Theories of Motivation - Summary
Theories of Motivation - Summary
There is only one way to avoid criticism: do nothing, say nothing, and be nothing.
(Aristotle)
I have been impressed with the urgency of doing. Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Being willing
is not enough; we must do.
(Leonardo da Vinci)
Motivated people are those who have made a conscious decision to devote
considerable effort to achieving something that they value. What they value will differ
greatly from one individual to another. There are a variety of ways to motivate
people, including the fear of losing a job, financial incentives, self-fulfilment goals
and goals for the organisation or groups within the organisation.
The traditional view- finds some of its origins in the work of Taylor and the school of
scientific management. At its most extreme, this view postulates the following:
Taylor took the view that there is a right (meaning best) way to perform any task. It is
managements job to determine the right way. Workers gain from this approach
because the right way is easier and pay is enhanced as a result of increased
productivity.
The human relation view - originates in the work of Mayo, known as the
Hawthorne Studies. The series of studies essentially concluded that the strongest
motivational force behind most employees behaviour at work was the preservation
and nurturing of social relationships with their colleagues. The main tenets of this view are
as follows:
The average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if he can.
Most people must be coerced, controlled, directed or threatened with
punishment to get them to expend adequate effort towards the achievement of
organisational objectives.
The average human being prefers to be directed, wishes to avoid
responsibility, has relatively little ambition, and wants security above all.
On the other hand, Theory Y makes different assumptions about the nature of
people:
Expenditure of physical and mental effort in work is as natural as play or rest. The
average human being does not inherently dislike work, which can be a source of
satisfaction.
External control and the threat of punishment are not the only means of
bringing about effort. People can exercise self-direction to achieve objectives
to which they are committed.
Commitment to objectives is a result of the rewards associated with their
achievement. The most significant of those rewards is satisfaction of the
selfactualisation needs.
The average human being learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept,
but to seek, responsibility. Avoidance of responsibility, emphasis on security
and low ambition are the result of experience and are not inherent in mans nature.
Capacity to exercise a relatively high degree of imagination, ingenuity and creativity
in the solution of organisational problems is widely, not narrowly, distributed in
the population.
Under conditions of modern industrial life, the intellectual potential of the
average human being is only partially utilised.
These various needs can be categorised in a number of ways eg, physiological and social
motives or intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.
Content theories focus on the question of what arouses, sustains and regulates
goal directed behaviour ie, the particular things that motivate people. They
offer ways to profile or analyse individuals to identify their needs.
Often criticised as being static and descriptive they appear to be linked more to job
satisfaction than to work effort. Maslow, Herzberg and McGregor take a universal
approach whereas McClelland and Argyris list forces and drives that will vary in
relation to different individuals.
Process theories attempt to explain and describe how people start, sustain
and direct behaviour aimed at the satisfaction of needs or the reduction of inner
tension. The major variables in process models are incentive, drive,
reinforcement and expectancy. The best-known work in this area has been
concerned with Vrooms expectancy theory, Handys motivation calculus and
Adams equity theory.
The major finding of the study was that the events that led to satisfaction were, not
surprisingly, of a quite different kind from those that led to dissatisfaction.
One set of factors are those which, if absent, cause dissatisfaction. These factors are
related to job context. They are concerned with job environment and are extrinsic to
the job itself.
They are called hygiene factors and include such elements as:
The other set of factors are those which, if present, serve to motivate the individual
to superior effort and performance. These factors are related to the job content of work.
They are motivators or growth factors. Motivation factors include:
achievement
increased responsibility
challenging work
recognition for achievements
growth and development.
David McClelland
(a) Need for achievement - where this is high then people have an intense desire to
succeed and an equally intense fear of failure.
C Argyris
Expectancy theory
There must also be the expectation that rewards are available. These relationships
determine the strength of the motivational link.
Porter and Lawlers model - Vrooms theory has been extended by the findings of Porter
and Lawler (Managerial Attitudes and Performance, 1968) in devising a more
complete model of motivation for management.
Basically, Porter and Lawlers model (shown below) shows that the amount of
effort generated depends upon:
The amount of effort deemed necessary and the probability of receiving the reward
are in turn influenced by the individuals record of performance to date, and range of skills,
personality, perception of his role, and any number of other environment factors.
(a) external rewards that are given by others and form part of the job situation (e.g.
wages, status, security)
The idea put forward here is that each person has a specific motivation calculus in
respect of every decision taken and this can be on a conscious or a
subconscious basis. This assesses three factors:
Needs- these may be defined in accordance with the ideasof Maslow or any other
researchers, and they are the persons needs at that time.
Desired results - these are what a person is expected to accomplish in the
work.
Expenditure (E) factors -these relate to the expenditure of effort, energy, and
excitement in attaining the desired results. Handy suggests that motivational
theories have been too preoccupied with effort. He notes that there seems to be a
set of words (coincidentally beginning with e) that might be more helpful.
As a result of this assessment we have a motivation decision. This is the strength of the
motivation to achieve the desired results. It will have to be dependent upon:
Needs
The motivation
E factors
calculus
Desired Results
When people sense inequities in their work they will be aroused to remove the
discomfort and restore a state of felt equity to the situation by:
People who feel overpaid (feel positive inequity) have been found to increase the quantity
or quality of their work, whilst those who are underpaid (feel negative inequity) do
the opposite. Feelings of inequity are determined solely by the individuals
interpretation of the situation - the fact that a manager feels that the annual pay review is
fair is immaterial.
Content theories attempt to explain those specific things that actually motivate the
individual at work. These theories are concerned with identifying peoples needs and
their relative strengths, and the goals they pursue in order to satisfy these needs.
Content theories place emphasis on the nature of needs and what motivates.
There is the assumption that everyone responds in much the same way to
motivating pressures and that there is, therefore, one best way to motivate
everybody. These theories provide a prescriptive list which managers can follow in an
attempt to increase productivity.
Process theories (expectancy and goal) change the emphasis from needs to the goals
and processes by which workers are motivated. They attempt to explain and
describe how people start, sustain and direct behaviour aimed at the satisfaction of
needs or reduction of inner tension. They place emphasis on the actual process of
motivation.
Process theories also attempt to identify major variables that explain behaviour, but
the focus is on the dynamics of how the variables are interrelated in explaining the
direction, degree and persistence of effort. The major variables in process models are
incentive, drive, reinforcement and expectancy.
Lets not forget an old theory that is the Carrot and Stick theory.
This traditional motivational theory, attributed to philosopher Jeremy Bentham, dates back
to around 1800 during the Industrial Revolution. It breaks down motivation into two basic
components: incentives and fear. Some workers are motivated by the desire to attain
additional compensation, a yearning to achieve status and power by "moving up the
ladder," or the need for praise. But some workers act out of fear: the fear of losing a job,
being reprimanded by a supervisor or not being able to adequately perform an
assignment.