The COMELEC issued a Money Ban Resolution that prohibited cash withdrawals and check encashments over 100,000 pesos per day during the election period. The Bankers Association of the Philippines filed a petition arguing the resolution exceeded COMELEC's authority. The Supreme Court dismissed the case as moot since it had already issued a status quo ante order preventing the resolution from being enforced during the election. The Court also noted the BSP and Monetary Board have authority to limit banking transactions for legitimate purposes during elections without a COMELEC resolution. Congress should also take note to address similar issues for future elections.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100%(1)100% found this document useful (1 vote)
644 views1 page
Bankers Association of The Philippines Vs Comelec
The COMELEC issued a Money Ban Resolution that prohibited cash withdrawals and check encashments over 100,000 pesos per day during the election period. The Bankers Association of the Philippines filed a petition arguing the resolution exceeded COMELEC's authority. The Supreme Court dismissed the case as moot since it had already issued a status quo ante order preventing the resolution from being enforced during the election. The Court also noted the BSP and Monetary Board have authority to limit banking transactions for legitimate purposes during elections without a COMELEC resolution. Congress should also take note to address similar issues for future elections.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
PARILLA, MAY ANN C.
LLB 2-1
ELECTION LAW MONDAYS/CW8
G.R. No. 206794
November 26, 2013 BANKERS ASSOSICATION OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. COMELEC Facts: This was a petition for the issuance of a status quo to enjoin the implementation of the Money Ban Resolution issued by COMELEC. The said ban prohibits the withdrawal of cash, encashment of checks and conversion of any monetary instrument into cash from May 8 to 13, 2013 exceeding One Hundred Thousand Pesos (P100,000.00) or its equivalent in any foreign currency, per day in banks, finance companies, quasi-banks, pawnshops, remittance companies and institutions performing similar functions. However, all other non-cash transactions are not covered. For this purpose, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas and other financial agencies of the government are hereby deputized to implement with utmost dispatch and ensure strict compliance with this resolution without violating the provisions of Republic Act No. 1405 , as amended, and Republic Act No. 6426. Issue: Whether or the COMELECs resolution was exercised in excess of its duty. Held: The Court held to dismiss the case, as it became moot and academic. The Court has issued a Status Quo Ante on May 10, 2013, thus the Money Ban Resolution was not in force during the most critical period of the elections. In addition, nothing in the exceptions of moot and academic principle relates to the case at bar. The Court considers it significant that the BSP and the Monetary Board continue to possess full and sufficient authority to address the COMELECs concerns and to limit banking transactions to legitimate purposes without need for any formal COMELEC resolution if and when the need arises. Likewise, the Congress should take note of the Money Ban Resolution and the evil it sought to prevent in application of its plenary power for future elections, thus rendering unnecessary further action on the merits of the assailed Money Ban Resolution at this point.