Wolfe Critical Terms For Science Fiction and Fantasy
Wolfe Critical Terms For Science Fiction and Fantasy
SCIENCE FICTION
AND FANTASY
A Glossary and Guide to Scholarship
Gary K. Wolfe
GREENWOOD PRESS
New York
Westport, Connecticut
London
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Wolfe, Gary K., 1946-
Critical terms for science fiction ami fantasy.
Bibliography: p.
Includes index.
I. Fantastic fiction-Dictionaries. 2. Science
fiction-Dictionaries. 3. Criticism-Dictionaries.
I. Title.
PN3435.W64 1986 809.3'876 86-3138
ISBN 0-313-22CJS1-3 (lib. bdg. : alk. pape!T)
Copyright 1986 by Gary K. Wolfe
All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be
reproduced, by any process or technique, without the
express wTitten consent of the publisher.
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 86-3138
ISBN: U-313-22981-3
First published in 1986
Greenwood Press, Inc.
88 Post Road West, Westport, Connecticut 06881
Printed in the United States of America
Preface vii
Introduction: Fantastic Literature and Literary Discourse xi
Critical Terms for Science Fiction and Fantasy
Works Consulted 145
Index of Primary Authors 157
Preface
For perhaps half a century now, those who write and read (and write
about) science fiction have been chronically unable to agree upon even
the meaning of the term ''science fiction" itself. In more recent years,
similar debates have arisen regarding allied genres of fantastic literature,
such as fantasy or horror fiction. Such confusion over the most basic
terminology is only the most visible symptom of a growing problem that
is apparent to anyone who rt!ads widely in tht! criticism and history of
these kinds of literature: On the one hand, concepts from traditional
literary discourse often seem inadequate to describe the peculiar tech-
niques and effects of the fantastic, while, on the other, terms coined
specifically to describe such literature frequently appear eccentric or
esoteric. Few branches of modern literary study have yielded as many
neologisms, specialized definitions, attempts at identifying subgenres,
and appropriations from other scholarly vocabularies as has the study
of fantastic literature-and yet the field is still far too young to have
established anything resembling a consensus critical vocabulary.
This glossary-the first literary glossary devoted specifically to the
study of fantastic literature-is not an attempt to prescribe such a vo-
cabulary, but rather to provide a guide to the breadth and variety of
the critical thought that has been brought to bear on this field. Nor is
this an encyclopedic reference work devoted to listing authors or themes-
several such works are available, and many are included in the bibli-
ography. (I would especially recommend Peter Nicholls' Science Fiction
Encyclopedia [1979] for those interested in such a comprehensive work.)
Finally, it is not a guide to that unique and colorful specialized vocab-
ulary known as "fanspeak," which is covered in Wilson Tucker's "Neo-
fan's Guide" (1955, 1973). Furthermore, this work contains very few
terms that overlap with such previous works.
viii PREFACE
The relationship between the arts of fantastic literature and the arts of
scholarly inquiry has long been a vaguely distrustful one; some might
even characterize it as a marriage of convenience born out of the science
fiction or fantasy writer's yearning for acceptance in the literary com-
munity and the academic's need for fresh critical material and improved
enrollments in sagging literature classes. To a great extent, in fact, the
dramatic blossoming of science fiction and fantasy scholarship which
began in the mid-1970s has been an extended game of catch-up: Students
(and teachers) from the thousand-odd science fiction and fantasy classes
suddenly being taught on campuses all over the world besieged librarians
for basic reference material, only to find that even the most respected
of genre authors were excluded from standard literary reference works.
The resulting demand created a significant library market for reference
works, books on the teaching of fantastic genres, general guides or
introductions to these genres, and more theoretical critical and historical
studies. At the same time, the growing acceptance of the genres as
objects of formal scholarly scrutiny created an atmosphere amenable to
critical dialogue within the academic community, and the community
of fans and professional authors continued as always to express a keen
interest in the nature and background of their field, as well as interest
in details about specific authors, publications, and works.
Science fiction and fantasy critics and scholars-most originally trained
in other academic fields-responded to this demand with a vengeance,
and genres that only a few years earlier had been all but invisible in
scholarly journals and on library reference shelves suddenly were among
the most scrutinized, catalogued, anatomized, and cross-referenced phe-
nomena in modern literature. Three major scholarly journals-Extrap-
olation, Science-Fiction Studies, and Foundation-appeared between 1959
xii INTRODUCTION
The imagination is not merely the soul's treasury, where the senses store their
pictures in safe-keeping for subsequent use; besides this it also has a region of
its own which extends much further than the dimension of the senses .... It not
only places the real before our eyes in a vivid image and makes distant thing~
present, but also, with a power more potent than that of magic, it draws that
which does not exist out of the state of potentiality, gives it a semblance of
reality and makes us see, hP.ar and feel these new creations.~
ception,., the most godlike of human qualities, while the fancy "has no
other counters to to play with, but fixities and definites. The Fancy is
indeed no other than a mode of Memory emancipated from the order
of time and space .... " 9 In other words, the earlier concept of imagi-
nation-that it is essentially a mode of memory-Coleridge relegates to
the secondary status of "fancy," while the imagination represents some-
thing new and entirely different-what Coleridge w~s to call (in a term
that fortunately has not gained wide acceptance) the '"esemplastic" power
of the mind.
In English literary discourse, Coleridge's famous distinction did much
to establish the terms by which fantastic literature would be discussed
for the rest of the century, and in so doing, to give legitimacy to the
notion of a vocabulary of the fantastic. Indeed, according to Stephen
Prickett, "by 1825 something very extraordinary had happened. From
being terms of derision, or descriptions of daydreaming, words like
'fantasy' and 'imagination' suddenly began to take on new status as
hurrah-words. " 111 But while Romantic poets and their critics could un-
dertake debates about the nature of imagination as revealed through
literary art, and while Romantic narrative artists such as Edgar Allan
Poe and Sir Walter Scott could begin to construct theoretical exami-
nations of the nature of their craft (a tradition continued by later fantastic
authors from George MacDonald to 1. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis),
critics in the major English journals remained skeptical of the uses of
the fantastic in works of fiction. 11 Fantasy elements were widely regarded
as superstitious and were generally tolerated only if supported by evi-
dence of actual belief or if supported by didactic or moral purpose. Even
Sir Walter Scott himself, while praising Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
(1818) in his essay "On the Supernatural in Fictitious Composition''
{1827), demanded that fantastic elements should be controlled and char-
acterized by "philosophical reasoning and moral truth." 12 Scott's essay
is of interest not only because it represents one of the earliest critical
discussions of a work now generally regarded as science fiction, but
because it reveals an attitude that would become increasingly dominant
in the later nineteenth century: that fantastic inventions, in an increas-
ingly pragmatic and industrialized age, required some sort of extralit-
erary rationale for their legitimate employment in a work of literature.
The attitude is exemplified in a more extreme form in an anonymous
essay titled "The Progress of Fiction as an Art," which appeared in the
Westminster Review in 1853. Argued this author, art, like technology,
progresses from more primitive to more sophisticated forms, and "a
scientific, and somewhat sceptical age, has no longer the power of be-
lieving in the marvels which delighted our ruder ancestors.'' 13 The fan-
tastic, in other words, was inappropriate for an age of science and
morality, and the values of realism came to dominate literary discourse,
xviii INTRODUCTION
despite the fact that the Victorian age itself was one of the great periods
in the development of fantasy literature. "Falsehood is so easy, truth
so difficult," wrote George Eliot in 1859. "The pencil is conscious of a
delightful facility in drawing a griffin-the longer the claws, and the
larger the wings, the better; but that marvellous facility which we mis-
took for genius is apt to forsake us when we want to draw a real unex-
aggerated lion. " 14
unreal, the work moves into another genre: the "uncanny," or super-
natural explained, or the ''marvelous." While many students of fantasy
find this definition of a genre unacceptably narrow (much fantasy would
seem to fit into Todorov's category of the marvelous), Todorov does go
on to offer a number of important comments on the nature of the
marvelous and the ways in which it might be manipulated through var-
ious techniques. Science fiction, for example, is the "scientific marvel-
ous," in which objects impossible in the world of the narrative are
rationalized through scientific or pseudoscientific means.
By shifting the discussion of the fantastic away from purely thematic
or topical considerations and toward the state of mind of the reader,
Todorov invited a kind of rhetorical criticism of fantasy that quickly
became a central element in modern discussions of the genre. Of those
studies written largely or in part in response to Todorov, the most
significant is surely Rosemary Jackson's Fantasy: The Literature of Sub-
version (1981). Viewing fantasy as a somewhat broader literary mode
than does Todorov, Jackson brings to its study a number of concepts
from psychoanalytic theory, arguing that fantasy is a historically deter-
mined form which provides expression for the fundamental anxieties
and desires of a culture.
Eric S. Rabkin's The Fantastic in Literature (1976) owes some debts
to Todorov but takes a radically different approach to the idea of the
fantastic. Whereas Todorov focuses on a particular element within a
work which might make it fantastic, Rabkin defines the fantastic as a
broad continuum of works ranging from the nearly realistic to the purely
chaotic and dreamlike. Science fiction, myths, fairy tales, horror stories,
heroic fantasy, and many other genres may be arrayed along this con-
tinuum according to their fantastic content. What defines fantasy, he
argues, is the deliberate reversal of "ground rules" within the narrative
and the depiction of events that are later shown to be in keeping with
the new ground rules; Rabkin calls such events "dis-expected" as op-
posed to "unexpected." Like Tolkien and Lewis, Rabkin defends the
escapist function of such works by arguing that they may offer new
perspectives on the reader's experiential world, that they may reveal
new modes of perception, and that in fact the fantastic may collectively
constitute a "basic mode of human knowing. " 19
The same year that Rabkin's study appeared saw the publication of
W. R. Irwin's The Game of the Impossible: A Rhetoric of Fantasy.
Broader in focus than Todorov's and yet narrower than Rabkin's, Irwin's
study was perhaps the first to attempt a formal delineation of a genre
of fantasy, which he defined as "a story based on and controlled by an
overt violation of what is generally accepted as possibility. " 20 While this
bears obvious similarities to Rabkin's reversal of "ground rules," Irwin
adds the dimension of "play" in arguing that this violation of norms is
INTRODUCTION xxiii
Science Fiction, and American Literature (1974) was one of the first
theoretically rigorous attempts to locate science fiction in a tradition of
literary discourse (what Ketterer called the "apocalyptic"); and in 1975
David Samuelson's Visions of Tomorrow provided detailed readings of
six classic science fiction novels, demonstrating convincingly that the
best science fiction could stand up to the kind of sophisticated textual
and thematic analysis traditionally associated with the realistic novel.
That same year saw the appearance of a slim volume by Robert Scholes,
a renowned critic whose interest in narrative had brought him increas-
ingly closer to the genre over a number of years. Structural Fabulation,
based on a series of lectures delivered at Notre Dame, contained some
broad theoretical proclamations and limited analysis of individual works,
but it did demonstrate that science fiction was beginning to draw the
attention of the critical "establishment," much in the same way that
Kingsley Amis' 1960 volume seemed to represent the attention of the
literary mainstream.
By the late 1970s, enough of a body of criticism had been established
that it no longer seemed necessary for each new volume to be compre-
hensively theoretical or historical in scope. Paul A. Carter's The Creation
of Tomorrow (1977) focused exclusively on the history of American
magazine science fiction, while Walter Meyers' Aliens and Linguists
(1980) dealt with language in science fiction, Patricia Warrick's The
Cybernetic Imagination in Science Fiction (1980) dealt with artificial
intelligence, Warren Wagar's Terminal Visions (1982) dealt with escha-
tological themes, and Casey Fredericks' The Future of Eternity dealt
with mythologies and myth systems. Theoretical models for the discus-
sion of the genre were presented by Darko Suvin (Metamorphoses of
Science Fiction [1979]), Gary K. Wolfe (The Known and the Unknown:
The Iconography of Science Fiction [1979]), and Mark Rose (Alien En-
counters [1981]).
Of these theoretical studies, the most widely discussed and debated
has undoubtedly been Suvin's. Defining the essential quality of science
fiction as "cognitive estrangement," Suvin provides a carefully reasoned
argument for setting the genre apart from related genres of fantastic
literature and for treating utopian fiction as a subgenre. He is careful
to place science fiction in the context of an intellectual tradition of
sociopolitical thought and, in the second half of his volume, analyzes
this tradition in terms of the early history of the genre both in Europe
and in America. His work is significant not only for bringing to science
fiction the methods of structuralist and Marxist literary analysis (and for
bringing science fiction to the attention of these disciplines), hut also
for the attention it pays to Eastern European science fiction and the
utopian tradition. While a number of readers have complained of Suvin 's
xxxii INTRODUCTION
rather dense style, the rigor of his methodology helped to set new stan-
dards for the discussion of science fiction in the context of intellectual
history.
An equally rigorous and challenging critic emerged during this time from
within the genre itself. Samuel R. Delany's critical writings, collected in The
Jewel-Hinged Jaw ( 1977), The American Shore ( 1978), and Starboard Wine
( 1984), focus largely on the kinds of language that make up fantastic narratives
and the evolution of conventional ways of reading, or' 'protocols,'' that enable
the reader to relate such language meaningfully to experience. Delany's fre-
quently brilliant, often pyrotechnic critical approach draws equally on the
highly personal experiences of a young fan turned author and on extensive
study of European post-structuralist modes of analysis. More than any other
critic, Delany has shown promise of bridging the gap between the traditions
of the science fiction writer-critic and the academic, but largely because of
this his essays have not always been as widely or well received as they deserve.
(Part of the problem, too, is their relative inaccessibility from having been
published in hardbound editions by a specialty press.)
If "academic" critics began to focus largely on science fiction in a broader
intellectual context, a number of writers in the genre began to turn to its own
internal history and development, and the 1970s saw a number of ambitious
histories of the genre, followed soon by more detailed and personal memoirs
and autobiographies. The first and best of the histories was Brian Aldiss'
Billion Year Spree: The True History of Science Fiction ( 1973), which im-
mediately generated controversy by its assertion that science fiction is a Ro-
mantic, post-Gothic narrative mode which began with Mary Shelley's
Frankenstein in 1817. Using that novel as his starting point, Aldiss proceeds
to persuasively demonstrate how the fundamental concerns laid out by Shelley-
the Faustian theme, the dual nature of human consciousness, the use and
misuse of science-have informed science fiction works throughout the nine-
teenth and twentieth centuries. Aid iss' British perspective provides him not
only with an acute sensitivity to the traditions of the English novel that science
fiction initially worked within and against, but also with a certain distance
from the American magazine tradition, which he treats with a rare objectivity
and good humor.
Much closer to the official" American history (in the sense of one which
conforms to the most widely held beliefs of many writers and fans) is James
Gunn's lavishly illustrated Alternate Worlds: The Illustrated History of Sci-
ence Fiction ( 1975). Gunn's work is avowedly a popular history rather than
a work of detailed scholarship, and it is valuable particularly for its treatment
of the evolution of science fiction in terms of the growth of technology and
the evolution of techniques of mass market publishing. Gunn makes few
controversial claims regarding the major figures in the field, but he does
provide the perspective of a working writer, and he conveys a sense of science
fiction as a profession and a popular art form in a way that more purely literary
INTRODUCTION xxxiii
of science fiction, this five-volume set features original essays on these works
by an anny of scholars and critics. Apart from the critical compromises
implicit in selecting works for inclusion, these essays are inevitably uneven
and widely divergent in their critical approaches. Nevertheless, the volume
represents one of the most exhaustive critical undertakings ever devoted to a
popular genre.
As a result of all these reference works and essay collections, for a while
more critics were spending time writing general-purpose assessments of au-
thors than were contributing to the major journals in the field. Extrapolation,
the first academic journal on science fiction, had existed since 1959, growing
from a semiannual newsletter for the Modem Language Association's Seminar
on Science Fiction to a full-fledged journal. Under the editorship of Thomas
Clareson from its founding until 1986, it remains the most eclectic of the
field's journals, and it was for years the source of the standard annual bib-
liography of scholarship until these bibliographies began to be issued sepa-
rately by Kent State University Press, which now publishes the journal as
well. (In 1985, the annual bibliography returned to Extrapolation.)" Foun-
dation, the first British science fiction journal, appeared in 1972 and con-
sistently features essays of the greatest clarity of style; many of the contributors
are the scholars who worked on Nicholls' Encyclopedia. Like that work,
Foundation partakes of certain traditions of fan scholarship and has perhaps
won greater acceptance among fans and writers than the other journals. Sci-
ence-Fiction Studies (SFS) was founded in 1973 under the editorship of Darko
Suvin and R. D. Mullen and soon became associated with political, socio-
logical, and semiotic approaches to the genre, and with discussions of non-
English-language science fiction. By far the most theoretical of the periodicals,
SFS has also had the most consistent viewpoint, despite its own protestations
of eclecticism.
By the mid-1970s, these three journals were publishing a combined total
of nine issues per year, and at least a half-dozen university presses were
including science fiction and fantasy scholarship on their lists. At least five
of these-Oxford, Indiana, Southern Illinois, Kent State, and Bowling Gree~
would commit to publishing series of studies on fantastic literature. Specialty
presses as well, most notably Borgo and Starmont House, began issuing series
of individual author studies, critical and reference works, and collections of
interviews. G. K. Hall began issuing a series of library-bound bibliographies
of individual science fiction and fantasy authors, and Greenwood Press un-
dertook an extensive series of original studies and collections of essays under
the editorship of Marshall Tymn as 'Contributions to the Study of Science
Fiction and Fantasy." In 1984, UMI Research Press began to mine uncon-
verted doctoral dissertations for a series of "Studies in Speculative Fiction.
Taplinger and Ungar issued series of essay collections. Textbook publishers,
too, found a market for science fiction anthologies and texts, as did library
reprint houses and yet more reference book publishers.
INTRODUCTION XXXV
Whether this relatively sudden blossoming of essays and books about sci-
ence fiction and fantasy meets a genuine need is of course questionable, and
raises again the question discussed earlier concerning the potential academic
exploitation of the field. At the same time, it is apparent that interest in the
fantastic is generally far greater than it once was, and that it cannot be
accounted for solely by library markets for new books or by ambitious college
faculty. Those who have contributed to the recent spate of reference books
and critical anthologies include not only academics, but fans who had pre-
viously published in unpaid fanzines, professional authors from within the
genre, and "literary essayists" whose interest in the work is neither purely
professional nor purely academic. The problem is that each of these groups
brings to their work a different set of critical assumptions and terminology,
and the resulting confusion arguably compromised the coherence of a great
many of the critical volumes on the genre that have appeared in the last decade
or so. While it might reasonably be argued that science fiction scholarship is
no more eclectic in its terminology than literary scholarship in general, it is
also true that there has been too little attention paid to the etiology and
etymology of some of the more specialized terms, and perhaps a concomitant
failure in communication among the various communities that have contrib-
uted to and continue to contribute to the scholarship of fantastic literature.
Scholars and fans almost certainly need to pay more attention to the best of
each other's work, and there may even be insights from such work that the
''pro" community of writers, editors, and publishers could find useful. It
may seem a simplistic claim, but only when these various communities begin
to look at each other's words can they fairly evaluate each other's ideas.
NOTES
I. Algis Budrys. "Books," Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction 64, no.
1 (January 1983); 19. Budrys was reviewing George Slusser, Eric S. Rabkin,
and Robert Scholes' Bridges to Fantasy (Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univer-
sity Press, 1982). Rabkin's response to the review appeared in Fantasy News-
letter, no. 60 (June/July 1983). The earlier attacks on academia include Lloyd
Biggle, Jr., "Science Fiction Goes to College: Groves and Morasses of Aca-
deme,'' Riverside Quarterly 6 (April 1974); 100-109, and "The Morasses of
Academe Revisited," Analog 98 (September 1978): 146-163; William Tenn,
Jazz Then, Musicology Now," The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction
42 (May 1972): 107-110; Ben Bova, "Teaching Science Fiction," Analog 93
(June 1974): 5-8; and Lester del Rey, "The Siren Song of Academe,'' Galaxy
36 (March 1975): 69-80, reprinted in Antaeus 25126 (Spring/Summer 1977); 312-
322. Russell Letson's essay "Contributions to the Critical Dialogue: As an
Academic Sees It," delivered at the 1986 International Conference on the Fan-
tastic in the Arts but unpublished at the time of this writing, is perhaps the most
intelligent discussion of this debate so far.
xxxvi INTRODUCTION
ABSURD. Albert Camus' term for the human condition (Le Mythe de
Sisyphe, 1942; trans. "The Myth of Sisyphus," 1955), which became
commonplace in criticism after Martin Esslin used it in 1961 to describe
a group of postwar dramatists-Beckett, Ionesco, Pinter, and others-
who rejected representational techniques of the realistic theatre in favor
of a variety of fantasy devices [44]. Since then, the term has been applied
to fiction as well, in particular the fiction of those authors like Beckett
who are associated with the Theatre of the Absurd. Many, if not most,
absurd works are in some degree fantasies, and some partake of the
thematic furniture of science fiction as well. For example, Eugene
Ionesco's Rhinoceros (1960) concerns the transformation of humans into
beasts, while Samuel Beckett's Endgame (1957) is set in a desolate world
resembling that of Post-Holocaust* fiction (198]. Peter Nicholls has also
described an .. absurdist" tradition within science fiction, which includes
works of J. G. Ballard, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., Harlan Ellison, Brian Aldiss,
and Thomas M. Disch [144). Finally, the term is often applied to works
of fantasy that prefigure the term itself, such as those of Franz Kafka,
Raymond Roussel, or Alfred Jarry.
others being the "primitive era," from 1815 to 1926; the Campbell Era,*
from 1938 to 1945-which Gunn later labeled "science-dominant"-and
the "atomic era" ofpost-1945 science fiction, dominated by Social Science
Fiction* as represented in the pages of Galaxy magazine, founded in
1950 (35).
ANTI-FANTASY. Tales that capture the reader's emotions rather than his
intellect, or that compromise the cognitive acceptance of the fantastic through
appeal to logical plausibility or archaic beliefs, according to W. R. Irwin,
who includes most traditional fairy tales in this category [I 05].
ANTI-UTOPIA 9
or bad principles and provide the bases for coherently imagined societies that
the author wants to promote or warn against, anti-utopia, in Huntington's
terms, refers to "a type of skeptical imagining that is opposed to the
consistencies of utopia-dystopia,'' or that questions the very assumptions
concerning human behavior that utopias and dystopias promote [I 04].
framework for discussing many of the common images and themes in fantasy
narratives (for example, the wise woman, the heroic quest) and has arguably
influenced a number of modem fantasy authors.
of this bias and now compiles its own bestseller lists based on reports
from mass market and specialty bookstores, the latter of which are
frequently ignored in more general compilations. (See, for example, the
lists published monthly in the science fiction newsmagazine Locus.)
While occasional science fiction or fantasy works by well-known authors
such as Arthur C. Clarke or Stephen King regularly appear on national
bestseller lists, the genre lists are as a rule more dependable in identifying
trends and popular new authors. As a critical term, "bestseller" retains
some of its disparaging overtones both within and without the genre,
usually referring to the perceived tendency of such works to reinforce
middle-class values, clarify or exploit ideas already in general circulation,
and provide accessible patterns of emotion and character.
overlook the rhetorical strategy of the cautionary tale and instead read
the novel as a straightforward attempt at Anticipation.*
DIGEST. Since 1922 and the founding of Reader's Digest, digest has
generally referred to magazines that present abridged or summarized
reprint articles on various topics; in science fiction and fantasy, however,
the term has come to refer exclusively to the trim size of the magazines
that became dominant in the 1950s, usually 5 114" x 7 112" or 5 112" x
7 112". Astounding Science Fiction was the first major science fiction
magazine to shift to digest size, in 1943, and often the term is used in
contrast with Pulp* magazines, which usually measured 7" x 10". In
fact, however, some digest size magazines (such as Other Worlds) were
printed on pulp paper stock in the later 1940s and early 1950s.
EPIC. A long narrative poem, usually dealing with the exploits of national
heroes and often featuring fantastic events. In popular usage, however,
the term has come to refer to almost any narrative on a grand scale,
and Patrick Parrinder may be justified in his complaint that a "debased"
use of the term is "one of the most regular features of the promotional
material on SF put out by publishers and film companies" [149). See
also EPIC FABLES; EPIC FANTASY.
EPIC FABLES. Short works of science fiction in which "a single future
crisis is portrayed with precision and economy," and that imply a future
heroic age of epic proportions, according to Patrick Parrinder, who views
such shorter works as generally more successful than longer attempts at
epic narrative forms in science fiction, which he also refers to as "truncated
epic" [181). Parrinder's views reflect indirectly Edgar Allan Poe's earlier
argument that poetry is essentially a discontinuous mode best suited for
the achievement of particular effects, which led to a fragmentation of
ESTRANGEMENT 31
the epic form in poetry, with shorter poems implying a larger unwritten
epic framework of which they are only a part. An example of such a
technique in science fiction might be the work of Cordwainer Smith
(Paul M. A. Linebarger), whose "Instrumentality uf Mankind .. stories
imply a broader narrative that Linebarger never published.
into common usage especially among Marxist critics following its usage
by Bertolt Brecht during the 1930s. (Although the exact derivation of
the term is complicated by the fact that Shklovsky's original ostranenie
has been variantly translated as .. defamiliarization" and Brecht's
Verfremdung as "'alienation," Darko Suvin combined these into the
single "estrangement" in his study of science fiction.) Brecht argued
that estrangement was a technique that allowed us to recognize a subject
while at the same time making it seem unfamiliar ("Kieines Organon
fi.ir das Theater," trans. 1964 as "A Brief Organon for the Theatre"),
and Suvin argued that this is a defining technique of science fiction (see
Cognitive Estrangement*) [187]. Casey Fredericks extended the term
to include psychological adjustment to radically new systems of thinking,
and compared it to the "decentration" of the psychology of Jean Piaget,
the "perceptual discontinuity" of Morse Peckham's analysis of the visual
arts, the "Paradigm* shift" of Thomas Kuhn's theory of the history of
science, and the Recovery* aspect of J. R. R. Tolkien's discussion of
fairy tales [89].
FABLE. In its most general sense, any short, symbolic narrative pointing
up a moral (a definition that would seem to include parables as well).
Some folklorists argue that the fable is a variant of the etiological animal
tale, that its purest form is the Beast-Fable,* and that the moral pointed
up is always one of common sense. Science fiction has on occasion been
touted as a means of presenting fables to less credulous modem audiences;
as early as 1874 Robert Louis Stevenson argued that a "modern fable"
would provide a "logical nexus between the moral expressed and the
machinery employed to express it"-in other words, that modern readers
seemed less willing to accept the pure fantastic as represented by earlier
fables [150]. See also EPIC FABLE.
FAERIE. ''The realm or state in which fairies have their being," according
to J. R. R. Tolkien, although he actually uses the term more broadly
to describe the nature of the Secondary World* in general [194]. In
general usage at least since Edmund Spenser's The Faerie Queene (1590)
36 FAERIE ROMANCE
it refers to the realm of the fairies or the world of the supernatural; also
spelled "faery."
FOLK TALE. A tale from oral tradition, as opposed to the literary fairy
tale or the Miirchen. *While folk tales often provide the source for such
works, they also may be the basis for other fantasy Adaptations* such
as horror and ghost stories, as well as a narrative strategy in the works
of authors from Ludwig Tieck to Manly Wade Wellman.
FUTURE HISTORICAL. ''A tale of the future using the techniques of the
historical novel," according to Isaac Asimov, whose own Foundation series
( 1942-1950) is the most famous example of the type [ 14].
FUTURE SHOCK. Journalistic term derived from the title of Alvin Toffter's
popular 1970 study of the impact of rapid technological and social change
on individuals and the culture at large. The term has been widely invoked in
discussions of the value of science fiction, and has arguably had some impact
on certain writers in the genre, notably John Brunner. See also FUTUROLOOY.
"The Turn of the Screw" ( 1898). In a still broader sense, the term has
sometimes been applied to the metaphoric presence of ghosts, as in
James Joyce's "The Dead." Julia Briggs includes in her definition stories
not only about ghosts, but about "possession and demonic bargains,
spirits other than those of the dead, including ghouls, vampires,
werewolves, the 'swarths' of living men and the 'ghost-soul' or
Doppelganger.*" Such stories, she argues, are "generically related
through a common intention of inducing fear by the use of the
supernatural," and thus are distinct from the tradition of fantasy which
derives from Fairy Tales* and from stories dealing with magical omens
or portents [37].
GOLDEN AGE. The earliest and most perfect of the Ages of the World
as described by Hesiod in his Works and Days (ca. 700 B.c.), and thus
often related to Utopian* thinking. In discussions of literary history,
however, "golden age" refers to a period of unparalleled productivity
and quality in the literary history of a nation or region-such as Latin
literature ca. 80 B.c.-14 A.D. In this latter sense, the term is often
informally applied to those periods during which popular art forms
developed and solidified major conventions and themes; "golden age"
has on occasion been defined with only some flippancy as the phase of
an individual reader's life during which he or she first fell in love with
a genre. In science fiction, however, the term most often refers to the
Campbell Era,* and has been even more specifically delimited by Isaac
Asimov as the years 1938-1950, during which Astounding Science Fiction
under Campbell dominated the market and published the early works
of a large number of major writers [ 14]. The term is, as Robert Scholes
and Eric Rabkin state, characteristic of science fiction Fandom* in being
"overstated, self-approving, and quite uncritical" [178). However, other
Pulp* genres have also been said to have their own golden ages; for
example, Sam Lundwall cites the years 1928-1939 for Weird Tales
magazine, those being the years in which authors such as H. P. Lovecraft,
Robert E. Howard, and Clark Ashton Smith published the stories that
would eventually come to define their particular Subgenres* (125).
HOUSEHOLD TALE. Jakob and Wilhelm Grimm's term for their story
collections which eventually became universally known as Fairy Tales.*
The term probably refers to the manner in which the tales were transmitted
through oral tradition, both by parents telling them to their children
and by household workers telling them as entertainment during boring
or repetitive tasks.
for the juvenile market, others, such as del Rey, have argued that the
segregation of specific works into such a market is artificial [74], and
indeed a number of so-called juveniles were either written as standard
science fiction novels or later released as such.
K
of the two central principles of successful fantasy writing [84]. See also
HYPOTHETICAL PROBABILITY.
fiction and fantasy writers and critics, "mainstream" is even more loosely
employed to refer to almost anything that is not science fiction or fantasy,
and "mainstream author" to refer to any author whose major work or
reputation lies outside the field. Such references are often acompanied
by complaints-often justified-that such works and authors are granted
a frequently undeserved mantle of respectability denied to genre authors;
this situation is not helped by publishers who often seek to broaden the
market for a book by denying its genre (thus, the ironic complaint that
a sure way to tell if a book by a mainstream author is science fiction is
if the dust jacket proclaims it not to be science fiction).
An early example of the usage of this term within the science fiction
community may be found in a letter from Isaac Asimov to the Bulletin
of the Atomic Scientists (13, May 1957), in which he argued that much
science fiction was as well written as "many 'mainstream' novels." An
example of the rhetorical misuse of the term which has since become
common in science fiction Fandom* is Donald A. Wollheim's astonishing
reference to "Portnoy's Complaint, The Love Machine, The Arrangement,
and the rest of that constant stream of psychiatrists' couch and bedroom
agonies that mark the triumphs of the mainstream" [212]. Usages such
as this led critic George Turner to describe "mainstream" as a "term
of insolence" and complain that "sf is the only genre which ever had
the blazing impudence to announce itself worthy of a consideration
separate from and beyond the body of traditional (whatever they thought
that word meant) literature" [196]. An anthology by Harry Harrison
(The Light Fantastic: Science Fiction Classics from the Mainstream, 1971)
contains a useful introductory essay by James Blish on these issues [28].
There is some confusion resulting from the more common use of this
term to refer to the dominant traditions of an art form or genre, or the
use common in jazz parlance since the 1950s to refer to jazz which has
its roots in a particular historical period, that is, the swing era. In the
latter sense, "mainstream science fiction" is sometimes used to refer to
Modern Science Fiction.*
MATTER. Any one of three broad categories of subject matter for the
medieval romance, identified by the thirteenth-century poet Jean Bodel,
and which have since become traditionally known as the "matters" of
France, Rome, and Britain. The matter of Britain included much
Arthurian material that has since provided inspiration for innumerable
fantasies.
NEBULA AWARD. Annual awards for novels and short fiction presented
since 1966 by the Science Fiction Writers of America,* whose membership
votes on the awards.
"new horizons, new forms, new styles, new challenges," Ellison himself
has expressed chagrin at having once been labeled the "chief prophet"
of the New Wave in America (by The New Yorker: "The Talk of the
Town: Evolution and Ideation" [September 16, 1967]). Similarly, many
of the other writers associated with this movement, such as Brian Aldiss,
J. G. Ballard, Thomas M. Disch, Samuel R. Delany, and Robert
Silverberg, have on frequent occasions expressed disdain for or confusion
over the term. Nevertheless, writers associated with the New Wave have
been credited with introducing new narrative strategies into science
fiction, with releasing the power of science fiction images as metaphor,
and with weakening the boundaries that had long separated science
fiction from Mainstream Fiction.*
entered the vocabulary of science fiction and fantasy editors and readers
in the 1950s and may have been first used by Horace L. Gold of Galaxy
magazine. Often, a "novella" in the science fiction magazines was
indistinguishable from a Novelet, * but some editors would present
novellas and novelets in the same issue, usually with the novella somewhat
longer. By tradition, a novella ranged from 20,000 to 40-45,000 words.
PLAY. "Nonearnest" but structured activities that lie outside moral and
cultural conventions, according to Johan Huizinga, whose theory of play
has been cited by W. R. Irwin and others as a part of the reason for
the appeal and cultural significance of fantasy [105].
discussions than is science fiction itself. The term seems to have largely
supplanted "mass culture," which gained popularity among sociologists
in the 1950s and is now disdained by some scholars as implicitly elitist,
its opposite being "high culture" or "serious art." This distinction was
largely based on the artist's supposed intent-"serious art" created for
its intrinsic value, "popular art" for the marketplace. More recent scholars
have tended more toward historical and economic definitions of the
term, referring to high culture as that associated with the privileged
classes and popular culture as that associated with the masses. But even
this definition presents problems, in that virtually all written literature
prior to the nineteenth century becomes high culture simply by virtue
of limited literacy, and such achievements as Gothic cathedrals, often
claimed as high culture, cannot realistically be said to have appealed to
such a limited audience. Still more recently, many scholars have tended
to agree with Russel Nye (The Unembarrassed Muse, 1970), who argued
that popular culture in its modern sense is the product of the rise of an
economically powerful middle class and the increase in literacy during
the last 200 years. These developments made it possible for artists to
survive economically by the sale of their works to a broad-based public
rather than by patronage of a small but wealthy audience. Popular
culture is also for this reason associated with technological developments
ranging from high-speed presses to television.
While fantasy in the broadest sense can be said to have a place in
narrative traditions of both "high" and "low" culture, modern generic
fantasy ~nd science fiction are clearly a product of this latter
development-first through Penny Dreadfuls* or Dime Novels,* later
through Pulp* magazines and film and television. A number of authors
and critics of the genre have complained about the association of science
fiction and fantasy with popular culture, and have often claimed a peculiar
kind of elitism for the genres based on the nature of their readership.
Such arguments sometimes confuse high culture with the Mainstream,*
which is itself arguably as much a concept of popular culture as are
popular genres. Recent scholarship, especially in science fiction study,
has begun more openly to acknowledge the popular culture origins of
the genre, and especially the degree to which for most of its history its
development was economically driven by magazine and book sales, and
at least indirectly by such unarguably popular culture phenomena as
science fiction films and television series. See also FORMULA; GENRE;
PARALITERATURE.
PULP. Originally a kind of cheap, acidic wood-pulp paper, but now more
often used to refer to the magazines published on such paper, which attained
a collective circulation of nearly I 0 million per issue during the 1930s, according
to Russel Nye (The Ullembarrassed Muse, 1970). More broadly, the term
came to characterize the fiction and illustrations published in those magazines,
and finally any fiction or illustrations making use of the conventions of pulp
forms. The invention of the pulp magazine is generally credited to Frank
Munsey, who in 1896 decided to convert his children's magazine Go/dell
Argosy to a popular all-fiction magazine titled Argosy, and switched to cheap
PULP 97
untrimmed wood-pulp paper in order to keep the price low. Pulp magazines
are of particular importance to the history of American fantasy in that, beginning
with Weird Tales in 1923, they provided a focal point, consolidated an audience,
and began to establish conventions and formulas for several Subgenre~* of
fantasy, especially Horror* fiction and Sword and Sorcery.* Science fiction
pulps were equally successful, and many historians of the genre have dated
its beginning as a self-conscious genre from the founding of Amazing Stories
by Hugo Gemsback in 1926. Western, romance, detective, aviation, and war
story pulps also flourished, but magazines devoted to other subgenres (such
as Oriental Tales, begun in 1930) did not fare as well. John W. Campbell,
Jr.'s Unknown, begun in 1939, did much to develop a modem popular genre
of logical and often humorous fantasy parallel to science fiction, and such
pulps as Famous Fantastic Mysteries and The A von Fantasy Reader were
instrumental in creating a younger audience for older Lost Race Fantasies*
and horror fiction. By the mid-1950s, most pulp magazines had been replaced
by Digest* size magazines, although critics and historians have since sometimes
used the term to refer to any sensational formulaic fiction.
Q
QUEST. While some would argue that the quest is a defining feature
of much fantasy literature, this term is sometimes used to distinguish
those narratives in which a traditionally mounted quest is the central
element of plot. See also ANTI-QUEST.
R
ROMANCE. Apart from its historical meanings and the various scholarly
debates over the romance as distinguished from the novel, this term has
popularly come to mean any fiction involving an idealized world or
idealized characters (probably after Northrop Frye [92]) or a specific
market genre involving romantic relationships in exotic settings. In the
first sense, most of fantastic literature would be subsumed by the genre,
as well as most popular genres such as the western, the detective story,
the heroic fantasy, or science fiction. See FANTASTIC ROMANCE.
s
wntmg style and " 'travelogue' plot construction" [43]. Despite its
awkwardness, "scientifiction" survived in letter columns and editorials of
the Pulp* magazines for the next two decades, and was even the title of an
early British Fanzine* in 1937. Occasional attempts have been made to revive
the term for general usage (see, for example, Ted White's editorial in the
May 1975 Amazing), but generally the word is now used in a purely historical
sense.
number of science fiction writers and critics, such as Samuel R. Delany, who
has argued that the signifying process in fantastic literature is a key factor
that sets it apart from Mundane* literature in its use of language [69].
SHAGGY GOD STORY. Michael Moorcock's label for tales that seek to
achieve a Sense of Wonder* by mechanically adapting biblical tales and
providing science fictional "explanations" for them-as, for example, the
"surprise ending" which reveals two characters to be Adam and Eve [144].
SHORT NOVEL. A long story, but not quite long enough to warrant separate
book publication. Rarely used by magazine editors in science fiction and
fantasy (who sometimes preferred "complete novel" or Novella*), the term
became popular among anthologists during the 1950s (compare Groff Conklin's
Six Great Short Novels of Science Fiction, 1954; H. L. Gold's Five Galaxy
Short Novels, 1958), although it was virtually interchangeable with "novelet."
Conklin, in his anthology, argued that the short novel was ideally suited to
the needs of science fiction, which often could not easily provide sufficient
exposition within the short story length but which did not always require
novel-length development for a single idea or concept. Conklin also defined
the short novel length as 15-40,000 words, or approximately the length that
magazine editors sometimes described as a novella.
SHORT STORY. A narrative shorter than a Novella* but longer than a Short
Short Story,* which by some accounts makes it a story of 2-15,000 words
[93]. A short story has also been defined as "a depiction of one decisive
experience in the protagonist's lifetime'' by Algis Budrys, who characterized
the early science fiction short story as heavily dependent on ''structural tricks''
such as surprise endings [43]. In this sense, the science fiction short story
evolved initially from the plot-oriented tradition of 0. Henry or Guy de
Maupassant (whereas the somewhat less common fantasy short story often
tended more toward the tale of "unified effect" pioneered by Edgar Allan
Poe and Nathaniel Hawthorne). The influence of the realistic tradition of
Chekhov and others entered science fiction in part through the influence of
John W. Campbell, Jr., who was said to have demanded "realistic" stories
in a fully realized science fiction environment. The modern tradition in the
short story, identified with Katherine Mansfield, Ernest Hemingway, and
others, did not become a major influence in fantastic literature until
comparatively recently, but experimental or surrealistic forms have developed
SOCIAL SCIENCE FICTION 119
the impact of scientific advance upon human beings" was perhaps too narrow
for many tastes, argued that the definition only applied to a ''subdivision''
of the field which he called "social science fiction," '"the only branch of
science fiction that is sociologically significant" [35]. (2) A more common
use of the term in the classroom treats ''social science''' as the modifier and
refers to works of science fiction that illustrate or illuminate particular problems
or issues in the social sciences; see, for example, Willis McNelly and Leon
Stover's anthology Above the Human Landscape: A Social Science Fiction
Anthology (Goodyear, 1972).
STATUS QUO SCIENCE FICTION. Frank Cioffi's term for that science
fiction published in Astounding during the 1930s that introduces and resolves
an anomaly within a recognizable social fabric, as opposed to subversive
science fiction, in which the anomaly changes society, or Other World Science
Fiction,* which is set entirely in an alternative world [52]. See also
SUBVERSION.
STEF. Proposed around 1945 by a fan named Jack Speer and since used by
almost no one except Algis Budrys in his 1980 essay "Paradise Charted"
[43]. "Stef" is a neologism deriving from STF, * itself an abbreviation for
Scientifiction, * and was apparently intended to provide a combinatory prefix
as an alternative to such terms as "science fictional"; as Budrys says, the
term is a "broad catchall" connoting fan activities and fannish attitudes.
societies" [78]. Examples of science fiction works that Eizykman cites are
Philip K. Dick's Solar Lottery (1955) and Robert Silverberg's The Stochastic
Man (1975).
UTOPIA. The genre that takes its name from Thomas More's 1516 work
meaning "no place" in Greek (with a probable pun on ''good place")
and which according to some critics includes the Subgenres* of dystopia
and Anti-Utopia.* Utopian fiction has evolved along substantially
separate lines from modern generic fantasy and is more often associated
with science fiction. Some critics have seen utopian elements in works
as diverse as James Branch Cabell's Poictesme series (1904-1929) and
J. R. R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (1954-1955), however, and it is
apparent that utopian writers may make more or less use of fantasy
techniques depending upon how their imaginary society is conceived.
William Morris' News from Nowhere (1891), for example, makes use
of much of the medievalism that characterized his fantasy romances,
while George Orwell's Animal Farm (1945) places a dystopian narrative
in the context of a Beast-Fable.* Science fiction is much more closely
allied historically with utopian fiction, and often one is described as a
subset of the other. "Utopia" has been defined as any transcending of
human boundaries (Ernest Bloch) or as transcending reality and social
orders (as opposed to "ideology," in the work of Karl Mannheim), but
it is most often defined as a fictional narrative whose central theme is
an imaginary state or community, sometimes with the corollary that
such a state should be idealized or that it should contain an implied
critique of an existing society or societies. Darko Suvin has argued that
the imaginary community of a utopia must be "organized according to
a more perfect principle than in the author's community" and that a
utopia is "based on estrangement arising out of an alternative historical
hypothesis" r187].
v
homages to traditional forms such as the epic. The term also sometimes
refers to modern works that partake of any of the above definitions or
seem to encode substantial unconscious content. The late novels of Philip
K. Dick are examples of works deriving from the science fiction tradition
which also partake of more traditional meanings of this term.
WEIRD TALE. Very loosely used term, most often referring to Uncanny*
or Occult Fiction,* but in recent decades (thanks to the influence of the
Pulp* magazine Weird Tales) often used specifically to denote Horror*
stories.
I. Aldiss, Brian W. Billion Year Spree: The True History of Science Fiction. Garden
City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1973.
2. ---.This World and Nearer Ones: Essays Exploring the Familiar. London:
Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1978.
3. Alexander, Lloyd. "Wishful Thinking-or Hopeful Dreaming?" The Horn Book
Magazine 44 (August 1968): 383-390. (Reprinted in Boyer and Zahorski, [29].)
4. Allen, Dick, ed. Science Fiction: The Future. New York: Harcourt, Brace,
Jovanovich, 1971.
5. - - - , and Lori Allen, ed. Looking Ahead: The Vision of Science Fiction. New
York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1975.
6. Allen, L. David. Science Fiction Reader's Guide. Lincoln, Neb.: Centennial
Press, 1974.
7. Alpers, Hans Joachim. "Loincloth, Double Ax, and Magic: 'Heroic Fantasy'
and Related Genres." trans. Robert Plank. Science Fiction Studies 14 (March
1978): 19-32.
8. Amis, Kingsley. New Maps of Hell. New York: Ballantine, 1960.
9. Angenot, Marc. "The Absent Paradigm." Science Fiction Studies 17 (March
1979): 9-19.
10. - - - , and Nadia Khouri. "An International Bibliography of Prehistoric Fic-
tion." Science Fiction Studies 23 (March 1981 ): 38-53.
II. Apter, T. E. Fantasy Literature: An Approach to Reality. Bloomington: Indiana
University Press, 1982.
12. Ash, Brian, ed. The Visual Encyclopedia of Science Fiction. New York: Har-
mony Books, 1977.
13. Ashley, Michael, ed. The History of the Science Fiction Magazine, 4 vols.
London: New English Library, 1974-1978.
146 WORKS CONSULTED
14. Asimov, Isaac. Asimov on Science Fiction. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday,
1981.
15. Atheling, William, Jr. [James Blish]. The Issue at Hand: Studies in Contem-
porary Magazine Science Fiction. Chicago: Advent, 1964.
16. ---.More Issues at Hand: Critical Studies in Contemporary Science Fiction.
Chicago: Advent, 1970.
17. Attebery, Brian. The Fantasy Tradition in American Literature: From Irving to
Le Guin. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1980.
18. - - - . ''Science Fantasy," in Cowart and Wymer [63].
19. Bailey, J. 0. Pilgrims through Space and Time: Trends and Patlern.r; in Scientific
and Utopian Fiction. New York: Argus Books, 1947.
20. Baker, Robert A., and Michael T. Nietzel. "The Science Fiction Detective
Story: Tomorrow's Private Eyes." The Armchair Detective 18, no. 2 (Spring
1985): 140-150.
21. Barnes, Myra Edward. Linguistics and Languages itr Science Fktion. New York:
Amo, 1974.
22. Barron, Neil, ed. Anatomy of Wonder: An Historical Survey and Critical Guide
to the Best of Science Fiction, 2d ed. New York: R. R. Bowker, 1981.
23. Barth, Melissa Ellen. "Problems in Generic Classification: Toward a Definition
of Fantasy Fiction." DAJ42 (1981): 2125A.
24. Berger, Harold L. Science Fiction and the New Dark Age. Bowling Green, Ohio:
Popular Press, 1976.
25. Berman, Ruth. "Critical Reactions to Fantasy in Four Nineteenth-Century Pe-
riodicals: Edinburgh Review, Blackwood's, Fraser's, and Cornhi/1." The Sphinx
4, no. 13 (1981): 1-37.
26. Bettelheim, Bruno. The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of
Fairy Tales. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1976.
27. Bleiler, Everett F., ed. The Guide to Supernatural Fiction. Kent, Ohio: Kent
State University Press, 1983.
28. Blish, James. "Introduction." The Light Fantastic: Science Fiction Classics
from the Mainstream, ed. Harry Harrison. New York: Scribner's, 1971. (See
also Atheling, William, Jr.)
29. Boyer, Robert H., and Kenneth J. Zahorski. Fantasists on Fantasy: A Collection
of Critical Reflections. New York: Avon, 19H4.
30. - - - . "Introduction." Dark Imaginings: A Collection of Gothic Fantasy.
New York: Dell, 1978.
31. - - - . "Introduction." The Fantastic Imagination: An Anthology of High
Fantasy. New York: Avon, 1977.
32. - - - . "Introduction." The Fantastic Imagination II: An Anthology of High
Fantasy. New York: Avon, 1978.
33. - - - . "Introduction." Visions ofWonder: An Anthology of Christian Fantasy.
New York: Avon, 1981.
WORKS CONSULTED 147
34. Bretnor, Reginald. ed. The Craft of Science Fiction. New York: Harper & Row,
1976.
35. - - - . ed. Modern Science Fiction: Its Meaning and Its Future. New York:
Coward-McCann, 1953.
36. - - - , ed. Science Fiction Today and Tomorrow. New York: Harper and Row,
1974.
37. Briggs, Julia. Night Visitors: The Rise and Fall of the English Ghost Story.
London: Faber and Faber, 1977.
38. Brooke-Rose, Christine. A Rhetoric of the Unreal: Studies in Narrative and
Structure, Especially of the Fantastic. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University
Press, 1981.
39. Browning, Gavin. "Scientism in Science Fiction." Science-Fiction Studies 33
(Spring 1985): 24-35.
40. Budrys, Algis. Benchmarks: Galaxy Bookshelf. Carbondale: Southern Illinois
University Press, 1985.
41. - - - . "Literatures of Milieux." Science Fiction Studies 31 (July 1984): 5-
17.
42. - - . "On Writing." Locus, II, no. 2 (March 1978): 4-6.
43. - - . "Paradise Charted." Triquarterly 49 (Fall 1980): 5-75.
44. Bullock, Alan, and Oliver Stallybrass, eds. The Harper Dictionary of Modern
Thought. New York: Harper, 1977.
45. Campbell, Joseph. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Bollingen Series XVII.
Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1949.
46. Canary, Robert H. "Science Fiction as Fictive History." Extrapolation 16 (De-
cember 1974): 81-95.
47. Carter, Lin. Imaginary Worlds: The Art of Fantasy. New York: Ballantine,
1973.
4R_ Carter, PauL The Creation of Tomorrow: Fifty Years of Magazine Science Fic-
tion. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.
49. Cawelti, John. Adventure, Mystery, and Romance: Formula Stories as Art and
Popular Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
50. Chesterton, G. K. "The Ethics of Elftand." Orthodoxy. New York: Dodd,
Mead, 1908.
51. - - - . "Fairy Tales," in Boyer and Zahorski [29].
52. Cioffi, Frank. Formula Fiction? An Anatomy ofAmerican Science Fiction, 1930-
1940. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1982.
53. Clareson, Thomas D., ed. Many Futures, Many Worlds: Theme and Form in
Science Fiction. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1977.
54. - - - , ed. SF: The Other Side of Realism. Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling
Green University Popular Press, 1971.
55. Clarke, I. F. Tale of the Future from the Beginning to the Present Day: An
Annotated Bibliogaphy, 3d ed. London: Library Association, 1978.
148 WORKS CONSULTED
76. Duffy, Maureen. The Erotic World of Faery. London: Hodder and Stoughton,
1972.
77. Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press, 1983.
78. Eizykman, Boris. "Chance and Science Fiction: SF as Stochastic Fiction. trans.
Will Straw. Science Fiction Studies 29 (March 1983): 24-34.
79. Eliade, Mircea. Myths, Dreams and Mysteries: The Encounter between Con-
temporary Faiths and Archaic Realities. trans. Philip Mairet. New York: Harper
& Row, 1960.
80. Elgin, Don D. The Comedy of the Fantastic: Ecological Perspectives on the
Fantasy Novel. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1985.
81. Elkins, Charles. "Science Fiction versus Futurology: Dramatic versus Rational
Models." Science Fiction Studies 17 (March 1979): 20-31.
82. Erlich, Richard, and Thomas P. Dunn, eds. Clockwork Worlds: Mechanized
Environments in Science Fiction. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1983.
83. - - - , eds. The Mechanical God: Machines in Science Fiction. Westport,
Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1982.
84. Eshbach, Lloyd Arthur, ed. Of Worlds Beyond: The Science of Science Fiction
Writing. Reading, Penn.: Fantasy Press, 1947.
85. Fiedler, Leslie. "Introduction." Beyond the Looking Glass: Extraordinary Works
of Fantasy and Fairy Tale, ed. Jonathan Cott. New York: Stonehill, 1973.
86. - - - . Love and Death in the American Novel. New York: Criterion, 1960.
87. Forster, E. M. Aspects of the Novel. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World,
1927.
88. Fqmklin, H. Bruce, ed. Future Perfect: American Science Fiction of the Nine-
teenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 1966.
89. Fredericks, Casey. The Future of Eternity: Mythologies of Science Fiction and
Fantasy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1982.
90. - - - . "Problems of Fantasy." Science Fiction Studies 5 ( 1978): 33-44.
91. Freud, Sigmund. "The Uncanny." Complete Psychological Works. ed. and
trans. James Strachey, Vol. 17, pp. 217-252. London: Hogarth Press, 1953.
92. Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton
University Press, 1957.
93. - - - , Sheridan Baker, and George Perkins. The Harper Handbook to Lit-
erature. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.
94. Gerber, Richard. Utopian Fantasy: A Study of English Utopian Fiction since
the End of the Nineteenth Century. London: Routledge & Keg an Paul, 1955.
95. Gove, Philip Babcock. The Imaginary Voyage in Prose Fiction. New York:
Columbia University Press, 1941.
96. Griffin, Brian, and David Wingrove. Apertures: A Study of the Writings of Brian
Aldiss. Contributions to the Study of Science Fiction and Fantasy No. 8. West-
port, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1984.
150 WORKS CONSULTED
97. Gunn, James. Alternate Worlds: The Illustrated History of Science Fiction.
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1975.
98. Haase, Donald P. "Romantic Theory of the Fantastic," in Magill [127], Vol.
5, pp. 2247-2258.
99. Hartwell, David. Age of Wonders: Exploring the World ofScience Fiction. New
York: Walker, 1984.
100. Hassler, Donald M. Comic Tones in Science Fiction: The An of Compromise
with Nature. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1982.
101. Hienger, Jorg. "The Uncanny in Science Fiction." trans. Elsa Schieder. Science
Fiction Studies 18 (July 1979): 144-152.
102. Hume, Kathryn. Fantasy and Mimesis: Responses to Reality in Western Liter-
ature. New York: Methuen, 1984.
103. Hunter, Mollie. "One World." Hom Book Magazine 51 (1975): 557-563, and
52 (1976): 32-38. (Reprinted in Boyer and Zahorski [29].)
104. Huntington, John. The Logic of Fantasy: H. G. Wells and Science Fiction. New
York: Columbia University Press, 1982.
105. Irwin, W. R. The Game of the Impossible: A Rhetoric of Fantasy. Urbana:
University of Illinois Press, 1976.
106. Jackson, Rosemary. Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Methuen,
1981.
107. Kayser, Wolfgang. The Grotesque in Art and Literature. trans. U. Weisstein.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1963.
108. Kelterer, David. New Wur/d.s for Old: The Apuc:alyptic Imagination, Science
Fiction, and American Literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1974.
109. - - - . "Science Fiction and Allied Literature." Science Fiction Studies 3, no.
8 (March 1976): 64-75.
110. Knight, Damon. In Search of Wonder: Essays on Modern Science Fiction, 2d
ed. Chicago: Advent, 1967.
Ill. - - - , ed. Turning Points: Essays on the Art of Science Fiction. New York:
Harper & Row, 1977.
112. Krappe, Alexander H. TheScienceofFolklore. New York: Norton, 1964 [1929].
113. Kreuziger, Frederick A. Apocalypse and Science Fiction: A Dialectic ofReligious
and Secular Soterio/ogies. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1982.
114. Le Guin, Ursula K. Foreword." The Wind's Twelve Quarters. New York:
Harper & Row, 1975.
115. - - - . The Language of the Night. ed. Susan Wood. New York: Putnam's,
1978. cDreams Must Explain Themselves" and "From Elfland to Poughkeep-
sie" reprinted in Boyer and Zahorski [29].)
116. Lem, Stanislaw. "Metafantasia: The Possibilities of SF." trans. Etelka de Lac-
zay and Istvan Csicsery-Ronay. Science Fiction Studies 23 (March 1981 ): 54-
71.
117. - - - . Microworlds: Writings on Science Fiction and Fantasy. New York:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1985.
WORKS CONSULTED 151
118. Lerner, Frederick Andrew. Modern Science Fiction and the American Literary
Community. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1985.
119. Lewis, C. S. Allegory of Love: A Study in Medieval Tradition. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1936.
120. ---.An Experiment in Criticism. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University
Press, 1965.
121. ---.Of Other Worlds: Essays and Stories. ed. Walter Hooper. New York:
Harcourt Brace, & World, 1966.
122. - - - . The Weight of Glory and Other Addresses. New York: Macmillan,
1949.
123. Lochhead, Marion. Renaissance of Wonder: The Fantasy Worlds of C. S. Lewis,
J. R. R. Tolkien, George MacDonald, E. Nesbit and Others. New York: Harper
& Row, 1977.
124. Lovecraft, H. P. Supernatural Horror in Literature. New York: Abramson,
1945. (Originally written in 1927; reprinted by Dover, New York, in 1973.)
125. Lundwall, Sam. Science Fiction: What It's All About. New York: Ace, 1971.
126. MacDonald, George. "The Fantastic Imagination." The Gifts of the Child Christ:
Fairy Tales and Stories for the Childlike. ed. Glenn Edward Sadler. Grand
Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans, 1973. Vol. I, pp. 23-28.
127. Magill, Frank, ed. Survey of Modern Fantasy Literature. 5 vols. Englewood
Cliffs, N.J.: Salem Press, 1983.
128. - - - , ed. Survey of Science Fiction Literature. 5 vols. Englewood Cliffs,
N.J.: Salem Press, 1979.
129. Malzberg, Barry. The Engines of the Night: Science Fiction in the Eighties. New
York: Harper, 1982.
130. Manguel, Alberto. "Foreword." Black Water: The Book of Fantastic Literature.
New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1983.
131. Manlove, C. N. The Impulse of Fantasy Literature. Kent, Ohio: Kent State
University Press, 1983.
132. - - - . Modern Fantasy: Five Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press, 1975.
133. Meyers, Walter E. Aliens and Linguists: Language Study and Science Fiction.
Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1980.
134. Mobley, Jane. "Toward a Definition of Fantasy Fiction." Extrapolation 15
(1974): 117-128.
135. - - - , ed. Phamasmagoria:TalesofFalltasyandtheSupernatural. New York:
Anchor, 1977.
136. Molson, Francis J. "Ethical Fantasy for Children," in Schlobin [171].
137. Moorman, Charles. Arthurian Triptych. Berkeley: University of California Press,
1960.
138. Moskowitz, Sam. Explorers of the Infinite: Shapers of Science Fiction. Cleve-
land: World, 1963.
152 WORKS CONSULTED
160. Rose, Mark. Alien Encounters: Anatomy of Science Fiction. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press. 1981 .
161. - - - , ed. Science Fiction: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs.
N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 1976.
162. Rottensteiner, Franz. ''European Theories of Famasy." in Magill [127]. vol.
5, pp. 2235-2246.
163. ---.The Science Fiction Book: An Illustrated History. New York: Seabury,
1975.
164. Russ, Joanna. "Dream Literature and Science Fiction." Extrapolation II (De-
cember 1969): 6-14.
165. - - - . "Speculations: The Subjunctivity of Science Fiction." Extrapolation
15 (December 1973): 51-59.
166. - - - . ''Towards an Aesthetic of Science Fiction.'' Science Fiction Studies 2
(July 1975): 112-119.
167. Sale, Roger. Fairy Tales and After: From Snow White to E. B. White. Cam-
bridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978.
168. Samuelson, David N. Visions ofTomorrow: Six Journeys from Outer to Inner
Space. New York: Arno, 1974.
169. Schlobin, Roger C. "Fantasy versus Horror," in Magill [127], vol. 5, 2259-
2265.
170. - - - . The Literature of Fantasy: A Comprehensive, Annotated Bibliography
of Modern Fantasy Fiction. New York: Garland, 1979.
171. - - - , ed. The Aesthetics of Famasy Literature and Art. Notre Dame: Uni-
versity of Notre Dame Press, 1982.
172. 'Schmerl, Rudolph B. "Fantasy as Technique." Virginia Quarterly Review 43
(Autumn 1967): 644-656. (Reprinted in Clareson [54].)
173. - - - . "Reason's Dream: Anti-Totalitarian Themes and Techniques of Fan-
tasy." Dissertation Abstracts 21 (1961): 2298.
174. Scholes, Robert. Fabulation and Metafiction. urbana: University of Illinois
Press, 1979.
175. - - - . The Fabulators. New York: Oxford University Press, 1967.
176. ---.Structural Fabulation: An Essay on Fiction ofthe Future. Notre Dame,
ln.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975.
177. - - - . Structuralism in Literature: An Introduction. New Haven: Yale Uni-
versity Press, 1974.
178. - - - , and Eric S. Rabkin. Science Fiction: History, Science, Vision. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
179. Searles, Baird, Martin Last, Beth Meachem, and Michael Franklin. A Reader's
Guide to Science Fiction. New York: Avon, 1979.
180. Slusser, George E., Eric S. Rabkin, and Robert Scholes, eds. Bridges to Fantasy.
Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982.
154 WORKS CONSULTED
181. ---,George R. Guffey, and Mark Rose, eds. Bridges to Science Fiction.
Carbondale: Southern IIJinois University Press, 1980.
182. ---,Eric S. Rabkin, and Robert Scholes, eds. Coordinates: Placing Science
Fiction and Fantasy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983.
183. Spencer, Kathleen L. " 'The Red Sun Is High, the Blue Low': Towards a
Stylistic Description of Science Fiction." Science Fiction Studies 29 (March
1983): 35-49.
184. Spinrad, Norman. "On Books." Destinies 2, no. 3 (Summer 1980): 250-259.
185. Stableford, Brian. "The Mythology of Faerie," in Magill [ 127], vol. 5, pp. 2283-
2298.
186. Suvin, Darko. "Narrative Logic, Ideological Domination, and the Range of SF:
A Hypothesis with a Historical Test.'' Science Fiction Studies 26 (March 1982):
1-25.
187. - - - . Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a
Literary Genre. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1979.
188. - - - . Victorian Science Fiction in the UK: The Discourses of Knowledge and
of Power. Boston: G.K. Hall, 1983.
189. Swinfen, Ann. In Defence of Fantasy: A Study of the Genre in English and
American Literature since 1945. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.
190. Thalmann, Marianne. The Romantic Fairy Tale: Seeds of Surrealism. trans.
Mary B. Corcoran. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1964.
191. Thompson, Hilary. "Doorways to Fantasy." Canadian Children's Literature
21 (1981 ): 8-16.
192. Thompson, Raymond H. "Arthurian Legend and Modem Fantasy," in Magill
[127], vol. 5, pp. 2299-2315.
193. Todorov, Tzvetan. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to Literary Genre.
trans. Richard Howard. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 1975.
194. Tolkien, J. R. R. "On Fairy-Stories." Tree and Leaf. London: Allen and Un-
win, 1964. (Excerpt reprinted in Boyer & Zahorski [29].)
195. Touponce, William F. Ray Bradbury and the Poetics of Reverie: Fantasy. Sci-
ence Fiction, and the Reader. Ann Arbor, Mich.: UMI Research Press, 1984.
196. Turner, George, and Peter Nicholls. "The SF Genealogy Scandal: An Expose,
with Cases for the Prosecution and Defence." Foundation 7-8 (March 1975):
159-176.
197. Tymn, Marshall B., Kenneth J. Zahorski, and Robert H. Boyer. Fantasy Lit-
erature: A Core Collection and Reference Guide. New York: R.R. Bowker,
1979.
198. Wagar, W. Warren. Terminal Visions: The Literature of Last Things. Bloom-
ington: Indiana University Press, 1982.
199. Waggoner, Diana. The Hills of Faraway: A Guide to Fantasy. New York:
Atheneum, 1978.
200. Walker, Jeanne Murray. "Myth, Exchange, and History in The Left Hand of
Darkness." Science Fiction Studies 18 (July 1979): 180-189.
WORKS CONSULTED 155
This index contains citations of fiction authors used as examples in the text. It
does not include critics or critical writings, since these are listed in the bibli-
ography and cited individually in each entry.