Experiment 6: Table 2. Computational Results
Experiment 6: Table 2. Computational Results
Adsorption
Padrillan, Hazel Rose B.
Group 2, Chem 157.1 - FEJ
Paras, Louise Ruth F.
Mr. John Ephraim E. Torres
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I.
C1
(M)
C2
(M)
C1 C2
(M)
WHOAc
(g)
WAC
(g)
5.220896
3.03924
0.973028
0.770412
0.431148
0.171988
0.10013
4.730848
1.913072
0.935332
0.739784
0.20026
0.160208
0.080104
0.490048
1.126168
0.037696
0.030628
0.230888
0.01178
0.020026
0.147014
0.33785
0.045235
0.036754
0.277066
0.014136
0.024031
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.147014
0.33785
0.045235
0.036754
0.277066
0.014136
0.024031
C1 - C2 = 5.220896 M - 4.730848 M
C1 - C2 = 0.490048 M
wHOAc, adsorbed = [(C1 - C2) * MW HOAc * Vsoln] / wactivated carbon
wHOAc, adsorbed = [ 0.490048 mol/L * 60 g/mol * 0.005 L ] / 1g
wHOAc, adsorbed = 0.147014 g
y = wHOAc, adsorped / wactivated carbon
y = 0.147014 g / 1 g
y = 0.147014
An adsorption plateau represents the saturation
point of the system wherein adsorbate is fully covered
with the adsorbent (Hubbard, 2002). As for this
experiment, there is no saturation value for the HOAc Activated carbon adsorption system because the graph
does not approach a constant maximum.
5
5
20
20
20
20
20
0.4712
0.4712
0.4712
0.4712
0.4712
0.4712
0.4712
55.4
32.25
41.3
32.7
18.3
7.30
4.25
5.220896
3.03924
0.973028
0.770412
0.431148
0.171988
0.10013
50.2
20.3
39.7
31.4
8.50
6.80
3.40
4.730848
1.913072
0.935332
0.739784
0.20026
0.160208
0.080104
slope = 1/q
1/q = 4.2317
q = 0.2363
y-intercept = 1/bq
1/bq = 8.5089
1/(b*0.2363) = 8.5089
b = 0.4974
The graph can be readily determined to be nonlinear. In addition, the correlation is very much far from
1. Thus, it can be assumed that the HOAc - Activated
Carbon adsorption does not obey the Langmuir isotherm
equation. This is indicative that the surface might not be
homogeneous and smooth and or the adsorption does
not form monolayer.
Freundlich isotherm equation is just a modified
Langmuir equation where K is a constant that indicates
the extent of the adsorption and n determines the
intensity of the adsorption (Cooney, 1999). Freundlich
assumed that as C increases, the adsorption continues
and does not form a plateau reaction unlike that of
Langmuirs. Another assumption was, the adsorption
energies at different sites were not equal but differs
exponentially (Deutsch, 1997). Also, as the temperature
increases, much higher pressure is needed to saturate
the solution. This equation is a model for rough surface
adsorption layers (Massel, 1996). Freundlich equation
was also rearranged to form a linear equation for better
interpretation.
slope = 1/n
1/n = 0.59
n = 1.6949
y-intercept = -1.0697
logK = -1.0697
K = 0.08517
Just like in the Langmuir equation, there is a
very poor correlation, r2 = 0.4638, in the experimental
data for the Freundlich plot. The obtained constants, K
and n, cannot be used because of this. Thus, the
adsorption system also does not obey Freundlich
equation.
The results from the two isotherm equations
cannot be compared and used to characterize the
adsorption system because of their poor correlation. The
experiment must be done again, with strict observance
of protocols and precise measurements of reagents
because these might account for the high error
deviations.
II.
References