Recubrimientos - SSPC-PA 2-2012
Recubrimientos - SSPC-PA 2-2012
May 1, 2012
1. Scope
1.1 This standard describes a procedure for determining
shop or field conformance to a specified coating dry film thickness (DFT) range on ferrous and non-ferrous metal substrates
using nondestructive coating thickness gages (magnetic and
electronic) described in ASTM D 7091.
2. Referenced Standards
2.1 The latest issue, revision, or amendment of the referenced standards in effect on the date of invitation to bid shall
govern unless otherwise specified. Standards marked with an
asterisk (*) are referenced only in the Notes, which are not
requirements of this standard.
D 7091
3. DEFINITIONS
3.1 Gage Reading: A single instrument reading.
3.2 Spot Measurement: The average of three, or at least
three gage readings made within a 1.5-inch (approximately
4-centimeter [~4-cm]) diameter circle. Acquisition of more than
three gage readings within a spot is permitted. Any unusually
2
CS 23.00/AWS C2.23M/NACE No. 12, Specification for the Application of Thermal Spray Coatings (Metallizing) of Aluminum, Zinc, and
Their Alloys and Composites for the Corrosion Protection of Steel is
available online at <http://www.sspc.org/marketplace>
ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken,
PA 19428-2959. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM
website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at
service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards volume
information, refer to the standards Document Summary page on the
ASTM website.
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
high or low gage readings that are not repeated consistently
are discarded. The average of the acceptable gage readings is
the spot measurement.
4. Description of Gages
4.1 Gage Types: The gage type is determined by the
operating principal employed in measuring the thickness and
is not determined by the mode of data readout, i.e. digital or
analog.
4.1.1 Type 1 Magnetic Pull-Off Gages: In magnetic
pull-off gages, a permanent magnet is brought into direct
contact with the coated surface. The force necessary to pull
the magnet from the surface is measured and interpreted
as the coating thickness value on a scale or display on the
gage. Less force is required to remove the magnet from a thick
coating. The scale is nonlinear.
6.3 Subtract the BMR from the gage reading to obtain the
thickness of the coating.
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
7.2 Measure the DFT of the dry coating at the number of
spots specified in Section 8.
for
8.1 Number of Measurements: Repeated gage readings, even at points close together, often differ due to small
surface irregularities of the coating and the substrate. Therefore, a minimum of three (3) gage readings shall be made for
each spot measurement of the coating. For each new gage
reading, move the probe to a new location within the 1.5 inch
(4-cm) diameter circle defining the spot. Discard any unusually
high or low gage readings that are not repeated consistently.
The average of the acceptable gage readings is the spot
measurement.
8.2 Unless otherwise specified in the procurement documents (project specification), an area measurement is obtained
by taking five (5) separate spot measurements (average of the
gage readings described in 8.1) randomly spaced throughout
each 100 ft2 (~10-m2) area to be measured and representative
of the coated surface. The five spot measurements shall be
made for each 100 ft2 (~10-m2) of area as follows:
8.2.1 For areas of coating not exceeding 300 ft2 (~30 m2)
arbitrarily select and measure each 100 ft2 (~10-m2) area.
8.2.2 For areas of coating greater than 300 ft2 (~30 m2)
and not exceeding 1,000 ft2 (~100 m2), arbitrarily select and
measure three 100 ft2 (~10-m2) areas.
NONCONFORMING
AREA
FIGURE 1
RADIATING SPOT MEASUREMENTS TO DETERMINE
EXTENT OF NONCONFORMING AREA
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
TABLE 1
COATING THICKNESS RESTRICTION LEVELS
Thickness
Level 1
Minimum
Maximum
Level 2
Minimum
Maximum
Level 3
Minimum
Maximum
Level 4
Minimum
Maximum
Level 5
Minimum
Maximum
Gage Reading
Spot
Measurement
Area Measurement
Unrestricted
Unrestricted
As specified
As specified
As specified
As specified
Unrestricted
Unrestricted
As specified
120% of maximum
As specified
As specified
Unrestricted
Unrestricted
80% of minimum
120% of maximum
As specified
As specified
Unrestricted
Unrestricted
80% of minimum
150% of maximum
As specified
As specified
Unrestricted
Unrestricted
80% of minimum
Unrestricted
As specified
Unrestricted
shall be no less than the cumulative minimum specified thickness and no greater than the cumulative maximum specified
thickness.
10. Disclaimer
10.1 While every precaution is taken to ensure that all
information furnished in SSPC standards and specifications is
as accurate, complete, and useful as possible, SSPC cannot
assume responsibility nor incur any obligation resulting from
the use of any materials, coatings or methods specified therein,
or of the specification or standard itself.
10.2 This standard does not attempt to address problems concerning safety associated with its use. The user of
this standard, as well as the user of all products or practices
described herein, is responsible for instituting appropriate
health and safety practices and for ensuring compliance with
all governmental regulations.
If the DFT of the existing coating is not too uneven or
eroded, the average DFT of the existing coating can be
measured per this standard to establish a base DFT. This base
DFT can then be subtracted from the total DFT to isolate the
thickness of the overcoat(s).
11. Notes
11.2 Correcting for Low or High Thickness: The specifier should specifically state the methodology to correct the
applied dry film for low or high thickness. If this information
is not contained in the specification, then the manufacturers
instructions should be followed.
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
Suppose this structure is 300 ft2 (~30 m2) in area. Mentally
divide the surface into three equal parts, each being about 100
ft2 (~10 m2).
Part A - 100 ft2 (~10 m2)
Part B - 100 ft2 (~10 m2)
Part C - 100 ft2 (~10 m2)
Spot 1
2.5 mils
64 m
Spot 2 3.0 76
Spot 3 2.1 53
Spot 4 3.0 76
Spot 5 2.3 58
Average
2.6 mils
65.4 m
Considering the U.S. Customary Measurements:
The average, 2.6 mils, exceeds the specified minimum of 2.5
mils and thus satisfies the specification. Next, determine if
the lowest spot measurement, 2.1 mils, is within 80% of the
FIGURE A1
PART A OF STRUCTURE
(AREA 100 FT2 [APPROXIMATELY 10 M2])
GAGE READINGS
Spot 1
Spot 2
2.6
3.0
2.0
Avg. 2.5
3.6
2.6
2.7
Avg. 3.0
1.5 inch
1.8
2.2
2.3
Avg. 2.1
10 ft
Spot 3
Spot 4
Spot 5
2.6
3.2
3.1
Avg. 3.0
10 ft
5
Part B
1.5
2.8
2.6
Avg. 2.3
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
To monitor the thickness of this entire 300-ft2 (approximately 30-m2), structure, at least 45 individual gage readings
must be taken, from which 15 spot measurements are calculated. The five spot measurements from each 100 ft2 (10-m2)
part of the structure are used to calculate the thickness of that
part.
A3.4, allows for fewer spot measurements. The user does not
have to require a full DFT determination for every beam in the
structure. For example, the requirement may be for a full DFT
determination on one beam out of ten, or a sample DFT determination on one beam out of five, or a combination of full and
sample DFT determinations. Note that for existing structures,
the top side of the top flange (Surface 1) may not be accessible
for measuring coating thickness.
A beam has twelve different surfaces as shown in Figure
A2. Any one of these surfaces may have a DFT outside the
specified range, and hence, shall be measured. If the thickness of the flange is less than 1 inch (25 mm), the contracting
parties may choose not to measure the DFT on the toe, i.e.,
surfaces 2, 6, 8, and 12 of Figure A2. As an informal initial
survey, the inspector may want to check for uniformity of DFT
across each surface. Is the DFT of the flange near the fillet the
same as near the toe? Is the DFT uniform across the web? The
inspector must be sure to use a gage that is not susceptible
to edge effects. Follow the gage manufacturers instructions
when measuring the edges.
FIGURE A2
THE SURFACES OF A STEEL BEAM
(36 in [91 cm] in height)
1
3
11
Top Flange
12
Toe
10
11
10t
4t
10b
4b
Web
Fillet
bbb
9
7
6
Bottom Flange
9
7
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
TABLE A2
DATASHEET FOR RECORDING SPOT MEASUREMENTS AND
AVERAGE DFT VALUES FOR THE 12 SURFACES OF A BEAM OR GIRDER
Spot Measurements of DFT on Beam # _______________
Surface
1
2
3
4t
4b
5
6
7
8
9
10t
10b
11
12
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
Average
t = top half of web (for beams equal to or greater than 36 in [91 cm] in height)
b = bottom half of web (for beams equal to or greater than 36 in [91 cm] in height)
Length of Beam
less than 20 ft (6 m)
from 20 to 60 ft (6 to 18 m)
over 60 ft (18 m)
* For beams 36 inches (91 cm) or more, the top half and the bottom half of the web are treated as separate surfaces in a full DFT determination.
DFT of surface 1. Repeat for the other 11 surfaces (7 surfaces
if the toe is not measured; 14 surfaces for tall beams). The data
can be reported in a format shown in Table A2.
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
A2.6 RESTRICTED ACCESS: If the beam is situated
such that one or more of the surfaces are not accessible, take
measurements on each accessible surface in accordance with
Section A2.2 or Section A2.4 through A2.4.2, as specified.
A2.7 ATTACHMENTS: Stiffeners and other attachments
to a beam shall be arbitrarily measured.
APPENDIX 4 - Method for Measuring Dry Film Thickness on Coated Steel Test Panels
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
low or high spot reading. If the additional measurements indicate the DFT in the disputed area of the panel to be below
the minimum or above the maximum allowable DFT, the panel
shall be rejected.
APPENDIX 5 - Method for Measuring Dry Film Thickness of Thin Coatings on Coated Steel Test Panels
that have been Abrasive Blast Cleaned
A7.2 Some carts may have several small items that could
exceed the number of spot DFT readings required based on
TABLE A7
NUMBER AND LOCATIONS OF SPOT MEASUREMENTS PIPE SPOOLS
Pipe Diameter
Interval Spacing
Up to 12 in (30 cm)
4 evenly spaced
6 evenly spaced
8 evenly spaced
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
A7, provides a very thorough inspection of a joint of pipe. The
DFT determination, described in Section A7.1, may allow for
fewer spot measurements. The user does not have to require a
full DFT determination for every joint of pipe. For example, the
requirement may be for a full DFT determination on one pipe
out of ten, or a sample DFT determination on one pipe out of
five, or a combination of full and sample DFT determinations.
Appendix 8 does not form a mandatory part of this standard, but it provides examples of how to adjust Type 2 gages
using shims on roughened (e.g., abrasive blast cleaned)
surfaces.
This example describes a method of adjustment to
improve the effectiveness of a Type 2 (electronic) gage on a
blast cleaned or otherwise roughened surface. Blast cleaning
is used throughout this example, but these methods are applicable to other types of surface preparation. A less uniform
surface, such as partially rusted hand tool cleaned steel, may
require more gage readings to achieve a satisfactory level of
statistical significance. Since gage operation differs among
manufacturers, follow the manufacturers instructions for
adjustment of a particular gage.
A Type 2 gage needs to be adjusted to account for the
profile of the substrate in order to read the coating thickness
directly. Type 2 gages equipped with double pole probes
may provide greater measuring precision on rough surfaces
compared to single pole probes.
A portion of the substrate, after blast cleaning but prior
to coating, can be used to adjust the gage. Alternatively, an
uncoated test panel, blast cleaned at the time the structure
was blast cleaned and having a profile representative of the
structure can be used to adjust the gage provided the test
panel is of material with similar magnetic properties and geometry as the substrate to be measured. If this is not available
then a correction value can be applied to a smooth surface
adjustment as described in A8.3.
Three adjustment techniques can be used depending
on the capability and features of the gage to be used for the
inspection. Note that due to the statistical variation produced
TABLE A8
TYPICAL GAGE CORRECTION VALUES USING ISO 8503 PROFILE GRADES
(SOURCE: ISO 19840)1
Fine
0.4
10
Medium
1.0
25
Coarse
1.6
40
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Case Postale 56, Geneva CH-1211, Switzerland. ISO standards
are available online from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 1819 L Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington,
DC 20036 or at <http://www.ansi.org>
10
SSPC-PA 2
May 1, 2012
by a roughened surface, individual readings taken using these
three methods may not perfectly agree.
The first two examples describe adjustment and verification to one or more shims. When shims are used, resultant
gage measurements are less accurate and must be recalculated. For example, if the accuracy of a properly calibrated
gage is 2% and the thickness of a shim is accurate to within
3%, the combined tolerance of the gage and the shim will be
4% as given by the sum of squares formula:
22 + 32 = 3.6055 4%
For the gage to be in agreement with the shim, the
average thickness measured by the gage must be within 4%
of the shims thickness. If the average thickness measured on
a 250-m (10-mil) shim is between 9.6 mils (240 m) and 10.4
mils (260 m), the gage is properly adjusted. The minimum
240 is 250 minus 4% of 250 (9.6 is 10 minus 4% of 10); the
maximum of 260 is 250 plus 4% of 250 (10.4 is 10 plus 4% of
10). [4% of 250 is 10; 4% of 10 is 0.4.]
Copyright
11