Small Group Analysis 12 Angry Men
Small Group Analysis 12 Angry Men
The Jurors
Character Traits
Juror #1
Foreman
A high-school assistant head coach, doggedly concerned to keep the proceedings formal and maintain authority; easily frustrated
and sensitive when someone objects to his control; inadequate for the job as foreman, not a natural leader and over-shadowed
by Juror # 8's natural leadership.
Juror #12
Juror #2
Ad Man
Meek Man
Juror #11
Immigrant
A watchmaker, speaks with a heavy accent,
of German-European descent, a recent refugee
and immigrant; expresses reverence and respect
for American democracy, its system of justice,
and the infallibility of the Law.
Juror #10
Bitter Man
A garage owner, who simmers with anger,
bitterness, racist bigotry; nasty, repellent, intolerant,
reactionary and accusative; segregates the world into
'us' and 'them'; needs the support of others to reinforce
his manic rants.
Juror #9
Old Man
Eldest man in group, white-haired, thin,
soft-spoken, resigned to death but has a
perceptive, fair-minded; named McCardle
Juror #8
Architect
An architect, instigates a thoughtful reconsideration
of the case against the accused; symbolically clad in
white; a liberal-minded, patient truth-and-justice
seeker who uses soft-spoken, calm logical reasoning;
balanced, decent, courageous, well-spoken and
concerned; considered a do-gooder (who is just
Juror #3
Angry Father
Juror #4
Man of Sophistication
Juror #5
Slum Man
Juror #6
lacks complete human concern for the defendant and for the immigrant juror; extroverted; keeps up
amusing banter and even impersonates James Cagney at one point; votes with the majority.
Paper Guidelines!!!!!!!!
Must be at least one page typed, double spaced, twelve point font.
Examine Twelve Angry Men jurors and analyze the following:
1. In general all groups experience three phase:
i. introductory phase - awkward getting to know you
ii. conflict/confrontation phase personalities, beliefs values emerge
iii. accommodation/cooperation/cohesion phase lets work it out
together
Explore, briefly how the plot of this play (each Act) corresponds to this formula.
2. How do they go about solving the problem?
3. What role does each character play in the group?
Identify the negative roles of some jurors: nitpicker, eager beaver, fence sitter,
wisecracker, superior being, dominator, clown, whiner.
Identify the positive roles of some jurors: impartial listener, clarifier, leader,
includer, moderator
4. How do their perceptions and values impacted their behavior and impact the
group?
5. How might a consensus have been reached in an easier fashion?
Somewhere in your analysis make sure to tie in at least five of the following terms:
discussion, cooperation, competition, cohesion, bombard, polarize, apathetic, status quo,
monopolize, constructive conflict, disruptive conflict, avoidance, groupthink and
accommodation AND how they did or did not impact the small group dynamics of
Twelve Angry Men.
Negative Roles
Nitpicker want everything spelled out and will squabble until they get what they want.
Eager beaver- want to offer a solution whether they have given it any thought or not.
Fence sitter dont dare take a position until they are sure what the key people will say.
Wisecracker group clown, people who seek attention in any way possible.
Superior being look down their noses at the whole business.
Dominator dont know when to quit talking
Clown always joking around never on task
Whiner complains about everything preventing others from being on task.
Positive Roles
Listener allow others to speak