0% found this document useful (0 votes)
317 views2 pages

HC Reply Writ Petition

This document is a reply filed in the High Court of Tamil Nadu in response to a writ petition. It raises two preliminary objections that no fundamental rights have been infringed, making the petition not maintainable, and that the petitioner does not have standing to file the petition. It then denies the contents of each paragraph of the writ petition. An affidavit in support is also included, affirming that the contents of the reply are true and correct to the best of the deponent's knowledge.

Uploaded by

Kumar Naveen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
317 views2 pages

HC Reply Writ Petition

This document is a reply filed in the High Court of Tamil Nadu in response to a writ petition. It raises two preliminary objections that no fundamental rights have been infringed, making the petition not maintainable, and that the petitioner does not have standing to file the petition. It then denies the contents of each paragraph of the writ petition. An affidavit in support is also included, affirming that the contents of the reply are true and correct to the best of the deponent's knowledge.

Uploaded by

Kumar Naveen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

HC Reply Writ Petition

BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF TN AT CHENNAI

CWP No.: _____

Petitioner
Versus

Respondents
Reply on behalf of the respondent No. _____ to the Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles
226/227 of the Constitution of India.

Respectfully Sheweth:
Preliminary Submissions/Objections:
1. That no fundamental or constitutional right whatsoever of the petitioner has been
infringed and as such the writ petition is not maintainable. ______
2. That the Writ Petition is not maintainable and the petitioner has no locus stand to file
the Writ Petition. _____ Reply on Merits
1. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are not denied to the extent that the
petitioner is a citizen of India. However, it is submitted that the petitioner is not entitled
to file or maintain this writ petition before this Hon'ble Court. __
2. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
3. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
4. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
5. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
6. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
7. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
8. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
9. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
10. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
11. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __
12. It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the writ petition is lacking of material

substance and is false, frivolous and vexatious and this writ petition deserves to be
dismissed and may be dismissed in the interest of justice with costs.
Chennai
Replying Respondent No._____
______
Through, Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF TN AT CHENNAI

CWP No.: ______

Petitioner
Versus

Respondents
Affidavit in support of reply on behalf of the replying respondent No. ______ to the Writ
Petition

I,______, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:1. That the accompanying reply has been drafted under my instructions.
2. That the contents of paras 1 to _____ of preliminary submissions and paras 1 to
_____ of the reply on merits are correct and true to the best of my knowledge and
contents of paras _____ to ______ are correct as per the legal advice.
3. That I further solemnly affirm and declare that this affidavit of mine is correct and
true, no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therein.
Affirmed here at Chennai this ______. Deponent

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy