The Deltic Engine
The Deltic Engine
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE
PAGE
1. Introduction
1.2. History
2. Napier Culverin
2.1. Design
3. Napier Deltic
3.1. Design
4. Uses of Deltic
8
8
12
12
13
14
5. Turbo-compound Deltic
15
1. Introduction
The idea of the Deltic engine began in 1943 when the British Admiralty set
up a committee to develop a high-power, lightweight diesel engine for Motor
Torpedo Boats. Before this, in the Royal Navy, these boats had been driven by
petrol engines but this fuel is highly flammable, making them vulnerable to fire,
and at a disadvantage compared to the German diesel-powered E-boats (a
torpedo boat). The diesel engines of that time, had poor power-to-weight ratio
and low speed. Before the war, Napier had been working on aviation diesel
designs (licensed versions of the Junkers Jumo 204) and had just created the
Culverins. The Admiralty felt these would be a reasonable starting point for the
larger design they required and commissioned him to design the engines they so
required. Thus, the Deltic engine came into existence by using three Culverins
attached in a delta formation.
2. Napier Culverin
2.1. Design
To understand the design or working of the Deltic engine, it is first
necessary to understand how the Napier Culverin or the Junkers Jumo engine
worked since they were both essentially the same types of engines.
Fig. 1
The Culverin or Jumo engines all used a two-stroke cycle with six
cylinders and twelve pistons, in an opposed piston configuration with two
crankshafts, one at the bottom of the cylinder block and the other at the top,
geared together. Fig. 1 shows a basic Culverin piston cylinder arrangement. The
pistons moved towards each other during the operating cycle. Intake and exhaust
manifolds were duplicated on both sides of the block. There were two camoperated injection pumps per cylinder, each feeding two nozzles, for 4 nozzles
per cylinder in all.
As is typical of two-stroke designs, the engines used fixed intake and
exhaust ports instead of valves, which were uncovered when the pistons reached
a certain point in their stroke. Normally such designs have poor volumetric
efficiency because both ports open and close at the same time and are generally
located across from each other in the cylinder. This leads to poor scavenging of
the burnt charge, which is why valve-less two-strokes generally run smoky and
are inefficient.
This problem was solved to a very large degree through clever
arrangement of the ports. The intake port was located under the "lower" piston,
while the exhaust port was under the "upper". The lower crankshaft ran eleven
degrees behind the upper, meaning that the exhaust ports opened first, allowing
proper scavenging. This system made these two stroke engines run as cleanly
and almost as efficiently as four-stroke engines using valves, but with
considerably less complexity. Fig 2 shows a cut section model of the Culverin
engine.
Fig 2
3. Napier Deltic
3.1. Design
The Napier Deltic engine as stated before was a modified form of the
Culverins. The original Napier Culverin was an opposed piston design. Instead of
each cylinder having a single piston and being closed at one end with a cylinder
head, the elongated cylinder contained two pistons moving in opposite directions
towards the centre as seen before. This negates the need for a heavy cylinder
head. This led to a rather "flat" engine, intended to be buried in the wings of large
aircraft. The Admiralty required a much more powerful engine, so for the added
power Napier took three of their original Culverins and "bolted them together".
Fig 4
The result was a triangle, as in fig 4; the cylinder banks forming the sides,
and tipped by three crankshafts, one at each corner. The crankshafts were
connected with phasing gears to drive one output shaft. Various models of Deltic
engine could be produced with varying numbers of cylinders, though nine and
eighteen cylinders were the most common, having three and six cylinders per
bank respectively.
One of features of the design engine was the way the crankshaft phasing
was arranged to allow for exhaust port lead and inlet port lag. These engines are
called 'uniflow' designs because the flow of gas into and out of the cylinder is one
way, assisted by mild supercharging to improve cylinder exhaust scavenging.
10
11
4. Uses of Deltic
12
13
The British Rail removed the Class 55 and 23 locomotives due to the
increasing technical problems in the locomotive parts. The main engine problems
were
By the late 1960s BR had drawn up a "National Traction Plan", whose aim
was to rationalise the number and types of diesel locomotives in traffic (and thus
reduce operating costs). Thus the Deltic locomotives or the Deltics in short were
withdrawn between 1968 and 1971.
14
5. Turbo-compound Deltic
15