Chapter 2

The Yoghurt: Chemical and Technological

Profiles

AbstractThe complex of fermentative reactions that are normally used in the

industry of yoghurts shows extraordinary performances with relation to produced
amounts and the qualitative composition of organic acids. The usual fermentative
pathway in the yoghurt manufacture is coincident with the common homolactic
fermentation. The synergic action of selected streptococci and lactobacilli in the
fermentation of raw milks determines the increased production of lactic acid, acetaldehyde and polysaccharides. Other interesting variations of chemical profiles in
yoghurts can be observed and explained with relation to the qualitative and quantitative distribution of different vitamins, benzoic and orotic acids, bacteriocins,
enzymes, peptides and amino acids.
KeywordsAcetaldehydeAcetoinAcetoneBacteriocinsDiacetylFolic
acid Homolactic fermentation Lactic acid Pantothenic acid

List of Abbreviations
CO2 Carbon dioxide
CFU Colony-forming unit
LAB Lactic acid bacterium
LDB 
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus
MW Molecular weight
ST 
Streptococcus thermophilus

E. Baglio, Chemistry and Technology of Yoghurt Fermentation, SpringerBriefs

in Chemistry of Foods, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07377-4_2, The Author(s) 2014

25

26

2 The Yoghurt: Chemical and Technological Profiles

2.1The Yoghurt: Biochemical Variations

The complex of fermentative reactions that are normally used in the industry of
yoghurts shows extraordinary performances with relation to produced amounts and
the qualitative composition of organic acids. In fact, the usual fermentative pathway
in the yoghurt manufacture is coincident with the common homolactic fermentation
(Sect. 1.1). However, two distinct and important features have to be mentioned:
The fermentative pathway is carried out by two different bacteria: Lactobacillus
delbruekii subsp. bulgaricus (LDB) and Streptococcus thermophilus (ST)
Above-mentioned lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are able to produce notable amounts
of organic acids by converting the same substrate (lactose) without competition.
On the contrary, LDB and ST can act synergically. Differently from other opportunistic associations, the synergic interaction is extremely efficient because of the
increased production of lactic acid, acetaldehyde and polysaccharides (Sect. 1.4).
The synergistic effect between above-mentioned LAB may be easily explained.
ST is stimulated by the bioavailability of free amino acids and peptides in culture
media. On the other side, LDB is able to attack and proteolyze milk proteins; consequently, needed amino acids and peptides can be easily found if lactobacilli can
spread freely in milks.
In general, it can be affirmed that five amino acidsvaline, glycine, histidine,
leucine and isoleucineand short peptides are preferred sources of nitrogen for ST.
With reference to LDB, the microbial growth is stimulated by active compounds
such as carbon dioxide and formic acid. It has to be highlighted that similar chemicals are massively produced by ST. As a clear result, the one bacterial species seems
to act as a biochemical growth engine for the other life forms: in other words, the
synergic association can be considered such as a binary feedback loop. This situation has been repeatedly observed in different experiments with or without the addition of specified prebiotics (Oliveira et al. 2009; De Souza Oliveira et al. 2011).
It has been also noted that milk pre-treatments can reduce carbon dioxide to
low values: this effect does not favour the rapid development of LDB because this
bacterium would need 30mg/Kg at least of carbon dioxide (CO2). However, the
release of CO2 can be enhanced by decarboxylation of urea: this reaction, carried
out by ST in yoghurts, has been reported to increase the initial level of CO2 from
10mg/kg at pH=6.42 until more than 150mg/Kg after only 60min of incubation; pH may reach 5.75.8 at least. In addition, the higher the incubation period,
the lower the pH and the higher the CO2 release (Battistotti and Bottazzi 1998).
As a consequence, favourable conditions for the development of LDB can be
obtained in milky mixtures (Sect. 1.5) after 3740min at 44.5C, in spite of the
deficiency of CO2 in original raw milks.
In addition, produced CO2 can reach excessive values after 60min. In fact, ST
strains can easily hydrolyze dissolved urea in milk mixtures with the final conversion in CO2 and ammonia, although the use of mutant streptococci without this
ureasic activity has been recently reported (Corrieu et al. 2005).

2.1 The Yoghurt: Biochemical Variations

27

Fig.2.1Chemical structure of pantothenic acid, also named vitamin B5, molecular formula:
C9H16NNaO5, MW: 241.216797gmol1. BKchem version 0.13.0, 2009 (http://bkchem.zirael.
org/index.html) has been used for drawing this structure

Fig.2.2Chemical structure
of folic acid, also named
vitamin B9, molecular
formula: C19H19N7O6,
MW: 441.397491gmol1.
BKchem version 0.13.0, 2009
(http://bkchem.zirael.org/
index.html) has been used for
drawing this structure

Other interesting biochemical variations can occur with relation to the conversion of lactose in lactic acidthe main, declared and expected result of the homolactic fermentationand other monosaccharides (Sect. 1.5). The amount of lactose
in fresh milks is reported between 4.8 and 5.1%; this content may be approximately
6% when speaking of raw milk for yoghurt purposes. After evaporation and fermentation (Sect. 1.5), the chemical profile of detectable sugars should correspond to
the following list: total carbohydrates, 4.85.2%; unfermented lactose, 3.84.0%;
galactose, 1.01.2%; glucose, negligible traces (Goodenough and Kleyn 1976).
LAB, homolactic fermentation and concomitant but extraneous chemical
reactions have other important effects on chemical profiles of vitamins, benzoic
and orotic acids, bacteriocins, enzymes, peptides and amino acids.
It has been reported (Sect. 1.6) that several B vitaminspantothenic acid, biotin,
etc.can decrease during the whole process of yoghurt productions. On the other
side, the demolition of vitamins by microbial activity is not absolute but selective.
For example, pantothenic acidmolecular formula: C9H16NNaO5, molecular weight
(MW): 241.216797gmol1, Fig.2.1can diminish in yoghurts after three hours:
20% of the original content in milks (Battistotti and Bottazzi 1998). Vitamin B12
can also decrease in the same condition: the measured diminution appears approximately 16.9%. On the other side, folic acidmolecular formula: C19H19N7O6, MW:
441.397491gmol1, Fig.2.2appears to increase. The final amount of this chemical substance3,805g/100gis 10.3 times higher than the original content in raw

28

2 The Yoghurt: Chemical and Technological Profiles

milks (Battistotti and Bottazzi 1998). Other studies indicate 80g/L in comparison
with the original content40g/Lin the original milk (Chandan and Kilara 2013).
Another vitamin, niacin, appears to slightly increase during time: +8.0%.
The above-shown chemical profile of vitamins may be explained as follows:
both LAB culture components require bioavailable pantothenic acid (Chandan and
Kilara 2013). Additionally, LDB needs also a considerable amount of folic acid,
but this molecule is abundantly synthesized by ST.
Actually, chemical profiles may always change during the storage of yoghurts.
For example, the maximum production of folic acid is obtained at 42C during
the incubation period. Subsequently, this molecule is reported to loss approximately 30%, while vitamin B12 continues to decrease: related contents appear
undetectable after 5days of storage (Chandan and Kilara 2013).
It should be noted also that there is a close relation between LAB and acetic acid bacteria with reference to the synthesis of vitamin B12 in acidalcoholic
drinks such as kefir. In particular, the detection of this vitamin shows increased
values when LAB and acetic acid bacteria are associated with the fluid food
medium (Otles and Cagindi 2003).
With relation to organic acids, two of those normally present in the milk
undergo significant transformations. Citric and uric acids do not seem normally
metabolized by LAB-associated cultures. On the other side, orotic acid is reduced
to 4.6mg/100mgppm from the original amount of 8.2mg/100mg in the original
milk, depending on productive conditions (Okonkwo and Kinsella 1969). Benzoic
acid is present in traces in milk for yoghurt purposes: after the production, it can
be found at 1530ppm and is associated with the metabolism of LAB cultures
(Otles and Cagindi 2003). The precursor of benzoic acid, hippuric acid, can be
converted depending on the activity of certain LAB strains (Tamime and Robinson
2007); in yoghurt, benzoic acid may be found between 35 and 60ppm. Detectable
contents appear approximately 30ppm when LDB and Lactobacillus acidophilus
are associated, while the same bacteriostatic substance is reported to be between
10 and 35ppm when mesophilic cultures of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis are
used (Battistotti and Bottazzi 1998).
The synthesis of above-shown acids is always considered with the concomitant
production of substances with antibacterial activities: organic acids or hydrogen
peroxide. With exclusive reference to yoghurts, the bulgarican bacteriocin is synthesized by LDB. This substance is thermostable, active at low pH and is reported
to show a wide spectrum of action towards both Gram-positive and Gram-negative
micro-organisms (Otles and Cagindi 2003). ST can synthesize thermophilin 13, a
peptide with MW of approximately 4,000gmol1: it is thermostable and active at
different pH values (Marciset et al. 1997). This LAB species produces also active
bacteriocins towards moulds such as Aspergillus and Rhizopus genera.
The accumulation of beta-galactosidase, a significant probiotic, in fermented milks
has to be remembered (Friend et al. 1983). The same thing can be affirmed when
speaking of proteases and peptidases of microbial origin: the release of peptides and
amino acids by hydrolysis is often correlated with nutritional and physiological benefits on the human health (Beshkova and Frengova 2012; Vasilijevic and Shah 2007).

2.1 The Yoghurt: Biochemical Variations

29

On the basis of mentioned chemical profiles, it can be highlighted that the

microbial metabolism of LAB cultures in yoghurts and other fermented milks
determines the synthesis of following chemicals:
1. Compounds derived from the hydrolysis and the metabolism of lactose: CO2,
lactic acid, acetic acid, ethyl alcohol, formic acid, succinic acid, acetone, diacetyl, acetoin, galactose and polysaccharides
2. Compounds derived from the hydrolysis of proteins: peptides, amino acids,
acetic aldehyde
3. Compounds derived from the utilization of urea: ammonia, formic acid, CO2
4. Compounds derived from the use of organic acids: benzoic acid from hippuric
acid.
Most detectable variations concerns:
Modifications in the chemical profile of vitamins: increase in folic acid and niacin,
decrease of pantothenic acid and B12
Changes in the amount of detectable nucleotides: increase of adenosine monophosphate, uridin monophosphate, guanine monophosphate and adenine dinucleotide
Variations in the distribution of minerals: increase in ionic forms, destabilization of calcium caseinatephosphate complexes
Synthesis of proteins with recognized antibacterial activity: various bacteriocins
Accumulation of enzymes: beta-galactosidase, proteases and peptidases.
Naturally, the strong increase of LAB microbial population should be also remembered:
the presence of hundreds of millions per gram of LAB and other probiotic micro-organisms can notably determine the protection of the produced yoghurt (and intermediate
milky mixtures during the fermentative process) against undesired life forms.

2.2Compositional Features of Yoghurts

The qualitative and quantitative profiles of nutrients in the milk mixture are partially
modified by fermentative processes: negligible modifications may be observed during
storage at 4C because the enzymatic activity of the active microflora is slowed down
or even inhibited. Actually, only a significant reduction of vitamin B12 and pantothenic
acid amounts60 and 30%, respectivelyand a negligible decrease of lactose and
galactose have been observed. By a general viewpoint, it can be affirmed that yoghurts
show a compositional situation with more abundant nutrients in comparison with the
original milk, excluding lactose. Anyway, the addition of milk proteins is crucial.
Table 2.1 shows the approximate composition of commercial yoghurts in the
modern industry and original data for several milks. The composition of dessert or
enriched yoghurts is determined also by the nature and the quantity of non-milk
ingredients. For example, glucose is particularly variable0.0% in white products, 0.73.2% in fruit yoghurtsdepending on the type of product and the peculiar
manufacturer. The composition of carbohydrates concerns (De Noni et al. 1998):

2 The Yoghurt: Chemical and Technological Profiles

30

Table2.1Average composition and energetic percentage value of cows milk and some types of
yoghurt (Agroscope Composition 2007; Agricultural Research Service 2013)

Dry residual, %
Protein, %
Fat, %
Total sugar, %
Lactic acid, %
Energetic value,
kcal/100g

Milk
Yoghurt
Full cream Skimmed Full cream white

Skimmed white Full cream fruit

12.5
3.3
3.4
4.8
0.003
62

14
6.7
0.2
4.9
0.5
47

9.5
3.4
0.2
5.0
0.003
35

15
4.3
4.1
4.6
0.5
66

22
4.3
4.5
15.7
0.5
102

Glucose
Lactose (2.63.6% in white products, 2.63.8% in fruit yoghurts)
Added sugars (sucrose and fructose: up to 8.9 and 6.7%, respectively, in sugary
white products)
Lactulose, a disaccharide consisting of galactose and fructose, in form of concentrated syrups or high-purity crystals, obtained by means of the epimerization
of lactose during the pasteurization process (Andrews 1984).
Normally, lactulosealso named 4-O--D-galactopyranosyl-D-fructoseis
found between 0.02 and 0.07% in sterilized milks depending on applied time/temperature cycles. On the other hand, lactulose is well known as a good sweetener:
different synthetic processes are available at present with relation to the production of this substance (Aider and Halleux 2007). Theoretically, lactulose should be
obtained by means of the isomerization reaction of lactose in alkaline media. One
of favourite mechanisms, the reaction of Lobry de Bruynvan Ekenstein, converts
the glucose part of the original lactose in fructose by means of the formation of
the enolic intermediate shape of lactose and epilactose in alkaline media such as
calcium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide (Aider and Halleux 2007). However,
several methods have been developed with the aim of enhancing the production:
different catalyzers and technological solutions, such as the purification and the
demineralization by anion and cation exchange resins have been recently proposed
(Aider and Halleux 2007; Carobbi and Innocenti 1990; Carobbi et al. 1985).
The chemical profile of organic acids should be studied and discussed. With relation to lactic acid, the related content in all commercially available yoghurts appears
greater than 0.8%. This amount corresponds to the minimum quantity for this type
of fermented milk. Normally, the maximum content should not exceed 1.3%: otherwise, products might exhibit particularly acidic tastes with some risk of consumeristic unacceptability. Other milk-related constituents may be considered important on
the nutritional level even if their amount is detected in limited quantities.
For instance, formic acidproduced by STis recognized capable of stimulating the multiplication of lactobacilli. Small amounts of this acidless than 40mg/
kgare also produced after the caramelization of lactose because of thermal treatments such as pasteurization (De Noni et al. 1998; Kroh 1994).

2.2 Compositional Features of Yoghurts

31

Flavours can be very important when speaking of yoghurts and the correlated
commercial success. Basically, aroma is affected by the compulsory presence of
minor constituents without fermentative origin: actually, these chemicals seems be
produced by reactions promoted by thermal processes in the same way of formic acid.
Generally, flavours are determined by the qualitative and quantitative presence of carbonylic acids. These substances may be obtained from fats lactones,
and their concentration is crucial with concern to more or less pleasant and intense
tastes (Cheng 2010; De Noni et al. 1998; Gaafar 1992; Laye et al. 1993):

Acetaldehyde (240mg/kg)
Acetoin (26mg/kg)
Acetone (14mg/kg)
Diacetyl (0.51.0mg/kg).

Finally, other minor substances may be cited: total free fatty acids, octanoic acid,
9-decenoic acid, tetradecanoic acid, octanol, ethyl acetate, etc., depending on the
peculiar aroma and the desired result. On the other hand, off-flavours with unacceptable or questionable results appear to be correlated with the presence of tyrosine, acetic acid, 3-methyl butanol, ethyl acetate, etc. (Cheng 2010).
In fact, the process of thermal caramelization and the so-called Maillard reactionin which lactose is involvedcan be cause of the production of these compounds. In addition, the overall chemical composition remains unmodified during
storage while microbiological profiles appear be subjected to major modifications.
Actually, the total number of LAB in yoghurts is comprised between 108 and 109
colony-forming units (CFU)/g during the production. Subsequently, a notable
reduction is observed after 30days at 4C until a final 107CFU/g microbial
count, although some discordance may be found in the scientific literature depending on storage temperatures and other factors (Birollo et al. 2000).
Higher storage temperatures cause generally more rapid decreases of microbial
counts until to 5106CFU/g before of the end of shelf life. It may be supposed that
this level is critical for LAB counts in yoghurts. Anyway, the presence of relatively
high numbers of vital LAB cultures depends also on the respect of low storage conditions during the declared shelf life. The same thing can be easily affirmed when
speaking of healthy properties and sensoryor chemicalprofiles of yoghurts.

References
Agricultural Research Service (2013) USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference,
Release 26, Nutrient Data Laboratory Home Page. http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/ndl.
Accessed 8 Apr 2014
Agroscope Composition (2007) FOAG Swiss Federal Office for Agriculture. http://www.agrosc
ope.admin.ch/joghurt-sauermilchprodukte/01368/index.html?lang=en. Accessed 8 Apr 2014
Aider M, Halleux DD (2007) Isomerization of lactose and lactulose production: review. Trends
Food Sci Technol 18(7):356364. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.03.005
Andrews GR (1984) Distinguishing pasteurized, UHT and sterilized milks by their lactulose content. Int J Dairy Technol 37(3):9295. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0307.1984.tb00498.x

32

2 The Yoghurt: Chemical and Technological Profiles

Battistotti B, Bottazzi V (1998) Microbiologia e tecnologia dei latti fermentati. In: Bottazzi V
(ed) I latti fermentati. Aspetti biochimici, tecnologici, probiotici e nutrizionali. Istituto
Danone, Milan, pp 3572
Beshkova D, Frengova G (2012) Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: microorganisms of potential biotechnological importance for the dairy industry. Eng Life Sci 12(4):419432. doi:10.1
002/elsc.201100127
Birollo GA, Reinheimer JA, Vinderola CG (2000) Viability of lactic acid microflora in different
types of yoghurt. Food Res Int 33(9):799805. doi:10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00101-0
Carobbi R, Innocenti F (1990) Process for preparing lactulose from lactose by epimerization with
sodium aluminate. US Patent 4,957,564, 18 Sep 1990
Carobbi R, Franci V, Miletti S (1985) Process for preparing lactulose from lactose, in the form of
a syrup or a crystalline product. US Patent 4,536,221, 20 Aug 1985
Chandan RC, Kilara A (eds) (2013) Manufacturing yogurt and fermented milks, 2nd edn. Wiley,
Chichester, pp 297317
Cheng H (2010) Volatile flavor compounds in yogurt: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr
50(10):938950. doi:10.1080/10408390903044081
Corrieu G, Monnet C, Sepulchre AM (2005) Use of strains of Streptococcus thermophilus which
are incapable of hydrolyzing urea in dairy products. US Patent 6,962,721, 8 Nov 2005
De Noni I, Resmini A, Tirelli A (1998) Chimica e tecnologia dello yogurt. In: Bottazzi V (ed)
I latti fermentati. Aspetti biochimici, tecnologici, probiotici e nutrizionali. Istituto Danone,
Milan, pp 7398
De Souza Oliveira RP, Perego P, De Oliveira MN, Converti A (2011) Effect of inulin as a prebiotic to improve growth and counts of a probiotic cocktail in fermented skim milk. LWT-Food
Sci Technol 44(2):520523. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2010.08.024
Friend BA, Fiedler JM, Shahani KM (1983) Influence of culture selection on the flavor, antimicrobial activity, beta-galactosidase and B-vitamins of yoghurt. Milchwissenschaft 38:133136
Gaafar AM (1992) Volatile flavour compounds of yoghurt. Int J Food Sci Technol 27(1):8791.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb01183.x
Goodenough ER, Kleyn DH (1976) Qualitative and quantitative changes in carbohydrates during
the manufacture of yogurt. J Dairy Sci 59(1):4547. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84153-7
Kroh LW (1994) Caramelisation in food and beverages. Food Chem 51(4):373379.
doi:10.1016/0308-8146(94)90188-0
Laye I, Karleskind D, Morr CV (1993) Chemical, microbiological and sensory properties of
plain nonfat yogurt. J Food Sci 58(5):991995. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb06096.x
Marciset O, Jeronimus-Stratingh MC, Mollet B, Poolman B (1997) Thermophilin 13, a nontypical antilisterial poration complex bacteriocin, that functions without a receptor. J Biol Chem
272(22):1427714284
Okonkwo P, Kinsella JE (1969) Orotic acid in yoghurt. J Dairy Sci 52(11):18611862.
doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(69)86856-6
Oliveira RPDS, Perego P, Converti A, De Oliveira MN (2009) Effect of inulin on growth and
acidification performance of different probiotic bacteria in co-cultures and mixed culture with
Streptococcus thermophilus. J Food Eng 91(1):133139. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.08.013
Otles S, Cagindi O (2003) Kefir: a probiotic dairy-composition, nutritional and therapeutic
aspects. Pak J Nutr 2(2):5459
Tamime AY, Robinson RK (2007) Tamime and Robinsons yoghurt: science and technology.
Woodhead Publishing Limited, Abington
Vasilijevic T, Shah NP (2007) Fermented milk: health benefits beyond probiotic effect. In: Hui YH,
Chandan RC, Clark S, Cross NA, Dobbs JC, Hurst WJ, Nollet LM, Shimoni E, Sinha N, Smith
EB, Surapat S, Titchenal A, Toldr F (eds) Handbook of food products manufacturing: health,
meat, milk, poultry, seafood, and vegetables, Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp. 99115

http://www.springer.com/978-3-319-07376-7