Money laundering is the process whereby the proceeds of crime are transformed into ostensibly

legitimate money or other assets.

[1]
However in a number of legal and regulatory system the term
money laundering has become conflated with other forms of financial crime, and sometimes used
more generally to include misuse of the financial system, including terrorism financing, tax
evasion and evading ofinternational sanctions. Most anti-money laundering laws openly conflate
money laundering (which is concerned with source of funds) with terrorism financing (which is
concerned with destination of funds) when regulating the financial system.
[2]

Money obtained from certain crimes, such as extortion, insider trading, drug trafficking, illegal
gambling and tax evasion is "dirty". It needs to be cleaned to appear to have derived from non-
criminal activities so that banks and other financial institutions will deal with it without suspicion.
Originally, the term applied to real money but now money laundering applies to the proceeds of
crime that are laundered using a variety of monetary instruments including securities, digital
currencies such as bitcoin, credit cards, and traditional currency. Money can be laundered by many
methods, which vary in complexity and sophistication.
Different countries may or may not treat tax evasion or payments in breach of international
sanctions as money laundering. Some jurisdictions differentiate these for definition purposes, and
others do not. Some jurisdictions define money laundering as obfuscating sources of money, either
intentionally or by merely using financial systems or services that do not identify or track sources or
destinations.
Other jurisdictions define money laundering to include money from activity that would have been a
crime in that jurisdiction, even if it were legal where the actual conduct occurred. This broad brush of
applying the term "money laundering" to merely incidental, extraterritorial, or simply privacy-seeking
behaviors has led some to label it "financial thoughtcrime".
[3]

Many regulatory and governmental authorities issue estimates each year for the amount of money
laundered, either worldwide or within their national economy. In 1996, theInternational Monetary
Fund estimated that two to five percent of the worldwide global economy involved laundered money.
The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering(FATF), an intergovernmental body set up to
combat money laundering, stated, "Overall, it is absolutely impossible to produce a reliable estimate
of the amount of money laundered and therefore the FATF does not publish any figures in this
regard."
[4]
Academic commentators have likewise been unable to estimate the volume of money with
any degree of assurance.
[5]
Various estimates of the scale of global money laundering are
sometimes repeated often enough to make some people regard them as factualbut no researcher
has overcome the inherent difficulty of measuring an actively concealed practice.
Regardless of the difficulty in measurement, the amount of money laundered each year is in
the billions (US dollars) and poses a significant policy concern for governments.
[5]
As a result,
governments and international bodies have undertaken efforts to deter, prevent, and apprehend
money launderers. Financial institutions have likewise undertaken efforts to prevent and detect
transactions involving dirty money, both as a result of government requirements and to avoid the
reputational risk involved. Issues relating to money laundering have existed as long as there have
been large scale criminal enterprises. Modern anti-money laundering laws have developed along
with the modern War on Drugs.
[6]
In more recent times anti-money laundering legislation is seen as
adjunct to the financial crime of terrorist financing in that both crimes usually involve the transmission
of funds through the financial system (although money laundering relates to where the money has
come from, and terrorist financing relating to where the money is going to).
Reverse money laundering is a process that disguises a legitimate source of funds that are to be
used for illegal purposes.
[7]
In an affidavit filed March 24, 2014 in United States District Court,
Northern California, San Francisco Division, FBI special agent Emmanuel V. Pascau alleged that
several people associated with the Chee Kung Tong organization, and California State Senator
Leland Yee, engaged in reverse money laundering activities.
Contents
[hide]
1 Methods
2 Enforcement
o 2.1 Criminalizing money laundering
o 2.2 The role of financial institutions
o 2.3 Value of enforcement costs and associated privacy concerns
o 2.4 Global Organizations working against money laundering
3 Laws and enforcement by region
o 3.1 Afghanistan
o 3.2 Australia
o 3.3 Bangladesh
o 3.4 Canada
o 3.5 European Union
o 3.6 India
o 3.7 United Kingdom
3.7.1 Bureaux de change
o 3.8 United States
3.8.1 Preventive
3.8.2 Criminal sanctions
4 Electronic money
5 Notable cases
6 See also
7 References
8 External links
Methods[edit]
Money laundering is commonly defined as occurring in three steps: the first step involves introducing
cash into the financial system by some means ("placement"); the second involves carrying out
complex financial transactions to camouflage the illegal source ("layering"); and the final step entails
acquiring wealth generated from the transactions of the illicit funds ("integration"). Some of these
steps may be omitted, depending on the circumstances; for example, non-cash proceeds that are
already in the financial system would have no need for placement.
[5]

Money laundering takes several different forms, although most methods can be categorized into one
of a few types. These include "bank methods, smurfing [also known as structuring], currency
exchanges, and double-invoicing".
[8]

Structuring: Often known as smurfing, this is a method of placement whereby cash is broken into
smaller deposits of money, used to defeat suspicion of money laundering and to avoid anti-
money laundering reporting requirements. A sub-component of this is to use smaller amounts of
cash to purchase bearer instruments, such as money orders, and then ultimately deposit those,
again in small amounts.
[9]

Bulk cash smuggling: This involves physically smuggling cash to another jurisdiction and
depositing it in a financial institution, such as an offshore bank, with greater bank secrecy or less
rigorous money laundering enforcement.
[10]

Cash-intensive businesses: In this method, a business typically involved in receiving cash uses
its accounts to deposit both legitimate and criminally derived cash, claiming all of it as legitimate
earnings. Service businesses are best suited to this method, as such businesses have no
variable costs, and it is hard to detect discrepancies between revenues and costs. Examples are
parking buildings, strip clubs, tanning beds, and casinos.
Trade-based laundering: This involves under- or overvaluing invoices to disguise the movement
of money.
[11]

Shell companies and trusts: Trusts and shell companies disguise the true owner of money.
Trusts and corporate vehicles, depending on the jurisdiction, need not disclose their true,
beneficial, owner.
[12]

Round-tripping: Here, money is deposited in a controlled foreign corporation offshore, preferably
in a tax haven where minimal records are kept, and then shipped back as aforeign direct
investment, exempt from taxation. A variant on this is to transfer money to a law firm or similar
organization as funds on account of fees, then to cancel the retainer and, when the money is
remitted, represent the sums received from the lawyers as a legacy under a will or proceeds of
litigation.
Bank capture: In this case, money launderers or criminals buy a controlling interest in a bank,
preferably in a jurisdiction with weak money laundering controls, and then move money through
the bank without scrutiny.
Casinos: In this method, an individual walks into a casino with cash and buys chips, plays for a
while, and then cashes in the chips, taking payment in a check, or just getting a receipt, claiming
it as gambling winnings.
[10]

Other gambling: Money is spent on gambling, preferably on higher odds. The wins are shown if
the source for money is asked for, while the losses are hidden.
Real estate: Someone purchases real estate with illegal proceeds and then sells the property.
To outsiders, the proceeds from the sale look like legitimate income. Alternatively, the price of
the property is manipulated: the seller agrees to a contract that underrepresents the value of the
property, and receives criminal proceeds to make up the difference.
[12]

Black salaries: A company may have unregistered employees without a written contract and pay
them cash salaries. Dirty money might be used to pay them.
[13]

Tax amnesties: For example, those that legalize unreported assets in tax havens and cash
[14]

Fictional loans
A goal of money laundering is to be able to use the dirty money for private consumption. If
unable to use it openly, the traditional way to keep the dirty money near is hiding it as cash at
home or other places. A more modern method is a credit card connected to a tax haven bank.
Enforcement[edit]
Anti-money laundering (AML) is a term mainly used in the financial and legal industries to describe
the legal controls that require financial institutions and other regulated entities to prevent, detect, and
report money laundering activities. Anti-money laundering guidelines came into prominence globally
as a result of the formation of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the promulgation of an
international framework of anti-money laundering standards.
[15]
These standards began to have
more relevance in 2000 and 2001, after FATF began a process to publicly identify countries that
were deficient in their anti-money laundering laws and international cooperation, a process
colloquially known as "name and shame".
[16][17]

An effective AML program requires a jurisdiction to have criminalized money laundering, given the
relevant regulators and police the powers and tools to investigate; be able to share information with
other countries as appropriate; and require financial institutions to identify their customers, establish
risk-based controls, keep records, and report suspicious activities.
[18]

Criminalizing money laundering[edit]
The elements of the crime of money laundering are set forth in the United Nations Convention
Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and Convention against
Transnational Organized Crime. It is defined as knowingly engaging in a financial transaction with
the proceeds of a crime for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property
from governments.
The role of financial institutions[edit]
While banks operating in the same country generally have to follow the same AML laws and
regulations, financial institutions all structure their AML efforts slightly different.
[19]
Today, most
financial institutions globally, and many non-financial institutions, are required to identify and report
transactions of a suspicious nature to the financial intelligence unit in the respective country. For
example, a bank must verify a customer's identity and, if necessary, monitor transactions for
suspicious activity. This is often termed as "know your customer". This means knowing the identity of
the customer and understanding the kinds of transactions in which the customer is likely to engage.
By knowing one's customers, financial institutions can often identify unusual or suspicious behavior,
termed anomalies, which may be an indication of money laundering.
[20]

Bank employees, such as tellers and customer account representatives, are trained in anti-money
laundering and are instructed to report activities that they deem suspicious. Additionally, anti-money
laundering software filters customer data, classifies it according to level of suspicion, and inspects it
for anomalies. Such anomalies include any sudden and substantial increase in funds, a large
withdrawal, or moving money to a bank secrecy jurisdiction. Smaller transactions that meet certain
criteria may also be flagged as suspicious. For example, structuring can lead to flagged transactions.
The software also flags names on government "blacklists" and transactions that involve countries
hostile to the host nation. Once the software has mined data and flagged suspect transactions, it
alerts bank management, who must then determine whether to file a report with the government.
Value of enforcement costs and associated privacy concerns[edit]
The financial services industry has become more vocal about the rising costs of anti-money
laundering regulation and the limited benefits that they claim it brings.
[21]
One commentator wrote
that "[w]ithout facts, [anti-money laundering] legislation has been driven on rhetoric, driving by ill-
guided activism responding to the need to be "seen to be doing something" rather than by an
objective understanding of its effects on predicate crime. The social panic approach is justified by
the language usedwe talk of the battle against terrorism or the war on drugs".
[22]
The
Economist magazine has become increasingly vocal in its criticism of such regulation, particularly
with reference to countering terrorist financing, referring to it as a "costly failure", although it
concedes that other efforts (like reducing identity and credit card fraud) may still be effective at
combating money laundering.
[23]

There is no precise measurement of the costs of regulation balanced against the harms associated
with money laundering,
[24]
and given the evaluation problems involved in assessing such an issue, it
is unlikely that the effectiveness of terror finance and money laundering laws could be determined
with any degree of accuracy.
[25]
The Economistestimated the annual costs of anti-money laundering
efforts in Europe and North America at US$5 billion in 2003, an increase from US$700 million in
2000.
[26]
Government-linked economists have noted the significant negative effects of money
laundering on economic development, including undermining domestic capital formation, depressing
growth, and diverting capital away from development.
[27]
Because of the intrinsic uncertainties of the
amount of money laundered, changes in the amount of money laundered, and the cost of anti-
money laundering systems, it is almost impossible to tell which anti-money laundering systems work
and which are more or less cost effective.
Besides economic costs to implement anti-money-laundering laws improper attention to data-
protection practices may entail disproportionate costs to individual privacy rights. In June 2011, the
data-protection advisory committee to the European Union, issued a report on data protection issues
related to the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, which identified numerous
transgressions against the established legal framework on privacy and data protection.
[28]
The report
made recommendations how to address money laundering and terrorist financing in ways that
safeguard personal privacy rights and data-protection laws.
[29]
In the United States, groups such as
the American Civil Liberties Union have expressed concern that money laundering rules require
banks to report on their own customers, essentially conscripting private businesses "into agents of
the surveillance state".
[30]

Many countries are obligated by various international instruments and standards, such as the
1988 United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances, the 2000 Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, the 2003 United Nations
Convention against Corruption, and the recommendations of the 1989 Financial Action Task Force
on Money Laundering to enact and enforce money laundering laws in an effort to stop narcotics
trafficking, international organised crime, and corruption. Mexico, which has faced a significant
increase in violent crime, established anti-money laundering controls in 2013 to curb the underlying
crime issue.
[31]

Global Organizations working against money laundering[edit]
Formed in 1989 by the G7 countries, the FATF is an intergovernmental body whose purpose is to
develop and promote an international response to combat money laundering. The FATF Secretariat
is housed at the headquarters of the OECD in Paris. In October 2001, FATF expanded its mission to
include combating the financing of terrorism. FATF is a policy-making body that brings together
legal, financial, and law enforcement experts to achieve national legislation and regulatory AML and
CFT reforms. As of 2014 its membership consists of 36 countries and territories and two regional
organizations. FATF works in collaboration with a number of international bodies and
organizations
[who?]
. These entities have observer status with FATF, which does not entitle them to
vote, but permits them full participation in plenary sessions and working groups.
[32]

FATF has developed 40 recommendations on money laundering and 9 special recommendations
regarding terrorist financing. FATF assesses each member country against these recommendations
in published reports. Countries seen as not being sufficiently compliant with such recommendations
are subjected to financial sanctions
[citation needed]
.
[33]

FATFs three primary functions with regard to money laundering are:
1. Monitoring members progress in implementing anti-money laundering measures.
2. Reviewing and reporting on laundering trends, techniques, and countermeasures.
3. Promoting the adoption and implementation of FATF anti-money laundering standards
globally.
Money laundering is the process whereby the proceeds of crime are transformed into ostensibly
legitimate money or other assets.
[1]
However in a number of legal and regulatory system the term
money laundering has become conflated with other forms of financial crime, and sometimes used
more generally to include misuse of the financial system, including terrorism financing, tax
evasion and evading ofinternational sanctions. Most anti-money laundering laws openly conflate
money laundering (which is concerned with source of funds) with terrorism financing (which is
concerned with destination of funds) when regulating the financial system.
[2]

Money obtained from certain crimes, such as extortion, insider trading, drug trafficking, illegal
gambling and tax evasion is "dirty". It needs to be cleaned to appear to have derived from non-
criminal activities so that banks and other financial institutions will deal with it without suspicion.
Originally, the term applied to real money but now money laundering applies to the proceeds of
crime that are laundered using a variety of monetary instruments including securities, digital
currencies such as bitcoin, credit cards, and traditional currency. Money can be laundered by many
methods, which vary in complexity and sophistication.
Different countries may or may not treat tax evasion or payments in breach of international
sanctions as money laundering. Some jurisdictions differentiate these for definition purposes, and
others do not. Some jurisdictions define money laundering as obfuscating sources of money, either
intentionally or by merely using financial systems or services that do not identify or track sources or
destinations.
Other jurisdictions define money laundering to include money from activity that would have been a
crime in that jurisdiction, even if it were legal where the actual conduct occurred. This broad brush of
applying the term "money laundering" to merely incidental, extraterritorial, or simply privacy-seeking
behaviors has led some to label it "financial thoughtcrime".
[3]

Many regulatory and governmental authorities issue estimates each year for the amount of money
laundered, either worldwide or within their national economy. In 1996, theInternational Monetary
Fund estimated that two to five percent of the worldwide global economy involved laundered money.
The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering(FATF), an intergovernmental body set up to
combat money laundering, stated, "Overall, it is absolutely impossible to produce a reliable estimate
of the amount of money laundered and therefore the FATF does not publish any figures in this
regard."
[4]
Academic commentators have likewise been unable to estimate the volume of money with
any degree of assurance.
[5]
Various estimates of the scale of global money laundering are
sometimes repeated often enough to make some people regard them as factualbut no researcher
has overcome the inherent difficulty of measuring an actively concealed practice.
Regardless of the difficulty in measurement, the amount of money laundered each year is in
the billions (US dollars) and poses a significant policy concern for governments.
[5]
As a result,
governments and international bodies have undertaken efforts to deter, prevent, and apprehend
money launderers. Financial institutions have likewise undertaken efforts to prevent and detect
transactions involving dirty money, both as a result of government requirements and to avoid the
reputational risk involved. Issues relating to money laundering have existed as long as there have
been large scale criminal enterprises. Modern anti-money laundering laws have developed along
with the modern War on Drugs.
[6]
In more recent times anti-money laundering legislation is seen as
adjunct to the financial crime of terrorist financing in that both crimes usually involve the transmission
of funds through the financial system (although money laundering relates to where the money has
come from, and terrorist financing relating to where the money is going to).
Reverse money laundering is a process that disguises a legitimate source of funds that are to be
used for illegal purposes.
[7]
In an affidavit filed March 24, 2014 in United States District Court,
Northern California, San Francisco Division, FBI special agent Emmanuel V. Pascau alleged that
several people associated with the Chee Kung Tong organization, and California State Senator
Leland Yee, engaged in reverse money laundering activities.
Contents
[hide]
1 Methods
2 Enforcement
o 2.1 Criminalizing money laundering
o 2.2 The role of financial institutions
o 2.3 Value of enforcement costs and associated privacy concerns
o 2.4 Global Organizations working against money laundering
3 Laws and enforcement by region
o 3.1 Afghanistan
o 3.2 Australia
o 3.3 Bangladesh
o 3.4 Canada
o 3.5 European Union
o 3.6 India
o 3.7 United Kingdom
3.7.1 Bureaux de change
o 3.8 United States
3.8.1 Preventive
3.8.2 Criminal sanctions
4 Electronic money
5 Notable cases
6 See also
7 References
8 External links
Methods[edit]
Money laundering is commonly defined as occurring in three steps: the first step involves introducing
cash into the financial system by some means ("placement"); the second involves carrying out
complex financial transactions to camouflage the illegal source ("layering"); and the final step entails
acquiring wealth generated from the transactions of the illicit funds ("integration"). Some of these
steps may be omitted, depending on the circumstances; for example, non-cash proceeds that are
already in the financial system would have no need for placement.
[5]

Money laundering takes several different forms, although most methods can be categorized into one
of a few types. These include "bank methods, smurfing [also known as structuring], currency
exchanges, and double-invoicing".
[8]

Structuring: Often known as smurfing, this is a method of placement whereby cash is broken into
smaller deposits of money, used to defeat suspicion of money laundering and to avoid anti-
money laundering reporting requirements. A sub-component of this is to use smaller amounts of
cash to purchase bearer instruments, such as money orders, and then ultimately deposit those,
again in small amounts.
[9]

Bulk cash smuggling: This involves physically smuggling cash to another jurisdiction and
depositing it in a financial institution, such as an offshore bank, with greater bank secrecy or less
rigorous money laundering enforcement.
[10]

Cash-intensive businesses: In this method, a business typically involved in receiving cash uses
its accounts to deposit both legitimate and criminally derived cash, claiming all of it as legitimate
earnings. Service businesses are best suited to this method, as such businesses have no
variable costs, and it is hard to detect discrepancies between revenues and costs. Examples are
parking buildings, strip clubs, tanning beds, and casinos.
Trade-based laundering: This involves under- or overvaluing invoices to disguise the movement
of money.
[11]

Shell companies and trusts: Trusts and shell companies disguise the true owner of money.
Trusts and corporate vehicles, depending on the jurisdiction, need not disclose their true,
beneficial, owner.
[12]

Round-tripping: Here, money is deposited in a controlled foreign corporation offshore, preferably
in a tax haven where minimal records are kept, and then shipped back as aforeign direct
investment, exempt from taxation. A variant on this is to transfer money to a law firm or similar
organization as funds on account of fees, then to cancel the retainer and, when the money is
remitted, represent the sums received from the lawyers as a legacy under a will or proceeds of
litigation.
Bank capture: In this case, money launderers or criminals buy a controlling interest in a bank,
preferably in a jurisdiction with weak money laundering controls, and then move money through
the bank without scrutiny.
Casinos: In this method, an individual walks into a casino with cash and buys chips, plays for a
while, and then cashes in the chips, taking payment in a check, or just getting a receipt, claiming
it as gambling winnings.
[10]

Other gambling: Money is spent on gambling, preferably on higher odds. The wins are shown if
the source for money is asked for, while the losses are hidden.
Real estate: Someone purchases real estate with illegal proceeds and then sells the property.
To outsiders, the proceeds from the sale look like legitimate income. Alternatively, the price of
the property is manipulated: the seller agrees to a contract that underrepresents the value of the
property, and receives criminal proceeds to make up the difference.
[12]

Black salaries: A company may have unregistered employees without a written contract and pay
them cash salaries. Dirty money might be used to pay them.
[13]

Tax amnesties: For example, those that legalize unreported assets in tax havens and cash
[14]

Fictional loans
A goal of money laundering is to be able to use the dirty money for private consumption. If
unable to use it openly, the traditional way to keep the dirty money near is hiding it as cash at
home or other places. A more modern method is a credit card connected to a tax haven bank.
Enforcement[edit]
Anti-money laundering (AML) is a term mainly used in the financial and legal industries to describe
the legal controls that require financial institutions and other regulated entities to prevent, detect, and
report money laundering activities. Anti-money laundering guidelines came into prominence globally
as a result of the formation of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the promulgation of an
international framework of anti-money laundering standards.
[15]
These standards began to have
more relevance in 2000 and 2001, after FATF began a process to publicly identify countries that
were deficient in their anti-money laundering laws and international cooperation, a process
colloquially known as "name and shame".
[16][17]

An effective AML program requires a jurisdiction to have criminalized money laundering, given the
relevant regulators and police the powers and tools to investigate; be able to share information with
other countries as appropriate; and require financial institutions to identify their customers, establish
risk-based controls, keep records, and report suspicious activities.
[18]

Criminalizing money laundering[edit]
The elements of the crime of money laundering are set forth in the United Nations Convention
Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and Convention against
Transnational Organized Crime. It is defined as knowingly engaging in a financial transaction with
the proceeds of a crime for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property
from governments.
The role of financial institutions[edit]
While banks operating in the same country generally have to follow the same AML laws and
regulations, financial institutions all structure their AML efforts slightly different.
[19]
Today, most
financial institutions globally, and many non-financial institutions, are required to identify and report
transactions of a suspicious nature to the financial intelligence unit in the respective country. For
example, a bank must verify a customer's identity and, if necessary, monitor transactions for
suspicious activity. This is often termed as "know your customer". This means knowing the identity of
the customer and understanding the kinds of transactions in which the customer is likely to engage.
By knowing one's customers, financial institutions can often identify unusual or suspicious behavior,
termed anomalies, which may be an indication of money laundering.
[20]

Bank employees, such as tellers and customer account representatives, are trained in anti-money
laundering and are instructed to report activities that they deem suspicious. Additionally, anti-money
laundering software filters customer data, classifies it according to level of suspicion, and inspects it
for anomalies. Such anomalies include any sudden and substantial increase in funds, a large
withdrawal, or moving money to a bank secrecy jurisdiction. Smaller transactions that meet certain
criteria may also be flagged as suspicious. For example, structuring can lead to flagged transactions.
The software also flags names on government "blacklists" and transactions that involve countries
hostile to the host nation. Once the software has mined data and flagged suspect transactions, it
alerts bank management, who must then determine whether to file a report with the government.
Value of enforcement costs and associated privacy concerns[edit]
The financial services industry has become more vocal about the rising costs of anti-money
laundering regulation and the limited benefits that they claim it brings.
[21]
One commentator wrote
that "[w]ithout facts, [anti-money laundering] legislation has been driven on rhetoric, driving by ill-
guided activism responding to the need to be "seen to be doing something" rather than by an
objective understanding of its effects on predicate crime. The social panic approach is justified by
the language usedwe talk of the battle against terrorism or the war on drugs".
[22]
The
Economist magazine has become increasingly vocal in its criticism of such regulation, particularly
with reference to countering terrorist financing, referring to it as a "costly failure", although it
concedes that other efforts (like reducing identity and credit card fraud) may still be effective at
combating money laundering.
[23]

There is no precise measurement of the costs of regulation balanced against the harms associated
with money laundering,
[24]
and given the evaluation problems involved in assessing such an issue, it
is unlikely that the effectiveness of terror finance and money laundering laws could be determined
with any degree of accuracy.
[25]
The Economistestimated the annual costs of anti-money laundering
efforts in Europe and North America at US$5 billion in 2003, an increase from US$700 million in
2000.
[26]
Government-linked economists have noted the significant negative effects of money
laundering on economic development, including undermining domestic capital formation, depressing
growth, and diverting capital away from development.
[27]
Because of the intrinsic uncertainties of the
amount of money laundered, changes in the amount of money laundered, and the cost of anti-
money laundering systems, it is almost impossible to tell which anti-money laundering systems work
and which are more or less cost effective.
Besides economic costs to implement anti-money-laundering laws improper attention to data-
protection practices may entail disproportionate costs to individual privacy rights. In June 2011, the
data-protection advisory committee to the European Union, issued a report on data protection issues
related to the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, which identified numerous
transgressions against the established legal framework on privacy and data protection.
[28]
The report
made recommendations how to address money laundering and terrorist financing in ways that
safeguard personal privacy rights and data-protection laws.
[29]
In the United States, groups such as
the American Civil Liberties Union have expressed concern that money laundering rules require
banks to report on their own customers, essentially conscripting private businesses "into agents of
the surveillance state".
[30]

Many countries are obligated by various international instruments and standards, such as the
1988 United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances, the 2000 Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, the 2003 United Nations
Convention against Corruption, and the recommendations of the 1989 Financial Action Task Force
on Money Laundering to enact and enforce money laundering laws in an effort to stop narcotics
trafficking, international organised crime, and corruption. Mexico, which has faced a significant
increase in violent crime, established anti-money laundering controls in 2013 to curb the underlying
crime issue.
[31]

Global Organizations working against money laundering[edit]
Formed in 1989 by the G7 countries, the FATF is an intergovernmental body whose purpose is to
develop and promote an international response to combat money laundering. The FATF Secretariat
is housed at the headquarters of the OECD in Paris. In October 2001, FATF expanded its mission to
include combating the financing of terrorism. FATF is a policy-making body that brings together
legal, financial, and law enforcement experts to achieve national legislation and regulatory AML and
CFT reforms. As of 2014 its membership consists of 36 countries and territories and two regional
organizations. FATF works in collaboration with a number of international bodies and
organizations
[who?]
. These entities have observer status with FATF, which does not entitle them to
vote, but permits them full participation in plenary sessions and working groups.
[32]

FATF has developed 40 recommendations on money laundering and 9 special recommendations
regarding terrorist financing. FATF assesses each member country against these recommendations
in published reports. Countries seen as not being sufficiently compliant with such recommendations
are subjected to financial sanctions
[citation needed]
.
[33]

FATFs three primary functions with regard to money laundering are:
1. Monitoring members progress in implementing anti-money laundering measures.
2. Reviewing and reporting on laundering trends, techniques, and countermeasures.
3. Promoting the adoption and implementation of FATF anti-money laundering standards
globally.
Money laundering is the process whereby the proceeds of crime are transformed into ostensibly
legitimate money or other assets.
[1]
However in a number of legal and regulatory system the term
money laundering has become conflated with other forms of financial crime, and sometimes used
more generally to include misuse of the financial system, including terrorism financing, tax
evasion and evading ofinternational sanctions. Most anti-money laundering laws openly conflate
money laundering (which is concerned with source of funds) with terrorism financing (which is
concerned with destination of funds) when regulating the financial system.
[2]

Money obtained from certain crimes, such as extortion, insider trading, drug trafficking, illegal
gambling and tax evasion is "dirty". It needs to be cleaned to appear to have derived from non-
criminal activities so that banks and other financial institutions will deal with it without suspicion.
Originally, the term applied to real money but now money laundering applies to the proceeds of
crime that are laundered using a variety of monetary instruments including securities, digital
currencies such as bitcoin, credit cards, and traditional currency. Money can be laundered by many
methods, which vary in complexity and sophistication.
Different countries may or may not treat tax evasion or payments in breach of international
sanctions as money laundering. Some jurisdictions differentiate these for definition purposes, and
others do not. Some jurisdictions define money laundering as obfuscating sources of money, either
intentionally or by merely using financial systems or services that do not identify or track sources or
destinations.
Other jurisdictions define money laundering to include money from activity that would have been a
crime in that jurisdiction, even if it were legal where the actual conduct occurred. This broad brush of
applying the term "money laundering" to merely incidental, extraterritorial, or simply privacy-seeking
behaviors has led some to label it "financial thoughtcrime".
[3]

Many regulatory and governmental authorities issue estimates each year for the amount of money
laundered, either worldwide or within their national economy. In 1996, theInternational Monetary
Fund estimated that two to five percent of the worldwide global economy involved laundered money.
The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering(FATF), an intergovernmental body set up to
combat money laundering, stated, "Overall, it is absolutely impossible to produce a reliable estimate
of the amount of money laundered and therefore the FATF does not publish any figures in this
regard."
[4]
Academic commentators have likewise been unable to estimate the volume of money with
any degree of assurance.
[5]
Various estimates of the scale of global money laundering are
sometimes repeated often enough to make some people regard them as factualbut no researcher
has overcome the inherent difficulty of measuring an actively concealed practice.
Regardless of the difficulty in measurement, the amount of money laundered each year is in
the billions (US dollars) and poses a significant policy concern for governments.
[5]
As a result,
governments and international bodies have undertaken efforts to deter, prevent, and apprehend
money launderers. Financial institutions have likewise undertaken efforts to prevent and detect
transactions involving dirty money, both as a result of government requirements and to avoid the
reputational risk involved. Issues relating to money laundering have existed as long as there have
been large scale criminal enterprises. Modern anti-money laundering laws have developed along
with the modern War on Drugs.
[6]
In more recent times anti-money laundering legislation is seen as
adjunct to the financial crime of terrorist financing in that both crimes usually involve the transmission
of funds through the financial system (although money laundering relates to where the money has
come from, and terrorist financing relating to where the money is going to).
Reverse money laundering is a process that disguises a legitimate source of funds that are to be
used for illegal purposes.
[7]
In an affidavit filed March 24, 2014 in United States District Court,
Northern California, San Francisco Division, FBI special agent Emmanuel V. Pascau alleged that
several people associated with the Chee Kung Tong organization, and California State Senator
Leland Yee, engaged in reverse money laundering activities.
Contents
[hide]
1 Methods
2 Enforcement
o 2.1 Criminalizing money laundering
o 2.2 The role of financial institutions
o 2.3 Value of enforcement costs and associated privacy concerns
o 2.4 Global Organizations working against money laundering
3 Laws and enforcement by region
o 3.1 Afghanistan
o 3.2 Australia
o 3.3 Bangladesh
o 3.4 Canada
o 3.5 European Union
o 3.6 India
o 3.7 United Kingdom
3.7.1 Bureaux de change
o 3.8 United States
3.8.1 Preventive
3.8.2 Criminal sanctions
4 Electronic money
5 Notable cases
6 See also
7 References
8 External links
Methods[edit]
Money laundering is commonly defined as occurring in three steps: the first step involves introducing
cash into the financial system by some means ("placement"); the second involves carrying out
complex financial transactions to camouflage the illegal source ("layering"); and the final step entails
acquiring wealth generated from the transactions of the illicit funds ("integration"). Some of these
steps may be omitted, depending on the circumstances; for example, non-cash proceeds that are
already in the financial system would have no need for placement.
[5]

Money laundering takes several different forms, although most methods can be categorized into one
of a few types. These include "bank methods, smurfing [also known as structuring], currency
exchanges, and double-invoicing".
[8]

Structuring: Often known as smurfing, this is a method of placement whereby cash is broken into
smaller deposits of money, used to defeat suspicion of money laundering and to avoid anti-
money laundering reporting requirements. A sub-component of this is to use smaller amounts of
cash to purchase bearer instruments, such as money orders, and then ultimately deposit those,
again in small amounts.
[9]

Bulk cash smuggling: This involves physically smuggling cash to another jurisdiction and
depositing it in a financial institution, such as an offshore bank, with greater bank secrecy or less
rigorous money laundering enforcement.
[10]

Cash-intensive businesses: In this method, a business typically involved in receiving cash uses
its accounts to deposit both legitimate and criminally derived cash, claiming all of it as legitimate
earnings. Service businesses are best suited to this method, as such businesses have no
variable costs, and it is hard to detect discrepancies between revenues and costs. Examples are
parking buildings, strip clubs, tanning beds, and casinos.
Trade-based laundering: This involves under- or overvaluing invoices to disguise the movement
of money.
[11]

Shell companies and trusts: Trusts and shell companies disguise the true owner of money.
Trusts and corporate vehicles, depending on the jurisdiction, need not disclose their true,
beneficial, owner.
[12]

Round-tripping: Here, money is deposited in a controlled foreign corporation offshore, preferably
in a tax haven where minimal records are kept, and then shipped back as aforeign direct
investment, exempt from taxation. A variant on this is to transfer money to a law firm or similar
organization as funds on account of fees, then to cancel the retainer and, when the money is
remitted, represent the sums received from the lawyers as a legacy under a will or proceeds of
litigation.
Bank capture: In this case, money launderers or criminals buy a controlling interest in a bank,
preferably in a jurisdiction with weak money laundering controls, and then move money through
the bank without scrutiny.
Casinos: In this method, an individual walks into a casino with cash and buys chips, plays for a
while, and then cashes in the chips, taking payment in a check, or just getting a receipt, claiming
it as gambling winnings.
[10]

Other gambling: Money is spent on gambling, preferably on higher odds. The wins are shown if
the source for money is asked for, while the losses are hidden.
Real estate: Someone purchases real estate with illegal proceeds and then sells the property.
To outsiders, the proceeds from the sale look like legitimate income. Alternatively, the price of
the property is manipulated: the seller agrees to a contract that underrepresents the value of the
property, and receives criminal proceeds to make up the difference.
[12]

Black salaries: A company may have unregistered employees without a written contract and pay
them cash salaries. Dirty money might be used to pay them.
[13]

Tax amnesties: For example, those that legalize unreported assets in tax havens and cash
[14]

Fictional loans
A goal of money laundering is to be able to use the dirty money for private consumption. If
unable to use it openly, the traditional way to keep the dirty money near is hiding it as cash at
home or other places. A more modern method is a credit card connected to a tax haven bank.
Enforcement[edit]
Anti-money laundering (AML) is a term mainly used in the financial and legal industries to describe
the legal controls that require financial institutions and other regulated entities to prevent, detect, and
report money laundering activities. Anti-money laundering guidelines came into prominence globally
as a result of the formation of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the promulgation of an
international framework of anti-money laundering standards.
[15]
These standards began to have
more relevance in 2000 and 2001, after FATF began a process to publicly identify countries that
were deficient in their anti-money laundering laws and international cooperation, a process
colloquially known as "name and shame".
[16][17]

An effective AML program requires a jurisdiction to have criminalized money laundering, given the
relevant regulators and police the powers and tools to investigate; be able to share information with
other countries as appropriate; and require financial institutions to identify their customers, establish
risk-based controls, keep records, and report suspicious activities.
[18]

Criminalizing money laundering[edit]
The elements of the crime of money laundering are set forth in the United Nations Convention
Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and Convention against
Transnational Organized Crime. It is defined as knowingly engaging in a financial transaction with
the proceeds of a crime for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property
from governments.
The role of financial institutions[edit]
While banks operating in the same country generally have to follow the same AML laws and
regulations, financial institutions all structure their AML efforts slightly different.
[19]
Today, most
financial institutions globally, and many non-financial institutions, are required to identify and report
transactions of a suspicious nature to the financial intelligence unit in the respective country. For
example, a bank must verify a customer's identity and, if necessary, monitor transactions for
suspicious activity. This is often termed as "know your customer". This means knowing the identity of
the customer and understanding the kinds of transactions in which the customer is likely to engage.
By knowing one's customers, financial institutions can often identify unusual or suspicious behavior,
termed anomalies, which may be an indication of money laundering.
[20]

Bank employees, such as tellers and customer account representatives, are trained in anti-money
laundering and are instructed to report activities that they deem suspicious. Additionally, anti-money
laundering software filters customer data, classifies it according to level of suspicion, and inspects it
for anomalies. Such anomalies include any sudden and substantial increase in funds, a large
withdrawal, or moving money to a bank secrecy jurisdiction. Smaller transactions that meet certain
criteria may also be flagged as suspicious. For example, structuring can lead to flagged transactions.
The software also flags names on government "blacklists" and transactions that involve countries
hostile to the host nation. Once the software has mined data and flagged suspect transactions, it
alerts bank management, who must then determine whether to file a report with the government.
Value of enforcement costs and associated privacy concerns[edit]
The financial services industry has become more vocal about the rising costs of anti-money
laundering regulation and the limited benefits that they claim it brings.
[21]
One commentator wrote
that "[w]ithout facts, [anti-money laundering] legislation has been driven on rhetoric, driving by ill-
guided activism responding to the need to be "seen to be doing something" rather than by an
objective understanding of its effects on predicate crime. The social panic approach is justified by
the language usedwe talk of the battle against terrorism or the war on drugs".
[22]
The
Economist magazine has become increasingly vocal in its criticism of such regulation, particularly
with reference to countering terrorist financing, referring to it as a "costly failure", although it
concedes that other efforts (like reducing identity and credit card fraud) may still be effective at
combating money laundering.
[23]

There is no precise measurement of the costs of regulation balanced against the harms associated
with money laundering,
[24]
and given the evaluation problems involved in assessing such an issue, it
is unlikely that the effectiveness of terror finance and money laundering laws could be determined
with any degree of accuracy.
[25]
The Economistestimated the annual costs of anti-money laundering
efforts in Europe and North America at US$5 billion in 2003, an increase from US$700 million in
2000.
[26]
Government-linked economists have noted the significant negative effects of money
laundering on economic development, including undermining domestic capital formation, depressing
growth, and diverting capital away from development.
[27]
Because of the intrinsic uncertainties of the
amount of money laundered, changes in the amount of money laundered, and the cost of anti-
money laundering systems, it is almost impossible to tell which anti-money laundering systems work
and which are more or less cost effective.
Besides economic costs to implement anti-money-laundering laws improper attention to data-
protection practices may entail disproportionate costs to individual privacy rights. In June 2011, the
data-protection advisory committee to the European Union, issued a report on data protection issues
related to the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, which identified numerous
transgressions against the established legal framework on privacy and data protection.
[28]
The report
made recommendations how to address money laundering and terrorist financing in ways that
safeguard personal privacy rights and data-protection laws.
[29]
In the United States, groups such as
the American Civil Liberties Union have expressed concern that money laundering rules require
banks to report on their own customers, essentially conscripting private businesses "into agents of
the surveillance state".
[30]

Many countries are obligated by various international instruments and standards, such as the
1988 United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances, the 2000 Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, the 2003 United Nations
Convention against Corruption, and the recommendations of the 1989 Financial Action Task Force
on Money Laundering to enact and enforce money laundering laws in an effort to stop narcotics
trafficking, international organised crime, and corruption. Mexico, which has faced a significant
increase in violent crime, established anti-money laundering controls in 2013 to curb the underlying
crime issue.
[31]

Global Organizations working against money laundering[edit]
Formed in 1989 by the G7 countries, the FATF is an intergovernmental body whose purpose is to
develop and promote an international response to combat money laundering. The FATF Secretariat
is housed at the headquarters of the OECD in Paris. In October 2001, FATF expanded its mission to
include combating the financing of terrorism. FATF is a policy-making body that brings together
legal, financial, and law enforcement experts to achieve national legislation and regulatory AML and
CFT reforms. As of 2014 its membership consists of 36 countries and territories and two regional
organizations. FATF works in collaboration with a number of international bodies and
organizations
[who?]
. These entities have observer status with FATF, which does not entitle them to
vote, but permits them full participation in plenary sessions and working groups.
[32]

FATF has developed 40 recommendations on money laundering and 9 special recommendations
regarding terrorist financing. FATF assesses each member country against these recommendations
in published reports. Countries seen as not being sufficiently compliant with such recommendations
are subjected to financial sanctions
[citation needed]
.
[33]

FATFs three primary functions with regard to money laundering are:
1. Monitoring members progress in implementing anti-money laundering measures.
2. Reviewing and reporting on laundering trends, techniques, and countermeasures.
3. Promoting the adoption and implementation of FATF anti-money laundering standards
globally.