HF Alkylation and NExOCTANE Tech For Gasoline Production
HF Alkylation and NExOCTANE Tech For Gasoline Production
Table of Contents
1. Abstract...1
1.1. Objectives
2. Gasoline Market Assessment.2
2.1. Gasoline Price Volatility and Elasticity of Demand for Gasoline
3. Literature Survey..5
3.1. HF composition for Alkylation
3.2. Evolution of a More Reliable Gasket for HF Alkylation Units
3.3. New process analysis tool for HF alkylation
3.4. Block Flow Diagram for HF Alkylation
3.5. Solid Acid Catalyst Alkylation Technology
4. Introduction to Alkylation.7
4.1. Alkylation Reaction
4.1.1. Alkylation using Sulphuric Acid as a Catalyst
4.1.2. Alkylation using Hydrofluoric Acid as a Catalyst
5. HF Alkylation.8
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Background
5.3. Significance
5.4. Process Chemistry
5.5. Alkylation Feed Stocks
5.6. Process Description.13
5.7. Process Variables
5.8. Alkylation Products
6. NExOCTANE Technology for Isooctane Production.18
6.1. Introduction to MTBE
6.2. Introduction to NExOCTANE
6.3. Process Chemistry
6.4. Cost-Effective Technology
6.5. NExOCTANE Process Description21
7. Environmental Considerations..22
7.1. Effluent Treatment
7.2. Effluent Gases
7.3. Liquid Effluents
7.4. Solid Effluents
8. Safety Issues in Alkylation Units...24
9. Modifications & Recommendations..24
9.1. Aerosol Potential
9.2. Mitigation
9.3. HF Modifiers
Page i
Page ii
Page iii
1. Abstract:
In todays world, the demand of gasoline is increasing day by day due to increase in
the number of auto-mobiles on the roads. The gasoline obtained by the crude
distillation is not enough to meet the current worldwide demand. So there is a need of
a method so that the less useful products of crude distillation can be converted to
gasoline in the refinery. Keeping in view the worlds gasoline demand alkylation
process units were primarily introduced by UOP and Philips. The alkylation
process uses the almost worthless olefins as raw materials from FCC (fluid
catalytic cracking) units in the refinery and converts them into the much more
useful and valuable products like gasoline and LPG.
The emergence of catalytic reforming techniques gave a vital tool for the production of
high-quality gasoline but the motor fuel produced in these operations is mainly aromatic
based and is characterized by its high sensitivity. The production of low sensitivity
gasoline components was required. A consequence of all these requirements was the
expansion of these alkylation operations.
Furthermore, the phase-out of MTBE (Methyl-ter-butyl-ether) which is used as an antiknock agent and oxygenate in gasoline (due to water pollution) has rendered the
already existing MTBE processing units useless. Hence, a suitable process is required
that can replace the MTBE and can give high octane number products. Isooctane has
been recognized essentially as a cost-effective alternative to MTBE [7]. It utilizes
same isobutylene feed that was used in MTBE production and it offers excellent
blending value and production of isooctane can be obtained in a low-cost renovation of
an existing plant of MTBE.
The NExOCTANE technology was developed for the isooctane production. This
technology is cost effective and also replaces MTBE effectively. NExOCTANE process
can be combined with HF Alkylation process to produce high quality gasoline which is
free from MTBE.
1.1 Objective:
The aim of this report is to combine the Alkylation process and NExOCTANE
technology to produce high octane gasoline which is free from environment threatening
MTBE and is also cost-effective. Both Alkylation and NExOCTANE processes are
explained in detail in this report along with modifications which would enhance the
safety of the Alkylation process.
Page 1
Source: Ref 2
Page 2
Source: Ref 2
Source: Ref 2
Page 3
Source: Ref 2
Source: Ref 2
Page 4
3. Literature Survey:
Page 5
Neste Oil, Lummus Technology and Albemarle Catalysts have established and
demonstrated an alkylation technology that is now being offered for license. AlkyClean
process employs robust zeolite catalyst formulation that is coupled with a novel reactor
processing system to yield a product of high quality alkylates.
Total installation cost of the facility is appreciably lower than the current liquid-acid
processes. With no presence of chlorides or liquid acids in the system, no treatment of
product or disposal of chlorides or acids is required. Lack of corrosive acids in system
and mild operating conditions allow for the carbon steel construction of the equipments.
TABLE 3.1: Features of Solid Acid Catalyst Alkylation Technology
Process Features
Process benefits
Robust, true-solid-acid
Eliminates corrosive liquid acid use and associated safety
catalyst
concerns.
Tolerant to feedstock impurities, changes in feedstockolefin
composition, and process upsets (e.g., water spikes)
Removes safety risks
associated with
liquid acids
Page 6
4. Introduction to Alkylation:
In petroleum refining industry the term alkylation is used for the reaction of an
isoparaffin with lower molecular weight olefins to produce higher molecular weight
isoparaffins [5].
The alkylation process that is of commercial importance involves low temperature for
alkylation performed in the presence of hydrofluoric acid or either sulphuric acid.
4.1 Alkylation Reaction:
In the process of alkylation by using sulphuric acid or hydrofluoric acid as catalysts
olefins react with only isoparaffines such as isopentane or isobutane (having tertiary
carbon atoms).Commercially only isobutane is used because isopentane has high
octane number and its vapor pressure is low.
The two processes used for alkyation are:
1. Alkylation using Sulphuric Acid as a catalyst
2. Alkylation using Hydroflouric Acid as a catalyst
4.1.1 Alkylation using Sulphuric Acid as a Catalyst:
This process does not require additional equipment as needed in the case of
hydrofluoric acid process for the recovery and neutralization of the hydrofluoric acid
in different streams.
Drying is advantageous but not necessary in sulphuric acid process. Free water
that drops out of the chilled feed is removed by only feed coalesces.
Safety and maintenance cost is less in comparison to hydrofluoric acid process.
Self-alkylation occurs at lesser extent in this process.
Less harmful for the environment.
Less capital and total operating costs in comparison to sulphuric acid process.
Instead of refrigeration cooling water can be used.
For emulsions smaller settling devices are required.
Reactor designs are smaller and feasible.
Hydrofluoric acid is completely regenerated.
Disposal of spent acid is not necessarily required.
Less turbulence and agitation is required.
Operation is more flexible relative to external ratio of isobutene to olefin,
temperature, etc.
Page 7
5. HF Alkylation
5.1 Introduction:
HF Alkylation process for the production of motor fuel catalytically combines isobutane
with light olefins, which are the mixtures of butylenes and propylenes to form a
branched-chain paraffinic fuel. The alkylation reaction is carried out in the presence of
Hydrofluoric acid under specific conditions which are selected to maximize yield and
quality of alkylate. The alkylate product has excellent antiknocking properties and has
high-octane because of high percentage of highly branched paraffins. Alkylate is a low
sulphur, clean-burning, low RVP gasoline blending component and it does not have
aromatic or compounds.
5.2 Background:
In the mid of 1950s, the development and acceptance of more-sophisticated and highperformance automotive engines placed a stress on the petroleum refiner in order to
increase both gasoline production and to improve the quality of motor fuel. The
emergence of catalytic reforming techniques gave a vital tool for the production of highquality gasoline [7]. However, the motor fuel which is produced in these operations is
mainly aromatic based and is characterized by its high sensitivity (that is, the spread
between motor and research octane number). Due to the fact that automobile
performance is more closely and completely related to road, rating of octane
(approximately the average of motor and research octanes), the production of low
sensitivity gasoline components was required. A consequence of all these requirements
was the expansion of these alkylation operations. Refiners started broadening the olefin
feeds range to both new and existing alkylation units to involve propylene and
occasionally butylenes as well as amylenes. In the beginning of 1960s, the HF
Alkylation process had virtually replaced motor fuel polymerization units for the new
installations of plants.
HF Alkylation process has got more importance in the refining situation of the 2000s. Its
importance is further increased due to the phase-out of MTBE and the increased
emphasis on the low-sulfur gasoline. The alkylation process is critically important in the
quality motor fuels production including many environmental gasoline blends. The
process facilitates refiners with a handy tool of unmatched economy and good
efficiency, one that will help refiners in strengthening and maintaining their position and
status in the gasoline production and marketing.
5.3 Significance:
The HF alkylation process is of vital importance to the present day. It plays a very
important role in production one of the most essential feeds to the final gasoline blend.
Page 8
With the increase in number of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units used in refineries its
significance has increased [23].
The FCC is used to add value to the heavy products produced in crude distillation. In
FCC heavy feeds are catalytically cracked into lighter products such as FCC gasoline
and light cycle oil, which can either be used after hydrotreating or directly in final
gasoline blending operations. The drawback of this FFC is that light olefins, like butene
and propene, are produced in FCC operations. These are products basically worthless
as feedstock. In the same way, in any crude distillation a large amount of light end
products like butane can be produced that has very limited use. Normal-butane can
easily be transformed into iso-butane, and in iso-butane form it can joins the C 3 or C 4
olefins (butene or propene) produced by FCC as the joint feeds to the HF alkylation
process [23].
The HF alkylation performs the critical role of improvement of these byproducts to highvalue product (alkylate), which is then used as a component of gasoline blending. This
task of utilizing the C 4 olefins produced from the FCC and the C 4 iso-alkanes produced
from the distillation of crude oil and changing them, through the process of catalytic HF
alkylation (an altered Friedel-Crafts reaction), into iso-octanes, continues to has major
importance in refining of petroleum.
5.4 Process Chemistry:
General:
In this process of HF Alkylation, HF acid is the catalyst that stimulates the isoparaffinolefin reaction. In this process, olefins react with only isoparaffins having tertiary carbon
atoms, such as isopentane or isobutane. In practice, only isobutane is used due of the
fact that isopentane has a high octane number and it also has a vapor pressure that has
historically permitted it to be blended directly into the finished gasolines. However,
where the environmental regulations have reduced the allowed gasoline vapor
pressure, isopentane is being removed from the gasoline, and refiner concern in
alkylation of this material with light olefins, particularly propylene, is increasing.
The real reactions occuring in the alkylation reactor are several and are comparatively
complex. In practice, the main product from a single olefin contains only a fraction of
alkylate because of the number of concurrent reactions that are probable in the
alkylation environment.
Reaction Mechanism:
Alkylation is one of the definitive examples of a reaction or reactions continuing via
carbenium ion mechanism. These reactions comprises of an initiation step followed by a
propagation step and may comprise of an isomerization step. In addition, polymerization
step and cracking steps may also be involved. Though, these side reactions are
commonly not desirable. HF alkylation primary reactions are shown in Fig 5.4.1.
Page 9
Initiation: The initiation step produces the tertiary butyl cations that will then carry on
the alkylation reaction. This step is shown in Fig 5.4.2.
Propagation: Propagation reactions include the tertiary butyl cation reacting with olefin
to form larger carbenium ion, which then extracts a hydride from the molecule of
isobutane. The hydride extraction produces the isoparaffin along with a new tertiary
butyl cation for carrying on the reaction chain. This step is shown in Fig 5.4.3.
Page 11
Hydrogen Transfer: The hydrogen transfer reaction is most noticeable with propylene
feed. This reaction initiates via the carbenium ion mechanism. In the first reaction
isobutane reacts with propylene to produce propane and butylene. After that the
butylene is alkylated with isobutane to produce trimethylpentane. From octanes view
point, this reaction can be a desirable one because trimethylpentane has considerably
higher octane than the dimethylpentane usually formed from propylene. Though, two
molecules of isobutane are needed for each alkylate molecule, so from economics point
of view this reaction may be undesirable.
Page 13
Iso-butane and oelifins are used feedstocks in the alkylation unit. The sources of olefins
mainly are coking operations and catalytic cracking. Propene and butenes are the most
commonly used olefins, but pentenes (amylenes) are also used in some units. Some
refineries also use pentenes feed to decrease the vapor pressure of FCC (fluid catalytic
cracking) gasoline and as the result the bromine number in the final blend of gasoline is
reduced. Alkylation of pentenes is also used to decrease the C 5 olefin content of final
gasoline blend and it also decreases the effect of C 5 olefin on ozone depletion and
causes less visual pollution in the environment.
Dehydrogenation of paraffins can yield olefins and isobutane provided to alkylation feed
unit is produced by commercial cracking of heavy paraffins. Catalytic crackers and
hydrocrackers produce a large amount of the isobutene that is provided in alkylation unit
but it can also be obtained from crude distillation, natural gas processing, and catalytic
reformers. Normal butane can be isomerized in some cases to provide additional
isobutane to the feed of alkylation unit.
TABLE 5.5.1: Compositions of Alkylate from Pure-Olefin Feed stocks
Source: Ref 7
Page 14
LEGEND
R= Reactor
S1 & S2= Settlers
I= Isostripper
AR= Acid Regenerator
HS= HF Stripper
AT= Aluminia Treater
KT= KOH Treater
LEGEND
= Rector Section
= Dimerization Section
= Distillation Section
= Hydrogenation Section
= Neutralization Section
iC4 to Akylation
iC4
Raffinate
Unreacted iC4
ADR
S2
Dried iC4
Makeup
PR
Dried Saturate
C4's
HF Acid
iC4
Recycle
Cooling
Water
in
Cooling
Water
out
HS
nC4
S1
TBR
AR
Dried
Oeilfin
Feed
Iso-Octene
Settled
Acid
Isobutylene
Feed
H2
AT
Acid
Return
Acid
Recycle
Polymer & CBM
to
Neutralization
Iso-Octane
KT
KT
Propane
Alkylate
KT
nC4
FIGURE 5.6.1: Process Flow Diagram C4 of HF Alkylation Process with NExOCTANE Technology
Reaction temperature
Acid strength
Isobutane concentration
Olefin space velocity.
Any change in these variables affects both product yield and quality. Typical HF
alkylation operating conditions are shown in Table 5.7.1.
Reaction Temperature: Reaction temperature has lesser effect using hydrofluoric
acid. In hydrofluoric acid alkylation increase in the temperature of the reactor from
60 to 125F degrades the quality of alkylate up to three octane numbers In
hydrofluoric acid alkylation, temperature is less important and reactor temperatures
are generally in the range of 70 to 100F [6].
Acid Strength: Acid strength has variable effects on the quality of alkylate
depending on the effectiveness of the mixing in the reactor and the water content
present in the acid. In hydrofluoric acid alkylation the alkylate having the highest
octane number is obtained in the acidity range of 86 to 90%. Commercial operations
generally have concentrations of acid between 83 and 92% hydrofluoric acid and
contain water less than 1% [6].
Isobutane Concentration: Isobutane concentration is usually expressed in terms of
the isobutane/olefin ratio. High ratios of isobutane/olefin increase the octane
number and the yield, and decrease side reactions and consumption of acid. In
industrial practice the ratio of isobutane/olefin on the reactor charge varies from 5:1
to 15: 1. In reactors having internal circulation to enhance the reactor feed ratio,
internal ratios are from 100:1 to 1000:1.
Page 16
Olefin Space Velocity: Olefin space velocity is stated as the volume of olefin that is
charged per hour to the acid volume in the reactor. Decreasing the olefin space
velocity decreases the quantity of high-boiling hydrocarbons formed, increases the
octane of the product, and reduces acid consumption. Olefin space velocity is one
technique of stating reaction time
TABLE 5.7.1: Range of Operating Variables in HF Alkylation
Source: Ref 8
Page 17
Page 18
With MTBE phase-out imminent, U.S. refiners faced the challenge of replacing the lost
octane value and the lost volume of MTBE in gasoline pool. Also, the utilization of idled
MTBE facilities and isobutylene feedstock resulted in persistent problems of
unrecovered and underutilized capital for the producers of MTBE.
Isooctane has been recognized essentially as a cost-effective alternative to
MTBE. It utilizes same isobutylene feed that was used in MTBE production and it offers
excellent blending value. Furthermore, production of isooctane can be obtained in a
low-cost renovation of an existing plant of MTBE.
The NExOCTANE technology was developed for the isooctane production. In this
process, isooctane is produced by the dimerization of isobutylene, which can be
hydrogenated for isooctane production. Both products are remarkable gasoline blend
stocks with ominously higher product value than polymerization or alkylate gasoline.
6.3 Process Chemistry:
The main reaction in the NExOCTANE process for the production of isooctane is the
dimerization of isobutylene over the acidic ion-exchange resin catalyst. The dimerization
reaction produces two isomers of isooctane or trimethylpentene (TMP), specifically, 2,
4, 4-TMP-1 and 2, 4, 4-TMP-2; reactions are shown in Fig 6.3.1.
NExOCTANE process uses alcohol and water as retarders. Acidic sites on the ionexchange resin are blocked by these polar components (alcohol and water), thereby
increasing the selectivity and controlling the catalyst activity to the formation of dimers.
The conditions of the process in the dimerization reactions are adjusted to maximize
high-quality isooctane product yield.
A little amount of C 7 and C 9 components along with other C 8 isomers will be produced
when additional olefin components such as propylene, isoamylene and n-butenes that
exist in the reaction mixture. In the process of NExOCTANE, these reactions are very
slow in comparison to the dimerization reaction of isobutylene and therefore only a
small percentage of these
Isooctene can be hydrogenated resulting in the formation of isooctane, according to the
following reaction:
Hydrogenation Section:
In the dimerization section the isooctene formed is further processed to produce the
saturated isooctane product in a hydrogenation unit. This unit can also be designed to
minimize sulfur content in the product in addition to saturating the olefins. This section
consists of a product stabilizer and trickle-bed hydrogenation reactor(s). The purpose of
the product stabilizer is to eradicate lighter components and unreacted hydrogen in
order to produce a product with a specified vapor pressure.
The utilities required for the NExOCTANE process are summarized as follows:
TABLE 6.5.2: Typical Utility Requirements
Source: Ref 7
7. Environmental Considerations:
7.1 Effluent Treatment:
In Alkylation units system of effluent-treatment, large amount of the neutralized HF acid
must ultimately leave the system as alkali metal fluoride. Due to its very low solubility in
water, CaF 2 is the desired final product. Effluent having HF acid can be treated with
lime [CaO-Ca(OH) 2 ] slurry or solution, or it can be indirectly neutralized in a KOH
system to form the required CaF 2 product.
KOH neutralization system presently used involves two-stage process. Since HF acid is
neutralized by the aqueous KOH, soluble potassium fluoride (KF) is formed, and the
KOH is progressively depleted. Periodically, some amount of KF containing the
neutralizing solution is withdrawn to KOH regenerator. In this particular vessel, lime
slurry reacts with KF to form insoluble CaF 2 and thus regenerates KF to KOH.
Regenerated KOH is returned to the system, and solid CaF 2 is routed to neutralizing
basin [7].
Page 22
Page 23
Product-Treating Solids: Product treating solids are originated when LPG products
are defluorinated over the activated alumina. Over the time, alumina loses ability to
defluorinate LPG product streams. At this moment, alumina is considered as spent, and
it is replaced with fresh alumina. The spent alumina must be disposed of in agreement
with applicable regulations or it must be sent to alumina vendor for recovery.
Miscellaneous Solids: The porous material such as wood, wiping cloths, pipe
coverings, and the packings that are alleged of coming into contact with the HF acid are
placed in specifically provided disposal cans for the removal and are then periodically
burned.
During normal unit operations these solids may originate or during maintenance period.
Staging of wood and other use of wood in area are kept to a minimum level. Before
being removed from the acid area the metal staging must be neutralized.
8. Safety Issues in Alkylation Units:
The alkylation unit consists of two main process hazards:
1) Light hydrocarbons in large volumes which are extremely flammable and possibly
explosive if released.
2) Toxic and corrosive acid catalyst.
Both hydrofluoric acid and sulphuric acid alkylation units have same volumes of
hydrocarbon with similar risks, but the risks accompanying each acid are different. From
the aerosol tendencies to mitigating the effects of leakage to personal protective
equipment, HF alkylation needs much stricter precautions because of its greater
potential to cause damage.
9. Modifications & Recommendations:
9.1 Aerosol Potential:
HF has a boiling point of 66.92oF (19.4C) at atmospheric pressure and it vaporizes in
the incident of a leak to the atmosphere. The scientific HF release tests accompanied in
1986 in the Nevada desert astonished the researchers when 100% liquid HF that was
released led to the formation of a white, dense and rolling cloud of toxic gas. This cloud
rapidly expanded and concentrations toxic gas was measured at distances of about five
to ten kilometers downwind of the release point. Therefore, unless mitigated, release of
HF in a refinery will place the refinery workers and the surroundings in severe danger.
Several HF accidents have occurred in recent years. The most prominent was in 1987
that occurred at Marathon Oil Company refinery situated in Texas City, Texas. This
incident needed a 50 square block area nearby the refinery to be exiled with over 900
people needing medical treatment for injuries caused by the accident. Luckily there
were no fatalities, since this was a minor release of HF vapor only.
Page 24
9.2 Mitigation:
Due to its tendency to form aerosol, HF spills and leaks carry a greater potential for
causing harm as the vapor resulting from a release cannot be contained easily.
Furthermore, the possibility for an HF leakage exists throughout the unit. API RP 751
calls for the installation of various protective systems for mitigating the effects of a
potential release of HF acid. Reliable instruments that speedily detect the release of HF
are recommended. These may comprise of closed-circuit TV and point sensors [12].
Water sprays of high volume capable of "knocking down" the cloud of HF acid are also
recommended. For mitigating 90% of an HF release, a 40:1 ratio of water to HF is
required. Provisions must be ensured for the potential of handling a large amount of HFcontaminated runoff water. This system should be completely tested. Low HF inventory
should be maintained, requiring close scheduling with the HF suppliers. Finally, a quick
acid deinventory system is recommended. This would displace acid from the leaking
section of the HF alkylation unit to a safe location, reducing the time the HF is allowed
to leak.
9.3 HF Modifiers:
As HF mitigation systems are activated only once a leakage has taken place and
aerosol has been released, research on HF modifiers shows that would itself decrease
the aerosoling tendency of the HF has been ongoing. There are two technologies that
are close to commercialization. Each technology claims that, when combined with a
40:1 water spray system of mitigation, the overall decrease in aerosol potential should
be about 95-97%.
Additionally, some of the tests have revealed octane increases in the alkylate product
when additives are used. The HF modifier technologies applied needs the installation of
an additive recovery system and additive separation additive recovery system, alkylate
treating section, storage and supply facilities of the additive.
Capital costs are projected to be around U.S $3.6 - 7.0 million. Furthermore, increase in
operating costs is expected [15].
9.4 Advances in HF Alkylation Technology:
UOP has disclosed a new design for enhanced conventional HF alkylation processes.
The new process uses split feed series recycle (SFSR) reactor sections for removing
process heat. It also offers minimized operating cost and octane maximization. The
Alkad process incorporates a vapor suppression additive into the cost-effective HF
alkylation unit, where the additive reduces HF aerosol emissions by 90% using other
mitigation techniques and hardware [15]. The additive does not give off sulfur to the
alkylate product as the Alkad process is claimed to be very tolerant of high sulfur oils
without contaminating the alkylate product. The additive does not adversely affect nor
degrade wastewater treating, and separates cleanly from hydrocarbons. It can also be
easily recovered and recycled into the alkylation unit.
Page 25
Figure 1
Page 26
Figure 2
Page 27
Figure 3
Page 28
Designer now starts thinking about proper orientation of the nozzles and the
provisions for accessing the points of operation and maintenance.
Considerations of pipeline leaving tower area and adjacent piping shall be
visualized.
First step is to orient manholes possibly all in the same directions.
Levels of the platforms are decided on elevation view based on manholes and
access to the relief valves.
All of the platform levels in proper segments of tower with a ladder location must be
drawn on a plan view. Manhole shall be displayed in proper segment with angle of
orientation, and space for swing of manhole covers taking davit hinge as the center.
The layout should be initiated from top of column with designer visualizing layout as
a whole. There shall be no trouble in dropping the large overhead line straight down
on the side of column, and leaves column at high level and crosses directly to
condenser. It clears the segment at lesser elevations for the piping or for the ladder
from the grade level to first platform.
The flexibility and the thermal load connected with large-dia of overhead lines to
condenser at grade level or at higher level should be considered. Relief valve
protecting tower is generally connected to overhead line. Relief valve discharging to
the atmosphere should be located on highest tower platform.
In closed system of relief-line, Relief-valve must be located on lowest tower platform
above relief -system header. This will ensure shortest relief-valve discharge to flare
header. Entire system of relief-line should be self-draining.
It is better to space platform brackets on tower equally and aligning brackets over
one another for entire length of tower. This will reduce interferences between
structural members and pipings.
Piping and nozzles must meet requirement of process while the platforms must
satisfy the maintenance and the operating needs. Tower piping access, instruments
and valves influence ladders placement.
The condenser and the reboiler lines are available between both sides of manhole
and ladders.
Page 29
Figure 4
Page 30
Figure 5
Figure 6
Page 32
11. Conclusions:
The HF alkylation process is of vital importance to the present day. It plays a very
important role in production one of the mostessential feeds to the final gasoline
blend. With the increase in number of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units used in
refineries its significance has increased.
The HF alkylation performs the critical role of improvement of the byproducts
from FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking) to high-value product (alkylate), which is
then used as a component of gasoline blending.
With MTBE phase-out imminent, U.S. refiners faced the challenge of replacing
the lost octane value and the lost volume of MTBE in gasoline pool. Also, the
utilization of idled MTBE facilities and isobutylene feedstock resulted in persistent
problems of unrecovered and underutilized capital for the producers of MTBE.
Isooctane has been recognized essentially as a cost-effective alternative to
MTBE. It utilizes same isobutylene feed that was used in MTBE production and it
offers excellent blending value. Furthermore, production of isooctane can be
obtained in a low-cost renovation of an existing plant of MTBE. The
NExOCTANE technology was developed for the isooctane production which is a
cost-effective revamp of existing MTBE processing units. The product of
NExOCTANE process is 2, 2, 4 trimethylpentane which has the highest octane
number of 100 among all hydrocarbons so it can blended to give a very high
quality gasoline.
The aim of this report was the production of high octane gasoline which is free
from environment threatening MTBE hence HF Alkylation process and
NExOCTANE technology were combined for this purpose.
For the installation of a new alkylation unit, H 2 SO 4 Alkylation is preferred these
days because it has less safety problems in case of leakages. So, for already
existing HF alkylation plants modifications were proposed to reduce the process
hazards and enhance its safety.
Page 33
1. Gasoline price volatility and the elasticity of demand for gasoline, C.-Y. Cynthia Lin,
Lea Prince, United States.
2. www.indexmundi.com/
3. The 12th Worldwide Alkylation Symposium, 49 June 2006, Orlando, FL, USA.
4. Hydrocarbon Processing, Jun 2003, 82 (6), 32
5. V. N. Ipatieff and L. Schmerling, Advances in Catalysis, vol. I (Academic Press, New
York, 1948), pp. 2763.
6. R. E. Payne, Petrol. Refiner. 37(9), 316329.
7. Robert A. Meyers, Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes, Third Edition,
(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1960).
8. Petrol. Refiner. 31(9), 156164 (1952).
9. Michael B. Simpson, Michael Kester
10. James H. Gary, Glenn E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Petroleum Refining:
Technology and Economics, Fifth Edition.
11. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methyl_tert-butyl_ether
12. http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/unregulated/mtbe.cfm
13. Conference, 2327 July 2006, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Contact: ASME
International, Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.
14. Volume 2006, Issue 11, November 2006.
15. US 8,153,096, Honeywell International Inc, Morristown, NJ, USA, 10 Apr 2012
16. W. A. Gruse and D. R. Stevens, Chemical Technology of Petroleum, 3rd ed.
(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1960), pp. 153163.
17. R. J. Hengstebeck, Petroleum Processing (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York,
(1959), pp. 218233.
18. Hydrocarbon Process. 49(9), 198203 (1970).
19. V. N. Ipatieff and L. Schmerling, Advances in Catalysis, vol. I (Academic Press, New
York, 1948), pp. 2763.
20. H. Lerner and V. A. Citarella, Hydrocarbon Process. 70(11), 8994 (1991).
21. A. V. Mrstik, K. A. Smith, and R. D. Pinkerton, Advan. Chem. Ser. 5(97), (1951).
22. http://stratfordengineering.com/articles/safety-issues-in-alkylation-units
23. Hydrofluoric Acid Alkylation, ABB and ConocoPhillips develop a critical new process
analysis tool
24. NExOCTANE, Petrochemicals, KBR Technologies
Page 34
Page 36