Scribd
Upload
1K views1 page

US VS Pons

This case involves Juan Pons who was charged with illegal importation of opium. Pons questioned the validity of the law under which he was charged, Act 2381, claiming it was passed on March 1 after the legislative session had ended on February 28. The court ruled that 1) legislative journals can be used as proof of when the legislature adjourned and 2) the court will not go behind clear legislative journals to determine the date of adjournment, as doing so would interfere with legislative powers. The journals stated the legislature adjourned at midnight on February 28, so the court upheld the validity of Act 2381.

Uploaded by

kdescallar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views1 page

US VS Pons

This case involves Juan Pons who was charged with illegal importation of opium. Pons questioned the validity of the law under which he was charged, Act 2381, claiming it was passed on March 1 after the legislative session had ended on February 28. The court ruled that 1) legislative journals can be used as proof of when the legislature adjourned and 2) the court will not go behind clear legislative journals to determine the date of adjournment, as doing so would interfere with legislative powers. The journals stated the legislature adjourned at midnight on February 28, so the court upheld the validity of Act 2381.

Uploaded by

kdescallar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

The United States VS Juan Pons

GR NO. L-11530

ISSUE FACTS RULING

Petitioner: Juan Pons

Respondent: The United States

Issue:
1. W/N the court can look to legislative
journals as proof of when the
adjournment of Legislature happened
2. W/N the court can go behind the
legislative journals to determine the
date of adjournment




Gabino Beliso, Juan Pons and Jacinto
Lacarte were charged with the crime of
illegal importation of Opium.
Juan Pons and Gabino Beliso were
tried separately. Both were found
guilty and both appealed but Beliso
later withdrew his appeal.
Pons questioned the validity of Act.
2381 and offered to prove that the last
day of the special session of the
Philippine Legislature for 1914 was the
28th day of February; that Act No.
2381, under which Pons must be
punished if found guilty, was not
passed or approved on the 28th of
February but on March 1 of that year;
and that, therefore, the same is null
and void.

1. Yes. Section 275 of the Code of Civil Procedure
provides that the existence of the "official acts of the
legislative, executive, and judicial departments of
the United States and of the Philippine Islands ...
shall be judicially recognized by the court without
the introduction of proof

Official documents may be proved through:

The proceedings of the Philippine Commission, or
of any legislative body that may be provided for the
Philippine Islands, or of Congress, by the journals
of those bodies or of either house thereof

2. The court did not go behind the legislative journals
when such journals are already clear and explicit
(about when Act No. 2381 was adjourned). to
inquiry into the veracity (accuracy) of the journals
of the Philippine Legislature, when they are, as we
have said, clear and explicit, would be to interfere
with the legitimate powers and functions of the
Legislature. The journals already say that the
Legislature adjourned at 12 midnight on February
28, 1914.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy