t(e re2uirement for t(e award of t(e degree of 3+a$ter in 4u$ine$$ Admini$tration5 from 31ukmini Devi *n$titute of Advanced Studie$6 7ew Del(i.5 %(i$ i$ an original work &y me.

Na>e of t7e st23ent: Co2:se: 0at97:

%a42:es7 Ti6a:i %0A /11-13

?Sign@

CERTI-ICATE -RO% THE &UIDE


%(i$ i$ to certify t(at t(e pro0ect titled 1A st234 on e52it4 anal4sis 6it7 s8e9ial :efe:en9e to Sto9; Pi9;ing St:ategies< i$ an academic work done &y 1%a42:es7 Ti6a:i< $u&mitted in t(e partial fulfillment of t(e re2uirement for t(e award of t(e degree of 3+a$ter$ in 4u$ine$$ Admini$tration5 from 31ukmini Devi *n$titute of Advanced Studie$6 7ew Del(i.5 under my guidance and direction. %o t(e &e$t of my knowledge and &elief t(e data and information pre$ented &y (im in t(e pro0ect (a$ not &een $u&mitted earlier el$ew(ere.

Na>e A =ani9a 0at7la ?P:oBe9t &2i3e@ RDIAS

AC=NO#!ED&E%ENT
* offer my $incere t(ank$ and (um&le regard$ to 1ukmini Devi *n$titute /f Advanced Studie$6 88S*. 9niver$ity6 7ew Del(i for imparting u$ very valua&le profe$$ional training in +4A. * pay my gratitude and $incere regard$ to =ani9a 0at7la6 my pro0ect 8uide for giving me t(e cream of (i$ knowledge. * am t(ankful to (im a$ (e (a$ &een a con$tant $ource of advice6 motivation and in$piration. * am al$o t(ankful to (im for giving (i$ $ugge$tion$ and encouragement t(roug(out t(e pro0ect work. * take t(e opportunity to e!pre$$ my gratitude and t(ank$ to our computer #a& $taff and li&rary $taff for providing me opportunity to utili:e t(eir re$ource$ for t(e completion of t(e pro0ect. * am al$o t(ankful to my family and friend$ for con$tantly motivating me to complete t(e pro0ect and providing me an environment w(ic( en(anced my knowledge.

Na>e of t7e st23ent: Co2:se: 0at97:

%a42:es7 Ti6a:i %0A /11-13

?Sign@

ECECUTI"E SU%%AR'
%(e pro0ect titled 3A $tudy on e2uity analy$i$ wit( $pecial reference to Stock .icking Strategie$5 (a$ &een completed after an in;dept( analy$i$ of *nve$tor$ perception and market reaction$. *n t(i$ pro0ect *ndian <inancial Sy$tem (a$ &een $tudied6 in w(ic( &ot( t(e organi:ed and unorgani:ed $ector$ (ave &een e!plored. %(e pro0ect cover$ financial $y$tem covering <inancial *n$titution$ =vi:. 1egulatory6 <inancial *ntermediarie$6 7on *ntermediarie$>6 organi:ed and unorgani:ed <inancial +arket$6 <inancial *n$trument$ and <inancial Service$. #egi$lation$ pa$$ed &y t(e 14* 1elating to <oreign *nve$tment$ and t(eir implication$ were clo$ely e!amined. 8uideline$ &y t(e 14* pertaining to Commodity <uture$ %rading were look forward in order to reali:e variou$ tool$ and procedure$ to ad(ere federal agencie$. Security !c(ange &oard of *ndia =S 4*> and it$ Capital market$ operation$ were di$cu$$ed including S 4*?$ <unction$ and it$ o&0ective$. 8uideline$ &y S 4* for Commodity <uture$ trading (ave &een under$tood in order to pur$ue $ucce$$ful and et(ical future$ trading in commodity market. %(e pro0ect include$@

+o$t of t(e $trategie$ di$cu$$ed in t(i$ pro0ect u$e t(e tool$ and tec(ni2ue$ of fundamental analy$i$6 w(o$e main o&0ective i$ to find t(e wort( of a company6 or it$ intrin$ic value.

*n 2uantitative analy$i$6 a company i$ wort( t(e $um of it$ di$counted ca$( flow$. *n ot(er word$6 it i$ wort( all of it$ future profit$ added toget(er. Some 2ualitative factor$ affecting t(e value of a company are it$ management6 &u$ine$$ model6 indu$try and &rand name. Aalue inve$tor$6 concerned wit( t(e pre$ent6 look for $tock$ $elling at a price t(at i$ lower t(an t(e e$timated wort( of t(e company6 a$ reflected &y it$ fundamental$. 8rowt( inve$tor$ are concerned wit( t(e future6 &uying companie$ t(at may &e trading (ig(er t(an

t(eir intrin$ic wort( &ut $(ow t(e potential to grow and one day e!ceed t(eir current valuation$.

%(e 8A1. $trategy i$ a com&ination of &ot( growt( and value@ inve$tor$ concerned wit( Bgrowt( at a rea$ona&le priceB look for companie$ t(at are $omew(at undervalued given t(eir growt( potential.

*ncome inve$tor$6 $eeking a $teady $tream of income from t(eir $tock$6 look for $olid companie$ t(at pay a (ig( &ut $u$taina&le dividend yield.

!ist of Tables
Table No.
1.1 1.2 1.3 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Ca$( <low 1e$idual Aalue Ci$torical arning$ Cindalco %a&le 7C.C %a&le 4rook$ #a&oratorie$ %a&le 7**% %a&le 4a0a0 Colding$ %a&le 13 1* $ */ *1 * *3 **

Na>e of t7e Table

Page No.

!ist of C7a:ts

C7a:t No.
1.1 4.1

Na>e of t7e C7a:t


*ndian <inancial Sy$tem Stock$ <inancial$

Page No.
2 45

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1

A0OUT THE INDUSTR'

%(e *ndian financial $y$tem con$i$t$ of many in$titution$6 in$trument$ and market$. <inancial in$trument$ range from t(e common coin$6 currency note$ and c(e2ue$6 to t(e more e!otic future$ $wap$ of (ig( finance.

%(e *ndian <inancial Sy$tem

/rgani:ed $ector

9n;/rgani:ed Sector <inancial Service$ <inancial *n$titution $ <inancial *n$trument $ +oney #ender$ #and #ord$ .awn 4roker$ *ndigenou$ 4anker$

<inancial +arket$

/t(er$

7on; *ntermediarie$ Diarie$

*ntermediarie$

1egulatory

%rader$

?1.1@ In3ian -inan9ial S4ste> %(e *ndian financial $y$tem i$ &roadly cla$$ified into 2 &road 8roup$@; 1. /rgani:ed Sector 2. 9norgani:ed Sector 1. O:ganiDe3 Se9to: %(e organi:ed $ector con$i$t$ of@ ; I@ -inan9ial Instit2tions a@ Reg2lato:4 %(e regulatory in$titution$ are t(e one$6 w(ic( form t(e regulation$6 and control t(e *ndian financial $y$tem. %(e 1e$erve 4ank of *ndia i$ t(e regulatory &ody6 w(ic( regulate$6 guide$ control$ and promote$ t(e *<S. b@ -inan9ial Inte:>e3ia:ies %(ey are t(e intermediarie$ w(o intermediate &etween t(e $aver and inve$tor$. %(ey lend money a$ well mo&ili:e$ $aving$D t(eir lia&ilitie$ are toward$ ultimate $aver$6 w(ile t(eir a$$et$ are from t(e inve$tor$ or &orrower$. %(ey can &e furt(er cla$$ified into@ 0an;ing All &anking in$titution$ are intermediarie$. Non-0an;ing

Some 7on;4anking in$titution$ al$o act a$ intermediarie$6 and w(en t(ey do $o t(ey are known a$ 7on; 4anking <inancial *ntermediarie$.9%*6 #*C6 8*C E 7A4A1D are $ome of t(e 74<C?$ in *ndia. 9@ Non Inte:>e3ia:ies 7on;intermediarie$ in$titution$ do t(e loan &u$ine$$ &ut t(eir re$ource$ are not directly o&tained from t(e $aver. II. -inan9ial %a:;ets <inancial +arket$ are t(e center$ or arrangement$ t(at provide facilitie$ for &uying E $elling of financial claim$ and $ervice$. <inancial market$ can &e cla$$ified into@ ; O:ganiDe3 >a:;ets %(e$e market$ compri$e of corporation$6 financial in$titution$6 individual$ and government$ w(o trade in t(e$e market$ eit(er directly or indirectly t(roug( &roker$ on organi:ed e!c(ange$ or office$. Uno:ganiDe3 >a:;ets %(e financial tran$action$6 w(ic( take place out$ide t(e well;e$ta&li$(ed e!c(ange$ or wit(out $y$tematic and orderly $tructure or arrangement$ con$titute$ t(e unorgani:ed market$. %(ey generally refer to t(e market$ in t(e village$. III. -inan9ial Inst:2>ents <inancial in$trument$ con$titute of $ecuritie$6 a$$et$ and claim$. <inancial $ecuritie$ are cla$$ified a$ primary and $econdary $ecuritie$. %(e primary $ecuritie$ are i$$ued &y t(e companie$ directly to t(e ultimate $aver$ a$ ordinary $(are$ and de&enture$6 w(ile t(e $econdary $ecuritie$ are i$$ued &y t(e financial intermediarie$ to t(e ultimate $aver$ a$ &ank depo$it$6 in$urance policie$ $o and on. I". -inan9ial Se:Ei9es

%(e term financial $ervice in a &road $en$e mean$ 3+o&ili:ing and allocating $aving$5. %(u$6 it can al$o &e offered a$ a proce$$ &y w(ic( fund$ are mo&ili:ed from a large num&er of $aver$ and make t(em availa&le to all t(o$e w(o are in need of it6 particularly to t(e corporate cu$tomer$. . T7e Uno:ganiDe3 Se9to: %(e unorgani:ed financial $y$tem compri$e$ of relatively le$$ controlled money lender$6 indigenou$ &anker$6 lending pawn &roker$6 land lord$6 trader$ etc. %(i$ part of t(e financial $y$tem i$ not directly controlled &y 14*. !egislations 8asse3 b4 t7e R0I Relating to -o:eign InEest>ents %(e 1e$erve 4ank of *ndia t(roug( it$ circular R0IF //*F3, A.P.Di: se:ies 9i:92la: no (*F-eb:2a:4 * //* (a$ introduced a $pecial $c(eme T7e !ibe:aliDe3 Re>ittan9e $c(eme of 9SD 256,,, =per year> for 1e$ident individual$. T7e i>8li9ations of t7is legislation 1e$ident *ndian$ can now freely inve$t in any over$ea$ tran$actionD t(i$ open$ t(e entire gamut of t(e *ndian *nve$tment $cenario to over$ea$ in$trument$ like fore! market$6 fore! derivative$6 inde! future$6 commodity future and option$ and all ot(er alternative inve$tment$. %(e legi$lation would eventually lead to complete li&erali:ation in t(e area$ of over$ea$ inve$tment$.

1.1.1 SECURITIES AND ECCHAN&E 0OARD O- INDIA ?SE0I@ S 4* wa$ $etup in April 126 1-)). %o $tart wit(6 S 4* wa$ $et up a$ a non;$tatutory &ody. *t took 4 year$ for t(e government to &ring a&out a $eparate legi$lation in t(e name of $ecuritie$ and e!c(ange &oard of *ndia Act6 1--26 conferring $tatutory power$ over practically all a$pect$ of capital market operation$. ObBe9tiEes of SE0I %o protect t(e intere$t of inve$tor$ $o t(at t(ere i$ a $teady flow of $aving$ into t(e capital market

%o regulate t(e $ecuritie$ market and en$ure fair practice$ &y t(e i$$uer$ of $ecuritie$6 $o t(at t(ey can rai$e re$ource$ at minimum co$t %o provide efficient $ervice$ &y &roker$6 merc(ant &anker$ and t(e ot(er intermediarie$6 $o t(at t(ey &ecome competitive and profe$$ional

-2n9tions of SE0I Sec 11 of t(e S 4* act $pecifie$ t(e function$ a$ follow$@; 1egulation of t(e $tock e!c(ange and $elf;regulatory organi:ation$ 1egi$tration and regulation of $tock &roker$6 $u&;&roker$6 regi$trar to all i$$ue6 merc(ant &anker$6 underwriter$6 portfolio manager$ and $uc( ot(er intermediarie$ w(o are a$$ociated wit( $ecuritie$ market 1egulation and regi$tration of t(e working of collective inve$tment $c(eme$ including +utual fund$ .ro(i&ition of fraudulent and unfair trade practice$ relating to $ecurity market .ro(i&it in$ider trading in $ecuritie$

1. A0OUT THE INDIAN STOC= %AR=ET

+ark %wain once divided t(e world into two kind$ of people@ t(o$e w(o (ave $een t(e famou$ *ndian monument6 t(e %a0 +a(al6 and t(o$e w(o (avenBt. %(e $ame could &e $aid a&out inve$tor$. %(ere are two kind$ of inve$tor$@ t(o$e w(o know a&out t(e inve$tment opportunitie$ in *ndia and t(o$e w(o donBt. *ndia may look like a $mall dot to $omeone in t(e 9.S.6 &ut upon clo$er in$pection6 you will find t(e $ame t(ing$ you would e!pect from any promi$ing market. Cere weBll provide an overview of t(e *ndian $tock market and (ow intere$ted inve$tor$ can gain e!po$ure. T7e 0SE an3 NSE +o$t of t(e trading in t(e *ndian $tock market take$ place on it$ two $tock e!c(ange$@ t(e 4om&ay Stock !c(ange =4S > and t(e 7ational Stock !c(ange =7S >. %(e 4S (a$ &een in e!i$tence $ince 1)'5. %(e 7S 6 on t(e ot(er (and6 wa$ founded in 1--2 and $tarted trading in 1--4. Cowever6 &ot( e!c(ange$ follow t(e $ame trading mec(ani$m6 trading (our$6 $ettlement proce$$6 etc. At t(e la$t count6 t(e 4S (ad a&out 46',, li$ted firm$6 w(erea$ t(e rival 7S (ad

a&out 162,,. /ut of all t(e li$ted firm$ on t(e 4S 6 only a&out 5,, firm$ con$titute more t(an -,F of it$ market capitali:ationD t(e re$t of t(e crowd con$i$t$ of (ig(ly illi2uid $(are$. Almo$t all t(e $ignificant firm$ of *ndia are li$ted on &ot( t(e e!c(ange$. 7S en0oy$ a dominant $(are in $pot trading6 wit( a&out ',F of t(e market $(are6 a$ of 2,,-6 and almo$t a complete monopoly in derivative$ trading6 wit( a&out a -)F $(are in t(i$ market6 al$o a$ of 2,,-. 4ot( e!c(ange$ compete for t(e order flow t(at lead$ to reduced co$t$6 market efficiency and innovation. %(e pre$ence of ar&itrageur$ keep$ t(e price$ on t(e two $tock e!c(ange$ wit(in a very tig(t range. T:a3ing %e97anis> %rading at &ot( t(e e!c(ange$ take$ place t(roug( an open electronic limit order &ook6 in w(ic( order matc(ing i$ done &y t(e trading computer. %(ere are no market maker$ or $peciali$t$ and t(e entire proce$$ i$ order;driven6 w(ic( mean$ t(at market order$ placed &y inve$tor$ are automatically matc(ed wit( t(e &e$t limit order$. A$ a re$ult6 &uyer$ and $eller$ remain anonymou$. %(e advantage of an order driven market i$ t(at it &ring$ more tran$parency6 &y di$playing all &uy and $ell order$ in t(e trading $y$tem. Cowever6 in t(e a&$ence of market maker$6 t(ere i$ no guarantee t(at order$ will &e e!ecuted. All order$ in t(e trading $y$tem need to &e placed t(roug( &roker$6 many of w(ic( provide online trading facility to retail cu$tomer$. *n$titutional inve$tor$ can al$o take advantage of t(e direct market acce$$ =D+A> option6 in w(ic( t(ey u$e trading terminal$ provided &y &roker$ for placing order$ directly into t(e $tock market trading $y$tem. Settle>ent C49le an3 T:a3ing Ho2:s 2uity $pot market$ follow a %G2 rolling $ettlement. %(i$ mean$ t(at any trade taking place on +onday6 get$ $ettled &y Hedne$day. All trading on $tock e!c(ange$ take$ place &etween -@55 am and 3@3, pm6 *ndian Standard %ime =G 5.5 (our$ 8+%>6 +onday t(roug( <riday. Delivery of $(are$ mu$t &e made in demateriali:ed form6 and eac( e!c(ange (a$ it$ own clearing (ou$e6 w(ic( a$$ume$ all $ettlement ri$k6 &y $erving a$ a central counterparty. %a:;et In3eGes

%(e two prominent *ndian market inde!e$ are Sen$e! and 7ifty. Sen$e! i$ t(e olde$t market inde! for e2uitie$D it include$ $(are$ of 3, firm$ li$ted on t(e 4S 6 w(ic( repre$ent a&out 45F of t(e inde!B$ free;float market capitali:ation. *t wa$ created in 1-)" and provide$ time $erie$ data from April 1-'-6 onward. Anot(er inde! i$ t(e SE. C7I 7iftyD it include$ 5, $(are$ li$ted on t(e 7S 6 w(ic( repre$ent a&out "2F of it$ free;float market capitali:ation. *t wa$ created in 1--" and provide$ time $erie$ data from July 1--,6 onward.

%a:;et Reg2lation %(e overall re$pon$i&ility of development6 regulation and $upervi$ion of t(e $tock market re$t$ wit( t(e Securitie$ E !c(ange 4oard of *ndia =S 4*>6 w(ic( wa$ formed in 1--2 a$ an independent aut(ority. Since t(en6 S 4* (a$ con$i$tently tried to lay down market rule$ in line wit( t(e &e$t market practice$. *t en0oy$ va$t power$ of impo$ing penaltie$ on market participant$6 in ca$e of a &reac(. #7o Can InEest In In3iaH *ndia $tarted permitting out$ide inve$tment$ only in t(e 1--,$. <oreign inve$tment$ are cla$$ified into two categorie$@ foreign direct inve$tment =<D*> and foreign portfolio inve$tment =<.*>. All inve$tment$ in w(ic( an inve$tor take$ part in t(e day;to;day management and operation$ of t(e company6 are treated a$ <D*6 w(erea$ inve$tment$ in $(are$ wit(out any control over management and operation$6 are treated a$ <.*. <or making portfolio inve$tment in *ndia6 one $(ould &e regi$tered eit(er a$ a foreign in$titutional inve$tor =<**> or a$ one of t(e $u&;account$ of one of t(e regi$tered <**$. 4ot( regi$tration$ are granted &y t(e market regulator6 S 4*. <oreign in$titutional inve$tor$ mainly con$i$t of mutual fund$6 pen$ion fund$6 endowment$6 $overeign wealt( fund$6 in$urance companie$6 &ank$6 a$$et management companie$ etc. At pre$ent6 *ndia doe$ not allow foreign individual$ to inve$t directly into it$ $tock market. Cowever6 (ig(;net;wort( individual$ =t(o$e wit( a net wort( of at lea$t K9S5, million> can &e regi$tered a$ $u&;account$ of an <**.

<oreign in$titutional inve$tor$ and t(eir $u& account$ can inve$t directly into any of t(e $tock$ li$ted on any of t(e $tock e!c(ange$. +o$t portfolio inve$tment$ con$i$t of inve$tment in $ecuritie$ in t(e primary and $econdary market$6 including $(are$6 de&enture$ and warrant$ of companie$ li$ted or to &e li$ted on a recogni:ed $tock e!c(ange in *ndia. <**$ can al$o inve$t in unli$ted $ecuritie$ out$ide $tock e!c(ange$6 $u&0ect to approval of t(e price &y t(e 1e$erve 4ank of *ndia. <inally6 t(ey can inve$t in unit$ of mutual fund$ and derivative$ traded on any $tock e!c(ange. An <** regi$tered a$ a de&t;only <** can inve$t 1,,F of it$ inve$tment into de&t in$trument$. /t(er <**$ mu$t inve$t a minimum of ',F of t(eir inve$tment$ in e2uity. %(e &alance of 3,F can &e inve$ted in de&t. <**$ mu$t u$e $pecial non;re$ident rupee &ank account$6 in order to move money in and out of *ndia. %(e &alance$ (eld in $uc( an account can &e fully repatriated.

Rest:i9tionsFInEest>ent Ceilings %(e government of *ndia pre$cri&e$ t(e <D* limit and different ceiling$ (ave &een pre$cri&ed for different $ector$. /ver a period of time6 t(e government (a$ &een progre$$ively increa$ing t(e ceiling$. <D* ceiling$ mo$tly fall in t(e range of 2";1,,F. 4y default6 t(e ma!imum limit for portfolio inve$tment in a particular li$ted firm6 i$ decided &y t(e <D* limit pre$cri&ed for t(e $ector to w(ic( t(e firm &elong$. Cowever6 t(ere are two additional re$triction$ on portfolio inve$tment. <ir$t6 t(e aggregate limit of inve$tment &y all <**$6 inclu$ive of t(eir $u&;account$ in any particular firm6 (a$ &een fi!ed at 24F of t(e paid;up capital. Cowever6 t(e $ame can &e rai$ed up to t(e $ector cap6 wit( t(e approval of t(e companyB$ &oard$ and $(are(older$. Secondly6 inve$tment &y any $ingle <** in any particular firm $(ould not e!ceed 1,F of t(e paid; up capital of t(e company. 1egulation$ permit a $eparate 1,F ceiling on inve$tment for eac( of t(e $u&;account$ of an <**6 in any particular firm. Cowever6 in ca$e of foreign corporation$ or individual$ inve$ting a$ a $u&;account6 t(e $ame ceiling i$ only 5F. 1egulation$ al$o impo$e limit$ for inve$tment in e2uity;&a$ed derivative$ trading on $tock e!c(ange$. T7e 0otto> !ine merging market$ like *ndia6 are fa$t &ecoming engine$ for future growt(. Currently6 only a very low percentage of t(e (ou$e(old $aving$ of *ndian$ are inve$ted in t(e dome$tic $tock market6 &ut

wit( 8D. growing at ';)F annually and a $ta&le financial market6 we mig(t $ee more money 0oining t(e race. +ay&e itB$ t(e rig(t time for out$ide inve$tor$ to $eriou$ly t(ink a&out 0oining t(e *ndia &andwagon.

1.3 A0OUT THE TOPIC

H(en it come$ to per$onal finance and t(e accumulation of wealt(6 few $u&0ect$ are more talked a&out t(an $tock$. *tB$ ea$y to under$tand w(y@ playing t(e $tock market i$ t(rilling. 4ut on t(i$ financial roller;coa$ter ride6 we all want to e!perience t(e up$ wit(out t(e down$. 4efore e!ploring t(e va$t world of $tock;picking met(odologie$6 we $(ould addre$$ a few mi$conception$. +any inve$tor$ new to t(e $tock;picking $cene &elieve t(at t(ere i$ $ome infalli&le $trategy t(at6 once followed6 will guarantee $ucce$$. There is no foolproof system for picking stocks! %(i$ doe$nBt mean you canBt e!pand your wealt( t(roug( t(e $tock market. *tB$ 0u$t &etter to t(ink of $tock;picking a$ an art rat(er t(an a $cience. %(ere are a few rea$on$ for t(i$@

1. So many factor$ affect a companyB$ (ealt( t(at it i$ nearly impo$$i&le to con$truct a formula t(at will predict $ucce$$. *t i$ one t(ing to a$$em&le data t(at you can work wit(6 &ut 2uite anot(er to determine w(ic( num&er$ are relevant. 2. A lot of information i$ intangi&le and cannot &e mea$ured. %(e 2uantifia&le a$pect$ of a company6 $uc( a$ profit$6 are ea$y enoug( to find. 4ut (ow do you mea$ure t(e 2ualitative factor$6 $uc( a$ t(e companyB$ $taff6 it$ competitive advantage$6 it$ reputation and $o onL %(i$ com&ination of tangi&le and intangi&le a$pect$ make$ picking $tock$ a (ig(ly $u&0ective6 even intuitive proce$$. 3. 4ecau$e of t(e (uman =often irrational> element in(erent in t(e force$ t(at move t(e $tock market6 $tock$ do not alway$ do w(at you anticipate t(eyBll do. motion$ can c(ange 2uickly and unpredicta&ly. And unfortunately6 w(en confidence turn$ into fear6 t(e $tock market can &e a dangerou$ place. %(e &ottom line i$ t(at t(ere i$ no one way to pick $tock$. 4etter to t(ink of every $tock $trategy a$ not(ing more t(an an application of a t(eory ; a M&e$t gue$$M of (ow to inve$t. And $ometime$ two $eemingly oppo$ed t(eorie$ can &e $ucce$$ful at t(e $ame time. .er(ap$ 0u$t a$ important a$ con$idering t(eory6 i$ determining (ow well an inve$tment $trategy fit$ your per$onal outlook6 time frame6 ri$k tolerance and t(e amount of time you want to devote to inve$ting and picking $tock$. At t(i$ point6 you may &e a$king your$elf w(y $tock;picking i$ $o important. H(y worry $o muc( a&out itL H(y $pend (our$ doing itL %(e an$wer i$ $imple@ wealt(. *f you &ecome a good $tock; picker6 you can increa$e your per$onal wealt( e!ponentially. %ake +icro$oft6 for e!ample. Cad you inve$ted in 4ill 8ate$B &rainc(ild at it$ *./ &ack in 1-)" and $imply (eld t(at inve$tment6 your return would (ave &een $omew(ere in t(e neig(&or(ood of 356,,,F &y $pring of 2,,4. *n ot(er word$6 over an 1);year period6 a K1,6,,, inve$tment would (ave turned it$elf into a cool K3.5 millionN =*n fact6 (ad you (ad t(i$ fore$ig(t in t(e &ull market of t(e late B-,$6 your return could (ave &een even greater.> Hit( return$ like t(i$6 itB$ no wonder t(at inve$tor$ continue to (unt for Mt(e ne!t +icro$oftM. Hit(out furt(er ado6 letB$ $tart &y delving into one of t(e mo$t &a$ic and crucial a$pect$ of $tock; picking@ fundamental analy$i$6 w(o$e t(eory underlie$ all of t(e $trategie$ we e!plore =wit( t(e e!ception of t(e la$t $ection on tec(nical analy$i$>. Alt(oug( t(ere are many difference$ &etween

eac( $trategy6 t(ey all come down to finding t(e wort( of a company. Oeep t(i$ in mind a$ we move forward. 1.3.1 Sto9;-Pi9;ing St:ategies: -2n3a>ental Anal4sis ver (ear $omeone $ay t(at a company (a$ M$trong fundamental$ML %(e p(ra$e i$ $o overu$ed t(at itB$ &ecome $omew(at of a clic(P. Any analy$t can refer to a companyB$ fundamental$ wit(out actually $aying anyt(ing meaningful. So (ere * define e!actly w(at fundamental$ are6 (ow and w(y t(ey are analy:ed6 and w(y fundamental analy$i$ i$ often a great $tarting point to picking good companie$. T7e T7eo:4 Doing &a$ic fundamental valuation i$ 2uite $traig(tforwardD all it take$ i$ a little time and energy. %(e goal of analy:ing a companyB$ fundamental$ i$ to find a $tockB$ intrin$ic value6 a fancy term for w(at you &elieve a $tock i$ really wort( ; a$ oppo$ed to t(e value at w(ic( it i$ &eing traded in t(e marketplace. *f t(e intrin$ic value i$ more t(an t(e current $(are price6 your analy$i$ i$ $(owing t(at t(e $tock i$ wort( more t(an it$ price and t(at it make$ $en$e to &uy t(e $tock. Alt(oug( t(ere are many different met(od$ of finding t(e intrin$ic value6 t(e premi$e &e(ind all t(e $trategie$ i$ t(e $ame@ a company i$ wort( t(e $um of it$ di$counted ca$( flow$. *n plain ngli$(6 t(i$ mean$ t(at a company i$ wort( all of it$ future profit$ added toget(er. And t(e$e future profit$ mu$t &e di$counted to account for t(e time value of money6 t(at i$6 t(e force &y w(ic( t(e K1 you receive in a yearB$ time i$ wort( le$$ t(an K1 you receive today. %(e idea &e(ind intrin$ic value e2ualing future profit$ make$ $en$e if you t(ink a&out (ow a &u$ine$$ provide$ value for it$ owner=$>. *f you (ave a $mall &u$ine$$6 it$ wort( i$ t(e money you can take from t(e company year after year =not t(e growt( of t(e $tock>. And you can take $omet(ing out of t(e company only if you (ave $omet(ing left over after you pay for $upplie$ and $alarie$6 reinve$t in new e2uipment6 and $o on. A &u$ine$$ i$ all a&out profit$6 plain old revenue minu$ e!pen$e$ ; t(e &a$i$ of intrin$ic value. &:eate: -ool T7eo:4

/ne of t(e a$$umption$ of t(e di$counted ca$( flow t(eory i$ t(at people are rational6 t(at no&ody would &uy a &u$ine$$ for more t(an it$ future di$counted ca$( flow$. Since a $tock repre$ent$ owner$(ip in a company6 t(i$ a$$umption applie$ to t(e $tock market. 4ut w(y6 t(en6 do $tock$ e!(i&it $uc( volatile movement$L *t doe$nBt make $en$e for a $tockB$ price to fluctuate $o muc( w(en t(e intrin$ic value i$nBt c(anging &y t(e minute. %(e fact i$ t(at many people do not view $tock$ a$ a repre$entation of di$counted ca$( flow$6 &ut a$ trading ve(icle$. H(o care$ w(at t(e ca$( flow$ are if you can $ell t(e $tock to $ome&ody el$e for more t(an w(at you paid for itL Cynic$ of t(i$ approac( (ave la&eled it t(e greater fool t(eory6 $ince t(e profit on a trade i$ not determined &y a companyB$ value6 &ut a&out $peculating w(et(er you can $ell to $ome ot(er inve$tor =t(e fool>. /n t(e ot(er (and6 a trader would $ay t(at inve$tor$ relying $olely on fundamental$ are leaving t(em$elve$ at t(e mercy of t(e market in$tead of o&$erving it$ trend$ and tendencie$. %(i$ de&ate demon$trate$ t(e general difference &etween a tec(nical and fundamental inve$tor. A follower of tec(nical analy$i$ i$ guided not &y value6 &ut &y t(e trend$ in t(e market often repre$ented in c(art$. So6 w(ic( i$ &etter@ fundamental or tec(nicalL %(e an$wer i$ neit(er. A$ we mentioned in t(e introduction6 every $trategy (a$ it$ own merit$. *n general6 fundamental i$ t(oug(t of a$ a long;term $trategy6 w(ile tec(nical i$ u$ed more for $(ort;term $trategie$. =HeBll talk more a&out tec(nical analy$i$ and (ow it work$ in a later $ection.> P2tting T7eo:4 into P:a9ti9e %(e idea of di$counting ca$( flow$ $eem$ okay in t(eory6 &ut implementing it in real life i$ difficult. /ne of t(e mo$t o&viou$ c(allenge$ i$ determining (ow far into t(e future we $(ould foreca$t ca$( flow$. *tB$ (ard enoug( to predict ne!t yearB$ profit$6 $o (ow can we predict t(e cour$e of t(e ne!t 1, year$L H(at if a company goe$ out of &u$ine$$L H(at if a company $urvive$ for (undred$ of year$L All of t(e$e uncertaintie$ and po$$i&ilitie$ e!plain w(y t(ere are many different model$ devi$ed for di$counting ca$( flow$6 &ut none completely e$cape$ t(e complication$ po$ed &y t(e uncertainty of t(e future. #etB$ look at a $ample of a model u$ed to value a company. 4ecau$e t(i$ i$ a generali:ed e!ample6 donBt worry if $ome detail$ arenBt clear. %(e purpo$e i$ to demon$trate t(e &ridging &etween t(eory and application. %ake a look at (ow valuation &a$ed on fundamental$ would look@

Pa:t 1: P:e3i9t $ 'ea:s of Cas7 -lo6s .rior year ca$( flow 8rowt( rate Ca$( flow Di$count factor4 Di$count value per year5 Sum of .A of Ca$( flow

1 K1,, 15F K115 ,.-3 K1,"

2 K115 15F K132 ,.)" K113

3 K132 15F K152 ,.'K121

4 K152 15F K1'5 ,.'4 K12-

K1'5 15F K2,1 ,.") K13' K"," <igure$ in 9SD million K

?Table 1.1 Cas7 -lo6@ QDi$count rate )F Q8rowt( rate for fir$t 5year$ 15F Q8rowt( rate after 5year$ 5F

Pa:t : Resi32al "al2e Ca$( flow five year$ 8rowt( rate Ca$( flow in $i! year$ Capitali:ation rate =k;g> Aalue at t(e end of year 5 Di$count factor at t(e end of year 5 .A or re$idual value *ntrin$ic value of t(e company ?Table 1. Resi32al "al2es@

K2,1 5F K211.13F K'6,3-.'5 ,.") K4'-1.14 K53-'.1)

%(e pro&lem wit( pro0ecting far into t(e future i$ t(at we (ave to account for t(e different rate$ at w(ic( a company will grow a$ it enter$ different p(a$e$. %o get around t(i$ pro&lem6 t(i$ model (a$ two part$@ =1> determining t(e $um of t(e di$counted future ca$( flow$ from eac( of t(e ne!t five year$ =year$ one to five>6 and =2> determining Bre$idual valueB6 w(ic( i$ t(e $um of t(e future ca$( flow$ from t(e year$ $tarting $i! year$ from now.

*n t(i$ particular e!ample6 t(e company i$ a$$umed to grow at 15F a year for t(e fir$t five year$ and t(en 5F every year after t(at =year $i! and &eyond>. <ir$t6 we add toget(er all t(e fir$t five yearly ca$( flow$ ; eac( of w(ic( are di$counted to year :ero6 t(e pre$ent ; in order to determine t(e pre$ent value =.A>. So once t(e pre$ent value of t(e company for t(e fir$t five year$ i$ calculated6 we mu$t6 in t(e $econd $tage of t(e model6 determine t(e value of t(e ca$( flow$ coming from t(e $i!t( year and all t(e following year$6 w(en t(e companyB$ growt( rate i$ a$$umed to &e 5F. %(e ca$( flow$ from all t(e$e year$ are di$counted &ack to year five and added toget(er6 t(en di$counted to year :ero6 and finally com&ined wit( t(e .A of t(e ca$( flow$ from year$ one to five =w(ic( we calculated in t(e fir$t part of t(e model>. And voilRN He (ave an e$timate =given our a$$umption$> of t(e intrin$ic value of t(e company. An e$timate t(at i$ (ig(er t(an t(e current market capitali:ation indicate$ t(at it may &e a good &uy. 4elow6 we (ave gone t(roug( eac( component of t(e model wit( $pecific note$@ 1. .rior;year ca$( flow ; %(e t(eoretical amount6 or total profit$6 t(at t(e $(are(older$ could take from t(e company t(e previou$ year. 2. 8rowt( rate ; %(e rate at w(ic( ownerB$ earning$ are e!pected to grow for t(e ne!t five year$. 3. Ca$( flow ; %(e t(eoretical amount t(at $(are(older$ would get if all t(e companyB$ earning$6 or profit$6 were di$tri&uted to t(em. 4. Di$count factor ; %(e num&er t(at &ring$ t(e future ca$( flow$ &ack to year :ero. *n ot(er word$6 t(e factor u$ed to determine t(e ca$( flow$B pre$ent value =.A>. 5. Di$count per year ; %(e ca$( flow multiplied &y t(e di$count factor. ". Ca$( flow in year five ; %(e amount t(e company could di$tri&ute to $(are(older$ in year five. '. 8rowt( rate ; %(e growt( rate from year $i! into perpetuity. ). Ca$( flow in year $i! ; %(e amount availa&le in year $i! to di$tri&ute to $(are(older$. -. Capitali:ation 1ate ; %(e di$count rate =t(e denominator> in t(e formula for a con$tantly growing perpetuity. 1,. Aalue at t(e end of year five ; %(e value of t(e company in five year$. 11. Di$count factor at t(e end of year five ; %(e di$count factor t(at convert$ t(e value of t(e firm in year five into t(e pre$ent value. 12. .A of re$idual value ; %(e pre$ent value of t(e firm in year five.

So far6 weBve &een very general on w(at a ca$( flow compri$e$6 and unfortunately6 t(ere i$ no ea$y way to mea$ure it. %(e only natural ca$( flow from a pu&lic company to it$ $(are(older$ i$ a dividend6 and t(e dividend di$count model =DD+> value$ a company &a$ed on it$ future dividend$. Cowever6 a company doe$nBt pay out all of it$ profit$ in dividend$6 and many profita&le companie$ donBt pay dividend$ at all. H(at (appen$ in t(e$e $ituation$L /t(er valuation option$ include analy:ing net income6 free ca$( flow6 4*%DA and a $erie$ of ot(er financial mea$ure$. %(ere are advantage$ and di$advantage$ to u$ing any of t(e$e metric$ to get a glimp$e into a companyB$ intrin$ic value. %(e point i$ t(at w(at repre$ent$ ca$( flow depend$ on t(e $ituation. 1egardle$$ of w(at model i$ u$ed6 t(e t(eory &e(ind all of t(em i$ t(e $ame.

1.3. Sto9;-Pi9;ing St:ategies: I2alitatiEe Anal4sis

<undamental analy$i$ (a$ a very wide $cope. Aaluing a company involve$ not only crunc(ing num&er$ and predicting ca$( flow$ &ut al$o looking at t(e general6 more $u&0ective 2ualitie$ of a company. Cere we will look at (ow t(e analy$i$ of 2ualitative factor$ i$ u$ed for picking a $tock. %anage>ent %(e &ack&one of any $ucce$$ful company i$ $trong management. %(e people at t(e top ultimately make t(e $trategic deci$ion$ and t(erefore $erve a$ a crucial factor determining t(e fate of t(e company. %o a$$e$$ t(e $trengt( of management6 inve$tor$ can $imply a$k t(e $tandard five H$@ w(o6 w(ere6 w(at6 w(en and w(yL Who? Do $ome re$earc(6 and find out w(o i$ running t(e company. Among ot(er t(ing$6 you $(ould know w(o it$ C /6 C</6 C// and C*/ are. %(en you can move onto t(e ne!t 2ue$tion.

Where? Sou need to find out w(ere t(e$e people come from6 $pecifically6 t(eir educational and employment &ackground$. A$k your$elf if t(e$e &ackground$ make t(e people $uita&le for directing t(e company in it$ indu$try. A management team con$i$ting of people w(o come from completely unrelated indu$trie$ $(ould rai$e 2ue$tion$. *f t(e C / of a newly;formed mining company previou$ly worked in t(e indu$try6 a$k your$elf w(et(er (e or $(e (a$ t(e nece$$ary 2ualitie$ to lead a mining company to $ucce$$. What and When? H(at i$ t(e management p(ilo$op(yL *n ot(er word$6 in w(at $tyle do t(e$e people intend to manage t(e companyL Some manager$ are more per$ona&le6 promoting an open6 tran$parent and fle!i&le way of running t(e &u$ine$$. /t(er management p(ilo$op(ie$ are more rigid and le$$ adapta&le6 valuing policy and e$ta&li$(ed logic a&ove all in t(e deci$ion;making proce$$. Sou can di$cern t(e $tyle of management &y looking at it$ pa$t action$ or &y reading t(e annual reportB$ management6 di$cu$$ion E analy$i$ =+DEA> $ection. A$k your$elf if you agree wit( t(i$ p(ilo$op(y6 and if it work$ for t(e company6 given it$ $i:e and t(e nature of it$ &u$ine$$. /nce you know t(e $tyle of t(e manager$6 find out w(en t(i$ team took over t(e company. Jack Helc(6 for e!ample6 wa$ C / of 8eneral lectric for over 2, year$. Ci$ long tenure i$ a good indication t(at (e wa$ a $ucce$$ful and profita&le managerD ot(erwi$e6 t(e $(are(older$ and t(e &oard of director$ wouldnBt (ave kept (im around. *f a company i$ doing poorly6 one of t(e fir$t action$ taken i$ management re$tructuring6 w(ic( i$ a nice way of $aying Ma c(ange in management due to poor re$ult$M. *f you $ee a company continually c(anging manager$6 it may &e a $ign to inve$t el$ew(ere. At t(e $ame time6 alt(oug( re$tructuring i$ often &roug(t on &y poor management6 it doe$nBt automatically mean t(e company i$ doomed. <or e!ample6 C(ry$ler Corp wa$ on t(e &rink of &ankruptcy w(en #ee *acocca6 t(e new C /6 came in and in$talled a new management team t(at renewed C(ry$lerB$ $tatu$ a$ a ma0or player in t(e auto indu$try. So6 management re$tructuring may &e a po$itive $ign6 $(owing t(at a $truggling company i$ making effort$ to improve it$ outlook and i$ a&out to $ee a c(ange for t(e &etter. Why? A final factor to inve$tigate i$ w(y t(e$e people (ave &ecome manager$. #ook at t(e managerB$

employment (i$tory6 and try to $ee if t(e$e rea$on$ are clear. Doe$ t(i$ per$on (ave t(e 2ualitie$ you &elieve are needed to make $omeone a good manager for t(i$ companyL Ca$ $T(e &een (ired &ecau$e of pa$t $ucce$$e$ and ac(ievement$6 or (a$ $T(e ac2uired t(e po$ition t(roug( 2ue$tiona&le mean$6 $uc( a$ $elf;appointment after in(eriting t(e companyL =no6 #7at a Co>8an4 Does an3 Ho6 it %a;es %one4 A $econd important factor to con$ider w(en analy:ing a companyB$ 2ualitative factor$ i$ it$ product=$> or $ervice=$>. Cow doe$ t(i$ company make moneyL *n fancy +4A parlance6 t(e 2ue$tion would &e MH(at i$ t(e companyB$ &u$ine$$ modelLM Onowing (ow a companyB$ activitie$ will &e profita&le i$ fundamental to determining t(e wort( of an inve$tment. /ften6 people will &oa$t a&out (ow profita&le t(ey t(ink t(eir new $tock will &e6 &ut w(en you a$k t(em w(at t(e company doe$6 it $eem$ t(eir vi$ion for t(e future i$ a little &lurry@ MHell6 t(ey (ave t(i$ (ig(;tec( t(ingama&o& t(at doe$ $omet(ing wit( fi&er;optic ca&le.M *f you arenBt $ure (ow your company will make money6 you canBt really &e $ure t(at it$ $tock will &ring you a return. /ne of t(e &igge$t le$$on$ taug(t &y t(e dotcom &u$t of t(e late B-,$ i$ t(at not under$tanding a &u$ine$$ model can (ave dire con$e2uence$. +any people (ad no idea (ow t(e dotcom companie$ were making money6 or w(y t(ey were trading $o (ig(. *n fact6 t(e$e companie$ werenBt making any moneyD itB$ 0u$t t(at t(eir growt( potential wa$ t(oug(t to &e enormou$. %(i$ led to over:ealou$ &uying &a$ed on a (erd mentality6 w(ic( in turn led to a market cra$(. 4ut not everyone lo$t money w(en t(e &u&&le &ur$t@ Harren 4uffett didnBt inve$t in (ig(;tec( primarily &ecau$e (e didnBt under$tand it. Alt(oug( (e wa$ o$traci:ed for t(i$ during t(e &u&&le6 it $aved (im &illion$ of dollar$ in t(e en$uing dotcom fallout. Sou need a $olid under$tanding of (ow a company actually generate$ revenue in order to evaluate w(et(er management i$ making t(e rig(t deci$ion$. In32st:4FCo>8etition A$ide from (aving a general under$tanding of w(at a company doe$6 you $(ould analy:e t(e c(aracteri$tic$ of it$ indu$try6 $uc( a$ it$ growt( potential. A mediocre company in a great indu$try can provide a $olid return6 w(ile a mediocre company in a poor indu$try will likely take a &ite out of your portfolio. /f cour$e6 di$cerning a companyB$ $tage of growt( will involve appro!imation6 &ut common $en$e can go a long way@ itB$ not (ard to $ee t(at t(e growt(

pro$pect$ of a (ig(;tec( indu$try are greater t(an t(o$e of t(e railway indu$try. *tB$ 0u$t a matter of a$king your$elf if t(e demand for t(e indu$try i$ growing. +arket $(are i$ anot(er important factor. #ook at (ow +icro$oft t(oroug(ly dominate$ t(e market for operating $y$tem$. Anyone trying to enter t(i$ market face$ (uge o&$tacle$ &ecau$e +icro$oft can take advantage of economie$ of $cale. %(i$ doe$ not mean t(at a company in a near monopoly $ituation i$ guaranteed to remain on top6 &ut inve$ting in a company t(at trie$ to take on t(e M5,,;pound gorillaM i$ a ri$ky venture. 4arrier$ again$t entry into a market can al$o give a company a $ignificant 2ualitative advantage. Compare6 for in$tance6 t(e re$taurant indu$try to t(e automo&ile or p(armaceutical$ indu$trie$. Any&ody can open up a re$taurant &ecau$e t(e $kill level and capital re2uired are very low. %(e automo&ile and p(armaceutical$ indu$trie$6 on t(e ot(er (and6 (ave ma$$ive &arrier$ to entry@ large capital e!penditure$6 e!clu$ive di$tri&ution c(annel$6 government regulation6 patent$ and $o on. %(e (arder it i$ for competition to enter an indu$try6 t(e greater t(e advantage for e!i$ting firm$. 0:an3 Na>e A valua&le &rand reflect$ year$ of product development and marketing. %ake for e!ample t(e mo$t popular &rand name in t(e world@ Coca;Cola. +any e$timate t(at t(e intangi&le value of CokeB$ &rand name i$ in t(e &illion$ of dollar$N +a$$ive corporation$ $uc( a$ .rocter E 8am&le rely on (undred$ of popular &rand name$ like %ide6 .amper$ and Cead E S(oulder$. Caving a portfolio of &rand$ diver$ifie$ ri$k &ecau$e t(e good performance of one &rand can compen$ate for t(e underperformer$. Oeep in mind t(at $ome $tock;picker$ $teer clear of any company t(at i$ &randed around one individual. %(ey do $o &ecau$e6 if a company i$ tied too clo$ely to one per$on6 any &ad new$ regarding t(at per$on may (inder t(e companyB$ $(are performance even if t(e new$ (a$ not(ing to do wit( company operation$. A perfect e!ample of t(i$ i$ t(e trou&le$ faced &y +art(a Stewart /mnimedia a$ a re$ult of StewartB$ legal pro&lem$ in 2,,4. DonJt OEe:9o>8li9ate Sou donBt need a .(D in finance to recogni:e a good company. *n (i$ &ook "/ne 9p on Hall StreetM6 .eter #ync( di$cu$$e$ a time w(en (i$ wife drew (i$ attention to a great product wit( p(enomenal marketing. Cane$ wa$ te$t marketing a product called #Begg$@ womenB$ panty(o$e

packaged in colorful pla$tic egg $(ell$. *n$tead of $elling t(e$e in department or $pecialty $tore$6 Cane$ put t(e product ne!t to t(e candy &ar$6 $oda and gum at t(e c(eckout$ of $upermarket$ ; a &rilliant idea $ince re$earc( $(owed t(at women fre2uented t(e $upermarket a&out 12 time$ more often t(an t(e traditional outlet$ for panty(o$e. %(e product wa$ a (uge $ucce$$ and &ecame t(e $econd (ig(e$t;$elling con$umer product of t(e 1-',$. +o$t women at t(e time would (ave ea$ily $een t(e popularity of t(i$ product6 and #ync(B$ wife wa$ one of t(em. %(ank$ to (er advice6 (e re$earc(ed t(e company a little deeper and turned (i$ inve$tment in Cane$ into a $olid earner for <idelity6 w(ile mo$t of t(e male manager$ on Hall Street mi$$ed out. %(e point i$ t(at itB$ not only Hall Street analy$t$ w(o are privy to information a&out companie$D average everyday people can $ee $uc( wonder$ too. *f you $ee a local company e!panding and doing well6 dig a little deeper6 a$k around. H(o know$6 it may &e t(e ne!t Cane$. Con9l2sion A$$e$$ing a company from a 2ualitative $tandpoint and determining w(et(er you $(ould inve$t in it are a$ important a$ looking at $ale$ and earning$. %(i$ $trategy may &e one of t(e $imple$t6 &ut it i$ al$o one of t(e mo$t effective way$ to evaluate a potential inve$tment. 1.3.3 Sto9;-Pi9;ing St:ategies: "al2e InEesting

Aalue inve$ting i$ one of t(e &e$t known $tock;picking met(od$. *n t(e 1-3,$6 4en0amin 8ra(am and David Dodd6 finance profe$$or$ at Colum&ia 9niver$ity6 laid out w(at many con$ider to &e t(e framework for value inve$ting. %(e concept i$ actually very $imple@ find companie$ trading &elow t(eir in(erent wort(. %(e value inve$tor look$ for $tock$ wit( $trong fundamental$ including earning$6 dividend$6 &ook value6 and ca$( flow ; t(at are $elling at a &argain price6 given t(eir 2uality. %(e value inve$tor $eek$ companie$ t(at $eem to &e incorrectly valued =undervalued> &y t(e market and t(erefore (ave t(e potential to increa$e in $(are price w(en t(e market correct$ it$ error in valuation. "al2eK Not L2n;M 4efore we get too far into t(e di$cu$$ion of value inve$ting6 letB$ get one t(ing $traig(t. Aalue inve$ting doe$nBt mean 0u$t &uying any $tock t(at decline$ and t(erefore $eem$ Mc(eapM in price.

Aalue inve$tor$ (ave to do t(eir (omework and &e confident t(at t(ey are picking a company t(at i$ c(eap given it$ (ig( 2uality. *tB$ important to di$tingui$( t(e difference &etween a value company and a company t(at $imply (a$ a declining price. Say for t(e pa$t year Company A (a$ &een trading at a&out K25 per $(are &ut $uddenly drop$ to K1, per $(are. %(i$ doe$ not automatically mean t(at t(e company i$ $elling at a &argain. All we know i$ t(at t(e company i$ le$$ e!pen$ive now t(an it wa$ la$t year. %(e drop in price could &e a re$ult of t(e market re$ponding to a fundamental pro&lem in t(e company. %o &e a real &argain6 t(i$ company mu$t (ave fundamental$ (ealt(y enoug( to imply it i$ wort( more t(an K1, ; value inve$ting alway$ compare$ current $(are price to intrin$ic value not to (i$toric $(are price$. "al2e InEesting at #o:; /ne of t(e greate$t inve$tor$ of all time6 Harren 4uffett6 (a$ proven t(at value inve$ting can work@ (i$ value $trategy took t(e $tock of 4erk$(ire Cat(away6 (i$ (olding company6 from K12 a $(are in 1-"' to K',6-,, in 2,,2. %(e company &eat t(e SE. 5,,B$ performance &y a&out 13.,2F on average annuallyN Alt(oug( 4uffett doe$ not $trictly categori:e (im$elf a$ a value inve$tor6 many of (i$ mo$t $ucce$$ful inve$tment$ were made on t(e &a$i$ of value inve$ting principle$. 024ing a 02sinessK not a Sto9; He $(ould emp(a$i:e t(at t(e value inve$ting mentality $ee$ a $tock a$ t(e ve(icle &y w(ic( a per$on &ecome$ an owner of a company ; to a value inve$tor profit$ are made &y inve$ting in 2uality companie$6 not &y trading. 4ecau$e t(eir met(od i$ a&out determining t(e wort( of t(e underlying a$$et6 value inve$tor$ pay no mind to t(e e!ternal factor$ affecting a company6 $uc( a$ market volatility or day;to;day price fluctuation$. %(e$e factor$ are not in(erent to t(e company6 and t(erefore are not $een to (ave any effect on t(e value of t(e &u$ine$$ in t(e long run. Cont:a3i9tions H(ile t(e efficient market (ypot(e$i$ = +C> claim$ t(at price$ are alway$ reflecting all relevant information6 and t(erefore are already $(owing t(e intrin$ic wort( of companie$6 value inve$ting relie$ on a premi$e t(at oppo$e$ t(at t(eory. Aalue inve$tor$ &ank on t(e +C &eing true only in

$ome academic wonderland. %(ey look for time$ of inefficiency6 w(en t(e market a$$ign$ an incorrect price to a $tock. Aalue inve$tor$ al$o di$agree wit( t(e principle t(at (ig( &eta =al$o known a$ volatility6 or $tandard deviation> nece$$arily tran$late$ into a ri$ky inve$tment. A company wit( an intrin$ic value of K2, per $(are &ut i$ trading at K15 would &e6 a$ we know6 an attractive inve$tment to value inve$tor$. *f t(e $(are price dropped to K1, per $(are6 t(e company would e!perience an increa$e in &eta6 w(ic( conventionally repre$ent$ an increa$e in ri$k. *f6 (owever6 t(e value inve$tor $till maintained t(at t(e intrin$ic value wa$ K2, per $(are6 $T(e would $ee t(i$ declining price a$ an even &etter &argain. And t(e &etter t(e &argain6 t(e le$$er t(e ri$k. A (ig( &eta doe$ not $care off value inve$tor$. A$ long a$ t(ey are confident in t(eir intrin$ic valuation6 an increa$e in down$ide volatility may &e a good t(ing. S9:eening fo: "al2e Sto9;s 7ow t(at we (ave a $olid under$tanding of w(at value inve$ting i$ and w(at it i$ not6 letB$ get into $ome of t(e 2ualitie$ of value $tock$. Uualitative a$pect$ of value $tock$@ 1. Where are value stocks found? ; veryw(ere. Aalue $tock$ can &e found trading on t(e7SS 6 7a$da26 A+ I6 over t(e counter6 on t(e <%S 6 7ikkei and $o on. 2. a> In what industries are value stocks located? ; Aalue $tock$ can &e located in anyindu$try6 including energy6 finance and even tec(nology =contrary to popular &elief>. &> In what industries are value stocks most often located? ; Alt(oug( value $tock$ can &e located anyw(ere6 t(ey are often located in indu$trie$ t(at (ave recently fallen on (ard time$6 or are currently facing market overreaction to a piece of new$ affecting t(e indu$try in t(e $(ort term. <or e!ample6 t(e auto indu$tryB$ cyclical nature allow$ for period$ of undervaluation of companie$ $uc( a$ <ord or 8+. 3. Can value companies be those that have just reached new lows? ; Definitely6 alt(oug( we mu$t re;emp(a$i:e t(at t(e Mc(eapne$$M of a company i$ relative to intrin$ic value. A company t(at (a$ 0u$t (it a new 12;mont( low or i$ at (alf of a 12;mont( (ig( may warrant furt(er inve$tigation.

Cere i$ a &reakdown of $ome of t(e num&er$ value inve$tor$ u$e a$ roug( guide$ for picking $tock$. Oeep in mind t(at t(e$e are guideline$6 not (ard;and;fa$t rule$@ 1. S(are price $(ould &e no more t(an two;t(ird$ of intrin$ic wort(. 2. #ook at companie$ wit( .T ratio$ at t(e lowe$t 1,F of all e2uity $ecuritie$. 3. . 8 $(ould &e le$$ t(an one. 4. Stock price $(ould &e no more t(an tangi&le &ook value. 5. %(ere $(ould &e no more de&t t(an e2uity =i.e. DT ratio V 1>. ". Current a$$et$ $(ould &e two time$ current lia&ilitie$. '. Dividend yield $(ould &e at lea$t two;t(ird$ of t(e long;term AAA &ond yield. ). arning$ growt( $(ould &e at lea$t 'F per annum compounded over t(e la$t 1, year$.

T7e PFE an3 PE& Ratios Contrary to popular &elief6 value inve$ting i$ not $imply a&out inve$ting in low .T $tock$. *tB$ 0u$t t(at $tock$ w(ic( are undervalued will often reflect t(i$ undervaluation t(roug( a low .T ratio6 w(ic( $(ould $imply provide a way to compare companie$ wit(in t(e $ame indu$try. <or e!ample6 if t(e average .T of t(e tec(nology con$ulting indu$try i$ 2,6 a company trading in t(at indu$try at 15 time$ earning$ $(ould $ound $ome &ell$ in t(e (ead$ of value inve$tor$. Anot(er popular metric for valuing a companyB$ intrin$ic value i$ t(e . 8 ratio6 calculated a$ a $tockB$ .T ratio divided &y it$ pro0ected year;over;year earning$ growt( rate. *n ot(er word$6 t(e ratio mea$ure$ (ow c(eap t(e $tock i$ w(ile taking into account it$ earning$ growt(. *f t(e companyB$ . 8 ratio i$ le$$ t(an one6 it i$ con$idered to &e undervalued.

Na::o6ing It Do6n EEen -2:t7e: /ne well;known and accepted met(od of picking value $tock$ i$ t(e net;net met(od. %(i$ met(od $tate$ t(at if a company i$ trading at two;t(ird$ of it$ current a$$et$6 no ot(er gauge of wort( i$ nece$$ary. %(e rea$oning &e(ind t(i$ i$ $imple@ if a company i$ trading at t(i$ level6 t(e &uyer i$ e$$entially getting all t(e permanent a$$et$ of t(e company =including property6 e2uipment6 etc> and t(e companyB$ intangi&le a$$et$ =mainly goodwill6 in mo$t ca$e$> for freeN 9nfortunately6 companie$ trading t(i$ low are few and far &etween. T7e %a:gin of Safet4

A di$cu$$ion of value inve$ting would not &e complete wit(out mentioning t(e u$e of a margin of $afety6 a tec(ni2ue w(ic( i$ $imple yet very effective. Con$ider a real;life e!ample of a margin of $afety. Say youBre planning a pyrotec(nic$ $(ow6 w(ic( will include flame$ and e!plo$ion$. Sou (ave concluded wit( a (ig( degree of certainty t(at itB$ perfectly $afe to $tand 1,, feet from t(e center of t(e e!plo$ion$. 4ut to &e a&$olutely $ure no one get$ (urt6 you implement a margin of $afety &y $etting up &arrier$ 125 feet from t(e e!plo$ion$. %(i$ u$e of a margin of $afety work$ $imilarly in value inve$ting. *tB$ $imply t(e practice of leaving room for error in your calculation$ of intrin$ic value. A value inve$tor may &e fairly confident t(at a company (a$ an intrin$ic value of K3, per $(are. 4ut in ca$e (i$ or (er calculation$ are a little too optimi$tic6 (e or $(e create$ a margin of $afetyTerror &y u$ing t(e K2" per $(are in t(eir $cenario analy$i$. %(e inve$tor may find t(at at K15 t(e company i$ $till an attractive inve$tment6 or (e or $(e may find t(at at K246 t(e company i$ not attractive enoug(. *f t(e $tockB$ intrin$ic value i$ lower t(an t(e inve$tor e$timated6 t(e margin of $afety would (elp prevent t(i$ inve$tor from paying too muc( for t(e $tock. Con9l2sion Aalue inve$ting i$ not a$ $e!y a$ $ome ot(er $tyle$ of inve$tingD it relie$ on a $trict $creening proce$$. 4ut 0u$t remem&er6 t(ereB$ not(ing &oring a&out outperforming t(e SE. &y 13F over a 4,;year $panN

1.3.* Sto9;-Pi9;ing St:ategies: &:o6t7 InEesting

*n t(e late 1--,$6 w(en tec(nology companie$ were flouri$(ing6 growt( inve$ting tec(ni2ue$ yielded unprecedented return$ for inve$tor$. 4ut &efore any inve$tor 0ump$ onto t(e growt( inve$ting &andwagon6 $T(e $(ould reali:e t(at t(i$ $trategy come$ wit( $u&$tantial ri$k$ and i$ not for everyone. "al2e Ee:s2s &:o6t7 %(e &e$t way to define growt( inve$ting i$ to contra$t it to value inve$ting. Aalue inve$tor$ are $trictly concerned wit( t(e (ere and nowD t(ey look for $tock$ t(at6 at t(i$ moment6 are trading for

le$$ t(an t(eir apparent wort(. 8rowt( inve$tor$6 on t(e ot(er (and6 focu$ on t(e future potential of a company6 wit( muc( le$$ emp(a$i$ on it$ pre$ent price. 9nlike value inve$tor$6 growt( inve$tor$ &uy companie$ t(at are trading (ig(er t(an t(eir current intrin$ic wort( ; &ut t(i$ i$ done wit( t(e &elief t(at t(e companie$B intrin$ic wort( will grow and t(erefore e!ceed t(eir current valuation$. A$ t(e name $ugge$t$6 growt( $tock$ are companie$ t(at grow $u&$tantially fa$ter t(an ot(er$. 8rowt( inve$tor$ are t(erefore primarily concerned wit( young companie$. %(e t(eory i$ t(at growt( in earning$ andTor revenue$ will directly tran$late into an increa$e in t(e $tock price. %ypically a growt( inve$tor look$ for inve$tment$ in rapidly e!panding indu$trie$ e$pecially t(o$e related to new tec(nology. .rofit$ are reali:ed t(roug( capital gain$ and not dividend$ a$ nearly all growt( companie$ reinve$t t(eir earning$ and do not pay a dividend. No A2to>ati9 -o:>2la 8rowt( inve$tor$ are concerned wit( a companyB$ future growt( potential6 &ut t(ere i$ no a&$olute formula for evaluating t(i$ potential. very met(od of picking growt( $tock$ =or any ot(er type of $tock> re2uire$ $ome individual interpretation and 0udgment. 8rowt( inve$tor$ u$e certain met(od$ ; or $et$ of guideline$ or criteria ; a$ a framework for t(eir analy$i$6 &ut t(e$e met(od$ mu$t &e applied wit( a companyB$ particular $ituation in mind. +ore $pecifically6 t(e inve$tor mu$t con$ider t(e company in relation to it$ pa$t performance and it$ indu$tryB$ performance. %(e application of any one guideline or criterion may t(erefore c(ange from company to company and from indu$try to indu$try. T7e NAIC %(e 7ational A$$ociation of *nve$tor$ Corporation =7A*C> i$ one of t(e &e$t known organi:ation$ u$ing and teac(ing t(e growt( inve$ting $trategy. *t i$6 a$ it $ay$ on it$ we&$ite6 Mone &ig inve$tment clu&M w(o$e goal i$ to teac( inve$tor$ (ow to inve$t wi$ely. %(e 7A*C (a$ developed $ome &a$ic Muniver$alM guideline$ for finding po$$i&le growt( companie$ ; (ereB$ a look at $ome of t(e 2ue$tion$ t(e 7A*C $ugge$t$ you $(ould a$k w(en con$idering $tock$. 1. Strong istorical !arnings "rowth?

According to t(e 7A*C6 t(e fir$t 2ue$tion a growt( inve$tor $(ould a$k i$ w(et(er t(e company6 &a$ed on annual revenue6 (a$ &een growing in t(e pa$t. 4elow are roug( guideline$ for t(e rate

of .S growt( an inve$tor $(ould look for in companie$ of differing $i:e$6 w(ic( would indicate t(eir growt( inve$ting potential@

Co>8an4 SiDe W K44 W K4,,m W K44 V K4,,+

%ini>2> &:o6t7 in !ast $4ea:s 5F 'F 12F

?Table 1.3 Histo:i9al Ea:nings@

Alt(oug( t(e 7A*C $ugge$t$ t(at companie$ di$play t(i$ type of .S growt( in at lea$t t(e la$t five year$6 a 1,;year period of t(i$ growt( i$ even more attractive. %(e &a$ic idea i$ t(at if a company (a$ di$played good growt( =a$ defined &y t(e a&ove c(art> over t(e la$t five; or 1,;year period6 it i$ likely to continue doing $o in t(e ne!t five to 1, year$. #. Strong $orward !arnings "rowth? %(e $econd criterion $et out &y t(e 7A*C i$ a pro0ected five;year growt( rate of at lea$t 1,;12F6 alt(oug( 15F or more i$ ideal. %(e$e pro0ection$ are made &y analy$t$6 t(e company or ot(er credi&le $ource$. %(e &ig pro&lem wit( forward e$timate$ i$ t(at t(ey are e$timate$. H(en a growt( inve$tor $ee$ an ideal growt( pro0ection6 (e or $(e6 &efore tru$ting t(i$ pro0ection6 mu$t evaluate it$ credi&ility. %(i$ re2uire$ knowledge of t(e typical growt( rate$ for different $i:e$ of companie$. <or e!ample6 an e$ta&li$(ed large cap will not &e a&le to grow a$ 2uickly a$ a younger $mall;cap tec( company. Al$o6 w(en evaluating analy$t con$en$u$ e$timate$6 an inve$tor $(ould learn a&out t(e companyB$ indu$try ; $pecifically6 w(at it$ pro$pect$ are and w(at $tage of growt( it i$ at. %. Is &anagement Controlling Costs and 'evenues? %(e t(ird guideline $et out &y t(e 7A*C focu$e$ $pecifically on pre;ta! profit margin$. %(ere are many e!ample$ of companie$ wit( a$tounding growt( in $ale$ &ut le$$ t(an out$tanding gain$ in

earning$. Cig( annual revenue growt( i$ good6 &ut if .S (a$ not increa$ed proportionately6 itB$ likely due to a decrea$e in profit margin. 4y comparing a companyB$ pre$ent profit margin$ to it$ pa$t margin$ and it$ competitionB$ profit margin$6 a growt( inve$tor i$ a&le to gauge fairly accurately w(et(er or not management i$ controlling co$t$ and revenue$ and maintaining margin$. A good rule of t(um& i$ t(at if company e!ceed$ it$ previou$ five;year average of pre;ta! profit margin$ a$ well a$ t(o$e of it$ indu$try6 t(e company may &e a good growt( candidate. (. Can &anagement )perate the *usiness !fficiently? fficiency can &e 2uantified &y u$ing return on e2uity =1/ >. fficient u$e of a$$et$ $(ould &e reflected in a $ta&le or increa$ing 1/ . Again6 analy$i$ of t(i$ metric $(ould &e relative@ a companyB$ pre$ent 1/ i$ &e$t compared to t(e five;year average 1/ of t(e company and t(e indu$try. +. Can the Stock ,rice -ouble in $ive .ears? *f a $tock cannot reali$tically dou&le in five year$6 itB$ pro&a&ly not a growt( $tock. %(atB$ t(e general con$en$u$. %(i$ may $eem like an overly (ig(6 unreali$tic $tandard6 &ut remem&er t(at wit( a growt( rate of 1,F6 a $tockB$ price would dou&le in $even year$. So t(e rate growt( inve$tor$ are $eeking i$ 15F per annum6 w(ic( yield$ a dou&ling in price in five year$.

1.3.$ Sto9;-Pi9;ing St:ategies: &ARP InEesting

Do you feel t(at you now (ave a firm gra$p of t(e principle$ of &ot( value and growt( inve$tingL *f youBre comforta&le wit( t(e$e two $tock;picking met(odologie$6 t(en youBre ready to learn a&out a newer6 (y&rid $y$tem of $tock $election. Cere we take a look at growt( at a rea$ona&le price6 or 8A1.. #7at Is &ARPH

%(e 8A1. $trategy i$ a com&ination of &ot( value and growt( inve$ting@ it look$ for companie$ t(at are $omew(at undervalued and (ave $olid $u$taina&le growt( potential. %(e criteria w(ic( 8A1.er$ look for in a company fall rig(t in &etween t(o$e $oug(t &y t(e value and growt( inve$tor$.

#7at &ARP Is NOT 4ecau$e 8A1. &orrow$ principle$ from &ot( value and growt( inve$ting6 $ome mi$conception$ a&out t(e $tyle per$i$t. Critic$ of 8A1. claim it i$ a wi$(y;wa$(y6 fence;$itting met(od t(at fail$ to e$ta&li$( meaningful $tandard$ for di$tingui$(ing good $tock pick$. Cowever6 8A1. doe$nBt deem 0u$t any $tock a wort(y inve$tment. #ike mo$t re$pecta&le met(odologie$6 it aim$ to identify companie$ t(at di$play very $pecific c(aracteri$tic$. Anot(er mi$conception i$ t(at 8A1. inve$tor$ $imply (old a portfolio wit( e2ual amount$ of &ot( value and growt( $tock$. Again6 t(i$ i$ not t(e ca$e@ &ecau$e eac( of t(eir $tock pick$ mu$t meet a $et of $trict criteria6 8A1.er$ identify $tock$ on an individual &a$i$6 $electing $tock$ t(at (ave neit(er purely value nor purely growt( c(aracteri$tic$6 &ut a com&ination of t(e two. #7o Uses &ARPH /ne of t(e &igge$t $upporter$ of 8A1. i$ .eter #ync(6 w(o$e p(ilo$op(ie$ we (ave already touc(ed on in t(e $ection on 2ualitative analy$i$. #ync( (a$ written $everal popular &ook$6 including M/ne 9p on Hall StreetM and M#earn to arnM6 and in t(e late 1--,$ and early 2,,, (e $tarred in t(e <idelity *nve$tment commercial$. +any con$ider #ync( t(e worldB$ &e$t fund manager6 partly due to (i$ 2-F average annual return over a 13;year $tretc( from 1-'';1--,.

T7e H4b:i3 C7a:a9te:isti9s #ike growt( inve$tor$6 8A1. inve$tor$ are concerned wit( t(e growt( pro$pect$ of a company@ t(ey like to $ee po$itive earning$ num&er$ for t(e pa$t few year$6 coupled wit( po$itive earning$ pro0ection$ for upcoming year$. 4ut unlike t(eir growt(;inve$ting cou$in$6 8A1. inve$tor$ are $keptical of e!tremely (ig( growt( e$timation$6 $uc( a$ t(o$e in t(e 25;5,F range. Companie$ wit(in t(i$ range carry too muc( ri$k and unpredicta&ility for 8A1.er$. %o t(em6 a $afer and more reali$tic earning$ growt( rate lie$ $omew(ere &etween 1,;2,F.

Somet(ing el$e t(at 8A1.er$ and growt( inve$tor$ $(are i$ t(eir attention to t(e 1/ figure. <or &ot( inve$ting type$6 a (ig( and increa$ing 1/ relative to t(e indu$try average i$ an indication of a $uperior company. 8A1.er$ and growt( inve$tor$ $(are ot(er metric$ to determine growt( potential. %(ey do6 (owever6 (ave different idea$ a&out w(at t(e ideal level$ e!(i&ited &y t(e different metric$ $(ould &e6 and &ot( type$ of inve$tor$ (ave varying ta$te$ in w(at t(ey like to $ee in a company. An e!ample of w(at many 8A1.er$ like to $ee i$ po$itive ca$( flow or6 in $ome ca$e$6 po$itive earning$ momentum. 4ecau$e a variety of additional criteria can &e u$ed to evaluate growt(6 8A1. inve$tor$ can cu$tomi:e t(eir $tock;picking $y$tem to t(eir per$onal $tyle. !erci$ing $u&0ectivity i$ an in(erent part of u$ing 8A1.. So if you u$e t(i$ $trategy6 you mu$t analy:e companie$ in relation to t(eir uni2ue conte!t$ =0u$t a$ you would wit( growt( inve$ting>. Since t(ere i$ no magic formula for confirming growt( pro$pect$6 inve$tor$ mu$t rely on t(eir own interpretation of company performance and operating condition$. *t would &e (ard to di$cu$$ any $tock;picking $trategy wit(out mentioning it$ u$e of t(e .T ratio. Alt(oug( t(ey look for (ig(er .T ratio$ t(an value inve$tor$ do6 8A1.er$ are wary of t(e (ig( .T ratio$ favored &y growt( inve$tor$. A growt( inve$tor may inve$t in a company trading at 5, or ", time$ earning$6 &ut t(e 8A1. inve$tor $ee$ t(i$ type of inve$ting a$ paying too muc( money for too muc( uncertainty. %(e 8A1.er i$ more likely to pick companie$ wit( .T ratio$ in t(e 15;25 range ; (owever6 t(i$ i$ a roug( e$timate6 not an infle!i&le rule 8A1.er$ follow wit(out any regard for a companyB$ conte!t. *n addition to a preference for a lower .T ratio6 t(e 8A1. inve$tor $(are$ t(e value inve$torB$ attraction to a low price;to;&ook ratio =.T4> ratio6 $pecifically a .T4 of &elow indu$try average. A low .T and .T4 are t(e two more prominent criteria wit( w(ic( 8A1.er$ in part mirror value inve$ting. %(ey may u$e ot(er $imilar or differing criteria6 &ut t(e main idea i$ t(at a 8A1. inve$tor i$ concerned a&out pre$ent valuation$. 04 t7e N2>be:s

7ow t(at we know w(at 8A1. inve$ting i$6 letB$ delve into $ome of t(e num&er$ t(at 8A1.er$ look for in potential companie$.

/he ,!" 'atio %(e . 8 ratio may very well &e t(e mo$t important metric to any 8A1. inve$tor6 a$ it &a$ically gauge$ t(e &alance &etween a $tockB$ growt( potential and it$ value. 8A1. inve$tor$ re2uire a . 8 no (ig(er t(an 1 and6 in mo$t ca$e$6 clo$er to ,.5. A . 8 of le$$ t(an 1 implie$ t(at6 at pre$ent6 t(e $tockB$ price i$ lower t(an it $(ould &e given it$ earning$ growt(. %o t(e 8A1. inve$tor6 a . 8 &elow 1 indicate$ t(at a $tock i$ undervalued and warrant$ furt(er analy$i$. ,!" at Work Say t(e %SJ Sport$ Conglomerate6 a fictional company6 i$ trading at 1- time$ earning$ =.T X 1-> and (a$ earning$ growing at 3,F. <rom t(i$ you can calculate t(at t(e %SJ (a$ a . 8 of ,."3 =1-T3,X,."3>6 w(ic( i$ pretty good &y 8A1. $tandard$. &ARP at #o:; 4ecau$e a 8A1. $trategy employ$ principle$ from &ot( value and growt( inve$ting6 t(e return$ t(at 8A1.er$ $ee during certain market p(a$e$ are often different t(an t(e return$ $trictly value or growt( inve$tor$ would $ee at t(o$e time$. <or in$tance6 in a raging &ull market t(e return$ from a growt( $trategy are often un&eata&le@ in t(e dotcom &oom of t(e mid; to late;1--,$6 for e!ample6 neit(er t(e value inve$tor nor t(e 8A1.er could compete. Cowever6 w(en t(e market doe$ turn6 a 8A1.er i$ le$$ likely to $uffer t(an t(e growt( inve$tor. %(erefore6 t(e 8A1. $trategy not only fu$e$ growt( and value $tock;picking criteria6 &ut al$o e!perience$ a com&ination of t(eir type$ of return$@ a value inve$tor will do &etter in &eari$( condition$D a growt( inve$tor will do e!ceptionally well in a raging &ull marketD and a 8A1.er will &e rewarded wit( more con$i$tent and predicta&le return$. Con9l2sion 8A1. mig(t $ound like t(e perfect $trategy6 &ut com&ining growt( and value inve$ting i$nBt a$

ea$y a$ it $ound$. *f you donBt ma$ter &ot( $trategie$6 you could find your$elf &uying mediocre rat(er t(an good 8A1. $tock$. 4ut a$ many great inve$tor$ $uc( a$ .eter #ync( (im$elf (ave proven6 t(e return$ are definitely wort( t(e time it take$ to learn t(e 8A1. tec(ni2ue$.

1.3.( Sto9;-Pi9;ing St:ategies: In9o>e InEesting

*ncome inve$ting6 w(ic( aim$ to pick companie$ t(at provide a $teady $tream of income6 i$ per(ap$ one of t(e mo$t $traig(t forward $tock;picking $trategie$. H(en inve$tor$ t(ink of $teady income t(ey commonly t(ink of fi!ed;income $ecuritie$ $uc( a$ &ond$. Cowever6 $tock$ can al$o provide a $teady income &y paying a $olid dividend. Cere we look at t(e $trategy t(at focu$e$ on finding t(e$e kind$ of $tock$. #7o Pa4s DiEi3en3sH *ncome inve$tor$ u$ually end up focu$ing on older6 more e$ta&li$(ed firm$6 w(ic( (ave reac(ed a certain $i:e and are no longer a&le to $u$tain (ig(er level$ of growt(. %(e$e companie$ generally no longer are in rapidly e!panding indu$trie$ and $o in$tead of reinve$ting retained earning$ into t(em$elve$ =a$ many (ig(;flying growt( companie$ do>6 mature firm$ tend to pay out retained earning$ a$ dividend$ a$ a way to provide a return to t(eir $(are(older$. %(u$6 dividend$ are more prominent in certain indu$trie$. 9tility companie$6 for e!ample6 (ave (i$torically paid a fairly decent dividend6 and t(i$ trend $(ould continue in t(e future DiEi3en3 'iel3 *ncome inve$ting i$ not $imply a&out inve$ting in companie$ wit( t(e (ig(e$t dividend$ =in dollar figure$>. %(e more important gauge i$ t(e dividend yield6 calculated &y dividing t(e annual dividend per $(are &y $(are price. %(i$ mea$ure$ t(e actual return t(at a dividend give$ t(e owner of t(e $tock. <or e!ample6 a company wit( a $(are price of K1,, and a dividend of K" per $(are (a$ a "F dividend yield6 or "F return from dividend$. %(e average dividend yield for companie$ in t(e SE. 5,, i$ 2;3F.

4ut income inve$tor$ demand a muc( (ig(er yield t(an 2;3F. +o$t are looking for a minimum 5;"F yield6 w(ic( on a K1;million inve$tment would produce an income =&efore ta!e$> of K5,6,,,;K",6,,,. %(e driving principle &e(ind t(i$ $trategy i$ pro&a&ly &ecoming pretty clear@ find good companie$ wit( $u$taina&le (ig( dividend yield$ to receive a $teady and predicta&le $tream of money over t(e long term. Anot(er factor to con$ider wit( t(e dividend yield i$ a companyB$ pa$t dividend policy. *ncome inve$tor$ mu$t determine w(et(er a pro$pective company can continue wit( it$ dividend$. *f a company (a$ recently increa$ed it$ dividend6 &e $ure to analy:e t(at deci$ion. A large increa$e6 $ay from 1.5F to "F6 over a $(ort period $uc( a$ a year or two6 may turn out to &e over; optimi$tic and un$u$taina&le into t(e future. %(e longer t(e company (a$ &een paying a good dividend6 t(e more likely it will continue to do $o in t(e future. Companie$ t(at (ave (ad $teady dividend$ over t(e pa$t five6 1,6 156 or even 5, year$ are likely to continue t(e trend.

DiEi3en3s A:e Not EEe:4t7ing Sou $(ould never inve$t $olely on t(e &a$i$ of dividend$. Oeep in mind t(at (ig( dividend$ donBt automatically indicate a good company. 4ecau$e t(ey are paid out of a companyB$ net income6 (ig(er dividend$ will re$ult in a lower retained earning$. .ro&lem$ ari$e w(en t(e income t(at would (ave &een &etter re;inve$ted into t(e company goe$ to (ig( dividend$ in$tead. %(e income inve$ting $trategy i$ a&out more t(an u$ing a $tock $creener to find t(e companie$ wit( t(e (ig(e$t dividend yield. 4ecau$e t(e$e yield$ are only wort( $omet(ing if t(ey are $u$taina&le6 income inve$tor$ mu$t &e $ure to analy:e t(eir companie$ carefully6 &uying only one$ t(at (ave good fundamental$. #ike all ot(er $trategie$ di$cu$$ed in t(i$ tutorial6 t(e income inve$ting $trategy (a$ no $et formula for finding a good company. %o determine t(e $u$taina&ility of dividend$ &y mean$ of fundamental analy$i$6 eac( individual inve$tor mu$t u$e (i$ or (er own interpretive $kill$ and per$onal 0udgment ; for t(i$ rea$on6 we wonBt get into w(at define$ a Mgood companyM. Sto9; Pi9;ingK not -iGe3 In9o>e

Somet(ing to remem&er i$ t(at dividend$ do not e2ual lower ri$k. %(e ri$k a$$ociated wit( any e2uity $ecurity $till applie$ to t(o$e wit( (ig( dividend yield$6 alt(oug( t(e ri$k can &e minimi:ed &y picking $olid companie$. TaGes TaGes TaGes /ne final important note@ in mo$t countrie$ and $tate$Tprovince$6 dividend payment$ are ta!ed at t(e $ame rate a$ your wage$. A$ $uc(6 t(e$e payment$ tend to &e ta!ed (ig(er t(an capital gain$6 w(ic( i$ a factor t(at reduce$ your overall return.

CHAPTER !ITERATURE RE"IE#

.1 CAN S!I% CA7 S#*+ i$ a p(ilo$op(y of $creening6 purc(a$ing and $elling common $tock. Developed &y Hilliam /B7eil6 t(e co;founder of Investor's Business Daily6 it i$ de$cri&ed in (i$ (ig(ly recommended &ook MCow to +ake +oney in Stock$M. %(e name may $ugge$t $ome &oring government agency6 &ut t(i$ acronym actually $tand$ for a very $ucce$$ful inve$tment $trategy. H(at make$ CA7 S#*+ different i$ it$ attention to tangi&le$ $uc( a$ earning$6 a$ well a$ intangi&le$ like a companyB$ overall $trengt( and idea$. %(e &e$t t(ing a&out t(i$ $trategy i$ t(at t(ereB$ evidence t(at it work$@ t(ere are countle$$ e!ample$ of companie$ t(at6 over t(e la$t (alf of t(e 2,t( century6 met CA7 S#*+ criteria &efore increa$ing enormou$ly in price. *n t(i$ $ection we e!plore eac( of t(e $even component$ of t(e CA7 S#*+ $y$tem. C N C2::ent Ea:nings A N Ann2al Ea:nings N N Ne6

S N S288l4 an3 De>an3 ! N !ea3e: o: !agga:3 I N Instit2tional S8onso:s7i8 % N %a:;et Di:e9tion CA7 S#*+ maintain t(at t(e &e$t way to keep track of market condition$ i$ to watc( t(e daily volume$ and movement$ of t(e market$. %(i$ component of CA7 S#*+ may re2uire t(e u$e of $ome tec(nical analy$i$ tool$6 w(ic( are de$igned to (elp inve$tor$Ttrader$ di$cern trend$.

. Dogs of t7e Do6

%(e inve$ting $trategy w(ic( focu$e$ on Dog$ of t(e Dow wa$ populari:ed &y +ic(ael Ciggin$ in (i$ &ook6 M4eating t(e DowM. %(e $trategyB$ $implicity i$ one of it$ mo$t attractive attri&ute$. %(e Dog$ of t(e Dow are t(e 1, of t(e 3, companie$ in t(e Dow Jone$ *ndu$trial Average =DJ*A> wit( t(e (ig(e$t dividend yield. *n t(e Dog$ of t(e Dow $trategy6 t(e inve$tor $(uffle$ around (i$ or (er portfolio6 ad0u$ting it $o t(at it i$ alway$ e2ually allocated in eac( of t(e$e 1, $tock$. %ypically6 $uc( an inve$tor would need to completely rid (i$ or (er portfolio of a&out t(ree to four $tock$ every year and replace t(em wit( different one$. %(e $tock$ are u$ually replaced &ecau$e t(eir dividend yield$ (ave fallen out of t(e top 1,6 or occa$ionally6 &ecau$e t(ey (ave &een removed from t(e DJ*A altoget(er.

CHAPTER 3

RESEARCH %ETHODO!O&'

ObBe9tiEe of t7e St234 %o $tudy (ow to pick $tock$. %o e!plore t(e difference &etween good $tock$ and &ad $tock$ %o minimi:e t(e e!po$ure %o find out t(e entry and e!it point w(ile &uying a $tock

S2b ObBe9tiEes %o $tudy e2uitie$ li$ted on 7S S9o8e of St234 %(e $tudy will &oo$t up t(e confidence of inve$tor$ w(ile picking up t(e $tock$

%(e$e $trategie$ will (elp minimi:e t(e e!po$ure in t(e $tock market *nve$tor$ will &e a&le to ma!imi:e t(eir wealt( wit( t(e (elp of t(e$e $trategie$ Onowledge empowerment will (elp inve$tor$ moving toward$ inve$ting in t(e $tock market

Resea:97 Design De$criptive Y A$ variou$ te$t and $tock$ $creener$ (ave &een u$ed and t(e 1e$earc( follow t(e de$criptive re$earc( de$ign Sa>8le Design %(e $ample $i:e i$ 5 Companie$ li$ted on 7ational Stock !c(ange. So2:9e of Data .rimary Data C(art$ 7ew$ Announcement$ <inancial$ Annual 1eport$

Secondary data +oneycontrol.com 8oogle <inance %(omp$on 1euter$ Sa(oo finance 7ational Stock !c(ange

Tools fo: Data Colle9tion Computer a$$i$ted te$ting tool$ w(ic( te$t t(e competency of $tock$ Cypot(e$i$ te$ting for identifying t(e $tock picking 0udgment

Codified te$t$ to pick t(e data determinant to pick t(e rig(t $tock Stock$ $creener$ to $creen variou$ $tock$ li$ted on t(e $tock e!c(ange !pert$ recommendation$ (ave &een u$ed and evaluated +anagement report$ (ave &een looked up to developed inve$tor$ confidence

Anal4ses an3 Inte:8:etation %(e variou$ tool$ for analy$i$ u$ed are grap($6 c(art$6 percentage growt(6 and $econdary data. !i>itations an3 Const:ains Con$traint of time. #ack of re$ource$ Co$t Con$traint.

CHAPTER * ANA!'S'S AND INERPRETATION

St:ategi9 Sto9; Pi9;s


A$ per t(e $tudy6 algorit(m$ (ave &een developed and u$ing t(e algorit(m$ following five companie$ (ave &een picked from 7S . %(e$e companie$ are con$i$tent performer6 undervalued6 and are great organi:ation$ wit( $trong fundamental value$ and management $upport. %(e$e companie$ can &een con$idered a$ a great &et in long run. Hin3al9o In32st:ies !i>ite3

Cindalco *ndu$trie$ #imited i$ an integrated aluminum manufacturer. %(e Company mine$ &au!ite and refine$ it into alumina. %(e CompanyB$ ot(er operation$ include t(e $melting of alumina into aluminum6 t(e manufacture of $emi;fa&ricated rolled and e!truded product$. %(e CompanyB$ product$ include aluminum ingot$6 $teel rod$ and rolled flat $teel product$. C(airman@ =2>a: %angala> 0i:la +anaging Director@ De&narayan 4(attac(arya C(ief <inancial /fficer@ .raveen +a(e$(wari Net 8:ofit >a:gin ?O@ Total 3ebtFassets ?Re9ent 4:@ ?O@ C2::ent :atio PFE :atio $4 EPS g:o6t7 :ate Ret2:n on inEest>ent ?$ 4: aEg@ ?O@ DiE :e9ent 52a:te: P:i9e to boo; DiE 4iel3 ?O@ 0eta C2::ent P:i9e 12.34 ,."5 2.1' 5.3-.12F 32."5 ; .42 1.4"F 1.1-5.",

?Table *.1 Hin3al9o@ %(i$ $tock look$ great on paper$ and i$ undervalued *6 recommend to &uy t(e$e $tock to get good return$ in long term. NHPC !t3 7ational Cydroelectric .ower Corp #td. i$ a (ydro;power development company &a$ed in *ndia. %(e Company (a$ con$tructed appro!imately 11 (ydro;power pro0ect$ in *ndia and a&road wit( a total in$talled capacity of 2554.35 +H. C(airmanT +anaging Director@ & Sai P:asa3 Director %ec(nical@ D P 07a:gaEa

Net 8:ofit >a:gin ?O@ Total 3ebtFassets ?Re9ent 4:@ ?O@ C2::ent :atio

21.5" ,.43 1.1'

PFE :atio $4 EPS g:o6t7 :ate Ret2:n on inEest>ent ?$ 4: aEg@ ?O@ DiE :e9ent 52a:te: P:i9e to boo; DiE 4iel3 ?O@ 0eta C2::ent P:i9e

).31 15.12F 2).25 ; .-1 3.3""F 1.4" 2,.-, ?Table *. NHPC@

8rowt( rate of t(i$ $tock &eat$ many of t(e &lue c(ip companie$ (ence *6 recommend to &uy t(i$ $tock.

0:oo;s !abo:ato:ies !t3 ?0=!@

4rook$ #a&oratorie$ #imited i$ a re$earc( and development driven p(armaceutical manufacturing company. %(e Company i$ a contract manufacturing company for t(e late$t molecule$ in *n0ecta&le$ and Clavulanic Acid range in %a&let$ and Dry Syrup$. Atul 1anc(al D2:ga San;a: %ait4 A$(ima 4anod(a !ecutive E 7on *ndependent C(airman of t(e 4oard C(ief !ecutive /fficer6 !ecutive Director ; %ec(nical6 Director Compliance /fficer6 Company Secretary

Net 8:ofit >a:gin ?O@ Total 3ebtFassets ?Re9ent 4:@ ?O@ C2::ent :atio PFE :atio

13.4) ,.,, 3.,5 3.31

$4 EPS g:o6t7 :ate Ret2:n on inEest>ent ?$ 4: aEg@ ?O@ DiE :e9ent 52a:te: P:i9e to boo; DiE 4iel3 ?O@ 0eta C2::ent P:i9e

35.-'F 1-.41 ,.,, ,.3" ; ; 2,.3,

?Table *.3 0:oo;s !abo:ato:ies@ 8rowt( rate and profit margin of t(i$ $tock i$ e!ceptional w(ic( pampered me to pick t(i$ $tock. Al$o after dawn of *% $tock$ .(arma look$ good and * recommend &uying t(i$ $tock.

NIIT Te97nologies !i>ite3 7**% %ec(nologie$ #imited i$ an information tec(nology =*%> $olution$ organi:ation engaged in application development and maintenance6 managed $ervice$6 cloud computing and &u$ine$$ proce$$ out$ourcing to organi:ation$ in t(e financial $ervice$6 in$urance6 travel6 tran$portation and logi$tic$6 manufacturing and di$tri&ution and government $ector$. %(e Company deliver$ $ervice$ acro$$ continent$ directly and t(roug( it$ network of $u&$idiarie$. *t i$ $ervicing cu$tomer$ in 7ort( E Sout( America6 urope6 t(e +iddle a$t6 A$ia and Au$tralia.

1a0endra Sing( .awar A:Ein3 T7a;2: .rati&(a O. Advani Net 8:ofit >a:gin ?O@ Total 3ebtFassets ?Re9ent 4:@ ?O@ C2::ent :atio PFE :atio $4 EPS g:o6t7 :ate Ret2:n on inEest>ent ?$ 4: aEg@ ?O@ DiE :e9ent 52a:te: P:i9e to boo; DiE 4iel3 ?O@

!ecutive C(airman of t(e 4oard6 +anaging Director C(ief !ecutive /fficer6 Joint +anaging Director6 !ecutive Director C(ief <inancial /fficer 13.)4 3.-, 2.15 12.-" ).2)F 23.4' ' 1.)4 2.)5

0eta C2::ent P:i9e

1.12'".-, ?Table *.* NIIT Te97nologies@

1eturn on inve$tment of t(i$ $tock $tand$ e!ceptional in t(e indu$try (ence *6 recommend to &uy t(i$ $tock.

0aBaB Hol3ings + InEest>ent !i>ite3 ?0HI!@ 4a0a0 Colding$ E *nve$tment #imited =4C*#> i$ an inve$tment company. 4C*# i$ non;&anking financial company. A$ of +arc( 316 2,126 t(e Company (eld 31.4-F in 4a0a0 Auto #imited and 3-.15F in 4a0a0 <in$erv #imited. 4a0a0 Auto Colding$ #imited =4AC#> i$ a w(olly owned $u&$idiary of t(e Company. +a(ara$(tra Scooter$ #imited i$ a 0oint venture company promoted &y t(e Company and He$tern +a(ara$(tra Development Corporation #imited.

SanBiE 0aBaB Aallari 8upte 1a(ul Oumar 4a0a0

+anaging Director6 !ecutive Director Company Secretary 7on; !ecutive C(airman of t(e 4oard

Net 8:ofit >a:gin ?O@ Total 3ebtFassets ?Re9ent 4:@ ?O@ C2::ent :atio PFE :atio $4 EPS g:o6t7 :ate Ret2:n on inEest>ent ?$ 4: aEg@ ?O@ DiE :e9ent 52a:te: P:i9e to boo; DiE 4iel3 ?O@ 0eta C2::ent P:i9e

'3.15 ,.,, 3.22 5.55 4.1,F 2.25F , 1.15 2.') ,.)1 -,'.-5

?Table *.$ 0aBaB Hol3ings@

7et .rofit margin of 4a0a0 Colding i$ way a(ead t(an t(e market indice$ and t(e company di$play it$ po$ition w(ile delivering (ig( return in long term. * recommend &uying t(i$ $tock.

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
"i#idend $ield % Net profit margin % Total debt/ assets % Growt !ate %

?C7a:t *.1 Sto9;s -inan9ials@

CHAPTER $ -INDIN&S

-:o> t7e anal4sis >a3e in t7e 8:eEio2s 97a8te: t7e follo6ing fin3ings 9an be 3e:iEe3:

+arket *nformation6 7ew$ and 4u$ine$$ activitie$ play$ varia&le role$ in day to day fluctuation$ of t(e $tock price$. <or intraday trading new$ (ave immediate effect$ on price movement$ and efficient market (ypot(e$i$ (ave ma0or role in it.

+o$t of t(e companie$ are overvalued and are trading at a price w(ic( i$ 2;1, time$ of companie$ &ook value

*ndian *nve$tor$ are maintaining di$tance from t(e $tock market w(ile <**$ are pampered to influ! t(e money

/nly large companie$ pay$ t(e dividend$6 mid;cap and $mall;cap companie$ often reinve$t t(e profit

Company?$ $ale$ are directly proportional to t(e fluctuation in t(eir $tock price$6 a$ it tell$ a&out t(e competency of t(e company

<oreign market$ (ave immediate impact$ on *ndian $tock$. /ver an entire day $tock$ $(ow movement$ of 5, point$ up and down.

CHAPTER ( RECO%%ENDATIONS + CONC!USION

Re9o>>en3ations
+ore awarene$$ mu$t &e created &y marketing appropriately $o a$ to increa$e t(e intere$t of *ndian *nve$tor$ *f ta! &enefit$ are given6 t(i$ induce more people to inve$t in $tock market A$ capital market i$ growing $o one $(ould trade in e!c(ange traded market rat(er t(an t(e /%C market /ne $(ould take &etter po$ition wit( t(e (elp of fundamental and tec(nical analy$i$ *t i$ a nece$$ity t(at one mu$t &e very educated to inve$t in capital market. So6 it i$ recommended t(at t(o$e w(o are not $o well educated $(ould con$ult t(e profe$$ional

Con9l2sion
7ow a day?$ inve$tor$ &ecome more careful in inve$tment wit( con$idering t(e factor like glo&al economy6 inflation6 market $entiment$6 management etc. *n t(e trading $y$tem people con$ider a&ove factor for inve$tment $o we can conclude t(at inve$tor are more moving toward$ t(e e!c(ange traded market %(e trading $y$tem al$o include$ trading and intermediary participant$6 w(o en$ure t(e correct price di$covery. %(u$6 t(e trading $y$tem i$ one of t(e factor$6 w(ic( reduce t(e ri$k in commodity future$. *n t(e capital market variou$ ri$k are involved &ut (ere wit( t(e (elp of t(e fundamental and tec(nical analy$i$ inve$tor$ are reducing t(eir ri$k. %(i$ can &e emp(a$i:ed &y t(e fact t(at t(ere (a$ &een an increa$ing trend in t(e volume traded in mo$t of t(e e2uitie$. <rom all t(e a&ove conclu$ion$ of it can &e concluded6 3 2uitie$ can &e u$ed a$ a $ound inve$tment in$trument5

0I0!IO&RAPH'

AnneG2:e
0oo;s
Cull C Jo(n =1-'4>. Stock$ and e2uitie$. Ha$(ington6 D.C.@ 7ational <inance Society. Ao(ra 7. D. =1--2>. <uture$ and /ption$. %ata +cgraw Cill$ .u&lication$. Aol ** EA*** 7icol6 A. +.6 E .e!man6 .. +. =1--->. .re$enting your finding$@ A practical guide for creating wealt(. Searle$6 4.6 E #a$t6 +. =1-'->. A readerB$ guide to fundamental analy$i$. 7ew Sork@ <act$ on <ile6 *nc. %oomer6 J. =1-))>. Cane. d. Darwin %. %urner. 7ew Sork@ 7orton.

Lo2:nals
cluteonline.com/journals/index.php/IBER/article/download/3449/3496 www.ssmrae.com/admin/.../a8d27c43d9c 9e9286 !4a7494"673!c.pd

Hall Street Journal 6 dated 14t( +arc( 2,136 article no. '

+oney 7ow dated 11t( +arc( 2,136 article no. 11 % Journal$ dated 1't( <e&ruary 2,136 article no. 23 4loom&erg +oney dated 21$t marc( 2,136 article no. 4 Anirud( Set(i 1eport dated 1-t( marc( 2,136 article no. -

#ebsites
www.r&i.orgTpreZwatc($tock$indice$(tml www.$e&i.comT$tockZregi$teredZcompanyZwatc(Zmovement$.cm$ (ttp@TTwww.n$eindia.comTliveZmarketTdynaContentTliveZwatc(Te2uitie$Z$tockZwatc(.(tm (ttp@TTwww.moneycontrol.comTfinancial$ (ttp@TTeconomictime$.indiatime$.comTmarket$T$tock$T$tock$;in;new$Ttop;five;momentum; pick$;for;t(i$;weekTarticle$(owT1))-11,2.cm$

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy