Scribd
Upload
1K views2 pages

Structural Masonry Designers Manual PDF

Lateral loads with masonry structures

Uploaded by

Madusha Tissera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views2 pages

Structural Masonry Designers Manual PDF

Lateral loads with masonry structures

Uploaded by

Madusha Tissera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
140 _ Structural Masonry Designers’ Manual gotval 400 ote enon Hey evs) log faction sles ai Figure 10.24 Bearing detail -solid wall Stage: Calculate Design Strength of Wall (@) Determine 075X751 og a Slenderness ratio= Eccentricity ofload =0.167t, therefore, by intrpolation from, BS 5628, Table7, )=0.333 (see Table 5.14 and Figure 1024) () Partial safety factor fy =25, (©) Characteristicstrength required, fy foe i 474592510 D383 21Sx IF =1657 N/mm? Stage 4: From BS 5628, Table 2(a) (see Table5.4) Use bricks with a compressive strength of 57.14 N/m? set ina designation () mortar. ‘The difference in the strength requirements for virtually the same quantity of materials shows the value of the diaphragm wall for such an application. The additional workmanship must, of course be set against the material saving for the diaphragm wall in order to relate the com- parative economies ofthe two solutions. In both solutions it has been assumed thatthe stability of the platform is pro- vided by other elements not considered inthis design 10.9 Concentrated Loads ‘Concentrated loads, such as occur at beam bearings and the like, ae analysed using increased characteristic com- pressive strengths, f,, from those shown in Table 2() of S 5628 (sce Table 5.4). The amount by which fis allowed to increase is governed by the type of bearing, and three bearing types are illustrated in BS 5628, Figure , for guid ance. Two main considerations dictate the bearing type stress increase, boing {@) The location of the concentrated load relative to the end cof the wall in which the load's capacity to disperse in both directionsis considered, — vo = Ste se eee, yo Se s, aan ‘beeen Point load W: Chen Figure 10.25. Dimensions for Example 14 () The length of bearing of the beam onto the wall in which the possibility of spalling due to insufficient bearing length is considered. The eccentricity of load produced in this bearing type should be considered separately in the assessment of the capacity reduction factor forthe wall asa whole. Esmple 14: Design of Wall with Ben Bearing Consider Example 9 and investigate the effect of the 1 beam bearing onto the external gable wall, The beam bear- ing details shown in Figure 1025 and theloadingsetc., are tobe taken as for Example 1 Stage 1: Calculate Design Loads on Wall UDL, (characteristic dead load G, from inner leaf only not influenced by load from beam reaction) Hal-brick wall=01025% 18x84 =1550kN/m Designload =x G,=14%155=21.70kN/m Point load W: rom Example 1, the design load per metre length of the spine wall = 271.5 KN/m. The first brick column is spaced 3.0 m away from the gable wall and, therefore, the beam reaction atthe bearing onto the gable wall Stage2 The wall thickness will be assumed to be already estab- lished as a 300 mm thick cavity comprising two halt-brick leaves with a 100/mm cavity Stage 3: Design Strength Required Consideration of beam bearings requires two design checks: {@) Thelocal effect immediately beneath the bearing area, (©) The overall effect on the wall taking account of what- lever other loads arealready inthe wall The recommended procedure is to design the later con- dition initially to establish the minimum brick and mortar strengths required, and then to proceed to check the local Design of Masonry Elements (1): Vertically Loaded 141, uot, aa . Aiba dese st ete Z 4000 45) Figure 1026 Spreading effect of bearing for Example 14 condition, including a concrete spreader or padstone beneath the beam bearing if found necessary. The intro- luction of such a spreader is likely to be more economical than increasing the brick and mortar strength of the whole wall, Figure 10.26 shows the spread effect of the bearing load UDL, from wall over: LUDL, is spread of load at 45° through brickwork and is additive to UDL, at 0th forslenderness considerations. Design load at 0rlevel: UDL, (as calculated) =21.70 However itis necessary to add the depth of wall below the bearing, ie. (05+ 1.6) x14 x01025%18=5.42 KN/m UDL; revised to 21.704542= 27.12 KN/m 75 up, = 478 Ma 36t Total design load (@) Determine f: Slenderess ratio, R= 2 075% 4.35.10" ‘Taxes =2387 Eccentricity of lad: The oad from the wall ever (UDL,) can be taken as applied on the centre ine of the inner leaf inthe lower storey. The beam will be assumed to be sensibly rigid ‘with minimum rotation at the bearing. The application of this load will therefore also be on the centre line of the inner leaf, ¢,=0. ‘Therefore, from BS 5528, Table7, B=0.536 (ee Table'.15) () Partial safety factor y, =2.5, asbefore, (© Calculate characteristic strength required, fi can Nps 1392510" TaBox TORS TISRTP =35N/mm? ‘Stage 4:By Interpolation Select Brick/Mortar Strength: {for Wall from BS 5628, Table 2a) (see Table 5.4) Use bricks with a compressive strength of 20 N/mun? setin a designation (i) mortar. Now design the beam bearing using the strength of brick and mortar, introducinga spreader, if roquired, beneath the ‘beam. The calculation will therefore assess the minimum ‘width of bearing area required, The beam or spreader will take full bearing onto the wall width and is a considerable distance from the ends of the wall By inspection, the detail ‘an be classed as a bearing type 2 from BS 5628, Figure 4 (sce Figure 548). The local design strength can be taken as 15h w HE andisoguato where W= bearing load + (UDL, x width of beamat bearing) ‘b= width of bearing area ‘Therefore (407.25 + 21.70.3925 TSx 58 x15 16m ‘This is greater than 4! = 410 m given in BS 5628, Figure 4, for bearing type 2 and is therefore not acceptable (see Figure 548), ‘The simplest solution isto introduce a brick pier for the bearing width required. Hence, try a 215 mm thick x 750 ‘mm long pier. The introduction ofthe pier will obviously strengthen the wall, so faras the intial par of the design is concerned, however, the same brick and mortar strength ‘willbe checked (see Figure 10.27) (407.25 + 21.7 x03) x25 x10? TT Exsaxas Width of bearing, ‘Area required, A=553mm (40.215 =0.86>0.553 m) Use 215750 long brick pier with 215% 750. 225 deep con- rete padstone beneath the beam bearing. 40) enol 500 concrete 2s, spreager 790 5k beck pier Figure 10.27 Pier dimensions for Example 14

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy