"Impact of "Make in India"
"Impact of "Make in India"
Inheriting a faltering economy, with GDP growth rate of under 5% (2013-2014), high
inflation (9 to 11 %), fiscal deficit of $86.08 billion (2013-14), red tape and rampant
corruption, Prime Minister NarendraModi had his task cut out. His immediate challenge
was to dispel the uncertainty around the Indian economy and make it a preferred stop
for investors. The 'Make in India' campaign was, thus, launched on 25th September
2014 and is part of the government's efforts to promote India as an investment friendly
destination.
'Aim of 'Make in India'
The slogan clearly points to the government's aim to make India a global manufacturing
hub. This signals a paradigm shift in focus, from tertiary to manufacturing. The
government reckons that the next big push for the Indian economy will come from the
manufacturing sector, which recorded a declining growth rate of 0.2% in 2013-14,
according to the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Manufacturing
contributes only 15% to India's GDP and the government wants to raise it to 25%. For
this, the government has identified 25 key sectors, which include: automobiles, auto
components, bio-technology, chemicals, defence manufacturing, electronic systems,
food processing, leather, mining, oil and gas, ports, railways, ports and textile.
youth of the country, alleviate poverty, attract investments, create value for Indian
goods and fix the rising trade deficit. Internationally, it will improve India's standing in
the world and investors will look at India not merely as a market but as an opportunity.
The interaction between domestic and international firms will, inevitably, help transform
domestic firms into MNCs. Just as China has emerged as the top manufacturing country
in the world (replacing US in 2010), generating an estimated $2.9 trillion in output in
2012 according to United Nations, India, too, can exploit the advantages of democracy,
demography and demand to transform itself into a self-reliant force, capable of meeting
the aspirations of its own people as well as becoming a preferred destination for foreign
funds.
Furthering his development agenda, the Prime Minister has been making an aggressive
pitch at various forums to woo not just Indian companies but foreign investors as well.
Though, it is too soon to predict the outcome of this particular campaign, the initial
signs are encouraging. Foreign governments and investors are warming up to the 'Make
in India' campaign. The US-India Business Council has identified upwards of $41 billion
for investment in India by its members in the next 3 years. Japan has pledged to invest
$33.6 billion in India within the next 5 years. China, too, has pledged investments
worth $20 billion.
The government has backed this campaign by taking steps such as:
setting up 'Invest India' (will act as the first reference point for assisting
investors)
setting up a dedicated web portal "http://www.makeinindia.com" to resolve all
queries
raising FDI caps in railways and defence production to 100% and 49%
respectively
The environment of positivity created by this campaign has significantly improved the
perception of the Indian economy.
PradhanMantri
Jan
DhanYojana
Critical
Appraisal
The objective of the Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-12) was to achieve a faster and
more inclusive growth in order to make the poor and downtrodden people a participant
in the growth process while allowing the fruits of growth to percolate to the lowest
strata of the society. Though eleventh five year plan achieved the faster growth but
progress in making the benefits of growth reach the lowest strata of the society has
remained far from being satisfactory. Until and unless financial inclusion is made an
inalienable part of the growth process, dream of inclusive growth is hard to achieve.
For that matter, Government of India on August 28, 2014, launched one of its most
ambitious schemes, the PradhanMantri Jan DhanYojana (PMJDY), to provide bank
account to each poor in every corner of the country and thus wipe out the financial
untouchability from the country. Till January 31, 2015, as many as 12.547 crore bank
accounts of poor have been opened under the scheme and balance under such accounts
has reached more than INR10,500crores.
Salient Features of the Scheme
Under the scheme, account holders will be provided zero-balance bank account
with RuPay debit card, in addition to accidental insurance cover of INR100,000
After six months of opening of the bank account, holders can avail INR5,000 loan
from the bank.
Mobile banking for the poor would be available through National Unified USSD
Platform (NUUP) for which all banks and mobile companies have come together.
The scheme has simplified the Know Your Customer (KYC) norms making it easy
to open an account at private as well as public sector banks.
Other benefits of the scheme includes easy transfer of money across India,
beneficiaries of Government Schemes will get Direct Benefit Transfer in these
accounts, access to pension and insurance products etc.
Just like MNREGA was the most ambitious programme of UPA government,
PMJDY is flagship programme of NDA government. Until and unless,
discrepancies in MNREGA are resolved through social audits or other measures,
ultimate objective of PMJDY is hard to achieve as wages of MNREGA will now be
transferred into PMJDY account.
Level of financial literacy in India is far from being satisfactory. Financial illiteracy
is a significant challenge in the path of success of the scheme.
Availability of bank branches and ATMs in rural areas poses another challenge.
Though banking has been made easy but unavailability of banks and ATMS in
nearby areas may force rural folks to go to the local money lender who usually
charges exorbitant rate of interest.
Nevertheless, there is no denying of the fact that without financial inclusion, dream of
inclusive growth will remain elusive. For that matter, PMJDY is the most important
scheme launched to achieve the objective of financial inclusion.
If environment protection is the basic requirement for sustaining the healthy life on the
globe, economic development is no less important to assure the quality of life of the
inhabitants of the earth. If climate change is a reality encountered by the world,
development is the basic requirement for reducing the economic and social inequality.
The only option left for the humans is to tread on the path of sustainable development
which improves life of a person without adversely affecting the environment
surrounding him. As once Mahatma Gandhi has said, Earth provides enough to satisfy
everymans need but not enough for any mans greed, sustainable development also
calls for the development in perpetuity which is not possible if the environment is
ignored.
It is true that clean technologies are bit expensive and increase the cost of production,
the polluting technologies would cost more by increasing the expenditure on healthcare.
The polluter must pay principle should be adopted universally to generate the funds for
environment protection.
It must be noted that environment protection is not to put environmentalist and
developers at the loggerheads but to make development in synergy with the
environment. In the quest of increasing the GDP, policy makers must not forget the
Green GDP. Indeed, environment protection and economic development can go and
must go hand in hand.
However, things are not going as was desired. Multiple agencies have been created at
various levels spreading across approximately 20 separate ministries and 35 state
governments and union territories with overlapping and conflicting priorities. Though
National Skill Development Agency (NSDA) was created in 2013 to consolidate efforts in
this sphere, it mainly has a coordination role, lacks any effective powers and remains
significantly under-resourced. Training infrastructure and capacity is another challenge.
It is estimated that various publicly funded organizations produce 3.5 million trained
personnel per annum against the 12.8 million new entrants into the workforce each
year.
Thus a domestic skill development policy needs to be overhauled. The institutional
structure needs simplification with greater investment in training infrastructure and an
emphasis on supporting a casual labour force. There is also a needto ensure
participation of private sector in the training and skill development by virtue of a
suitable incentive policy. Apart from this, regular education is also required to be
dovetailed with the industry requirement. In the light of highly specialized nature of
jobs which would be created in future, it is required that government have to give the
top most priority to ensure the more inclusive growth in future.
Wind Energy in India - Reaching New Heights Every Day
Wind energy is the form of energy extracted from wind and is used in the production of
electrical power with wind turbines, mechanical power using windmills, for water
pumping wind-pumps and in sails for propelling ships. Its a renewable and hence a
clean source of energy. This is the only source of energy for which man doesnt require
water.
India is the only country to have a dedicated ministry for Renewable Energy. Ministry of
New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) headquartered at Lodhi Road, New Delhi is a
ministry formed in 1992 by The Government of India. The ministry has a specialized
technical institution in Chennai with the name Centre for Wind Energy Technology (CWET) under its aegis. The ministry has also formed the India National Offshore Wind
Energy Authority with an objective to enhance Indias wind power production and
consumption.
Till 2006 India had only 6270MW of Wind Power Installed capacity but later made a
steady progress and crossed the 20kMW bar taking India to fifth position in the world in
installed wind power capacity. The share of Wind energy in total installed capacity of the
country is 8.5% but it generates 1.6% of the countrys total power. Wind Energy has
the highest contribution of 66.7% in the total Renewable energy (comprising various
sources) of India.
Region wise, Tamil Nadu is the major contributor in Indias total Wind power installed
capacity i.e. 7253MW followed by Gujarat (2093MW) and Maharashtra (2976MW).
Then Rajasthan stands fourth with 2355MW of capacity and rest of the nation
contributes only 400MW. The Muppandal wind farm with total capacity of 1500MW,
amounting to 20% of the countrys capacity, is the largest wind power farm in India.
Suzlon is the market leader in wind energy segment in India with 43% of market share.
It has pioneered the advanced wind turbine technology currently in use in India. It is
also a leading manufacturer of wind turbines for the Indian Market. Other contributing
companies in this field are Subhash Limited, Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation
Limited (MMTCL), Gudimangalam Wind Farm etc.
However, future of wind energy in India is hindered by following factors
1. Initial cost for wind turbines is very high, even more than that of conventional
fossil fuel generators per MW installed
2. The controversial and tough Land acquisition policies.
3. Noise pollution these plants generate
The total power potential of India is around 300-400GW according to the Lawrence
Berkley National Laboratory while potential from Wind energy is about 102GW. In the
12th five year plan, Government of India has set a target of adding over 11GW capacity
Wind Energy Plants in the country. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) of
India has announced a revised estimation of the potential wind power resource from
initial estimates of 49,130 MW to 102,788 MW.
Also there are several reports about potential for off-shore wind energy hot spots in
India, which include coastal area of Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Orissa.
The future of Wind energy seems bright and is definitely going to lead India towards
energy sufficiency and security.
Mangalyaan has made India proud !
It is true that necessity is the mother of invention but there are several other
milestones achieved by the human beings during the course of evolution not due to the
necessity but because of curiosity in human mind. If the human mind would have been
devoid of any curiosity about the unknown, we might still be living in the Paleolithic
age.
The latest Mangalyaan or the Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM) endeavor by the Indian Space
Research Organization (ISRO) is too driven by the curiosity about the unknown in the
outer space. In fact the rover sent to the Mars by National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) of the United States was also named as Curiosity.
During the initial stage of Mangalyaan in the backdrop of premature death of
Chandrayaan mission, there was some criticism on the ground of cost borne for such
mission by a developing country like India which can use this money for various social
needs
like
public
health,
removal
of
poverty
etc.
But the truth is that such projects are more important for a developing country like
India which had made us into the ranks of interplanetary nations. It is not an
extravagant expenditure but an investment driven by curiosity into the unknown which
may open the door of insurmountable benefits in future. Now daring to look beyond the
earth into the infinite universe, India has expanded its possibilities by infinity.
After the successful insertion of MOM into the Mars orbit on September 24, 2014, India
became the first country in the world to achieve such event in its very first attempt and
the
third
one
overall
to
do
so
after
the
US
and
Europe.
On November 5, 2013, MOM was launched by Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV
C25) from ShriHari Kota in Andhra Pradesh. Apart from the success of this mission,
another thing which makes every Indian proud is that it is made with mainly home
grown Indian technologies. The parts of the Mangalyaan were made in small factories in
India. The main foreign contribution to this mission's success has been the irreplaceable
communications services of NASA's Deep Space Network, delivering Mars Orbiter
Mission's
messages
to
Earth.
It is the cheapest successful interplanetary mission ever carried out. The entire cost of
the mission is USD74 million (INR453 crore) which is less than the budget of Hollywood
movie Gravity which was about USD100 million (INR 612 crore). The average cost of
the mission borne by people of India is INR4.0 per person. The per kilometre cost of the
mission was less than INR 7 per km, which is less than the cost of travel by an autorickshaw
in
major
Indian
cities.
The pride generated by Mangalyaan among Indians can be judged by the frustration
caused by the mission in our western neighbor. After the success of MOM, infamous
nuclear scientist of Pakistan Abdul Qadeer Khan tweeted, India had reached Mars at a
price seven times less than that of a metro bus project while Pakistani PM Nawaz Sharif
was enjoying his US visit spending $1 lakh per day of taxpayers' money. In another
tweet, he said, "India was once a child to us in terms of technology, but corrupt
politicians arrested our scientists, closed researches on US direction." However, India
received compliments as well where website of Pakistani newspaper 'Tribune Express'
stated: "Congratulations to India. Really, we need to look at our neighbor and gauge
where
and
how
we
have
fallen
behind."
The Mangalyaan will study Mars for around six months. In addition to cameras that will
photograph Mars' surface, it is equipped with different instruments that will analyze the
planet's
atmosphere,
looking
for
methane
in
particular.
Scientists believe that, if methane is present, it could be a sign of microbial life and will
give some hints about the origin of life. Some previous crafts have detected traces of
methane,
but
the
Curiosity
rover
has
failed
to
find
any.
Thus the objective of MOM is not just to show the Indian entry into other planets but
scientific investigation as well. The mission is indeed a proud moment for every Indian
as it has expanded its horizons beyond our green planet and now not just sky but the
universe is limit.
Aimed at improving the lives of millions of Indias poor, both in rural and urban, by
bringing them into the financial mainstream, the PMJDYs target is to open 7.5 crore
bank accounts by January 2015.
To achieve that goal, the programme will help people to open zero-balance accounts
with any bank, either public or private, with far more simple Know-Your-Customer rules
and minimal documentation. An Aadhaar card is just all required to open a Jan Dhan
account, which also comes with accident insurance benefit of up to Rs 1 lakh with each
account.
Further, accounts opened before January 26, 2015 will also get an additional life cover
of Rs 30,000. Jan Dhan account holders will also get an overdraft facility subject to
conditions.
The moot question, however, is why PMJDY? Will it help achieve governments
envisaged goals or become another lofty scheme waiting in files for its eventual death?
The case for expanding the scope of organized banking to every nook and corner of the
country is strong.
At present, only 58% of Indian households have access to banking services, which
means more than 40% of households lack access to formal credit and finance system
and therefore, are forced to depend on usurious money-lenders. Furthermore, potential
investors among them have no option but to put money in shady Ponzi schemes.
A formal bank account becoming the norm will also help the government to directly pay
all subsidies into the accounts of the poor and help plug the leaks. An efficient,
transparent and sleek system of subsidy disbursal will help the government to better
assess and implement its social welfare schemes.
Critics, however, ask: how is the scheme different from previous schemes to provide
organized access to credit to the rural and urban poor?
How the government will finance insurance premium and viability of maintaining these
bank accounts? At a time when banks are shifting to the concept of privileged access
and priority services, will banks give good service to zero-balance account customers?
Whether the government or BFSI, the taxpayer will have to share the burden of yet
another government scheme.
The initial response to the scheme has been quite encouraging with 1.5 crores account
opened on the first day. Industry too has welcomed the scheme but expects sound and
efficient implementation to create lasting impact on poverty eradication.
Following are the perceived pros and cons of PMJDY :
Pros
Expand banking, financial & insurance sectors
Allow direct cash transfer to targeted beneficiaries
Cons
Another social welfare scheme
Questionable viability of banking, insurance accounts
A large and rapid devaluation may scare off international investors. It makes
investors less willing to hold government debt because it is effectively reducing
the value of their holdings.
However, there are positives of the depreciation as well and many industries
cheer the depreciation
Exports become cheaper, more competitive to foreign buyers. Therefore, this
provides a boost for domestic demand.
Travel to India gets cheaper; local industry may benefit.
Those working abroad can gain more on remitting money to their homeland.
The ability of depreciation to affect the exports and imports depends upon the demand
elasticity of goods and services exported or imported. For instance, if the oil imports are
demand inelastic i.e. price of oil has little impact on its import demand, depreciation will
have little impact on current account deficit.
Nevertheless, there are some other benefits of depreciation also which doesnt accrue
directly. Rupee depreciation raises the cost of components and goods for importdependent businesses. It puts them at a disadvantage vis--vis companies that are net
exporters. So while rupee depreciation seems to be painful in the short term, it may
turn out to be a blessing in disguise for the Indian manufacturing sector in the medium
to long term.
A cheaper rupee will incentivise Indian companies to export more besides helping them
substitute some of the costlier imported goods in the domestic market with local
products. Thus, despite strengthening the ills like inflation, Rupee depreciation has its
positives and can help in developing the manufacturing base of the economy.