Improvement of Voltage Stability by Optimal Capacitor Placement Using Sensitivity Matrix
Improvement of Voltage Stability by Optimal Capacitor Placement Using Sensitivity Matrix
32 www.erpublication.org
Improvement of Voltage Stability by Optimal Capacitor placement using Sensitivity Matrix
for the Capacitor to be placed in the system and the TABLE I. LINE FLOW INDICES OF 15- BUS SYSTEM
sensitivity indices for the buses remain same as long as the
system configuration remains the same. From To LFISP LFISQ LFIRP LFIRQ
Xi X
LFIRQ : 4 2
Qi 2i Pr2 (4)
11 12 0.0033 -0.0033 0.0022 -0.0022
Vi 1 Vi 2 4 13 0.0057 -0.0057 0.0039 -0.0039
where
Vi :- voltages at the sending end node i 4 14 0.0061 -0.0062 0.0041 -0.0042
Vi+1:-voltages at the receiving end node i +1
ri:-resistance of the line joining the nodes i and i +1
Xi:-reactance of the line joining the nodes
Pi :- real power flowing from node i B. L index:
Qi :- reactive power flowing from node i
Pr :- real power entering from node i +1 In this method the Y-bus matrix of the system is split
Qr :- real power entering from node i +1 into rows and columns of generators and load buses.
These line flow indices are calculated for all the lines in I G YGG YGL VG
the system and the lines with a high value (close to 1) are I Y (6)
considered as critical lines. The receiving end bus of the L LG YLL VL
critical line/lines is identified as the weakest bus from the
VL Z LL FLG I L
I K
voltage stability perspective.
YGG VG
(7)
Issues with Line flow indices: G GL
Consider the expressions for LFISP and LFIRP. If i, = 0 then FLG = [YLL]-1 [YLG] (8)
LFISP = 0 and LFIRP = 0 indicating that the lines are stable ig
Vi
in the case of real power flow which could be misleading. L j 1 Fji (9)
This is because, the power transferred over a line is given by i 1 Vj
33 www.erpublication.org
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR)
ISSN: 2321-0869, Volume-2, Issue-12, December 2014
mode i are defined as kiik
Bus no L-Index
2 0.0292
3 0.0448
4 0.0511
5 0.0521
6 0.0431
7 0.0445
8 0.0327
9 0.0339 Fig. 2. Participation factor of 15- bus system
10 0.0521
11 0.0567 III. SENSITIVITY MATRIX
12 0.0581
L- Index as introduced in section. 2. would predict voltage
13 0.0536 stability.
14 0.0538 To derive L-Index sensitivities Let {1,2,3.g} be no of
15 0.0455 generator nodes{g+1, g+2, g+3n} be no of load nodes
The L-index is,
ig
Vi
L j 1 Fji (13)
i 1 Vj
where the subscript
G :- refers to the generator buses in the system
L :- refers to the load buses in the system
Squaring the equation then,
2
2
ig
V ig
2
1 Fji i 1 F V i (14)
L j Vj ji
Vj
i 1 i 1
Put,
2
K L (15)
j j
2
ig
Vi
Fig. 1. L- index of 15- bus system.
K 1 F ji (16)
j Vj
i 1
C. Participation factor: Differentiating the above equation, the new equation is:
K j ig V ig V i
21 Fji i Fji 2 (17)
It is developed as follows. Consider the load flow
V j i 1 V i 1 V
Jacobian. j j
P H N
Q M
L V
(10)
P H N
Q M V
L
(18)
Although both P and Q changes affect system conditions,
it is possible to study the effect of reactive power
injections on the voltage stability by setting P (P As the inclusion of an extra capacitor would change only
constant) and deriving the Q V sensitivities at different the reactive power, we would make P in to be zero. From
loads. Thus this,
Q [ L MH 1 N ]V J R V (11)
J R (12)
Q L MH 1N V J R V V J R 1 Q (19
where )
: Left Eigen matrix of JR where (JR) is the reduced Jacobian.
: Right Eigen matrix of JR where Q is a vector of change in reactive power
injections
- Eigenvalues JR
The participation factors for the bus k and the critical
Q Qg 1Qg 2Qg 3......... '
(20)
34 www.erpublication.org
Improvement of Voltage Stability by Optimal Capacitor placement using Sensitivity Matrix
L
max [1] L
actual
ig ig ig
L j
1 1 F ji Vi 1 Fji Vi2 a ji * Qi (26) The optimal location of capacitor along with the Q value
Lj Vj Vj i 1
i 1 i 1 is found out.
1 V i g V i g
Lq 1 i 1 Fji i i 1 Fji i2 i 1 a ji
ig
(27) V. CASE STUDY AND RESULTS
L j V j V j
The method is carried out for finding the capacitor
This is called L- Index sensitivity matrix. location, in 15 bus system with four times the normal load
and the results are presented below.
TABLE III. COMPARISON OF L OBTAINED BOTH IN CONVENTIONAL
AND L-INDEX SENSITIVITY
Buses exceeding Llimi are [B4 B5 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14].
Bus L from L-Index L from conventional Lred = [L4 L5 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14].
no sensitivities method
TABLE IV. REDUCED SENSITIVITY MATRIX OF 15 BUS EXPERIMENT
2 0.001561375 0.00153235 SYSTEM
3 0.002982529 0.002926712 4 5 10 11 12 13 14
0.18 0.186 0.160 0.178 0.184 0.192 0.193
4 0.003036517 0.002977799 4
241 57 42 13 33 5 3
5 0.003045882 0.002986667 0.18 0.224 0.165 0.184 0.190 0.199 0.199
5
861 97 87 18 59 03 86
6 0.001625685 0.00159306 0.16 0.166 0.209 0.233 0.241 0.172
10 0.172
7 0.001632134 0.001599146 299 71 07 26 74 72
0.19 0.194 0.244 0.335 0.348 0.200 0.201
11
8 0.001577317 0.001547467 035 69 16 98 64 87 71
0.20 0.204 0.256 0.353 0.419 0.211 0.212
9 0.001582524 0.001552402 12
023 79 83 42 22 3 18
10 0.004477482 0.004394593 0.19 0.202 0.173 0.192 0.199 0.258 0.209
13
758 08 77 95 66 67 37
11 0.006484893 0.006368077
0.19 0.203 0.174 0.194 0.200 0.209 0.237
14
12 0.008109174 0.007966572 88 33 84 14 9 8 82
13 0.003058382 0.002998492
14 0.003059996 0.003000017 Lmax = [0.53262 0.54971 0.55208 0.63254 0.66014
15 0.001636937 0.001603675 0.57359 0.57676]
35 www.erpublication.org
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR)
ISSN: 2321-0869, Volume-2, Issue-12, December 2014
Lmin = [0.032616 0.049709 0.052083 0.13254 0.16014 [7]. W. Xu and Y. Mansour, Voltage stability analysis using generic
dynamic load models, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 9, pp.
0.073588 0.076765] 479-493, Feb. 1994.
[8]. O. Crisan and M. Liu, Voltage collapse prediction using an improved
Imposing the condition Lmin L Lmax and
sensitivity approach, Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 28, no.
running optimization program we get values of capacitors 3, pp. 181-190, Jan. 1994.
as given below: [9]. J. Lu, C. W. Liu, and J. S. Thorp, New methods for computing a
saddle-node bifurcation point for voltage stability analysis, in IEEE
TABLE V. CAPACITOR PLACEMENT FOR VOLTAGE STABILITY Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 10, pp. 978-89, May 1995
IMPROVEMENT
[10] T. Van Gutsem and R. Mailhot, Validation of a fast voltage stability
Bus no Value of Capacitor analysis method on the Hydro Quebec system, IEEE PES Winter Power
Meeting, 96 WM 280-8-P W RS
4 2.3036e-011
5 1.8078e-011
10 1.6882e-011
11 1.5086e-010
12 0.38191
13 1.2864e-011
14 0.00016339
VI. CONCLUSION
This paper emphasis on the analyzing and improvement of
voltage stability of radial power systems. The various indices
which have been proposed for assessing voltage stability are
studied. Patterns of voltage stability indices are been
observed and their dependence on the electrical distance has
been studied. An algorithm is proposed for optimal placement
of the capacitors to improve the voltage stability to the
required level based on the new sensitive index proposed. The
effect of reactive power injections at a bus on the entire power
system in consideration is studied. The algorithms which have
been proposed for radial power systems can also be suitably
modified and can be applied to meshed systems.
REFERENCES
36 www.erpublication.org