Scribd
Upload
85 views6 pages

Subject: Positive Temperature Difference

This document provides information about calculating the positive and negative temperature differences for a bridge girder. It includes the section properties, temperatures at different locations, coefficients of expansion, and calculations to determine the axial forces and moments due to the temperature changes. The positive temperature difference calculates an axial force of 431 kN and moment of 158.9 kN-m. The negative temperature difference calculates an axial force of 993.6 kN and moment of 146.2 kN-m. It also includes the temperature variations, material properties, and elongations/shortening of the bridge girder due to the temperature changes.

Uploaded by

anuj3936
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
85 views6 pages

Subject: Positive Temperature Difference

This document provides information about calculating the positive and negative temperature differences for a bridge girder. It includes the section properties, temperatures at different locations, coefficients of expansion, and calculations to determine the axial forces and moments due to the temperature changes. The positive temperature difference calculates an axial force of 431 kN and moment of 158.9 kN-m. The negative temperature difference calculates an axial force of 993.6 kN and moment of 146.2 kN-m. It also includes the temperature variations, material properties, and elongations/shortening of the bridge girder due to the temperature changes.

Uploaded by

anuj3936
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Subject :

Positive Temperature Difference

770

T1
h1 =

section
a

150
T2

h2 =

15.4

400
0

1000

h3 =

SECTION

100

fig1.

2 T3

Positive Temperature

see Group 4 as per Fig 9 of BD 37/01


see Table 24 BD 37/01 (Temp Diff.)
Total height of girder
Area of cross section

C.G of Girder from Bottom


C.G of Girder from Top
Grade of Concrete
Youngs modulus of Concrete
Co-efficient of expansion
Moment of inertia about C.G
Section Mod. top of beam

Section Mod. Bottom of beam

S.No.
1
2
3

=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=

1
m
mm2
0.77
0.5
m
0.5
m
2
60 N/mm
2
30000000 kN/m
0.000012 per degree per m

see 5.4.6 BD37/01

4
0.064 m
3
0.128333 m
3
0.128333 m

a x Ec x
Temp at Temp at
Ec x alph x
alpha*te
top
bott
m
Depth
Breadth Area
Avg Temp Ave.temp
yb - y
0.15
0.77
0.1155
15.4
4
9.7
3492 403.326
0.425
0.25
0
0
4
0
2
720
0
0.225
0.1
0.77
0.077
0
2
1
360
27.72
-0.45
431.046

Axial Force
Moment about centre axis

=
=

431.046 kN
158.9396 kN-m

(yb-y) x a
x Ec x alph
Xt
171.4136
0
-12.474
158.9396

Results
Axial Force
Axial stress
Moment stress at top
Moment stress at bottom

Section
a
b
c
d
e

=
=
=
=

431.046
559.8
1238.49
-1238.49

kN
kN/m2
2
kN/m
2
kN/m

Compressive are +ve


Tensile are -ve

Eigen Axial
Bending Resultant
Stress Stress
Stress
Stress
5544
559.8 1238.49 3745.71
1440
559.8 866.943
13.257
0
559.8 247.698 -807.498
0
0
0
0
720
559.8 -1238.49 1398.69

Subject :

Negative Temperature Difference

770

13.4
h1 200

3
h2 400

1000
d
h3 200
e

0.9
h4 200

6.4

SECTION

Total height of girder


Area of cross section

C.G of Girder from Bottom


C.G of Girder from Top
Grade of Concrete
Youngs modulus of Concrete
Co-efficient of expansion
Moment of inertia about C.G
Section Mod. top of beam

Section Mod. Bottom of beam

=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=

1
0.77
0.5
0.5
60
30000000
0.000012
0.064167
0.128333
0.128333

m
mm2
m
m
N/mm2
kN/m2
per degree per m
m4
m3
m3

S.No.

a x Ec x
(yb-y) x a
Temp at Temp at
Ec x alph x
alpha*te
x Ec x alph
bott
m
Xt
Depth
Breadth Area(m2) top
Avg Temp Ave.temp
yb - y
1
0.2
1
0.2
13.4
3
8.2
2952
590.4
0.4
236.16
2
0.2
1
0.2
3
0
1.5
540
108
0.2
21.6
3
4

0.2
0.2

1
1

Axial Force
Moment about centre axis

0.2
0.2

0
0.9

=
=

0.9
6.4

0.45
3.65

162
1314

32.4
262.8
993.6

-0.2
-0.4

993.6 kN
146.16 kN-m

Results
Axial Force
Axial stress
Moment stress at top
Moment stress at bottom

Section
a
b
c
d
e
f

=
=
=
=

Eigen Axial
Bending Resultant
Stress Stress
Stress
Stress
4824
993.6 1138.909 2691.491
1080
993.6 683.3455 -596.945
0
993.6 227.7818 -1221.38
0
993.6 -227.782 -765.818
324
993.6 -683.345 13.74545
2304
993.6 -1138.91 2449.309

993.6
1290.39
1138.909
-1138.909

kN
kN/m2
2
kN/m
kN/m2

Compressive are +ve


Tensile are -ve

-6.48
-105.12
146.16

Axial temperature
Type of Deck Surface

Unsurfaced

Type of Const.Group
Const. Temperature

Group IV

Fig 9 of BD 37/01
-5 Construction temp. for rise
15 Construction temp. for Fall

For maximum temperature


Maximum shade air temperature for 120 yrs return period

Factor for conversion to 30 yrs return period =


Factor for height above msl (for 130m above mean sea level)
Maximum shade air temperature after adjustments
Maximum effective bridge temperature for abovementioned construction group
Adjustment for deck surfacing
Design maximum thermal load for axial strain
Construction temp. for rise

=
=
=
=

Hence variation in temperature

35+-1.7+-1.3

35 deg C
-1.7
-1.30
32.00
32
0
32
-5

=
=
32--5

deg C
deg C
deg C
deg C
deg C
deg C

37 deg C

Minimum shade air temperature for 120 yrs return period

-18 deg C

Factor for conversion to 30 yrs return period =


Factor for height above msl (for 130m above mean sea level)
Minimum shade air temperature after adjustments
Minimum effective bridge temperature for above mentioned construction group
Adjustment for deck surfacing

=
=
=
=

see Fig 8 of BD 37/01


(Manchester city)
see 3.8 (ii) of IAN 86/07
see 5.4.2.2 of BD 37/01
see Table 11 BD37/01
see Table 12 BD37/01
see 5.3.2.2.4 of BD37/01
Assumed

For minimum temperature

-18+1.7+-0.65

Design minimum thermal load for axial strain


Construction temp. for Fall
Hence variation in temperature

15--11

1.7
-0.65
-16.95
-10
-1

deg C
deg C
deg C
deg C

=
=

-11 deg C
15 deg C

26 deg C

1.50E+07 kN/m2

1.20E-05 per deg C

Fig 7 of BD 37/01
(Manchester city)
see 3.8 (ii) of IAN 86/07
see 5.4.2.2 of BD 37/01
see Table 10 BD37/01
see Table 12 BD37/01
see 5.3.2.2.4 of BD37/01
Assumed

The temperature loadings are applied to the STAAD model


Long term modulus of elasticity

Elt

Co-efficient of thermal expansion

= E/2

see 4.3.2.1 BS5400 part 4


(refer table 3)
see 5.4.6 BD37/01

S. No.
1 Solid section at ends length =

1 m

2 Varying section
length =
3 Regular beam section length =

1 m
1 m

Elongation due to maximum temperature variations at following beam lengths

S. No.
1
2
3

4.44E-04 m
4.44E-04 m
4.44E-04 m

(input values acc to structure)

Shortning due to minimum temp variations at following beam lengths

S. No.
1
2
3

3.12E-04 m
3.12E-04 m
3.12E-04 m

566

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy