0% found this document useful (0 votes)
115 views2 pages

Laurette SET Scores

This document contains a faculty individual course evaluation report for Professor Laurette Deanna's ENG1020 course in the Winter 2017 term. Based on responses from 13 of the 16 enrolled students, the course and instructor received positive ratings overall. Students reported learning a great deal in the course and rated the instructor's teaching as excellent. Key metrics like organization, clarity, enthusiasm and knowledge of content also received high marks.

Uploaded by

Deanna Laurette
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
115 views2 pages

Laurette SET Scores

This document contains a faculty individual course evaluation report for Professor Laurette Deanna's ENG1020 course in the Winter 2017 term. Based on responses from 13 of the 16 enrolled students, the course and instructor received positive ratings overall. Students reported learning a great deal in the course and rated the instructor's teaching as excellent. Key metrics like organization, clarity, enthusiasm and knowledge of content also received high marks.

Uploaded by

Deanna Laurette
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

As Of: Jun 8, 2017

Time: 11:51:34 AM
Testing, Evaluation and Research Services Report ID: SET002

Faculty Individual Report


(Page 1 of 2)

College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Winter 2017

Instructor: Laurette Deanna Course : ENG1020 Call No. 25675 Students Responding: 13 out of 16

SUMMARY COURSE EVALUATION RATINGS #RESPONDING IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES


Mn. Md. SD Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor N/A U/A
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) (A) (B)
How would you rate this course? 4.0 4 1.2 5 4 2 0 1 0 0
Great Deal A lot Moderate Little Nothing N/A U/A
How much have you learned in this course? 3.8 4 1.2 3 4 2 0 1 0 0

SUMMARY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor N/A U/A
How would you rate the instructor's teaching in this course? 4.2 5 1.3 8 0 3 0 1 0 0
MEAN SUMMATIVE CLASS ----- -----
RATING ..................................................................... 12.0 1.2

STUDENT PROFILE RATINGS #RESPONDING IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES


Mn. Md. SD Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Before enrolling I had an interest in the subject matter of this course. 3.0 3 1.0 0 4 5 2 1
I wanted to take this course. 2.9 3 1.1 1 2 5 3 1
----- -----
MEAN SUMMATIVE INTEREST RATING ................................................................ 5.9 1.0

Required Elective
The course for me was:.............................................................................. 12 0

< 60 % 60 - 69 % 70-79 % 80 - 89 % 90 - 100 %


I attended approximately this percentage of class meetings:................. 0 0 2 2 8

A B C D Other
I expect a final grade in this course of :............................................... 9 2 0 0 1

Mn = Mean; Md = Median; SD = Standard Deviation


N/A = Not Applicable; U/A = Unable to Answer

Wayne State University | Testing, Evaluation and Research Services | 686 Student Center, Detroit, MI 48202 | (313) 577-3400, set@wayne.edu Page 1 of 2
As Of: Jun 8, 2017
Time: 11:51:34 AM
Testing, Evaluation and Research Services Report ID: SET002

Faculty Individual Report


(Page 2 of 2)

Instructor: Laurette Deanna Course : ENG1020 Call No. 25675 Students Responding: 13 out of 16

INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK-DIAGNOSTICS RATINGS #RESPONDING IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES


Mn. Md. SD Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree N/A U/A
Organization/Clarity (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) (A) (B)
To me, The instructor was clear and understandable in speaking and in
4.5 5 0.9 8 3 0 1 0 0 0
written materials.
Class sessions helped me understand the course content. 4.6 5 0.9 9 2 0 1 0 0 0
I felt that the course was well organized. 4.4 5 0.9 7 4 0 1 0 0 0
Instructor Enthusiasm
To me, the instructor seemed enthusiastic about the subject. 4.4 4.5 0.7 6 5 1 0 0 0 0
The instructor encouraged me to do high quality work in this course. 4.2 4.5 1.1 6 5 0 0 1 0 0
Group Interaction
I felt free to ask questions in this course. 4.2 4.5 1.1 6 4 0 2 0 0 0
I felt encouraged to be an active participants. 4.0 4 1.1 5 4 1 2 0 0 0
Individual Rapport
The instructor was available to me electronically or in person. 3.8 4 1.1 4 4 2 2 0 0 0
I felt that the instructor treated all students in the class with respect. 4.5 5 0.7 7 4 1 0 0 0 0
Breadth of Coverage
I felt the instructor had good knowledge of the course content. 4.6 5 0.7 8 3 1 0 0 0 0
The instructor discussed differing views about the material appropriate to
4.6 5 0.7 8 3 1 0 0 0 0
the content.
Examinations/Grading
Class expectations, requirements, and grading were explained in the
4.4 4.5 0.7 6 5 1 0 0 0 0
syllabus and in class near the beginning of the course.
I felt that evaluation and grading were fair. 4.2 4 0.8 5 4 3 0 0 0 0
The instructor provided feedback on my performance within the time
4.1 4 1.2 5 5 1 0 1 0 0
frame noted in the syllabus.
The instructor's feedback on my work was helpful. 4.4 5 1.2 8 3 0 0 1 0 0
Assignments/Readings
Course assignments (e.g., reading or those activities) contributed to my
4.1 4 1.1 4 7 0 0 1 0 0
learning in this class.

Workload/Difficulty RATINGS #RESPONDING IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES


Too Difficult Difficult Moderate Elementary Too Elementary N/A U/A
Mn. Md. SD (+2) (+1) (0) (-1) (-2)
For me, the course was: ................................................. 0.0 0 0.9 1 1 7 3 0 0 0
Too Heavy Heavy Moderate Little Too Little N/A U/A
(+2) (+1) (0) (-1) (-2)
I felt that the workload in the course was: .......................................... 0.2 0 0.7 1 1 9 1 0 0 0
Too Fast Fast Moderate Slow Too Slow N/A U/A
(+2) (+1) (0) (-1) (-2)
I felt that the course pace was: ............................................................. 0.3 0 0.8 1 3 7 1 0 0 0

INSTRUCTOR SUPPLIED ITEMS: #RESPONDING IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES


(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) (A) (B)
1. ...............................................................................................................................
2. ...............................................................................................................................
3. ...............................................................................................................................
4. ...............................................................................................................................
5. ...............................................................................................................................
6. ...............................................................................................................................
7. ...............................................................................................................................
8. ...............................................................................................................................
9. ...............................................................................................................................
10. ..............................................................................................................................

Mn = Mean; Md = Median; SD = Standard Deviation


N/A = Not Applicable; U/A = Unable to Answer

Wayne State University | Testing, Evaluation and Research Services | 686 Student Center, Detroit, MI 48202 | (313) 577-3400, set@wayne.edu Page 2 of 2

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy