4 Wheel Alignment on a Mazda MX-5 Miata

by Andrew Willliams
Can you measure and check 4 wheel alignment on a "5" using string, straight edge,
plumb bob, spirit level and extending rule etc. Those nay sayers should note that
motorbike frame re-aligners use a jig, and tape measure ;-). Any Freemasons among
us will know little more was used to build Europe's great cathedrals, or to navigate the
world! So why do people think the idea totally foreign when it comes to a simple car
geometry. The MX-5 is not a hand crafted car like say the Jensen Interceptor, they are
computer designed, the monocoque and suspension components are jigged, assembled
and spot welded by robots, to within fractions of a millimetre! Manufacturers can not
afford for things not to line up!
Read any US site dedicated to auto-cross and "5" motor sport, and they will talk about
all sorts of trick settings. They will tell you that the rear wheel "toe" and camber is
where you start (as they affect the handling most). Front wheel "toe", and camber
come next, finally the caster angle is checked, and is sometimes compromised slightly
due to the other (more radical) settings. The caster angle is mainly a function of the
original design, it adds "damping" and "self centring" to steering. 5 degrees or slightly
less is the desirable caster angle. If less, it makes the steering lighter - for those
without PAS! Doing a search of the US "5" web sites. fora, and also Wikipedia will
explain all this in far greater detail (see here, and the other external links on this page).
If any modifications are made to the "5" suspension, (see below!) such as replacement
springs, dampers, bushes, track rod ends etc., alignment can be checked (and can if
necessary be adjusted) using simple tools. Mazda tolerances are pretty wide, so
getting within spec. is not difficult. Playing with rear "toe" and camber settings can be
great fun! Obviously this web page is only my opinion, but I think all the links give
great (independent) understanding in the subject Enjoy!
A few suggested pre-requisites:
1) Check tyre inflation.
2) Make sure the suspension is settled... Go for a drive (a week is plenty of time to
allow new components to settle)
3) While driving, find the centre position of the steering wheel, this is useful to know
(for resetting steering wheel position).
4) Find out whether the car drifts to the left or right - can help with adjustments (and
for resetting steering wheel position).

5) Find the most level (even) ground you can, to carry out the checks. (garage or
reasonable drive-way will do!)
FM recommended these settings as a good set up, who am I to argue!
Front wheels:
Caster: 5.0 degrees
Camber: 1.0 degree negative (about 5 mm out at the bottom, per side)
Toe in: 1.6 mm (0.8 mm per side)
Rear wheels:
Camber: 1.5 degrees negative (about 8 mm out at the bottom, per side)
Toe in: 1.6 mm (0.8 mm per side)

First thing to do.is to note the front and rear track in the table and diagram above.
The front "axle line" is 20 mm (10 mm either side) narrower than the rear. Run a
string as shown, carefully measuring from the wheel (centre) hub at the front and back
wheels, allowing for the extra 10mm at the front. See pictures below,

Front wheel >>>>>-----------------------------------------------> Rear wheel

A second string should be run on the opposite side in a similar fashion, - note the
string being used here is thick for photographic purposes (ideally a lighter thread or
fishing line, should be used) The strings must extend past the front and rear of the car,
so the two strings can be checked to see if they are parallel (with one another). This
assures that the set up is as accurate as possible. Measurements can also be taken to
specific parts of the car body too (each side being compared).

These strings should be a pretty accurate datum to work

(measure) from...

Rear Wheels
So, all you need to do is measure between the string and the front of the wheel, and
between the string, and the back of the wheel - as shown below. The difference
should be: "toe in" up to about 1 mm. The picture shows the "near side" rear wheel
being measured for "toe"! (In fact "toe" measurement - in milli-metres - is specified at
at the fat point of the tyre, measuring at the wheel is possibly more accurate!) This is
the reason the specification is normally given in degrees.
If the wheel is running exactly parallel (front and rear) it is still within Mazda spec.,
but ideally, both sides should have the same measurement (toe), and be within
Mazda spec.

Do exactly the same on the car's "off side" (opposite side).

On the car shown, polyurethane bushes were fitted all around, the 8 adjuster bolts
were set to the centre position, unsurprisingly the car wheel alignment was pretty
accurate from the start. As stated in the opening paragraph, this should be the case,
unless the car has been in a serious prang, or the bushes worn. Everything should be
pretty straight!

Front Wheels
For the front, the steering is first wound lock to lock, to be sure the steering wheel is

centring in the middle of the rack. This proves the (new) track rod ends are fitted in
the correct position. Tracking is checked in exactly the same way as rear wheel
alignment, again, shown in the pictures below. Note front adjustment for toe is
generally done with the track rod ends, and not the wishbone adjustment. Front
wishbone adjustment is for camber and caster

Rear Wheels re-check

Now it is time to hold a straight edge against each rear wheel (in turn) to recheck the
stringing measurement, holding the straight edge firmly against the tyre wall. at the
sill line, as shown. This technique is used in many applications, such as checking

motorcycle wheel alignment, and in industry for checking drive belt/pulley

alignment. Use it to double check the string method.

If the job has been done correctly, both sides should match. Note in the picture below,
the distance marked at the arrows, is at the seam where the front wing meets the sill
(directly below the door hinge). On a Mk 1 (fitted with standard off-set wheels) the
gap should be about 35 mm - importantly it should be exactly the same on each side!
There should be no significant tyre "run-out" (or bubbles etc.) so this measurement
should be a reasonably accurate "quick check" (if it is wrong, go back to stringing or
possibly a professional job). As you will see, with a 2 metre straight edge, if the wheel
being measured is out by say 1 degree; at 2 metres, this would equate to
approximately 30 mm (difference) where the arrows are! Clearly, rear wheel

alignment can be checked to within a few minutes of arc, (the same on each side)
using this final (rougher) check method!

Not only does this double check to a fair degree of accuracy, it also shows that all is
well with the monocoque (no serious accident damage!) It is also a very quick check
(30 seconds) to prove nothing has shifted, since last time the job was done. This is
useful if you travel heavily pot-holed back road (as I do).
With a little more time "stringing" the car using a 4 sided box (across the front and the
rear of the car), the hub centre measurement from the front and rear strings can also be
used to ensure the toe angle of the front and rear wheels are even. This double checks
for "thrust angle" (a term used when a car is deliberately set up "skewed" for running
on oval circuits and the like) This is also confirmed with the "straight edge" compared
against the (side) sills.

Camber can be checked, added or adjusted, using spirit level, plumb bob or extending
rule. Obviously the car need to be on reasonably level ground (fudge factor can be
worked out reasonably easily - I'll leave this to the enthusiast). Instead, it can also be
done, if you know the measurement (on the same axle) between the two wheel hub
centres (using the distance between the two strings and a few simple subtractions).
You can easily figure out negative camber, with the extending rule, measuring under
the car's (front or rear) "axle line", underside, "inside wheel" to "inside wheel". The
notches on the adjuster bolts can be used, as a guide (see the Mazda chart below).
Caster angle is pretty much a function of the original suspension design, if the rest is
right, caster should be within tolerance. Most motor sport people consider Caster has
the least effect on handling. This Youtube video, gives a few ideas with that.Sealey do
a DIY caster and camber measuring tool for 35 (see image below), which could be
easily adapted. Do a search on Google for "Sealey +Caster" if you are really keen. If
you do not feel confident with this, then just leave the front alone! Ultimately there is
nothing stopping you paying for a professional job, in the certain knowledge that you
now understand what is going on underneath, (and that all the bolts are moving
freely). Below are details on how to adjust the bolts.
35 Sealey caster tool

Settings

Epilogue
The vast majority of "5's" will never see a full alignment in their lives (outside the

original factory one) This task is often ignored even by dealerships during the initial
new car "pre-delivery inspection" (it is supposed to be done, but few have the
equipment). Very occasionally, a "5" might have the tracking adjusted, when an owner
finds a "scrubbed out" front tyre, that is the closest most get to an alignment.
Is a full (100+) alignment mandatory, some enthusiasts, pedants, and anal
retentive's think so, and on a regular basis too! But on a sunny afternoon, is it fun
doing the above (if only checking), it would also help with the decision whether a
100 - 150 alignment is worth the effort and cost.

Wishbone bushing
Flexing in standard rubber wishbone bushes is far greater than with modern
polyurethane bushes (this is why the MX-5 challenge don't allow them in their regs.!)
Having old, tired, torn and split bushes in a complex multi-link suspension, makes a
100 alignment somewhat moot, especially if your car is only worth 1500. On newer
cars, where serious capital has been invested, the added cost of an alignment is
probably not that significant, on the original outlay, though MK 3's probably need the
lowering kit first!
Organic rubber bushes on a 10 or 15 year old MX-5, which has covered 60,000 miles
(or whatever) will have started to perish (as mine had). This is not easy to see, with
the bushes in situe. In Norman Garrett's book he suggests that new bushes are one of
the best value handling upgrades "bang for the buck". If you are considering
replacement wishbone and anti-roll bar bushes, fitting polyurethane bushes will
improve handling, without affecting ride comfort to any great extent. It should be
noted that there are different hardness polyurethane bushes. They are expensive,
requiring considerable capital outlay, also they are difficult to fit as a DIY job. Anyone
considering replacement polyurethane bushes, would be well advised going for the
split ones, as they are much easier to fit. (I bought complete bushes, which really
required a proper bench press to push them home.)

Lowering springs
Lowering the MX-5 can be done quite cheaply using "trim springs" These a quite
literally standard springs that have had about 75 - 100mm cut off their "free"
length(using an angle grinder). There are also aftermarket lowering springs designed
to fit on the standard shock absorbers. Avoid both these options, they are awful, they
reduce "sprung travel". When the car goes light (over a hump), during landing,
the suspension has lots of almost unsprung travel, it then tends to quickly bottom out
on the "bump stops" which causes very unstable conditions and feel. Low springs on
the track, are fine, but for everyday road use they are a very poor option.
Shown, a standard rear spring and a purchased "trim spring" (35mm lowering)

"Coil-Over" struts
Replacement struts - often referred to as "coil-overs", though the standard ones are
"coil-over" (damper) too! "Road springs", and shock absorbers (more accurately
"dampers") need to be be matched, for a successful outcome. Purchasing those known
as "ride height kits" are undoubtedly the ones to go for. Specifically ones with
adjustable damping, AND screw adjustable spring perches, as shown below.

Example of a screw perch "ride height kit"

Struts with fixed perches, or those with multi position perches are useless, as it is
highly unlikely that the EXACT ride height will ever be achieved. Having to remove
the strut, and compress the spring, to change the height is a futile pointless task. The
slight extra cost of the screw perch type, is well worth the extra money. With screw
perches, the ride can be set to the ideal height, for the roads travelled. From a 4 x 4
look alike, to a track hugging low rider! A car that is too low, is a misery, too high, and
the handling and looks compromised!
Some other useful recourses
http://www.fizzindi.demon.co.uk/wheelalign.htm
http://www.miata.net/garage/align.html

http://www.hummingbirds.net/alignment.html
http://www.fizzindi.demon.co.uk/mk2align.doc
http://www.quadesl.com/miata_alignment.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_(vehicle)
http://www.tampabaymiatas.net/Misc_Pages/Miata Suspension.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caster_angle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camber_angle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toe_(automotive)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ackermann_steering_geometry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HbkslChoBY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrWkqJzYfQ4
http://www.familycar.com/Alignment.htm Thrust Angle
http://autorepair.about.com/od/glossary/a/glossary_new.htm
http://www.miata.net/sport/Physics/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-link_suspension
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understeer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oversteer
Front sub frame and suspension

Rear sub frame and suspension

Monocoque dimensions