Chapter - 1 Introduction To Operations Research
Chapter - 1 Introduction To Operations Research
CHAPTER - 1
Introduction to Operations Research
History of Operations Research
Operations Research is a relatively new discipline. Whereas 70 years
ago it would have been possible to study mathematics, physics or
engineering (for example) at university it would not have been possible to
study OR, indeed the term OR did not exist then. It was only really in the
late 1930's that operational research began in a systematic fashion, and it
started in the UK.
Early in 1936 the British Air Ministry established Bawdsey Research
Station, on the east coast, near Felixstowe, Suffolk, as the centre where all
pre-war radar experiments for both the Air Force and the Army would be
carried out. Experimental radar equipment was brought up to a high state
of reliability and ranges of over 100 miles on aircraft were obtained.
It was also in 1936 that Royal Air Force (RAF) Fighter Command,
charged specifically with the air defense of Britain, was first created. It
lacked however any effective fighter aircraft - no Hurricanes or Spitfires
had come into service - and no radar data was yet fed into its very
elementary warning and control system.
It had become clear that radar would create a whole new series of
problems in fighter direction and control so in late 1936 some experiments
started at Biggin Hill in Kent into the effective use of such data. This early
work, attempting to integrate radar data with ground based observer data
for fighter interception, was the start of OR.
The first of three major pre-war air-defense exercises was carried
out in the summer of 1937. The experimental radar station at Bawdsey
Research Station was brought into operation and the information derived
from it was fed into the general air-defense warning and control system.
From the early warning point of view this exercise was encouraging, but
the tracking information obtained from radar, after filtering and
transmission through the control and display network, was not very
satisfactory.
In July 1938 a second major air-defense exercise was carried out.
Four additional radar stations had been installed along the coast and it
was hoped that Britain now had an aircraft location and control system
greatly improved both in coverage and effectiveness. Not so! The exercise
revealed, rather, that a new and serious problem had arisen. This was the
need to coordinate and correlate the additional, and often conflicting,
Page 1
Operations Research
information received from the additional radar stations. With the out-break
of war apparently imminent, it was obvious that something new - drastic if
necessary - had to be attempted. Some new approach was needed.
Accordingly, on the termination of the exercise, the Superintendent
of Bawdsey Research Station, A.P. Rowe, announced that although the
exercise had again demonstrated the technical feasibility of the radar
system for detecting aircraft, its operational achievements still fell far
short of requirements. He therefore proposed that a crash program of
research into the operational - as opposed to the technical - aspects of the
system should begin immediately. The term "operational research"
[RESEARCH into (military) OPERATIONS] was coined as a suitable
description of this new branch of applied science. The first team was
selected from amongst the scientists of the radar research group the
same day.
In the summer of 1939 Britain held what was to be its last pre-war
air defense exercise. It involved some 33,000 men, 1,300 aircraft, 110
antiaircraft guns, 700 searchlights, and 100 barrage balloons. This
exercise showed a great improvement in the operation of the air defense
warning and control system. The contribution made by the OR teams was
so apparent that the Air Officer Commander-in-Chief RAF Fighter
Command (Air Chief Marshal Sir Hugh Dowding) requested that, on the
outbreak of war, they should be attached to his headquarters at
Stanmore.
On May 15th 1940, with German forces advancing rapidly in France,
Stanmore Research Section was asked to analyze a French request for ten
additional fighter squadrons (12 aircraft a squadron) when losses were
running at some three squadrons every two days. They prepared graphs
for Winston Churchill (the British Prime Minister of the time), based upon a
study of current daily losses and replacement rates, indicating how rapidly
such a move would deplete fighter strength. No aircraft were sent and
most of those currently in France were recalled.
This is held by some to be the most strategic contribution to the
course of the war made by OR (as the aircraft and pilots saved were
consequently available for the successful air defense of Britain, the Battle
of Britain).
In 1941, an Operational Research Section (ORS) was established in
Coastal Command which was to carry out some of the most well-known
OR work in World War II. Although scientists had (plainly) been involved in
the hardware side of warfare (designing better planes, bombs, tanks, etc)
scientific analysis of the operational use of military resources had never
Page 2
Operations Research
taken place in a systematic fashion before the Second World War. Military
personnel were simply not trained to undertake such analysis.
These early OR workers came from many different disciplines, one
group consisted of a physicist, two physiologists, two mathematical
physicists and a surveyor. What such people brought to their work were
"scientifically trained" minds, used to querying assumptions, logic,
exploring hypotheses, devising experiments, collecting data, analyzing
numbers, etc. Many too were of high intellectual caliber (at least four
wartime OR personnel were later to win Nobel prizes when they returned
to their peacetime disciplines).
By the end of the war OR was well established in the armed services
both in the UK and in the USA.
Operations Research started just before World War II in Britain with
the establishment of teams of scientists to study the strategic and tactical
problems involved in military operations. The objective was to find the
most effective utilization of limited military resources by the use of
quantitative techniques.
Following the end of the war OR spread, although it spread in
different ways in the UK and USA.
You should be clear that the growth of OR since it began (and
especially in the last 30 years) is, to a large extent, the result of the
increasing power and widespread availability of computers. Most (though
not all) OR involves carrying out a large number of numeric calculations.
Without computers this would simply not be possible.
Operations Research
Operations Research
ii.
2. In Finance.
In these modern times of economic crisis, it has become very
necessary for every government to have a careful planning for the
economic development of the country. OR-techniques can be fruitfully
applied.
i.
ii.
iii.
3. In Industry.
If the industry manager decides his policies (not necessarily
optimum) only on the basis of his experience (without using OR
techniques) and a day comes when his retirement, then a heavy loss is
encountered before the industry. This heavy loss can immediately be
compensated by newly appointing a young specialist of OR techniques in
business management. Thus OR is useful to the Industry Director in
deciding optimum allocation of various limited resources such as men,
machines, material, money, time, etc., to arrive at the optimum decision.
4. In Marketing.
With the help of OR techniques a Marketing Administrator (Manager)
can decide.
Page 5
Operations Research
i.
Where to distribute the products for sale so that the total cost of
transportation etc., is minimum.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
5. In Personnel Management
A personnel manager can use OR techniques:
i.
ii.
iii.
6. In Production management
A production manager can use OR techniques.
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
To select, locate and design the sites for the production plants,
etc.,
ii.
Page 6
Operations Research
Operations Research
Page 8
Operations Research
Page 9
Operations Research
After completing the model, it is once again tested as a whole for errors if
any. A model may be said to be valid if it can provide a reliable prediction
of the systems performance. A good practitioner of Operation Research
realizes that his model be applicable for a longer time and thus he
updates the model time to time by taking into account the past, present
and future specifications of the problem.
Implementation
After a system is developed for applying the model, the last phase of an
OR study is to implement this system as prescribed by the management.
This phase is a critical one because it is here, and only here, that the
benefits of the study are reaped.
The success of the implementation phase depends on a great deal upon
the support of both top management and operating management.
The implementation phase involves several steps. First, the OR team gives
operating management a careful explanation of the new system to be
adopted and how it relates to operating realities. Next, these two parties
share the responsibility for developing the procedures required to put this
system into operation. Operating management then sees that a detailed
indoctrination is given to the personnel involved.
Page 10
Operations Research
Finally, the tested results of the model are implemented to work. This
phase primarily executed with the cooperation of the Operation Research
Experts and those who are responsible for managing and operating the
system.
Next, the analyst collects data to estimate the values of parameters that
affect the organization's problem. These estimates are used to develop (in
Step 3) and evaluate (in Step 4) a mathematical model of the
organization's problem.
Step 3.
Operations Research
In this step, the analyst presents the model and the recommendations
from Step 5 to the decision making individual or group. In some situations,
one might present several alternatives and let the organization choose the
decision maker(s) choose the one that best meets her/his/their needs.
After presenting the results of the OR study to the decision maker(s), the
analyst may find that s/he does not (or they do not) approve of the
recommendations. This may result from incorrect definition of the problem
on hand or from failure to involve decision maker(s) from the start of the
project. In this case, the analyst should return to Step 1, 2, or 3.
Step 7.
If the decision maker(s) has accepted the study, the analyst aids in
implementing the recommendations. The system must be constantly
monitored (and updated dynamically as the environment changes) to
ensure that the recommendations are enabling decision maker(s) to meet
her/his/their objectives.
ii.
iii.
The model should be simple and logical in its structure. There should
be less number of variables.
iv.
Advantages of a model
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Page 12
Operations Research
iii.
iv.
v.
Formulation of problem
The main idea in O.R. is to build a suitable model taking into account
all the factors in the problem in any industry. It is not always easy to
formulate a model for a given problem. Even if the problem is
formulated there is no guarantee that solution to the problem exists.
Considerable progress has already been made to solve all routine
problems and we can do fast by the use of standard programmes
with the electronic high speed computers.
ii.
Operations Research
iv.
Organization aspect
Even though the O.R. models emphasize to take the entire
organization into account, it is difficult in certain cases to build a
model taking all factors into consideration. The problem may
become complicated with more objective functions and constraints
may be inconsistent or contradicting. Then a solution may not exist.
Basic OR Concepts
"OR is the representation of real-world systems by mathematical models
together with the use of quantitative methods (algorithms) for solving
such models, with a view to optimizing."
We can also define a mathematical model as consisting of:
Decision variables, which are the unknowns to be determined by the
solution to the model.
Constraints to represent the physical limitations of the system
An objective function
An optimal solution to the model is the identification of a set of
variable values which are feasible (satisfy all the constraints) and
which lead to the optimal value of the objective function.
In general terms we can regard OR as being the application of scientific
methods / thinking to decision making.
Underlying OR is the philosophy that:
Decisions have to be made; and
Using a quantitative (explicit, articulated) approach will lead to
better decisions than using non-quantitative (implicit, unarticulated)
approaches.
Indeed it can be argued that although OR is imperfect it offers the best
available approach to making a particular decision in many instances
(which is not to say that using OR will produce the right decision).
Page 14
Operations Research
Exercise:
1. Define the term operations research and write brief notes on
applications of operations research. (Garhwal 97,96; Meerut (IPM) 90, IGNOU 2001
(June), Dec. 06/Jan.07, Dec.08/Jan.09)
Meerut82) - 6M
(June-
July 2009) - 6M
Page 15
Operations Research
7. List and briefly explain the various types of models used in OR.
8. What are the various phases through which an OR team normally has
to proceed?
Page 16