Name:

ID:
Admin. Date:
By Reuven Bar-On, Ph.D.
Development Report
The information given in this report should be used as a means of generating hypotheses and as a guide
to assessment. Higher standard scores are associated with greater levels of emotional intelligence and
better performance. 100 represents effective emotional functioning. Scores greater than 100 represent
enhanced emotional functioning, and scores of less than 100 indicate areas that may be improved. (The
value -99 may appear if scores are incomputable due to missing item responses).
Sample Report
20712
January 10, 2003
BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory
Copyright 2002 Multi-Health Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
P.O. Box 950, North Tonawanda, NY 14120-0950
3770 Victoria Park Ave., Toronto, ON M2H 3M6
This Development Report contains several sections that are briefly described in this introduction.
Development Reports are intended for the use of counselors, clinicians, and other professionals who
require an in-depth report of the EQ-i results that includes numeric scores. For direct presentation to
clients, the Resource Report should be utilized instead.
This Development Report first graphically displays the results for Total EQ, the 5 composite scales, and
the 15 subscales. The report then provides several pages of text that describe the results for each of the
scales and for the respondents profile. This text provides general information that may serve as the
foundation or start point for assessment. This text is then used in combination with all other available
information to formulate a complete assessment.
Once all of the assessment information is put together, it is desirable to formulate a plan for improving
and best utilizing emotional intelligence skills. The Development Report supports this stage of EQ-i use
by offering simple development strategies. These strategies are useful tips to improve areas that are
targeted for development. In formulating and implementing an intervention plan, counselors may
incorporate some of the strategies provided. The EQ-i results, the specific circumstances of the client,
and relevant considerations determine the best strategy or strategies to use. Strategies other than those
listed (or supplementing those listed) in the report often, of course, are employed when they offer the
best chance for successful change. The tips provided in the report are action-oriented and often provide
a quick effective means of initiating positive change.
The Counselors section of the report includes a brief summary of all of the results. It includes information
about the validity of the administration, critical responses (if any), raw scores, and a complete item
response listing.
In short, this Development Report provides scores, interpretive text, and intervention suggestions. It is a
tool that helps guide assessment and provides direction for the initiation of programs to foster positive
impact.
Introduction
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 2
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 3
Composite Scales
Total EQ
This graph shows the respondent's Total EQ.
This graph presents the results for the five composite scales.
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 4
Content Subscales
The following graph shows the 15 EQ-i subscales grouped according to composite area.
Interpretation Guide for EQ-i Composite and Content
Subscale Scores
Total EQ: 115
Cautionary Remarks
This computerized report is meant to act as an interpretive aid and should not be used as the sole basis
for placement, intervention, or other kinds of decision making. This report works best when combined
with other sources of relevant information. The report is based on an algorithm that produces the
interpretations most common for the scores that are obtained. Unusual interpretations must be explored
with other instruments and on a case-by-case basis.
The following sections describe the meaning of scores for the Total EQ-i scale and each of the EQ-i
content scales. In general, high results identify areas of relative strength. Results in the midrange on
these scales indicate satisfactory functioning and are obtained by the majority of those in the population
who have taken the EQ-i. Low results indicate areas that need to be improved in order to increase overall
emotional and social intelligence. If all the results are high or all results are low, it is useful to identify the
scales with the highest and lowest results; this will help pinpoint areas of relative strength or weakness.
The Total EQ for Sample indicates an individual who overall feels good about himself and others and
who is leading a successful life. Individuals like Sample who are at the upper end of the scale for Total
EQ scale are generally optimistic about dealing with problems and have a positive outlook on life. Sample
successfully controls his emotions and typically is not impulsive. He is probably realistic, assertive, and at
least fairly successful in solving problems. He is likely to be optimistic and have a positive outlook on life.
Sample's Emotional Intelligence will help optimize his achievements and success. A more detailed
description of the EQ-i components is given in the next section.
Intrapersonal: 112
This component of the Total EQ-i score pertains to the assessment of the inner self. The subcomponents
of the Intrapersonal EQ scale include Self-Regard, Emotional Self-Awareness, Assertiveness,
Independence, and Self-Actualization. Sample's Intrapersonal score is substantially higher than average.
High scores are indicative of an individual who is in touch with his feelings, feels good about himself and
about life in general. High scores on the Intrapersonal scale are usually obtained by individuals who are
independent, strong-minded, and able to express and convey feelings and ideas with confidence.
Self-Regard: 96
The Self-Regard scale score is within the range that is typical of other people in the population. There is
reasonably satisfactory self-regard and self-respect, but there may be times when he is somewhat
self-critical. Self-confidence is satisfactory most of the time, but there may be situations where he is less
self-assured.
Emotional Self-Awareness: 118
The results indicate highly effective emotional self-awareness. Sample is in touch with his feelings and
emotions; and usually knows what he is feeling and why. This individual is also comfortable expressing
feelings to others.
Assertiveness: 103
The responses indicate a reasonably good ability to express feelings and emotions. This individual is
usually not self-conscious or bashful, and seems to be able to openly express feelings, thoughts, and
beliefs in a constructive manner.
Independence: 125
The responses indicate an individual who is independent in his thinking and who also has a strong
preference to act independently. This type of person may ask others for advice, but rarely depends upon
others to make important decisions on his behalf. This individual likely prefers to be in charge rather than
being under the supervision of someone else.
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 5
Self-Actualization: 110
Sample is achieving, or coming close to achieving, his full potential in most aspects of his life. This
individual is probably deriving a great deal of enjoyment from life and is involved in pursuits that are
meaningful, interesting, and exciting for him. As a result, Sample is likely energetic, highly motivated, and
successful. He will strive to optimize performance.
Interpersonal: 113
This component of the Total EQ-i scale taps interpersonal capacity and functioning. The subcomponents
of the Interpersonal scale include Empathy, Social Responsibility, and Interpersonal Relationship.
Overall, the Interpersonal scale results indicate social adeptness, the ability to understand others, as well
as the ability to interact and relate well with people. Typically, Sample is responsible and dependable,
and Sample functions well in tasks involving making contact with others and teamwork.
Empathy: 112
The responses indicate an individual with a good awareness, understanding, and appreciation of the
feelings of others. Sample probably will go out of his way to help others, and will try to avoid hurting
other people's feelings.
Social Responsibility: 121
The results in this area suggest an individual who is cooperative and constructive. Sample is probably
quite responsible and dependable. He will be helpful when interacting with others and will try to contribute
to the "community at large" (society, the corporation, team, etc.).
Interpersonal Relationship: 107
The results suggest that Sample has above average interpersonal skills. Most relationships for this
person are mutually satisfying most of the time, and involve the proper amount of intimacy and the
appropriate giving and receiving of affection. Sample is able to form agreeable relationships and
alliances. This ability supports effective communication and the mutually beneficial exchanges of ideas,
feelings, and information.
Stress Management: 114
The Stress Management component of the EQ-i consists of the Stress Tolerance and Impulse Control
Subscales. Both components of this composite scale are above average indicating a calm disposition,
lack of impulsivity, and the ability to withstand stress.
Stress Tolerance: 114
The results of the Stress Tolerance scale indicate an enhanced ability to withstand adverse events and
stressful situations. Sample is generally able to cope with stress actively and effectively. This type of
person is generally calm and rarely gets overly anxious or agitated.
Impulse Control: 111
Sample's ability to resist or delay impulses, drives, and temptations to act is higher than average. He is
rarely impatient, rarely overreacts or loses control.
Adaptability: 112
This part of the EQ-i is composed of the Reality Testing, Flexibility, and Problem Solving Scales and
examines how successful one is in coping with environmental demands based on one's ability to
effectively size up and deal with problematic situations. The Adaptability component is substantially
higher than average. Sample is probably very flexible and able to adjust to changing circumstances and
situations. The responses to the Adaptability component of the EQ-i suggest that he is practical, realistic,
and does not over-indulge in fantasy. He understands problematic situations and can usually come up
with effective solutions. Not only is this a valuable personal attribute for home and family life, but those
with good adaptability thrive in work settings that require someone who is "down-to-earth," clear thinking,
and adapts easily to changing demands.
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 6
Reality Testing: 117
The results for this subscale indicate an individual who is able to evaluate the correspondence between
what he experiences (the subjective) and what in reality exists (the objective). Sample can be described
as realistic, well grounded, and "tuned in" to whats going on around him.
The results indicate an adequate ability to adjust emotions, thoughts, and behavior to changing situations
and conditions. Certain routines or habits may be difficult for Sample to break, and adjusting to major
changes may be difficult. Overall, though, most adjustments are handled adequately.
Flexibility: 98
Problem Solving: 116
The responses to the Problem Solving scale reflect an effective approach to resolving problems. Sample
has a very deliberating style, and is good at defining problems as well as generating and implementing
potentially effective solutions. The responses indicate a very methodical individual.
The subcomponents of this composite scale consist of the Optimism and Happiness subscales. These
components of the EQ-i measure one's general feeling of contentment and overall outlook on life. High
scores on these components indicate a positive outlook that can help bolster oneself and those around.
Both components of the General Mood scale are about average or higher, and descriptions of these
components are given below.
General Mood: 110
The results indicate an above average degree of optimism suggesting an individual who is usually able to
look at the brighter side of life and maintain a positive attitude. This characteristic is usually helpful in
handling difficult or stressful situations.
Optimism: 108
Happiness: 112
The responses to the items on this scale indicate a person who feels satisfied with his life, who enjoys
the company of others, and who is able to derive a great deal of pleasure and fun from life. Sample
probably has a happy disposition and is pleasant to be with.
Profile Summary
Overall, the EQ-i results indicate well-developed Emotional Intelligence. However, there are fairly large
differences in the scores for the 15 content scales indicating areas of relative strength and areas of
improvement.
The highest subscales are Independence (125), Social Responsibility (121), Emotional Self-Awareness
(118).
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 7
Simple Strategies for Development
Strategies for improving the areas that yielded the lowest EQ-i scores
Self-Regard
Build confidence by recognizing successful efforts and independent achievements
Make sure achievements are properly celebrated and rewarded
Train to improve skills and increase self-regard by increasing capabilities
Set goals that are challenging yet readily obtainable
Be aware of, but do not overfocus on, weaknesses
Pinpoint areas of relative strength and try to capitalize fully on these areas
Flexibility
Emphasize activities/tasks that require reliability and consistency
Ensure there is sufficient preparation time to help mitigate the impact of significant change
Brainstorm, preferably in a group context, to harvest ideas for handling dynamic, changing demands
Be sure adequate training is received to prepare for new activities and roles; Use change as an
opportunity to learn and develop
Consider how past experiences and skills are applicable to new challenges
Assertiveness
Learn to recognize when others are making unreasonable demands.
Reduce barriers to "up-front" communication by making circumstances less threatening
Some people have trouble being assertive in face-to-face discourse; written or electronic
communications methods may be viable alternatives
Increase confidence (key to assertiveness) by recognizing and rewarding well-presented thoughts
and ideas
If the problem with being assertive is due to a personality style, assertiveness training may be needed
Practice appropriate assertiveness in non-threatening situations with non-threatening persons (e.g.,
with friends); Get informal feedback; Apply this information and experience to other situations and
persons
Closing Remark
This narrative report is meant as an aid to help understand the results of the BarOn EQ-i. Combined with
other information, EQ-i can help identify areas of strength to as well as areas that could be improved.
This report describes the emotional and social functioning of the respondent in accordance with the
responses provided.
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 8
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 9
Counselor's Section
Administration Date: January 10, 2003
Age:
Sample Report
Male under 30
Name:
Norm Type:
29
Gender: Male
This section provides a complete scoring summary including sections on assessment validity, raw
scores, and item responses.
Guideline Unadjusted Score Adjusted Score Score Summary
OK 6 Inconsistency Index
OK 116 Positive Impression
OK 87 Negative Impression
High 119 115 TOTAL EQ:
High 115 112 INTRAPERSONAL:
Average 101 96 Self-Regard
High 121 118 Emotional Self-Awareness
Average 103 103 Assertiveness
Very High 125 125 Independence
High 114 110 Self-Actualization
High 117 113 INTERPERSONAL:
High 112 112 Empathy
Very High 125 121 Social Responsibility
Average 111 107 Interpersonal Relationship
High 120 114 STRESS MANAGEMENT:
High 118 114 Stress Tolerance
High 116 111 Impulse Control
High 116 112 ADAPTABILITY:
High 121 117 Reality Testing
Average 101 98 Flexibility
High 119 116 Problem Solving
High 116 110 GENERAL MOOD:
Average 113 108 Optimism
High 116 112 Happiness
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 10
Graph of Total EQ, Composite Scales, and Subscales
This graph shows Total EQ followed by each composite scale with its subscales.
Validity Comment:
Validity Indicators
The validity indicators are all in the acceptable range suggesting valid responses and results that are not
unduly influenced by response style.
Impression:
Inconsistency Index:
Type I = -2.88, Type II = -3.84, Type III = -4.68, Type IV = -5.64, Type
V = -4.23
Correction:
6
Positive = 116
Negative = 87
Several sections follow that present and describe the validity scale results.
Inconsistency Index
The responses to items with similar content are consistent with one another.
Positive Impression (PI) and Negative Impression (NI) Scores
The score on the Positive Impression scale (PI) was somewhat elevated. Although the elevated PI score
indicates a tendency towards overly positive self-presentation, the tendency was small and should not
have a major influence on the results and interpretation of the EQ-i.
The correction factors are used to fine tune EQ-i scores on the basis of validity scale scores. The
adjusted (or corrected) scores take into account response style. Corrections of greater than zero mean
that points have been added to the scores, and corrections less than zero mean that points have been
taken off the scores. Because the EQ-i scales are affected differently by response tendencies, different
types of corrections are applied as follows:
Type I applies to Total Intrapersonal, Emotional Self-Awareness, Problem Solving, and Flexibility.
Type II applies to Total EQ, Total Adaptability, Reality Testing, and Stress Tolerance.
Type III applies to Social Responsibility, Happiness and Impulse Control.
Type IV applies to Total Stress Management, Total General Mood, and Self-Regard.
Type V applies to Total Interpersonal, Interpersonal Relationship, Optimism, and Self-Actualization.
There is no correction for Independence, Empathy, and Assertiveness.
Correction Factors:
Summary of Validity Scale Results
Overall, the validity indicators described in this section suggest that the EQ-i results should be
considered valid.
Profile Summary
Overall, the EQ-i results indicate well-developed Emotional Intelligence. However, there are fairly large
differences in the scores for the 15 content scales indicating areas of relative strength and areas of
improvement.
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 11
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 12
Scale Raw Scores
For research purposes only.
Item Responses
5 = Very Often true of me or true of me, 4 = Often true of me, 3 = Sometimes true of me, 2 =
Seldom true of me, 1 = Very Seldom true or not true of me, 0 = Omitted Item
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 13
BarOn EQ-i Development Report for Sample Report Page 14
Date Printed: February 12, 2003
End of Report