0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views3 pages

Miscellaneous Properties of Full Graphs

Paper Title Miscellaneous Properties Of Full Graphs Authors Shadi Ibrahim Khalaf, Veena Mathad, Sultan Senan Mahde Abstract In this paper, we stablish miscellaneous properties of the full graph of a graph. We obtain characterizations of this graph. Also, we prove that for any connected graph G, the full graph of G is not separable. Keywords Full graph, Block graph, Line graph, Middle graph, Separable Citation/Export MLA Shadi Ibrahim Khalaf, Veena Mathad, Sultan Senan Mahde, “Miscellaneous Properties Of Full Graphs”, May 17 Volume 5 Issue 5 , International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication (IJRITCC), ISSN: 2321-8169, PP: 417 – 419 APA Shadi Ibrahim Khalaf, Veena Mathad, Sultan Senan Mahde, May 17 Volume 5 Issue 5, “Miscellaneous Properties Of Full Graphs”, International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication (IJRITCC), ISSN: 2321-8169, PP: 417 – 419

Uploaded by

Editor IJRITCC
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views3 pages

Miscellaneous Properties of Full Graphs

Paper Title Miscellaneous Properties Of Full Graphs Authors Shadi Ibrahim Khalaf, Veena Mathad, Sultan Senan Mahde Abstract In this paper, we stablish miscellaneous properties of the full graph of a graph. We obtain characterizations of this graph. Also, we prove that for any connected graph G, the full graph of G is not separable. Keywords Full graph, Block graph, Line graph, Middle graph, Separable Citation/Export MLA Shadi Ibrahim Khalaf, Veena Mathad, Sultan Senan Mahde, “Miscellaneous Properties Of Full Graphs”, May 17 Volume 5 Issue 5 , International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication (IJRITCC), ISSN: 2321-8169, PP: 417 – 419 APA Shadi Ibrahim Khalaf, Veena Mathad, Sultan Senan Mahde, May 17 Volume 5 Issue 5, “Miscellaneous Properties Of Full Graphs”, International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication (IJRITCC), ISSN: 2321-8169, PP: 417 – 419

Uploaded by

Editor IJRITCC
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169

Volume: 5 Issue: 5 417 419


_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Miscellaneous Properties Of Full Graphs

Shadi Ibrahim Khalaf *, Veena Mathad and Sultan Senan Mahde

Department o f Studies in Mathematics, U niversit y o f Mysore, Man-


asagangotri, Mysuru - 570 006, I N D I A
E-mail address: shadikhalaf1989@hotmail.com

Department o f Studies in Mathematics, U niversit y o f Mysore, Man-


asagangotri, Mysuru - 570 006, I N D I A
E-mail address: veena-mathad@rediffmail.com

Department o f Studies in Mathematics, U niversit y o f Mysore, Man-


asagangotri, Mysuru - 570 006, I N D I A
E-mail address: sultan.mahde@gmail.com

Abstract. In this paper, we stablish miscellaneous properties of the full graph of a graph. We obtain characterizations
of this graph. Also, we prove that for any connected graph G, the full graph of G is not separable.

Keywords and phrases. Full graph, Block graph, Line graph, Middle graph, Separable.
__________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________

1. Introduction smallest cycle in G. The chromatic number (G) of a


All graphs considered here are nite, undirected graph G is the minimum number of colors required to
without loops and multiple edges. For all denitions assign to the vertices of G in such a way that no two
and notations not given in this paper, we refer to [4]. adjacent vertices of G receive the same color [4].
A graph G with p vertices and q edges is called a (p, q) A graph G is called a null graph (or empty graph) if
graph, the number p is referred to as the order of a E(G) is empty, a null graph of order p is denoted by Np
graph G and q is referred to as the size of a graph G [9]. A graph G is called planer if it can be drawn in the
[4]. plane without any intersecting edges [3].
If B = {u1, u2, u3, ..., ur, r2} is a block of a graph G, The eccentricity e(v) of a vertex v in a connected
then we say that vertex u1 and block B are incident graph G is dened as e(v)=max{d(v, u)|u V (G)}
with each other, as are u2 and block B and so on. If B
where d(v, u) is the distance between u and v. The
= {e1, e2, e3, ..., es, s1} is a block of a graph G, then
radius r(G) is the minimum eccentricity among the
we say that edge e1 and block B are incident with each
vertices of G, and the diameter d(G) is the maximum
other, as are e2 and B and so on. If two distinct blocks
eccentricity [4].
B1 and B2 are incident with a common cut vertex then,
A wheel graph Wp of order p, sometimes simply called
they are adjacent blocks [6]. The vertices, edges and
a p-wheel is a graph that contains a cycle of order p
blocks of a graph are called its members. A cut vertex
1, and for which every vertex in the cycle is joined to
of a connected graph G is a vertex whose removal
one other vertex in the center [4]. A cycle passing
increases the number of components of G [4].
through all the vertices of a graph is called a hamil-
A set D of vertices in a graph G is called dominating
tonian cycle. A graph containing a hamiltonian cycle is
set of G if every vertex in V D is adjacent to some
called a hamil- tonian graph [4].
vertex in D, the minimum cardinality of a dominating
The line graph L(G) of a graph G is the graph whose
set in G is called the domination number (G) of a
vertex set is the set of edges of G and two vertices are
graph G [5]. A dominating set D is a total dominating
adjacent if the corresponding edges are adjacent in G
set if the induced subgraph D has no isolated vertices,
[4].
the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set in G
The block graph B(G) of a graph G is the graph whose vertex
is called the total domination number t(G) of G [5].
set is the set of blocks of G and two vertices are adjacent if the
The girth of a graph G, denoted girth(G) is size of the
417
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 417 419
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
corresponding blocks are incident with a cut vertex in G [4]. vertex v in C p, let v be the corresponding vertex in F
The full graph F (G) of a graph G is the graph whose set of (C p), v is adjacent to two vertices corresponding to two
vertices is the union of the set of vertices, edges and blocks of
vertices in C p , v is adjacent to two vertices which
G, in which two vertices are adjacent if the corresponding
members of G are adjacent or one corresponds to a vertex and corresponds to two edges in C p , also v is adjacent to a
the other to an edge incident with it or one corresponds to a vertex corresponding to a block in C p , then deg( v ) = 5.
block B and other to a vertex v of G and v is in B or one Theorem 2.2. For any connected graph G, F (G) has no
corresponds to a block B and the other to an edge e of G and cut ver- tices.
e is in B [7]. Many other graph valued functions in graph
Proof. Let G be a connected graph, rst let v be any
theory were studied, for example, in [2, 4, 8, 10].
vertex in F (G) which corresponds to a vertex or an edge of
The following results will be useful in the proof of our
G, and let u, w be any two distinct vertices of F (G) which
results.
are di erent from v, if u, w correspond to adjacent blocks in
Theorem 1.1. [4] A vertex v of a connected graph G with
G then u, w are adjacent, otherwise there exists a u w path
at least three vertices is a cut vertex of G if and only if there
starting from u passing through some vertices which correspond
exist vertices u and w of G distinct from v such that v is in to blocks of G, this means v is not on this path. By Theorem
every u w path in G. Theorem 1.2. [4] A nontrivial 1.1, v is not a cut vertex of F (G). Next, let v be any vertex
graph is bipartite if and only if all its cycles are even. in F (G) which corresponds to a block of G, if G has one
block then F (G) v is total graph of G which is connected
2. Miscellaneous properties of full graph since G is connected. Now if G has more than one block
Re ma r k 2.1. For any graph G, the block graph B(G) of a then in F (G) v there is a vertices which correspond to the
graph G is a subgraph of F (G). blocks of G and the total graph (vertices which corresponding
Re ma r k 2.2. For any graph G, the line graph of G is a to vertices and edges of G), since G is connected then total
subgraph of F (G). graph of G is connected, also each one of the vertices
corresponding to the blocks of G is adjacent with at least one
Theorem 2.1. For any cycle C p, the wheel W2p+1 is a
vertex from the vertices which correspond to a vertices of G,
spanning subgraph of F (C p).
this means that F (G) v is connected, then v isnt a cut
Proof. Suppose G is a cycle C p, then the number of blocks vertex of G, therefore F (G) has no cut vertex.
is 1, then in F ( C p) there is a vertex v corresponding to this
Corollary 2.3. For any connected graph G, F (G) is not
block and by denition of F (C p) this vertex must be separable.
joined to all vertices corre- sponding to vertices and edges of
Theorem 2.3. For any tree T , if v is a cut vertex, and
C p. So, v will be the center vertex adjacent to all vertices in
deg(v) = n, then in F (T ), deg(v ) = 3n, where v is the
F (C p), and the other vertices of F (C p) form a cycle since any
vertex corresponding to v in F (T ).
vertex corresponding to edge of C p is adjacent to two vertices
Proof. Let v be a cut vertex in a tree T , and deg(v) =
corresponding to vertices of C p and so on, this establishes a
n, this means that v is adjacent to n vertices and incident
wheel W2p+1 .
with n edges in T , since v is a cut vertex and every edge in
Corollary 2.1. For any cycle C p, r ( F (C p)) = d(F ( C p)) T is a block, v lies in n blocks, therefore by the denition
= 2. of F (T ), v is adjacent to n vertices
Corollary 2.2. For any cycle C p , F ( C p) is hamiltonian corresponding to vertices of T , and to n vertices corresponding
graph. to edges of T , and to n vertices corresponding to blocks of T ,
Prop o sitio n 2.1. Let G = (p, q) be a graph which is a block. then deg(v ) = 3n.
Then the maximum degree in F (G) is the degree of the
vertex corresponding to the block of G which (p + q). Theorem 2.4. For any edge in a graph G, with edge degree n,
Proof. Let G be a graph which is a block, then in F (G) the degree of the corresponding vertex in F (G) is n + 3.
there is a vertex v corresponding to this block and v is
adjacent to all vertices in F (G) that corresponds to vertices Proof. If an edge e in G is of edge degree n. Then e is
and edges of G, thus the degree of v is (p + q), which is the adjacent to n edges, say, e1, e2, , en . Let v be a vertex in F
maximum degree in F (G) since |V ( F (G))|=p + q + 1. (G) which is corresponding to e clearly v is adjacent to n
vertices in F (G) corre- sponding to, e1, e2, , en . Also v
Lemma 2.1. If v is a vertex of cycle C p , and v is the is adjacent to two vertices that correspond to vertices incident
corresponding vertex in F (C p), then deg( v ) = 5. with e in G, and v is adjacent to one vertex which is
Proof. Let G be a cycle C p, then deg(v) = 2 for any corresponding to a block B in G and e is in B. This means
418
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 417 419
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
v is adjacent to n + 3 vertices in F (G). vertex cor- responding to a block of G is adjacent to all
vertices corresponding to vertices and edges of G that lie in
Theorem 2.5. For any connected graph G = (p, q), F (G) this block. Also the vertices corre- sponding to blocks of G are
is tree if and only if G K1 . connected since G is connected, this means that the vertices
corresponding to blocks of G together are adjacent to all vertices
Proof. Suppose a connected graph G is K1, then in F (G)
of F (G), then they are dominating set of F (G), therefore
there are two vertices one corresponding to the vertex of G
( F (G)) |B|.
and the other one to a block of G, by denition of F (G),
Corollary 2.5. For any connected graph G,
both vertices are adjacent, this establishes P 2, then F (G) is a
t(F (G)) |B|.
tree. Conversely, suppose F (G) is tree, we now prove that G
is K1. On the contrary, assume that connected graph G is Theorem 2.9. For any connected graph G with
not K1, clearly p 2. Then G has a block B. Let vertices |B| 2, ( F (G) ) = 2.
u, v B. Since u, v are incident with B, it implies that Proof. Suppose that G is a connected graph with |B| 2,
the vertices corresponding to B, u, v, form a cycle C 3 in F then there are at least two blocks say, B1, B2, and there are
(G), this means F (G) is not tree, a contradiction. We two distinct vertices v B1, u B2, such that v and u are
conclude that G K1 . not cut vertices. Let v , u , be the vertices in F (G)
Theorem 2.6. If graph G has the path P 2 as a subgraph, then F corresponding to v, u, respectively. Clearly by the denition
(G) is not a bipartite graph. of F (G), v is adjacent only to vertices corresponding to
elements of G lying in B1 and the same is to u in B2. Now in
Proof. Let G be a graph having the path P 2 as a subgraph.
Then G has a block B. Let vertices u, v B. Since u, v
( F (G ) ), v is djacent to all vertices which corresponds to
are incident with B, it implies that the vertices corresponding elements of G that are not in B1, and u is adjacent to all
to B, u, v, form a cycle C 3 in F (G). By Theorem 1.2, F vertices corresponding to elements of G that are not in B2.
(G) is not a bipartite graph.Theorem 2.7. If G has the path This means v , u are dominating ( F (G) ), then ( F (G) )
P 2 as a subgraph, = 2.
girth( F (G)) = 3
. References
Proof. Let G be a graph having the path P 2 as a subgraph, [1] R. Balakrishnan and K. Ranganathan, A Textbook of Graph
then by the proof of Theorem 2.7, F (G) contains a cycle Theory, Springer Science Business Media, New York, USA,
C 3 which is the shortest cycle, then girth( F (G)) = 3. 2012.
[2] B. Basavanagoud and Veena Mathad, Graph equations for line
Prop o sitio n 2.2. If G has the path P 2 as a subgraph, then graphs, blitact graphs and blict graphs, Journal of Discrete
F (G) Mathematical Sciences and Cryp- tography. (2015); 3 (3): 373
has K4 as an induced subgraph . 379.
Proof. Let G be a graph having the path P 2 as a subgraph, [3] J. A. Bondy and U. S. R. Murty, Graph Theory with
then G has a block B which contains one edge e and two Applications, The Macmil- lan Press Ltd, 1976.
[4] F. Harary, Graph Theory, Addison Wesley, Reading Mass, 1969.
vertices say, v, u. Since e, v, u, are incident with B, and v,
[5] T. W. Haynes, S. T. Hedetniemi and P. J. Slater Fundamentals of
u, are incident with e, then the vertices corresponding to u, v, domination in graphs, Morcel Dekker, Inc, 1998.
e, B, form a complete graph K4 in F (G). [6] V. R. Kulli, The semitotal block graph and total-block graph of a
Corollary 2.4. If G has the path P 2 as a subgraph, (F graph, India J. Pure Appl. Math. (1976); 7: 625630.
(G)) 4. [7] V. R. Kulli, On full graphs, Journal of Computer and
Mathematical sciences. (2015); 6(5): 261267.
Theorem 2.8. For any connected graph G, ( F (G)) |B|
[8] V. R. Kulli, On line-block graphs, Iternational Reasearch Journal
where of Pure Al- Gebra. (2015); 5(4): 4044.
|B| is the number of blocks of G. [9] K. K. Meng, D. F. Ming, and T. E. Guan, Introduction to graph
Proof. Let G be a connected graph. The following cases are theory, World Scientic Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 5 Toh Tuck
considered. Link, Singapore, 2007.
[10] Veena Mathad, Graph equations for line graphs, middle graphs,
Case1. G has one block, then in F (G) the vertex
semi-splitting block graphs and semiline splitting block graphs,
corresponding to this block is adjacent to all other vertices of
Proceedings of the Jangjeon Mathematical Society. (2011); 14:
F (G). By the denition 209214.
of F (G), in this case (F (G)) = 1 = |B|.
Case2. G has more than one blocks, then in F (G) every
419
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy