DKAM ROE Reporter January 2016 PDF
DKAM ROE Reporter January 2016 PDF
Pendulum
Between 2009 and the middle of 2015, the Capital Ideas Fund, like the broader
equity markets, performed well. However, markets need to reset and these
resets come in the form of corrections. The Toronto Stock Exchange has been
in the midst of a correction since the third quarter of 2014 and that correction
continues into early 2016.
In 2015, the Capital Ideas Fund was up 4.06%1, compared to the S&P/TSX
Total Return Index, which fell 8.32%2 last year. While the start of 2016 has
been challenging, like 2009, I expect the market to perform better as the year
unfolds.
The 2009-2015 bull market is over. Since the Canadian stock market peaked in
September of 2014, Canadian equity indices are down roughly 24%3. This
clearly represents a significant reset, but neither I nor anyone else knows if this
correction is over.
Here is what I do know. I know that oil is trading at a price level that is
unsustainably low. I know that the Canadian Dollar is in the lower third of its
historical trading range and from a purchasing power of parity (PPP)
perspective is quite undervalued. Fair value for the Canadian Dollar is
probably somewhere between USD 0.80 and 0.84. I also know that both
Canadian and international equity investors are significantly underweight the
Canadian market. I read every day about foreign investors who are snapping up
Canadian real estate, from ski chalets to office towers. And I also know that
Canadian growth stocks are very, very attractively priced.
So how attractively priced is the Canadian stock market right now? I regularly
track the forty fastest growing companies in Canada (hereafter referred to as
the Fast 40) and the valuation of these companies by quartile is presented in
Figure 1 below. The cheapest quartile of growth stocks trades at 4.7x 2016
cash earnings and even the second quartile trades on just 8.2x 2016 cash
earnings. Twenty of the forty fastest growth stocks in Canada now trade on
less than 10x 2016 earnings.
The last time I saw valuations this low was back in 2009 when we were
emerging from a far more serious stock market correction. The correction of
2008/2009 was in my view an actual crisis whereas todays correction stems
primarily from concerns related to the slowdown in the global economy. The
collapse of various commodity prices, trouble in China and the slowdown in
emerging markets are all growth problems. October 2008 was about a financial
system that was broken. In 2015/2016, we are dealing with a growth slowdown
that is ultimately linked to global demographics.
Is there really no growth left in the world? Not necessarily, but growth is going
to be a bit harder to find for at least another decade. Economic growth
historically comes from demographics and innovation. Dents analysis
suggests to me that companies that require population growth to grow will
struggle because growth in industries that require population growth will
become a zero-sum game.
Besides population growth the other source of growth in our economy comes
from innovation. Companies that invent, discover and make new things have
always been an important part of our economy, but there are two reasons why
in the next ten years they will be even more important. First, the market share
of companies that grow because of innovation compared to those that grow
primarily because of population growth will almost certainly increase given the
demographic slowdown. But the second reason is the speed at which
innovation itself is occurring. We live in a world where technology and
innovation allow for the adoption of new gadgets, medicines, services and
technology at an increasingly fast pace. Thus, one can easily argue in 2016
that at the same time that demographic growth is slowing rapidly, innovation
based growth is accelerating.
The phenomenon I describe above is reflected in stock markets all over the
world, and certainly one can see it on the TSX. In Figure 2 below I once again
make reference to the Fast 40 vs the weighting of the TSX 60 index. Here we
see that more than half of the Fast 40 companies are either in technology or
healthcare industries, while only 6% of the TSX 60 consists of companies
operating in those sectors. At the other end of the scale, we see the TSX 60
with a 27% weighting in natural resources while similar stocks represent just a
2.5% weighting in the Fast 40. If you are building a Canadian Growth
portfolio, it will bear little resemblance to the TSX 60.
Given my outlook for growth in 2016, it is time to turn our attention to specific
companies. Before I do I should point out that I often describe technology and
The Capital Ideas Fund invests in companies that are run by ethical and
competent management teams. Typically, we invest in companies that
consistently earn a high ROE without excessive use of leverage. As we look
into 2016, here are the 25 high ROE stocks in Canada with market caps greater
than $500MM that are on our focus list. Note that the Fast 40 companies I refer
to above have market capitalizations of greater than $75MM whereas the
companies I discuss have market capitalizations in excess of $500MM. Thus,
the constituents of the Fast 40 and those represented in the following tables are
not identical but overlap significantly.
Figure 4 - High ROE stocks in Canada - Ranked by 2016 DKAM estimated P/E
Rank Company Ticker Industry Mkt Cap ($MM) P/E
1 Concordia Health CXR Pharma 1497 3.6
2 Intertain Group IT Gaming 625 4.5
3 Home Capital Group HCG Specialty Lender 1826 5.2
4 Amaya Gaming AYA Gaming 3156 5.2
5 Mitel Networks MNW Network 718 5.3
6 Valeant Pharma VRX Pharma 30956 6.5
7 Linamar LNR Auto parts 3808 8.2
8 Exco Technologies XTC Technology/Software 613 10.1
9 CGI Group GIB.A IT services 16820 12.1
10 Open Text OTC Software 5581 12.3
11 MacDonald Dettwiler MDA IT/Space/Technology 3104 12.4
12 Clearwater Seafoods CLR Seafood 592 13.0
13 MTY Foods MTY Food franchising 574 13.3
14 Canadian Pacific Railway CP Railways 26149 14.3
15 Intertape Polymer ITP Tape 986 14.7
16 Cara Operations CAO Restaurants 1330 16.2
17 Spin Master TOY Toys 1958 16.6
18 Constellation Software Inc. CSU Technology/Software 7731 17.9
19 Boyd Group BYD.UN Autobody 996 19.2
20 CCL Industries CCL.B Packaging 7088 20.8
21 Alimentation Couche-Tard ATD.B Convenience Stores 24365 21.4
22 Dollarama DOL Retailing 9220 23.3
23 Enghouse ESL Software 1599 24.5
24 Colliers CIG Real estate mgmt 2222 24.7
25 Kinaxis KXS Technology/Software 1100 59.9
In Figure 4, we show the exact same list as we had in Figure 3, but this time
we rank the list from cheapest to most expensive. For those of you who care to
go back to our past newsletters, it is interesting to note how many companies
have been here before. However, in every case, the stocks that were on last
years list and this years list are now significantly cheaper than they were a
year ago.
In Figure 5 we rank the stocks by a ratio of ROE to P/E. Effectively what this
shows is how many units of growth one buys for a unit of P/E. Thus, Valeant
offers 9.8 units of growth per unit of P/E while Kinaxis offers a half a unit of
growth per unit of P/E. While there are clearly companies in this database that
have questions surrounding future earnings, there are still a number of very
solid companies that offer excellent investment potential.
Final thoughts
Last year was a tough year. Even though we beat the index by more than 12%4,
it didnt feel like a win. Looking into 2016, I sense that we will have better
numbers to report by year end. The pendulum that has taken the Canadian
market and currencies lower feels like it is about to swing back the other way.
I also once again want to thank and compliment my team. Dominika, Chris,
Jesse, Jordan and Ali are hardworking and ethical. They embody the qualities
that I also look for in the management teams of the companies we invest in. I
am a lucky man to be able to work with such fine people and by extension the
investors in Donville Kent are lucky to have such fine people watching out for
us.
DISCLAIMER
Readers are advised that the material herein should be used solely for informational purposes. Donville Kent
Asset Management Inc. (DKAM) does not purport to tell or suggest which investment securities members or
readers should buy or sell for themselves. Readers should always conduct their own research and due diligence
and obtain professional advice before making any investment decision. DKAM will not be liable for any loss or
damage caused by a reader's reliance on information obtained in any of our newsletters, presentations, special
reports, email correspondence, or on our website. Our readers are solely responsible for their own investment
decisions.
The information contained herein does not constitute a representation by the publisher or a solicitation for the
purchase or sale of securities. Our opinions and analyses are based on sources believed to be reliable and are
written in good faith, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy or
completeness. All information contained in our newsletters, presentations or on our website should be
independently verified with the companies mentioned. The editor and publisher are not responsible for errors or
omissions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Unit value and investment returns will fluctuate
and there is no assurance that a fund can maintain a specific net asset value. The fund is available to investors
eligible to invest under a prospectus exemption, such as accredited investors. Prospective investors should rely
solely on the Fund's offering documentation, which outlines the risk factors in making a decision to invest.
The S&P/TSX Composite Total Return Index ("the index") is similar to the DKAM Capital Ideas Fund LP ("the
fund") in that both include publicly traded Canadian equities of various market capitalizations across several
industries, and reflect both movements in the stock prices as well as reinvestment of dividend income. However,
there are several differences between the fund and the index, as the fund can invest both long and short, can
utilize leverage, can take concentrated positions in single equities, and may invest in companies that have
smaller market capitalizations then those that are included in the index. In addition, the index does not include
any fees or expenses whereas the fund data presented is net of all fees and expenses. The source of the index
data is S&P/Capital IQ.
DKAM receives no compensation of any kind from any companies that are mentioned in our newsletters or on
our website. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The DKAM Capital Ideas Fund,
employees, writers, and other related parties may hold positions in the securities that are discussed in our
newsletters, presentations or on our website.