Kaust Repository: Micromachined On-Chip Dielectric Resonator Antenna Operating at 60 GHZ
Kaust Repository: Micromachined On-Chip Dielectric Resonator Antenna Operating at 60 GHZ
Repository
DOI 10.1109/TAP.2015.2439694
0018-926X (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/TAP.2015.2439694, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
AP1310-1380 2
dBi. In [7], a Dielectric Resonator Antenna above Patch through the arms of the magnetic dipole in the same direction.
(DRAP) was introduced. The substrate of the antenna was The magnetic and electric field distributions of the DRA
GaAs. This antenna has a good impedance bandwidth designed at 60 GHz is shown in Fig. 2, as calculated by HFSS
(29.2%), whereas it has a gain of 3.6 dBi. For all these using finite element method. The magnetic field distribution
designs, the DRA itself was constructed from a material matches that of the HE11 mode of the DRA [21]. It is clear
different from the silicon or GaAs substrate material, which from Fig. 2 that the magnetic field along the DRA has the
requires hybrid integration. In [18], a high resistivity (si= 300 same direction as the magnetic current flowing through the
.cm) silicon was used as a material for both the substrate and feeding magnetic dipole, and the maximum magnetic field
the four DRAs arranged as 22 array. A number of occurs at the interface between the DRA and the substrate.
BenzoCycloButhene (BCB) films were deposited on top of the This ensures maximum coupling from the feeding dipole to
slotted ground plane at the back-side of the substrate to realize the desired DRA mode. On the other hand, the electric field at
the feeding microstrip network. The gain of this DRA array the top of the DRA is along the x-axis, normal to the magnetic
was about 11 dBi and its simulated radiation efficiency was field. It is worth noting that the coupling magnetic dipole is
62%. Such antenna represents a complete on-chip solution in not located at the center of the DRA in order to achieve best
which the DRA is micromachined from the same wafer matching with the feeding CPW line.
carrying the driving circuit.
In this paper, a novel cylindrical DRA suitable for on-chip
applications is introduced. The proposed DRA is
micromachined in silicon. A Coplanar Waveguide (CPW)
structure is used to feed the proposed DRA, instead of the
microstrip network used in [18]. Therefore, no BCB layers are
required, which leads to a simpler and less expensive design.
Unlike the CPW-fed DRAs presented in [8, 15-17], the CPW
feeding line of the proposed design is placed at the underside
of the substrate. This facilitates the construction of the DRA
and its feeding network using a single wafer. (a)
The paper is organized as follows: the structure of the new
antenna together with its radiation mechanism is introduced in
Section II. A parametric study that leads to the optimum
antenna dimensions is presented in Section III. The fabrication (b)
technology used to realize the proposed antenna is outlined in
Section IV. The optimum design is characterized both
theoretically and experimentally in Section V. The important
conclusions are stated in Section VI.
0018-926X (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/TAP.2015.2439694, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
AP1310-1380 3
TABLE I
SENSITIVITY OF THE RESONANCE FREQUENCY AND RETURN LOSS TO THE
PERTURBATION OF THE DRA DESIGN PARAMETERS
Resonance Frequency Return Loss
Antenna
Sensitivity Sensitivity
Parameter
(GHz/10% Perturbation) (dB/10% Perturbation)
R 3.29 6.95
L 0.59 12.29
W 0.18 3.49
S 0.56 14.49
(c)
TABLE II
Fig. 2. Field distribution of the DRA at 60 GHz: (a) Magnetic field along the OPTIMUM D IMENSIONS OF THE DRA
top face of the DRA, (b) Magnetic field along the central plane perpendicular
to the substrate and parallel to the magnetic dipole, and (c) Electric field along Antenna OPTIMUM Antenna
Optimum Value
the top face of the DRA. Parameter VALUE Parameter
L 1.068 mm W 265 m
R 1.18 mm S 1.2 mm
III. PARAMETRIC STUDY AND OPTIMUM DESIGN
This section shows the effect of varying the geometrical Unlike the resistive part of the input impedance, which is
design parameters of the DRA: R, L, W, and S, shown in Fig. affected mainly by L, its imaginary part is affected by both L
1, on its frequency response. The DRA dimensions determine and S, as shown in Fig. 4(b). As L increases, the antenna input
the resonant frequency. Table I shows the sensitivity of the impedance becomes more inductive due to the increased
resonance frequency and return loss of the DRA to 10% spacing between the short-circuit termination of the magnetic
perturbation (increase) of its design parameters around their dipole and the feeding point. On the other hand, as S increases
optimum values. The optimum values are listed in Table II. It the DRA becomes more capacitive due to the increase in the
is worth mentioning that in this study, the height of the DRA modal voltage as one move away from the center of the DRA.
was kept constant. Since, we are bounded by the wafer It is worth mentioning that the region of maximum current, i.e.
thickness (675 m), increasing the height of the DRA implies magnetic field, corresponds to minimum voltage, i.e. electric
decreasing the substrate thickness which affects the field, and vice versa. All geometrical parameters of the
mechanical stability of the antenna. On the other hand, proposed structure are simultaneously optimized using HFSS
decreasing the height of the DRA adversely affects the so as to obtain maximum gain and minimum return loss at 60
antennas radiation characteristics. The choice of H = 400 um GHz.
is considered a compromise between both factors. From Table
I, it can be observed that the most effective parameter to tune
the resonance frequency is the radius of the DRA, R. This is
expected as the DRA is the radiating element whose size must
control most the value of the resonance frequency. Fig. 3
shows the HFSS simulated return loss of the DRA versus
frequency for different values of the DRA radius, R. As R
increases the value of the resonance frequency decreases,
while good matching is maintained.
According to Table I, the length, L, and location, S, of the
feeding dipole play the major role in achieving good matching
between the DRA radiating mode and the feeding line. In
other words, the input impedance of the DRA is mostly
controlled via the two parameters L and S.
Fig. 4 shows the variation of the input impedance of the
DRA simulated using HFSS at 60 GHz versus L and S.
According to Fig. 4(a), as S increases, the input resistance
slightly increases due to the decrease and the increase of the Fig. 3: Return loss of the DRA versus frequency for different values of the
radius, R. The rest of parameters are kept constant at L = 1.068 mm, S = 1.2
DRA modal current and voltage, respectively, which are mm, and W = 265 m.
proportional to the modal magnetic and electric field,
respectively. The modal magnetic field is shown in Fig. 2.
This behavior is similar to the effect of varying the location of
the probe feeding a microstrip patch antenna. In a similar
manner to a microstrip patch electromagnetically excited by
an inductively coupled slot terminated by a short-circuit [22],
the input resistance of the proposed antenna is strongly
dependent on the length, L, of the feeding magnetic dipole. As
L increases, the real part of the input impedance decreases
significantly, as shown in Fig. 4(a).
0018-926X (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/TAP.2015.2439694, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
AP1310-1380 4
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 5: Process flow for fabricating the proposed DRA: (a) start-up silicon
wafer, (b) DRIE from top-side, (c) copper electroplating at back-side, (d)
(b) copper patterning.
Fig. 4: Input impedance of the DRA at 60 GHz versus the feeding dipole
length (L) and spacing (S): (a) real part, and (b) imaginary part. The other two
parameters are kept constant at R = 1.18 mm, and W =265 m.
IV. FABRICATION
The structure of the proposed DRA is relatively simple and
can be fabricated using micromachining technology in three (a)
steps. Six inch double sided polished high-resistivity silicon
wafers (si 2,000 .cm and thickness = 675 m) were used
for fabrication. One side of this wafer was etched through a
depth of 400 m using a Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE)
process in order to remove the silicon around the DRA [23-25]
while maintaining vertical cylindrical sidewall. It is worth
mentioning that a number of DRA prototypes were fabricated
within the same wafer. Ideally, the silicon has to be removed
(b)
totally in between adjacent DRAs. However, this process
requires etching of huge amount of silicon. For fabrication Fig. 6: SEM photos of the fabricated DRA: (a) top side showing the DRA, and
simplicity, sufficient amount of silicon was etched away (b) bottom side showing the feeding CPW line terminated by the magnetic
dipole.
around the DRA, such that a minimum distance of 4 mm is
kept clear in all directions. This leaves silicon walls
surrounding the DRAs. The presence of these walls has a
0018-926X (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/TAP.2015.2439694, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
AP1310-1380 5
V. THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERIATION frequency (59 GHz). The radiation efficiency of the fabricated
In this section, the measured electrical characteristics of the antenna can be calculated from the measured gain, and the
estimated directivity of the antenna. In our calculations, we
fabricated DRA are presented and compared with the
used the approximated formula of the directivity, D, which is
simulated results. For accurate comparison, the silicon walls
given by [27]:
surrounding the DRA were taken into consideration in the
32400
simulation. Fig. 7 shows the measured and simulated return D (1)
loss of the optimized DRA versus frequency. The simulations E H
of the optimized DRA were carried out using HFSS. The where E and H are the measured 3-dB beamwidths along
return loss curves show good agreement between simulations the E- and H- planes, respectively. At 60 GHz, the calculated
and measurements. The measured resonance frequency was 59 radiation efficiency is 79.35% compared to the simulated
GHz very close to the value determined by HFSS, which is efficiency of 92.04%.It is clear that the approximated
59.5 GHz. Measurements showed better matching and slightly directivity is a source of error. The alternative is to measure
wider bandwidth than simulations. This is mainly due to extra the whole radiation pattern in all directions and calculate the
losses that are not considered by the simulators. The measured directivity according to its definition. However, this is rather
10 dB impedance bandwidth was 2.23 GHz, which unpractical and would take a much longer measurement time.
corresponds to 3.78% at 59 GHz. Such bandwidth is Looking at Fig. 9(b), it can be seen that the radiation pattern
considered sufficient for a number of mm-wave wireless widens once more outside the 3-dB beamwidth which implies
systems. For WPAN applications where the bandwidth that the real directivity is less than the approximated one.
extends from 57 GHz to 64 GHz, a few more proposed DRAs
with different dimensions are required to cover the entire
passband.
The 3D radiation pattern of the proposed DRA is shown in
Fig. 8, as simulated using HFSS at 59.5 GHz. As shown, the
antenna is radiating mainly towards the boresight. The
simulated gain, directivity, and radiation efficiency are 8.27
dBi, 8.11 dBi, and 92.04%, respectively. The 15 dB back-
side radiation is attributed mainly to radiation from the
magnetic dipole etched within the ground plane.
Fig. 9 shows the measured and simulated co- and cross-
polar components of the far field at the corresponding
resonance frequency along the E- and H-planes. The detailed
measurement setup is presented in [26]. The H-plane is the
plane parallel to the magnetic dipole, while the plane Fig. 7: Measured and simulated return loss versus frequency for the optimized
DRA.
perpendicular to it is the E-plane. There is reasonable
agreement between simulations and measurements. The reason
for the observed discrepancy is the fact that during
measurements, the DRA structure is mounted within a large
ground plate which is part of the measurement equipment.
This alters the radiation patterns, mainly above 60. It is also
observed that around 10, there is a noticeable difference
between simulations and measurements since there is no
complete isolation between the probe positioner side and the
radiating side. Thus, reflection from the positioner gives rise Fig. 8: 3D radiation pattern of the DRA at its resonance frequency as
to this dip as it appears in one plane at one side only. simulated with HFSS.
Comparing the co- and cross- polarization components in the
E- and H- planes, it is clear that the proposed DRA enjoys a
high degree of polarization purity especially in the broadside
direction. The simulated and measured cross-polar levels in
the broadside direction are 42.25 dB and 15.00 dB,
respectively. The relatively higher measured cross-
polarization level is mainly due to unwanted reflections within
the measurement setup. The measured 3-dB beamwidth of the
proposed DRA is 45 and 114 in the E- and H- planes,
respectively.
Fig. 10 shows the simulated and measured gain versus
frequency. From the figure, it is clear that antenna has an (a) (b)
average gain of around 6.5 dBi along its working bandwidth.
Fig. 9: Measured and simulated radiation pattern of the DRA at its resonance
A maximum gain of 7 dBi was measured at the resonance frequency (____HFSS,- - - Measured):(a) co- and cross-polar components in E-
0018-926X (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/TAP.2015.2439694, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
AP1310-1380 6
plane, (b) co- and cross-polar component in H-plane. [8] Y. Coulibaly, M. Nedil, L. Talbi, and T. A. Denidni, Design of a mm-
wave broadband CPW-fed stacked dielectric resonator antenna for
underground mining communication, IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas
Propag. Soc. (APSURSI), pp.1-4, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July 2010.
[9] Y. Coulibaly, M. Nedil, L. Talbi, and T. A. Denidni, High gain
cylindrical dielectric resonator with superstrate for broadband
millimeter-wave underground mining communications, 14th Int. Symp.
Antenna Technol. Appl. Electromagnetics and the American
Electromagnetics Conf. (ANTEM-AMEREM), pp.1-4, July 2010.
[10] A. Agouzoul, M. Nedil, Y. Coulibaly, T. A. Denidni, I. Ben Mabrouk,
and L.Talbi, Design of a high gain hybrid dielectric resonator antenna
for millimeter-waves underground application, IEEE Antennas Propag.
Soc., pp.1688-1691, July 2011.
[11] Y.-M. Pan, K. W. Leung, and K.-M. Luk, Design of the millimeter-
wave rectangular dielectric resonator antenna using a higher-order
mode, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.59, no.8, pp.2780-2788,
Aug. 2011.
[12] A. Perron, T. A. Denidni, and A.-R. Sebak, High-gain hybrid dielectric
resonator antenna for millimeter-wave applications: design and
implementation, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.57, no.10,
pp.2882-2892, Oct. 2009.
Fig. 10: Simulated and measured gain versus frequency for the proposed DRA. [13] D. Guha, A. Banerjee, and Y. M. M. Antar, New radiating mode in a
cylindrical DRA to produce broadside high gain radiation, IEEE Int.
Symp. Antennas Propag. Soc. (APSURSI), pp.1-4, July 2010.
VI. CONCLUSION [14] D. Guha, A. Banerjee, C. Kumar, and Y. M. M. Antar, Higher order
mode excitation for high-gain broadside radiation from cylindrical
In this paper, a micromachined on-chip DRA with single dielectric resonator antennas, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.60,
silicon wafer is designed, fabricated, and measured for the first no.1, pp.71-77, Jan. 2012.
time. A complete parametric study for the proposed antenna [15] P.V. Bijumon, A .P. Freundorfer, M. Sayer, and Y. M. M. Antar, On-
chip silicon integrated cylindrical dielectric resonator antenna for
has been presented. The new antenna has a number of millimeter wave applications, Int. Symp. Signals, Syst. and Electronics
appealing characteristics, such as: fabrication simplicity, high (ISSSE), pp.489-492, July 2007.
radiation efficiency, high gain, and low cross-polarization [16] P. V. Bijumon, Y. M. M. Antar, A. P. Freundorfer, and M. Sayer,
Dielectric resonator antenna on silicon substrate for system on-chip
level. In addition, the proposed antenna is suitable for applications, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.56, no.11, pp.3404-
monolithic integration with the driving electronics. Such 3410, Nov. 2008.
feature has a high value in the millimeter-wave range because [17] M.-R. Nezhad-Ahmadi, M. Fakharzadeh, B. Biglarbegian, and S. Safavi-
the added parasitics due to hybrid integration may deteriorate Naeini, High-efficiency on-chip dielectric resonator antenna for mm-
wave transceivers, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.58, no.10,
the performance of such high-frequency systems. pp.3388-3392, Oct. 2010.
[18] J. Svedin, L.-G. Huss, D. Karlen, P. Enoksson, and C. Rusu, A
ACKNOWLEDGMENT micromachined 94 GHz dielectric resonator antenna for focal plane
array applications, IEEE/MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. (IMS), pp.1375-
This publication is based on work supported by award 1378, June 2007.
number: UK-C0015 OUK made by King Abdullah University [19] M. N. Afsar, H. Chi, X. Li, Millimeter wave complex refractive index,
complex dielectric permittivity and loss tangent of high purity and
of Science and Technology (KAUST) and was co-funded by
compensated silicon, Conf. Precision electromagnetic Measurements,
the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-V) of the pp. 238-239, June 1990.
Flemish government through the FWO project G.0897.10N. [20] M. Riaziat, R. Majidi-Ahy, and I-J. Feng, Propagation modes and
dispersion characteristics of coplanar waveguides, IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol.38, no.3, pp.245-251, 1990.
REFERENCES [21] D. Kajfezand, A. W. Glisson, and J. James, Computed modal field
[1] S. A. Long, M. McAllister, and L. Shen, The resonant cylindrical distributions for isolated dielectric resonators, IEEE Trans. Microw.
dielectric cavity antenna, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.31, no.3, Theory, vol.32, no.12, pp.1609-1616, Dec. 1984.
pp.406-412, May 1983. [22] L. Giauffret, J.-M. Laheurte, and A. Papiernik, Study of various shapes
[2] K. W. Leung, K. M. Luk, K. Y. A. Lai, and D. Lin, Theory and of the coupling slot in CPW-fed microstrip antennas, IEEE Trans.
experiment of a coaxial probe fed hemispherical dielectric resonator Antennas Propag., vol.45, no.4, pp.642-647, April 1997.
antenna, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.41, no.10, pp.13901398, [23] E. A. Soliman, S. Sedky, M. O. Sallam, S. Hassan, O. El Katteb, A. K.
Oct. 1993. S. Abdel Aziz, and M. Refaat, Novel MEMS dipole/monopole antenna
[3] R. A. Kranenburg and S. A. Long, Microstrip transmission line for wireless system operating at 77 GHz, Progress in Electromagnetics
excitation of dielectric resonator antennas, Electronics Lett., vol.24,
Research Symp. Online, vol.6, no.6, pp.547-550, July 2010.
no.18, pp.1156-1157, Sept. 1988.
[4] R. A. Kranenburg, S. A. Long, and J. T. Williams, Coplanar waveguide [24] E. A. Soliman, S. Hassan, O. El Katteb, M. O. Sallam, M. Serry, and S.
excitation of dielectric resonator antennas, IEEE Trans. Antennas Sedky, 77-GHz MEMS brick-wall antenna fed by coupled microstrip
Propag., vol.39, no.1, pp.119-122, Jan. 1991. lines, IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas Propag. Soc. (APSURSI), pp.1-
[5] J. T. H. St. Martin, Y. M. M. Antar, A. A. Kishk, A. Ittipiboon, and M. 4, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July 2010.
Cuhaci, Dielectric resonator antenna using aperture [25] M. O. Sallam, E. A .Soliman, and S. Sedky, Novel linearly and
coupling, Electronics Lett., vol.26, no.24, pp.2015-2016, Nov. 1990. circularly polarized 60 GHz MEMS antennas on low- and high-
[6] K.-W. Leung, Conformal strip excitation of dielectric resonator resistivity silicon, 5th European Conf. Antennas Propag. (EuCAP),
antenna, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.48, no.6, pp.961-967, June pp.1194-1198, Rome, Italy, April 2011.
2000. [26] K. Mohammadpour-Aghdam, S. Brebels, A. Enayati, R. Faraji-Dana, G.
[7] J. Oh, T. Baek, D. Shin, J. Rhee, and S. Nam, 60-GHz CPW-fed A. E. Vandenbosch, and W. De Raedt, RF probe influence study in
dielectric resonator-above-patch (DRAP) antenna for broadband WLAN millimeter-wave antenna pattern measurements, Int. J. of RF Microw.
applications using micromachining technology, Microw. Optical Comput.-Aided Eng., vol. 21, no. 4, pp.413-420, July 2011.
Technol. Lett., vol.49, no.8, pp.1859-1861, Aug. 2007.
0018-926X (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/TAP.2015.2439694, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
AP1310-1380 7
[27] C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory and Design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Professor and principal investigator of IMPACT Lab. He was an invited
1997. researcher at the VTT Micro-modules Research Center (Oulu, Finland) in
2006. Dr. Shamim was the recipient of the best paper prize at the European
Mai O. Sallam(S13) was born in Cairo, Egypt, in Wireless Technology Conference in 2008. He was given the Ottawa Centre of
October 1986. She received her B.Sc. degree (with Research Innovation (OCRI) Researcher of the Year Award in 2008. His work
honors) in Electronics and Communications Engineering on Wireless Dosimeter won the ITAC SMC Award at Canadian
from Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt in 2008 and the Microelectronics Corporation TEXPO in 2007. He received the best student
M.Sc. degree in Physics in 2012 from the American paper finalist prize at IEEE APS conference in 2005. He also won numerous
University in Cairo, Egypt. She is currently working business related awards, including 1st prize in Canadas national business plan
towards her Ph.D. degree at both the American University competition and was selected for OCRI Entrepreneur of the year award in
in Cairo and the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. 2010. He has authored/co-authored over 65 international publications and is
Since December 2008, she joined the Youssef Jameel an inventor on 8 patents. His research interests are in integrated on-chip
Science and Technology Research Center (YJ-STRC) at the American antennas, low power CMOS RFICs for system-on-chip (SoC) applications and
University in Cairo as a research assistant. Her research interests include advanced system-on-package (SoP) designs in multilayer LTCC, LCP, and
RFID tag antennas, micromachined on-chip antennas for millimeter wave paper substrates through screen and inkjet printing techniques. Dr. Shamim
applications, and plasmonics. serves on the editorial board of IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation.
0018-926X (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/TAP.2015.2439694, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
AP1310-1380 8
0018-926X (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.