12 51 2 PB
12 51 2 PB
1:1
138
taxpayers when they need it rather as an enforcement tool after the event (p.57),
as in the case of the UK, Australia and Italy, are considered important. The point
is that taxpayers are to be seen as valued customers, not as robbers, to make the
tax system responsive and responsible.
Part 2 reviews the capacity building and database issues for the customs
department. Given the resources, emphasis on user-friendly modern technologies
backed by risk management tools is needed to prevent fraud and smuggling,
which requires massive regional and international cooperation. To make the
database readily analysable and exchangeable, legislative enactments with layered
authorisation should be in place.
Part 3 deals with three crosscutting issues impact assessments, widening the tax
base and enforcement mechanisms. An underdeveloped area of Indias tax
administration is that neither of the two Boards carries out an ex-ante impact
assessment (p.735). The tax base is narrow and overwhelmed with inadequate
enforcement efforts. The Commission recommends ex-ante and ex-post
stakeholder consultation, using both quantitative and qualitative methods, to
identify the potential impact of tax policy changes. For the tax base to expand,
suggestions include increased attention to withholding taxes, high net individuals,
presumptive taxes, and bringing large agricultural firms and other informal sector
business into the tax net. The synergy in base expansion and tax collection would
be higher if the enforcement schemes focus on both enhancing trust and a
collaborative relationship with the taxpayers along with verification audits of
complex transactions tracked down using risk rating tools. Search and seizure can
only be used in special cases.
The final substantive part is part 4, which has chapters on developing forecasting
models for revenue targets and fraud detection as well as overall research capacity
building for the tax administration. In the case of revenue and arrears forecasting,
a combination of short and long term conditional/causal tax specific models, using
transparent data with periodic review of macroeconomic changes, could be
applied to replace the current unstructured budget making practices. Similarly, the
currently practised silo data and skills management pools need to be better
integrated and buttressed with risk based analytical tools, knowledge sharing and
mutual cooperation. Practical research for tax policy making, except for some
scattered and sporadic attempts, is at a budding stage in the tax administration of
India. A multi-disciplinary evidence-based research body, funded adequately and
linked with external research bodies, is recommended to carry out meaningful
works on all important areas, ranging from compliance tracking to tax disputes.
Knowledge gaps and training needs have been focused as usual in revitalizing the
research units.
These are the bare bones of the analysis and recommendations made in the report.
The power of the report is in the simplicity of presentation and painstaking
coverage of the tax administration, not as much in the theoretical originality of tax
reform literature: none of the recommendations is new deriving much from
international best practice, without seriously delving about the usability of the
reforms proposals in the Indian context. For this reason, this review will probably
have less impact, while being a useful reference work.
139
140