Contemporary Research Handbook
Contemporary Research Handbook
The Depth of the Review
3.0
4.0
3.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
45
Conventionalism of Style of Write-Up 2.0 1.0 1.5 2.0
12 Total
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework of the Study
Adoption and application of existing theory or concept
Evolution and appropriateness of new concepts and theories
Evolution and quality of research hypotheses
Quality of research questions
Conventionalism of Style of Write-Up
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0
1.0 1.5 2.0
1.0 1.5 2.0
13 Total
Data Analysis and Findings
Quality of data generated and used
Methodology used in generating the data
Procedures used in analyzing the data
Inferences made from the data analysis
Inferences made to answer the research questions
Method used in evaluating each research hypotheses and its validity
The relationship of the research outcome and the validity of the theories and
concepts applied
2.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
1.0 1.5 2.0
1.0 1.5 2.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0
23 Total
Conclusion and Recommendation
Main conclusions drawn
Main recommendations, i.e. their viability and practicability
5.0
5.0
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
10 Total
Miscellaneous Issues on the Report
Style of Writing, i.e. professional manner
Grammatical errors, typing mistakes, etc.
Observation of standard procedures of referencing and citation
Level of innovation and ambition of the researcher
Tidiness and formatting procedures observed
General presentation of the document
2.0
2.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0
0.5 1.0
0.5 1.0
0.5 1.0
11 Total
Total Mark Awarded Total Marks (Page 1)
Oral Presentation and Defense
Self-expression 3.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0
46
Students familiarity with the topic and area of study
Students articulation and understanding of issues
Students response to questions raised
2.0
2.0
8.0
1.0 1.5 2.0
1.0 1.5 2.0
1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
6.0 7.0 8.0
15 Total Marks (Page 2)
FINAL MARK
Notes as Guidance for Marking
Where there are 2 categories in grading: 0.5 = Average; 1.0 = Good
Where there are 3 categories in grading: 1.0 = Average; 1.5 = Good;
2.0 = Very Good
Where there are 3 categories in grading: 1.0 = Average; 2.0 = Good;
3.0 = Very Good
Where there are 4 categories in grading: 0.5 = Poor; 1.0 = Average;
1.5 = Good; 2.0 = Very Good
Where there are 4 categories in grading: 1.0 = Poor; 2.0 = Average;
3.0 = Good; 4.0 = Very Good
Interpretation of the Final Mark:
Less than 40 Points = Fail
Above 50 Points = Pass
Between 50 and 69 Points = Pass with major corrections
Above 70 Points = Pass with minor corrections
47
(BACK COVER)