Karnataka Samskrita University: Pampamahakavi Road, Chamarajpet, Bangalare
Karnataka Samskrita University: Pampamahakavi Road, Chamarajpet, Bangalare
(with the financial assistance of Inidan Council for Philosophical Research, New Delhi)
apprehends an object as it is. Prama is classified into two categories Kevala Prama Directproof and Anu Prama Indirect-proof. Knowledge apprehends its object directly by its nature,
whereas the instruments like sense organs do get the objects through the knowledge they
generate. Apprehension is the nature of cognition. Knowledge is the central point of this inquiry of
Prama. Other factors of knowledge (Parma) are Primate, Pamela and Prama (the instrument
of knowledge).
Pram (knowledge): The act of knowing yields to knowledge, which is true by itself. It can be the
quality of self or the modification of mind Manas. Pramta (knower) the agent of the act
knowing is Pramta the knower. The knower or sentient agent lives, thinks, and ability to
understand through his senses. Prameya (knowable object) The entire range of phenomenal
existence with objects physical or psychical is termed Prameya. It literally means that which
deserves to be known. It is admitted as an axiom that there is nothing in this world that is not
knowable.
The other phenomena of cognition are Samaya (Doubt) and Viparyaya (error or
misapprehension). A detailed account on the five factors that play role in generation of doubt
according to various schools has been considered to be the best instance of the rigor of high
intellectual pursuit of the author. The author reduces the number of factors to one saying that the
only one factor i.e., common property could be the cause for doubt leaving out all four viz., distinct
property, debate, etc. In a very short but complete note on error, the author mentions all the
theories of various schools of Indian thoughts, reviews them and makes the stand of Dvaita school
clear.
Another important aspect that is described here is Gradation in knowledge. On the ground of
Philosophy of Madhva, r Jayatrtha describes several types of knowledge which differ in extent,
range, intensity and clarity. These types are arranged by him in a descending order that suits to the
ontological gradation of spirits admitted in Dvaita Philosophy starting from perfect super-divine
knowledge to imperfect human knowledge.
crya Madhva the proponent of the Dvaita School, has explained about the epistemology of his
new School in his works. Since, MAdhvas language is profound and the elucidations are scattered
over several works, it is difficult to comprehend for a novice. Hence Prama-Paddhati was
composed by his successor of third generation r Jayatrtha. The simple and captivating style of
this work is sure to ignite the interest in the readers to conduct further study in detail. This work is
not only regarded as a standard textbook of Dvaita studies, but also considered as a basic
authentic work in the Dvaita dialectic literature.
The work is classified into three chapters i) Pratyaka ii) Anumna and iii) gama as a
compendious yet full treatment of the Dvaita epistemology in smaller captions. Its discussion on
the stand points of other schools on various topics and their criticism is not much detailed.
However, it is systematized and presented in an easily comprehendible style that can make even a
novice understand the intricacies of Dvaita epistemology. The unique commentary skill of r
Jayatrtha comprises of profound scholarship, style of exposition, lucid language, commitment to
the original author, views on opposition with thorough knowledge, logical integrity, appropriate and
comprehensive method of thinking.
r Jayatrtha the author
r Jayatrtha who is familiar with his title name kcrya in Dvaita Tradition is held in high
esteem and placed only next to crya Madhva. It is Jayatrtha who is responsible for shaping
Dvaita school of thought in a systematic manner. Otherwise, the Dvaita Schoolwould not have
enjoyed the present status of a complete philosophy among other prominent Daranas like Advaita
and Viidvaita. This fact is admitted not only by stalwarts like Vysatrtha and others within the
tradition, but also by the eminent thinkers of opponent schools.
r Jayatrtha lived a very short lifespan of 45 years (his period as a monk 1365 to 1388 AD)
after about seven decades after disappearance of r Madhva. Before Jayatrtha, prominent
disciples of crya Madhva have also commented the major works of Madhva. However, the
methodology of exposition followed by them was not sufficient to place the Dvaita School in the
position given to a complete system of Vedanta in all aspects during that period. Jayatrtha
achieved this through his commentaries on Madhvas complete dialectical works. The original
works by Madhva are very short and crisp in style. Madhvas arguments against opponent thought,
though they were logical and supported by sufficient proof, were subject to criticism by
contemporary philosopher due to lack of proper understanding. And moreover, many questions
discussed in the contemporary works of other schools were not dealt in the fashion followed by
them.
The Bhya on Brahma-Stras by Madhva, authored in a different style, could not be understood
in a conventional way of interpretation of Brahma-Stras as it is done in other schools. Jayatrtha
attempted to construct the Adhikaraas in the traditionally admitted manner, drawing on the ideas
from Madhvas own work.
He was also a pioneer in developing a complete methodology to establish the categories and
concepts of Dvaita Vedanta that was followed by all the subsequent writers of Dvaita system. He
examined all theories proposed by thinkers, who lived prior to him. His way of interpretation is
found very unique in the whole Indian commentary literature. No wonder, that Madhvas words
were not interpreted by anyone else after him as he left little room for other interpretations. He
interpreted many lines of Madhva in several ways and sometimes the number of interpretations
reached even up to twenty-five.
Reading Material
The Pramanapaddhati book is condensed on the basis of identified important topics. This will cover
entire text in ten days.
Reference Book
Path of Proof : This work is rendered into English by Prof. Shrinivasa Varakhedi adopting the
mirror-translation method, which has been published by Manipal University Press in 2012.
Workshop Details:
Dates : 1-10 February 2017
Venue : Aksharam, Girinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka State
Eligibility to apply:
Academic Director
Prof. Shrinivasa Varakhedi, Professor and Dean, Karnataka Sanskrit University, Bengaluru 18
Advisors Prof. S.R. Bhat, Prof. D. Prahlada Char, Prof. K E Devanathan, and Prof Rajaram
Shukla.
Resource Persons 1. Prof. D. Prahlada Char, 2. Prof. K E Devanathan, 3. Prof. Rajaram Shukla,
4. Dr. A V Nagasampige, 5. Prof. Veeranarayana Pandurangi, 6. Prof. Tirumala Kulakarni, 7. Prof.
Satyanarayana Acharya, 8. Dr. M. Narayana, 9. Dr. BV Venkataramana, 10. Dr. Vinay. P.
Contact :
Dr. Shivani, Associate Professor (Coordinator) shivani.ksu@gmail.com, 9497680167
Dr. Vinay P, Asst Professor (Coordinator) - vinayacharya1981@gmail.com
Dr Shruthi H K, Reseacrh Associate (Coordinator) - shruthi.rsvp@gmail.com