Defective contracts can have different statuses depending on the type of defect:
1. Void contracts are absolutely null and void. Voidable contracts are valid unless annulled by a court. Unenforceable contracts are valid but cannot be enforced in court unless the defects are cured or ratified. Rescissible contracts are valid and enforceable unless rescinded.
2. The remedies for each type are: declaration of nullity for void contracts, annulment or ratification for voidable, ratification for unenforceable, and rescission for rescissible.
3. Prescription periods (time limits for filing legal actions) vary depending on the type of defect and circumstances
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
418 views2 pages
Oblicon Defective Contracts
Defective contracts can have different statuses depending on the type of defect:
1. Void contracts are absolutely null and void. Voidable contracts are valid unless annulled by a court. Unenforceable contracts are valid but cannot be enforced in court unless the defects are cured or ratified. Rescissible contracts are valid and enforceable unless rescinded.
2. The remedies for each type are: declaration of nullity for void contracts, annulment or ratification for voidable, ratification for unenforceable, and rescission for rescissible.
3. Prescription periods (time limits for filing legal actions) vary depending on the type of defect and circumstances
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Comparative Table of Defective Contracts
Defective Void Voidable Unenforceabl Rescissible
Contract e Status of Absolutely null Valid and Valid but Valid and contract and void binding unenforceable enforceable between the in court unless unless parties unless they are cured rescinded annulled by a or ratified proper action in court Remedy Declaration of Annulment; Ratification Rescission Absolute Ratification Nullity or Inexistence Prescription No prescription 4 years : No prescription Gen. rule: 4 (1410) 1. In case of years intimidation, Exceptions: violence, or 1. For persons undue under influence, from guardianship: the time period shall intimidation, begin from the etc., ceases termination of 2. In case of incapacity mistake or 2. For fraud, from the absentees, time it was from the time discovered the domicile is 3. In case of known contracts (1389) entered into by minors or incapacitated persons, from the time guardianship ceases. (1391) Real Party Contracting Contracting The One of the parties and parties contracting parties or a third person parties and the third person aggrieved party Grounds 1. Those 1. Those where 1. Caused by (Art. 1381) whose cause, one of the lack of form, 1. Those which object or parties is authority, or are entered purpose is incapable of capacity of into by contrary to giving consent both parties guardians law, morals, to a contract. not cured by whenever the good customs, 2. Those where prescription wards whom public order or the consent is 2. agreement they represent public policy vitiated by not intended suffer lesion by 2. Those which mistake, to confer legal more than are absolutely violence, rights and of the value of simulated or intimidation, obligations the things fictitious undue which are the 3. Those influence, or object thereof; whose cause fraud 2. Those or object did (Art. 1390) agreed upon in not exist at the representation time of the of absentees, if transaction the latter 4. Those suffer the whose object lesion stated in is outside the the preceding commerce of number; men 3. Those 5. Those which undertaken in contemplate fraud of an impossible creditor when service the latter 6. Those where cannot in any the intention other manner of the parties collect claims relative to the due them; principal 4. Those which object if the refer to things contract under litigation cannot be if they have ascertained been entered 7. Those into by the expressly defendant w/o prohibited or the knowledge declared void and approval by law of the litigants (Art. 1409) or of competent judicial authority; 5. All other contracts specially declared by law to be subject to rescission; 6. Payments made in state of insolvency for obligations to whose fulfillment the debtor could not be compelled at the time they were effected.
MICHAEL C. GUY, petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. SIXTO MARELLA, JR., Presiding Judge, RTC, Branch 138, Makati City and minors, KAREN DANES WEI and KAMILLE DANES WEI, represented by their mother, REMEDIOS OANES, respondents.