0% found this document useful (0 votes)
783 views1 page

RMR Lengkap

This document presents the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system, which provides a methodology for classifying rock masses based on their geotechnical properties and rating various parameters that influence the strength and stability of the rock mass. It lists the key parameters used in the RMR system - including intact rock strength, quality of drill cores, spacing of discontinuities, condition of discontinuities, groundwater conditions, and discontinuity orientation. Based on the total ratings of these parameters, the rock mass is assigned a class from I to V, with class I being very good rock and class V being very poor rock. Guidelines are provided for interpreting the different rock mass classes.

Uploaded by

Amar Yamani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
783 views1 page

RMR Lengkap

This document presents the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system, which provides a methodology for classifying rock masses based on their geotechnical properties and rating various parameters that influence the strength and stability of the rock mass. It lists the key parameters used in the RMR system - including intact rock strength, quality of drill cores, spacing of discontinuities, condition of discontinuities, groundwater conditions, and discontinuity orientation. Based on the total ratings of these parameters, the rock mass is assigned a class from I to V, with class I being very good rock and class V being very poor rock. Guidelines are provided for interpreting the different rock mass classes.

Uploaded by

Amar Yamani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Table 4.4: Rock Mass Rating System (After Bieniawski, 1989).

A. CLASSIFICATION PARAMETERS AND THEIR RATINGS


Parameter

>10 MPa

4 - 10 MPa

2 - 4 MPa

1 - 2 MPa

>250 MPa

100 - 250 MPa

50 - 100 MPa

25 - 50 MPa

15

12

For this low range uniaxial compressive


test is preferred
5 - 25 1 - 5
<1
MPa
MPa MPa
2
1
0

Drill core Quality RQD

90% - 100%

75% - 90%

50% - 75%

25% - 50%

< 25%

Rating

20

17

13

Spacing of discontinuities

>2m

0.6 - 2 . m

200 - 600 mm

60 - 200 mm

< 60 mm

Rating

20

10

2
3

Range of values

Strength
of
intact rock Uniaxial comp.
material
strength
Rating

Point-load
strength index

15

Very rough surfaces


Not continuous
Condition of discontinuities No separation
(See E)
Unweathered
wall
rock
Rating

Inflow per 10 m
tunnel length (l/m)
Ground (Joint water press)/
5 water (Major principal )
General conditions
Rating

Slightly rough surfaces


Separation < 1 mm
Slightly weathered
walls

30

25

None

< 10

10 - 25

Slightly rough sur- Slickensided surfaces


or
faces
Gouge < 5 mm thick
Separation < 1 mm
or
Highly weathered
Separation 1-5 mm
walls
Continuous
20
10

Soft gouge >5 mm


thick
or
Separation > 5 mm
Continuous
0

25 - 125

> 125

< 0.1

0.1, - 0.2

0.2 - 0.5

> 0.5

Completely dry

Damp

Wet

Dripping

Flowing

15

10

0
Very Unfavourable

B. RATING ADJUSTMENT FOR DISCONTINUITY ORIENTATIONS (See F)


Strike and dip orientations

Ratings

Very favourable

Favourable

Fair

Unfavourable

Tunnels & mines

-2

-5

-10

-12

Foundations

-2

-7

-15

-25

Slopes

-5

-25

-50

C. ROCK MASS CLASSES DETERMINED FROM TOTAL RATINGS


Rating

100

Class number
Description

81

80

61

60

41

40

< 21

21

II

III

IV

Very good rock

Good rock

Fair rock

Poor rock

Very poor rock

D. MEANING OF ROCK CLASSES


Class number

II

III

IV

20 yrs for 15 m span

1 year for 10 m span

1 week for 5 m span

10 hrs for 2.5 m span

30 min for 1 m span

Cohesion of rock mass (kPa)

> 400

300 - 400

200 - 300

100 - 200

< 100

Friction angle of rock mass (deg)

> 45

35 - 45

25 - 35

15 - 25

< 15

3 - 10 m
2
0.1 - 1.0 mm
4
Slightly rough
3
Hard filling > 5 mm
2
Moderately weathered
3

10 - 20 m
1
1 - 5 mm
1
Smooth
1
Soft filling < 5 mm
2
Highly weathered
1

> 20 m
0
> 5 mm
0
Slickensided
0
Soft filling > 5 mm
0
Decomposed
0

Average stand-up time

E. GUIDELINES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF DISCONTINUITY conditions


Discontinuity length (persistence)
<1m
1-3m
Rating
6
4
Separation (aperture)
None
< 0.1 mm
Rating
6
5
Roughness
Very rough
Rough
Rating
6
5
Infilling (gouge)
None
Hard filling < 5 mm
Rating
6
4
Weathering
Unweathered
Slightly weathered
Ratings
6
5

F. EFFECT OF DISCONTINUITY STRIKE AND DIP ORIENTATION IN TUNNELLING**


Strike perpendicular to tunnel axis

Strike parallel to tunnel axis

Drive with dip - Dip 45 - 90

Drive with dip - Dip 20 - 45

Dip 45 - 90

Dip 20 - 45

Very favourable

Favourable

Very favourable

Fair

Drive against dip - Dip 45-90

Drive against dip - Dip 20-45

Dip 0-20 - Irrespective of strike

Fair

Unfavourable

Fair

* Some conditions are mutually exclusive . For example, if infilling is present, the roughness of the surface will be overshadowed by the
influence of the gouge. In such cases use A.4 directly.
** Modified after W ickham et al (1972).

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy