Previously Incurred Project Cost Future Eligible Project Cost
Previously Incurred Project Cost Future Eligible Project Cost
______________________________________________________________________________
Project Name
Previously Incurred Project Cost
Future Eligible Project Cost
Total Project Cost
NSFHP Request
Total Federal Funding (including NSFHP)
Are matching funds restricted to a specific
project component? If so, which one?
ii
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT LOCATION AND PARTIES
GRANT FUND SOURCES/USES
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
PROJECT READINESS
FEDERAL SELECTION CRITERIA
RESULTS OF THE BCA
APPENDICES
2
11
13
14
15
18
25
Project Description
a) PROJECT DETAILS AND BACKGROUND
Maine is unique in that it borders only one other state but has a 611-mile border with Canada.
The Port of Portland, Maine, is the largest container seaport in the state closest to Europe.
Future growth into and out of the region can have a profound effect on transportation in the
northeast. The State of Maine has long pursued its Three-Port Strategy for preserving the
resources of the coastal Maine while encouraging industrial port development. A tremendous
catalyst for growth of that strategy was a successful TIGER I grant receipt in 2009. A key
component of that grant was the development of a container port at the International Marine
Terminal in Portland. That initial $5M funding has since been parlayed into over $25M of
additional state and private investment at the port allowing it to handle some 17,000 containers
of freight over the last 3 years (2013-2015).
The Port is now poised to enter a phase of exponential but clearly and carefully targeted
growth. And as the initial USDOT grant was the spark to begin the redevelopment of the Port,
a FASTLANE grant is being sought to again provide the catalyst for investment and this time
for a new phase of growth and improvements. This growth will be driven to rail and vessels
and will minimize the use of the US Highway System and other roadways as well as key
border crossings.
The Maine Intermodal Port Productivity Project will make key investments at the Port of
Portland allowing this space constrained facility to fully realize its potential through efficiency
2
The $15,438,347 in freight port and rail infrastructure investment will yield $46,315,041
in economic output for this region.2
The project has a total Net Present Value (NPV) benefit of at least $304.9 million and a
benefit-cost ratio of at least 3.7 to 1. For the purposes of this FASTLANE grant
occurring among upstream suppliers. See ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS, INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT,
http://www.aar.org/incongress/infrastructuretaxincentive/infrastructuretaxincentive.aspx.
All of the infrastructure improvements are integrated throughout the Port complex to provide
for the utilization, efficiency and safety improvements necessary to handle the coming growth
in container traffic. Each of the portions of the Project has independent utility but the whole is
far greater than the sum of the parts because of the designed interaction of each improvement
to the overall operation at the port.
The result of the project will be the northern most intermodal container port on the east coast of
the US, better able to compete with Canadian ports and improve traffic flows into the entire
region. Containers that would otherwise land in Halifax and Montreal will land in Portland
3
4
This new area will complete an open space between two concrete travel ramps of
approximately 190-ft by 60-ft and create a robust wharf which will span over the existing
seawalls. The wharf will be constructed of steel pipe piles and a concrete superstructure
designed to provide an industrial strength deck of 1,000 per square foot (psf) live load
capacity and a continuous working surface of 450 linear feet along the waterfront; an increase
of over 40 percent. This work will also include removal of remnant steel and timber piles along
the waterfront, removal of one concrete ramp (of limited 450 psf live load capacity), and
rehabilitation of the existing seawall in select locations. The wharf infill area will improve the
functionality of the waterfront by increasing the square foot area of the deck by approximately
11,400 square feet and result in a continuous shoreline structure.
Before
After
Each aspect of the project provides for new independent utility if it were the only work
completed. The infill alone would allow for movement flexibility of the existing harbor crane
and some minor efficiency gains could be realized. The new fenders would have the safety
benefits if they were the only aspect of the Project. And the mobile harbor crane would also
generate efficiency gains but they too would be minimal without the footprint expansion. True
efficiency improvements come when these are completed in tandem, as the additional square
footage on the wharf will be created allowing the new crane room to work in great
coordination with the existing crane.
2. Rail
Four key improvements will be made to the rail aspect of the project that focus on capacity
gains, returning to a state of good repair and safety upgrades. Similar to the dockside
improvements, these also have independent utility.
1. Terminal Capacity Improvements ($1,169,710)
Despite the fact that the Portland IMT recently constructed over 4,100 linear feet of railroad
track including a new 750-ft siding along an industrial concrete loading slab and a new 750-ft
runaround track the rail support yard to the Port remains small with little capacity to handle
containers of a substantial volume through the Port. Prior those modifications rail traffic did
8
II.
11
PORTLAND COMMUNITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Portland's Economic Scorecard 2015 (Sept. 2015)
http://www.portlandregion.com/ (last visited March 31 2016).
7
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS , Portland-South Portland, ME - May 2015 OES Metropolitan and
Nonmetropolitan Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, May 2015 (last visited March 31, 2016).
8
See id.
9
MAINE DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION, Maine Integrated Freight Strategy, June 2014 http://www.maine.gov/mdot/ofbs/docs/FreightStrat.pdf.
12
The significant growth of international traffic via steam ship and intermodal traffic at the rail
ramp at the IMT as well as the near term opportunities for container traffic to increase fivefold
through the facility if the infrastructure exists to support the increased demand has made this
project a top priority at MaineDOT and the Department has prioritized funds accordingly.
2. Maine Port Authority and International Marine Terminal
The Maine Port Authority is a body both corporate and politic in the State established for
the general purpose of acquiring, constructing and operating any kind of port terminal
facility and railroad facility within the State of Maine. The Authority consists of a seven
member Board of Directors, 5 of whom are appointed by the Governor. The President of the
Maine International Trade Center serves as an ex-officio member of the Board, as does the
Maine Commissioner of Transportation, who shall act as chairman and president. The
Maine Port Authority and MaineDOT may enter into such agreements as the Directors and
Commissioner determine to be in the best interests of the State for the department to
acquire, construct, maintain and operate any or all facilities funded from bonds such as those
used for the Project match.
3. Pan Am Railways
The portion of the Project on Pan Am Railway is $1.46 million and they are committed to a
$0.49 million private match. PAR has a strong commitment to and history with public-private
partnerships. The state of Massachusetts was the recipient of a grant award as part of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail
program. U.S. Department of Transportation awarded $70 million for final design and
construction of the "Knowledge Corridor" along the Connecticut River rail line in western
Massachusetts and with Pan Am as a partner; the project was completed at the end of 2014 and
has resulted in the reroute of the Vermonter Amtrak train and the savings of more than thirty
minutes of transit time. In the seventh round of TIGER, PAR was part of a unique partnership
with MDOT and 3 other private shortline railroads that were awarded a grant to improve their
railroads to a state of good repair. That award is being consummated and Pan Am will begin
their portion of the project this summer laying new rail from Waterville, ME to Northern Maine
Junction, points north and east of this Project. Additionally PAR hosts the Downeaster on its
line from Brunswick, ME, to Massachusetts and has successfully completed numerous track
improvement projects that benefit that service. PAR is one of the larger private employers in
Maine with over 400 on the payroll there and 800 employees overall.
These three project parties have been working together for many years for the benefit of the IMT
and are natural partners to further develop the exponential growth at the Port. They have long
demonstrated the ability to plan, develop and execute projects including projects utilizing both
state and federal funds and to complete those projects on time and within budget. The project
schedule anticipates completion by mid-2018 and sees no obstacles to achieving that.
III.
13
Project Amount
$7,719,173
$4,500,000
$2,189,607
$537,000
$492,567
Project Percentage
50.0%
29.1%
14.1.%
3.5%
3.2%
$15,438,347
100%
Cost Effectiveness
Benefits are discussed in narrative form in the application and are, when possible, quantified in
the attached benefit cost analysis Excel worksheet.11 A summary is below.
7% NPV Summary
COSTS
CAPEX
$14,428,362
$482,972
$401,341,796
MAINTENANCE
BENEFITS
$18,180,612
14
$54,555,803
$22,985,585
$110,150,361
$2,556,879
$404,381,647
3.67
3% NPV Summary
COSTS
CAPEX
BENEFITS
$14,988,686
$695,330
$596,362,647
MAINTENANCE
$24,425,929
$82,876,733
$34,334,367
$156,625,715
$2,556,879
$599,614,856
3.83
In addition to the quantifiable benefits, this project will greatly expand the capacity and
reliability of freight movements via barge, rail and truck throughout the Northeast.
ASCEs 2013 Report Card for Americas Infrastructure notes that despite $91B in Federal, State
and Local capital investments annually, road infrastructure is still projected to decline.12
Congestion on major urban highways cost the economy an estimated $101 billion in wasted
time and fuel annually.13 The breakdown by State located in the I-95 Northeast Corridor, is as
follows14:
State
Rhode Island
Connecticut
New Jersey
New York
Massachusetts
Maine
New Hampshire
% Major
Roads in
Poor
Condition
41%
41%
35%
23%
19%
7%
17%
% of Bridges
considered
Functionally
Obsolete
35%
25%
26%
27%
43%
18%
18%
Spending only the federal portion of investment for the Project would only alternatively pay for
four miles of rural Maine roads.
V.
Project Readiness
All aspects of the Project will be on existing Port of Portland IMT property or on existing
railroad right of way. As such, nearly all required filings for the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) process will be through Categorical Exclusions (CE). There are two known
12
American Society of Civil Engineers, Roads, ASCE: 2013 Report Card for Americas Infrastructure 2013,
http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/a/#p/grade-sheet/americas-infrastructure-investment-needs (last visited April 3, 2016).
13 See id.
14
See id. at States.
15
All of the project participants are committed to a quick start and timely completion. All
matching funds, both state and private, are committed. Project cost estimates were developed
after extensive design and study of options by industry renowned infrastructure solutions firm
HNTB. There are no pending agreements or legislative approvals required. The project focuses
on a facility whose improvement is already a stated goal in the Maine Integrated Freight Strategy
15
16
Community involvement in preparation for the Project to date has been significant. In addition
to hosting city, mayoral, gubernatorial, state and federal delegations, the local community has
been kept well apprised of plans for the Project. Frequent presentations have been made to the
Portland Waterfront Alliance, a monthly meeting of property owners, terminal operators,
community groups, environmental organizations, federal, state, and city officials, and members
of the community interested in Portland harbor. There have been repeated presentations to the
Propeller Club of Portland, the Portland Longshoremans Benevolent Society, the Maine/New
Hampshire Port Safety Port Safety Forum and the Northeast Regional Ocean Council on Ocean
Planning (as it relates to traffic coming to and from the terminal). Local neighborhoods have
been kept apprised at Planning Board review meetings and there is an on-going education
program at schools on transportation through the terminal with the City of South Portland. In
addition, input on the design for the Terminal Operations and Maintenance Center was sought
and received from Port labor local 861. The Project has been well vetted and is well supported
as evidenced by numerous and strong letters of support appended to this application.
Risks for the Project are few. Customers for the facility are existing and well established putting
little risk to future volumes through the Port. Every container going through the Port yields
benefits to the highway system. Environmental challenges are minimal due to Categorical
Exclusions and prior received permitting. Execution risk is low as all participants are past
USDOT grant awardees that have completed projects on time and within project budget.
Funding for the Project has the backing of the State of Maine at the highest levels and a
commitment letter from the private participant with a history of meeting federal grant
commitments. The construction aspects to the Project are all well designed, straight forward and
similar projects have previously been completed by the project parties. In Maine the potential
for brevity to the construction season always exists due to weather and the duration of frozen
ground but even that only has potential to delay the Project whose schedule has completion well
in advance of statutory timelines for fund obligations. It is difficult to see where risks are a
threat to Project completion, fund expenditures and benefit realization.
17
At the end of 2015, Atlanta-based temperature controlled supply chain company, Americold, the
18
If the capacity at the Port can be increased to allow for it, 50,000 annual containers can be a
reality by the end of the decade saving over 35 million US truck miles between 2017-2020 and
over 14 million miles per-year thereafter.20 The Project creates the largest intermodal logistics
hub north of Boston giving customers in the region the optionality to ship by vessel, rail or truck.
16
ALLIANCE, G. C. C.,IARW global top 25 list of refrigerated warehousing companies. http://www.gcca.org/resources/industrytopics/cold-chain-market-research-trends/iarw-top-25-list-of-largest-refrigerated-warehousing-and-logistics-companies/iarwglobal-top-25-list/ (last visited April 3, 2016).
17 See id.
18 Bell, T. Americold wins bid to build cold-storage warehouse on Portland waterfront, The Portland Press Herald /Maine Sunday
telegram. http://www.pressherald.com/2015/08/31/americold-wins-bid-for-waterfront-warehouse/ (last visited April 3, 2016).
19 See id.
20 See Appendix A, Benefit Cost Analysis.
19
20
24
21
See U.S. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, 2015 LARGE TRUCK
AND BUS CRASH FACTS 2015 http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/54000/54800/54849/Large-Truck-and-Bus-Crash-Facts-2013.pdf
27
The fraction of the Value of a Statistical Life used for a MAIS Level 1 accident is .003, as per the FASTLANE BCA guidance.
22
The port authority worked with the Northeast Regional Ocean Council to understand the
implications the project, and specifically the New England Marine Highway Project traffic
patterns, will have for Ocean Planning. Formed in 2005 by the Governors of the New England
states, the council facilitates the development of coordinated and collaborative responses to
coastal and ocean management issues that benefit from regional solutions and lists its first
mission as identifying local, state, and regional ecosystem-based environmental issues.29 And
as is a goal of the three cabinet secretaries, labor has been having a say in how the port operates
and innovates30 as their opinion and perspective on the improvements of the Project were
sought directly by the Ports management.
From an overall environmental perspective, railroads and barges and local drays by truck are less
impactful to the environment than long-distance truck hauls and that is the intended and expected
outcome of the Project. The result is better fuel consumption, fewer emissions, less new
geographic footprint impacted and more and better use of an existing footprint, one that mostly
requires only Categorical Exclusions from NEPA to complete.
c) Other Review Criteria
1) Partnerships and Innovation
In addition to the funding partners and project parties for the Project there are two key
partnerships that make the Project both important and unique. They include the New England
Marine Highway Project designated as a Marine Highway Project by USDOT in 2010 and the
Investing in Manufacturing Communities Partnership (IMCP) where Portland was an initial
designee by the US Department of Commerce in 2014.
New England Marine Highway Program
The Americas Marine Highway Program, a USDOT-led program to expand the use of our
Nations navigable waterways to relieve landside congestion, reduce air emissions, and generate
other public benefits by increasing the efficiency of the surface transportation system and
providing a convenient transportation alternative alongside congested landside transportation
corridors. Selected by USDOT in the first call for projects, The New England Marine Highway
Project was created by the Maine Port Authority with the support of a wide variety of public and
private sector partners in 2010. The purpose of the New England Marine Highway Project
(NEMHP) is to create a sustainable, cost-competitive waterborne freight service between the
Port of Portland and the Port of New York/New Jersey with the objective of getting trucks off
29
NORTHEAST REGIONAL OCEAN COUNCIL. http://northeastoceancouncil.org/about/nroc-overview/ (last visited April 10, 2016).
U.S. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION, US Ports: Investing in engines of economic development and American competitiveness
https://www.transportation.gov/fastlane/ports-engines-of-economic-development-and-american-competitiveness (last visited
April 10, 2016).
30
23
24
See Appendix A.
25
* As additional letters of support are submitted, they will be forwarded to USDOT with the
Project name clearly labeled.
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
27