Organic Chemistry Practical Report
Organic Chemistry Practical Report
Title:
Thin-layer Chromatography: Separation of Plant Pigment
Objective:
Objective of this experiment is to study the thin-layer chromatography of extracted
leave pigment from spinach and -carotene from tomato paste, and the tomato
juice rainbow.
Introduction:
Thin-layer Chromatography, TLC, is a technique where components of the
mixtures separated by differential migration through a planar bed of the stationary
phase. It is a form of planar chromatography which is similar to the paper
chromatography, but the only different is that the stationary phase of TLC is finelydivided sorbent spread as thin layer on the supporting flat surface such as plastic,
aluminum or glass plate. Separation of sample solute can be done by applying
(spotting) small amount of the sample near the end of the plate and place in the
mobile phase. Mobile phase is a phase when the base of the plate is inserted inside
a particular solvent and allows the solvent to move upwards by capillary action.
Solvent used in mobile phase is depends on the type of sample solute that will be
undergoing chromatography; example, for thin-layer chromatography of vegetable
leaf pigment, solvent used will be the mixture of hexane and acetone with the ratio
70:30 (to prepare 100mL of solvent), for thin-layer chromatography of -carotene
from tomato paste, carrot paste or other type of either fruit or vegetable that
contain -carotene , solvent used will be the mixture of petroleum ether: toluene:
acetone with the ratio 45:1:4 (to prepare 100mL of solvent).
As the separation occurs, each component present in the solute will interact
with the stationary and mobile phase to a various degree which creates the
individual bands of the plate. It is consider as the best separation of the component
when the solvent polarity is adjusted to allow the retardation factor, Rf value, of the
compound that has been separated in the range of 0.4 to 0.6. Rf value is the ratio of
distance traveled by a particular spots from baseline, compared to the distance
traveled by the solvent front which is measured from the baseline. Rf value that has
been calculated is helpful in identifying compound.
Rf value formula:
Rf =
added into the cylinder filled full with tomato juice, allowing the
bromine water to penetrate through the tomato juice. This causes
more and more double bond present in the tomato pigment
started to react with the bromine water and eventually most of
the double bond in tomato pigment will be broken. Slow stirring
while adding bromine water will cause a series of color change in
the cylinder which looks like rainbow.
Procedure:
Part A: Extraction of the leaf pigment.
A small mortar and pestle were used to grind several spinach
leaves thoroughly in a mixture of 4 mL petroleum ether and 2 mL
ethanol. The liquid extracts were transferred to the test tube by
using Pasteur pipet and were swirled gently with an equal volume
of water. Aqueous layer were removed and discarded by using
gravitational filtration method and the petroleum ether extract
were transferred to the Erlenmeyer flask. Several spatula-tips full
of anhydrous sodium sulfate were added. The solution were
decant from the drying agent after 5-10 minute by using
gravitational filtration together with the cotton wool. The steps
above were repeated by replacing the spinach leave to spinach
stem.
Part B: Thin-Layer Chromatography
Preparation of TLC Chamber
Components
Pigment 1st
0.15
Pigment 2nd
2.60
0.18
2.60
0.18
2.50
0.17
2.50
0.17
Pigment 3rd
14.30
1.00
Calculation step:
Distance travelled by Spinach leaf:
1st pigment:
Rf = distance moved by the solute (pigment)
= 2.40cm 14.30cm
= 0.17cm
Components
1st Spot
(Tomato)
2nd Spot
(Tomato)
Pigment 1st
Length
(cm)
12.50
3.25
Rf
value
0.26
Length
(cm)
12.50
3.20
Rf
Lengt
Rf
value h (cm) value
12.50
0.25
1.60
0.13
Length
(cm)
12.50
1.40
Rf
value
0.11
Pigment 2nd
3.30
0.26
12.00
0.96
4.20
0.34
4.00
0.32
Pigment 3rd
12.00
0.96
12.10
0.97
11.90
0.95
Pigment 4th
12.30
0.98
12.20
0.98
Rf value
0.98
0.59
0.42
0.28
Xanthophyll II
0.15
Table 3 Theoretical Rf value of the spinach pigment
Based on the table 1 above, Rf values of the first pigment
(spinach leaves) are 0.16 respectively. But in table 3, R f value of
0.16 does not falls into any of the theoretical R f value. Thus we
can conclude that this pigment was not one of the spinach
pigments. Rf value of the second pigment (spinach leaves) are
0.18 and 1.00 respectively. Once again, in table 3, R f value of 0.18
and 1.00 does not falls into any of the theoretical R f value. Thus
we once conclude that event this pigment (stem) was not one of
the spinach pigments.
As for the stem sample, Rf value of the first pigment are 0.15
respectively. In table 3, Rf value of of 0.15 falls into a spinach
pigment called Xanthophyll ll. Thus we can conclude that this
pigment was one of the spinach pigments which is the
Xanthophyll ll. Rf value of second pigment (stem) are 0.17. But in
table 3, Rf value of 0.17 does not falls into any of the theoretical
Rf value. Thus we can conclude that this pigment was not one of
the spinach pigments.
In the TLC Plate that contains separation of the tomato and carotene
(Vitamin); four pigments were able to be identified in tomato and
three pigments were able to be identified in the -carotene
(Vitamin). As the same thing that has occurs in the spinach TLC
plate, it also occurs in the tomato and -carotene TLC plate. Thus,
to identified the pigment on the TLC plate, obtain experiment Rf
value are calculated can compared with the theoretical R f value of
the pigment which is stated in table 4 below.
Pigment name
-carotene
-carotene
Rf value
0.97
0.94
Lycopene
0.81
Leutein
0.75
Violaxathin
0.66
Neoxathin
0.28
Table 4 Theoritical Rf values of the carotenoid plant pigment
According to the table 2 above, Rf values of the first pigment
(-carotene) are0.26 respectively. Rf values of 0.26 in table 4 does
not show any of the carotenoid plant pigment. Thus, we can
conclude that high chances that this pigment of R f values of 0.16
are not one of the -carotene pigment. As for the second pigment
(-carotene), Rf values are also 0.26, which is the same as the
first pigment of the -carotene. Thus has the same conclusion as
the first pigment. Rf values of the third pigment (-carotene) are
0.96. But in table 4, Rf value of 0.96 does not falls into any of the
theoretical Rf value. Thus we can conclude that this pigment was
not one of the -carotene pigments.
As for the tomato sample, Rf value of the first pigments
(tomato) are 0.13 and 0.11 respectively. Both Rf value of the first
pigments does not falls into any of the theoretical R f value in table
4 above. Thus we can conclude that these two pigments was not
one of the tomato pigments. In the second pigment (tomato
pigment), the Rf value are 0.34 and 0.32 respectively. Once
again, in table 4, Rf value of 0.34 and 0.32 does not falls into any
of the theoretical Rf value. Thus we once conclude that these two
pigments was not one of the tomato pigments.
Rf value of the third pigment are 0.97 and 0.95
respectively. In table 4 above, Rf value of 0.97 falls into one of the
carotemoid plant pigment which is
-carotene. Thus we can conclude that this particular pigment is
one of the carotenoid plant pigment called as -carotene. On the
other hand, Rf value of 0.95 does not falls into any of the
carotenoid plant pigment base on the table 4 above. Thus we can
conclude that this pigment with the Rf value of the 0.95 was not
one of the tomato pigment. Last but not least, R f value of pigment
Conclusion:
In conclusion, TLC, Thin-Layer chromatography technique is
widely used because it is useful and cheap to identify a particular
component inside the mixture. TLC technique is also very useful
in identify the polarity of a particular component present in a
mixture.
Reference :
Chatwal, & Gurdeep, R. (n.d.). ebrary:
Document Viewing Options. Retrieved
from
http://site.ebrary.com/id/10416169?
ppg=39