Scribd
Upload
294 views4 pages

(Hidalgo) DFEH 168394-160733

In the Matter of the Complaint of Deborah Hidalgo, Complainant. vs. City Of Carmel-by-the-Sea Respondent, Discrimination, Retaliation, COMPLAINT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION BEFORE THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING (DFEH No. 168394-160733)

Uploaded by

L. A. Paterson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
294 views4 pages

(Hidalgo) DFEH 168394-160733

In the Matter of the Complaint of Deborah Hidalgo, Complainant. vs. City Of Carmel-by-the-Sea Respondent, Discrimination, Retaliation, COMPLAINT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION BEFORE THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING (DFEH No. 168394-160733)

Uploaded by

L. A. Paterson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

1

COMPLAINT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION

BEFORE THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING


Under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act
(Gov. Code, 12900 et seq.)

6
7
8
9

In the Matter of the Complaint of


Deborah Hidalgo, Complainant.
23026 Espada Dr.
Salinas California 93908

DFEH No. 168394-160733

vs.

10

11
12

City Of Carmel-by-the-Sea Respondent.


P.O.BoxCC
Carmel By The Sea, CA, California 93921

13
14

Complainant alleges:

15

1. Respondent City Of Carmel-by-the-Sea is a State/Local Govt subject to suit under the California Fair
Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, 12900 et seq.). Complainant believes respondent is
subject to the FEHA.

16
17

2. On or around June 01, 2014, complainant alleges that respondent took the following adverse actions against
complainant: Discrimination, Retaliation Denied a good faith interactive process, Denied a work

18

environment free of discrimination and/or retaliation, Denied family care or medical leave, Denied
reinstatement, Other, . Complainant believes respondent committed these actions because of their: Disability

19
20
21

3. Complainant Deborah Hidalgo resides in the City of Salinas, State of California. If complaint includes corespondents please see below.

22

-5Complaint- DFEH No. 168394-160733

H 902-1

Date Filed: May 22,20 15

2
3
4

5
6
7
8

Additional Complaint Details:


Deborah Hidalgo was released by her Doctor to return to work as a Police Services
Officer on June 1,2014. She was denied reinstatement from medical leave based on her
disability or perceived disability. Her employer demanded as a condition of returning
from medical leave that she undergo a psychiatric fitness for duty examination which
was not job related or required by any business necessity. She was also denied
reasonable accommodation and her employer did not engage in an interactive process
in good faith. She was served with Notice of Intent to terminate her employment on
February 25,2015 based on her disability and alleged job abandonment. She believes
these actions were motivated by retaliation against her for taking medical leave and for
stating her complaint of employment discrimination.

10
11

12
13

14
15
16
17

18
19

20
21

22

-6-

H902-1

Complaint - DFEH No. 168394-160733

Date Filed: May 22,2015

1
2
3
4

VERIFICATION
I, Michelle A. Welsh, am the Attorney for Complainant in the above-entitled complaint. I have read the
foregoing complaint and know the contents thereof. The same is true of my own knowledge, except as to those
matters which are therein alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters, I believe it to be true.
On May 22, 2015, I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
is true and correct.

Pacific Grove CA
Michelle A. Welsh

6
7

9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16

17
18
19

20
21

22

-7Comp aint- DFEH No. 168394-160733

H !102-1

Date Filed: May 22, 2015

'

'

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

(1013A, 2015.5. C.C.P.)

3
4

I am a resident of Monterey County, California; I am over the age of eighteen (18)

years and not a party to the entitled within action; my business address is STONER, WELSH

& SCHMIDT, 413 Forest Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA 93950.

I am readily familiar with the business' practice for collection and processing of

correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and .I declare that the

within documents would be deposited with the United States Postal Service on the date set

10

forth below in :fue ordinary course of business.

11

On May 22, 2015, I served the within Complaint ofEmployment Discrimination and

12

Retaliation on Defendants by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope for collection

13

and mailing on said date, following ordinary business practices, addressed as follows:

14
15
16
17
18

Vincent P. Hurley, Esq.


Law Office of Vincent P. Hurley
28 Seascape Village
Aptos, CA 95003
I declare under penalty of perjury according to the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 22, 2015, at Pacific Grove, California.

19
20

21

Linda Victorino

22

23
24
25

26
27

28

STONER, WELSH
AND SCHMIDT
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Hidalgo v. City ofCarmel~by~the~Sea


Proof of Service by Mail, Page 1 of 1

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy