0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views2 pages

Scible v. Haines, 4th Cir. (2006)

This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Lawrence E. Scible's appeal of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views2 pages

Scible v. Haines, 4th Cir. (2006)

This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Lawrence E. Scible's appeal of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6199

LAWRENCE E. SCIBLE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM
HAINES,
Correctional Center,

Warden,

Huttonsville
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (2:04-cv-00092-REM)

Submitted:

August 31, 2006

Decided:

October 4, 2006

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence E. Scible, Appellant Pro Se. Colleen Anne Ford, OFFICE OF


THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Lawrence E. Scible appeals the district courts order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2000) petition.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

See Scible v.

Haines, No. 2:04-cv-00092-REM (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 20, 2006).

We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy