Security and Risks
Security and Risks
Uttarakhand Failure
Violation of Nature as the Cause
1. There is ample scientific evidence that the Himalayan watersheds have witnessed
unprecedented deforestation. Vegetative cover slows the speed of falling rain and
prevents soil erosion and gully formation. Besides forests and soil soak water from
the rain, release it slowly and prevent water flowing as run-off.
2. There is mounting evidence that global warming is fast catching up with the
Himalaya.
3. While it is important to appreciate the aspirations of locals and economic
activities, there cannot be a lack of enforcement of land use laws. Such laws were
violated with impunity in Uttarakhand as construction activity came up on the
river banks.
4. Hydel activities cause slope weakening and destabilisation. Similarly sand mining
and stone industries also weaken the river system.
Role of Ecological Neglect by the State
1. It is not as if the state government wasn't unaware of the looming threat.
Government reports had warned of the unchecked dangers of urbanisation and
from hydel projects. The authorities have always treated environment with scant
regard.
2. The Centre had declared a stretch of 100 km between Gomukh and Uttarkashi
along the Bhagirathi river as an eco-sensitive zone. However, the state
government is opposing the move, saying this would adversely affect the
development in the region.
3. The fact is that the dams, barrages and embankments on one hand, magnify the
enormity of high floods when they come and on the other, instil a false sense of
security in minds of those who come to occupy the erstwhile khadar lands that all
is well. The truth is the opposite. Only normal and periodic climatic events have
been converted into man-made disasters, with man coming to
colonise khadar land.
Role of Dams
1. Big dams, like the one at Tehri, disturb the highly fragile Himalayan tectonic
system.
2. But this time the dam managed to protect big towns like Rishikesh and Haridwar
through regulation of the Bhagirathi river waters, most of which were held back
in the 42-km long reservoir. Experts have now recommended a big dam across the
Alaknanda river also to further manage the flow of water.
3. Being a hill state, Uttarakhand is ecologically sensitive but its two main sources of
income are tourism and hydel energy. The state cannot look away from these two
sources.
4. Construction of hydel dams require rivers to be diverted through tunnels to
generate power. The construction of these tunnels unsettles the mountainous
terrain and contributes to a greater quantity of rocks and sediment crashing
down.
CAG Report on Uttarakhand's Preparedness
1. It pointed out that the SDMA had remained virtually non-functional.
2. The state had also failed to incorporate disaster prevention into the development
planning.
1. No thought was given to the fragile ecosystem of the state in the
developmental planning process.
2. Buildings were permitted on floodplains of the rivers.
3. Such unsafe construction is linked to the religious tourism. Why can't we
adopt policies of Bhutan where tourism is regulated to bring it in harmony
with the environment?
4. Construction of hydel dams require rivers to be diverted through tunnels to
generate power. The construction of these tunnels unsettles the
mountainous terrain and contributes to a greater quantity of rocks and
sediment crashing down.
3. Vulnerability assessment at local level and identification of necessary mitigative
action had not been done. Buildings were permitted on floodplains of the rivers.
4. The disaster management plan was in place but its implementation was
absolutely poor.
1. The communication system was also inadequate, with the delay in sharing of
disaster information.
2. Absence of any guidelines meant the preparedness was almost nil. The
disaster struck on June 16 and rescue and relief operations could begin only
on June 24 when the Army was called in.
3. Until then the government had no clue. It had no idea about the magnitude
of what had struck the state.
5. Restoration work undertaken under the Calamity Relief Fund were delayed and
violated the guidelines.
6. Some warning system had been in place, such as radars and climate prediction.
1. The reports of IMD have always been very imprecise like "heave to very
heavy rainfall in some areas in Uttarakhand". No one has any idea of what
heavy to very heavy means.
2. The prediction accuracy and forewarning capabilities of IMD need to be
increased. Apart from quantifying the amount of rainfall, spatial distribution
information should also be given.
3. World over such systems are in place and even in our country such systems
are in place for cyclones.
National Oil Spill Contingency Plan (NOSDCP)
The idea is to mitigate the impact of all oil spills on the environment by -
Setting specific standards for oil spill equipment stockpiles
Establishing time frames for oil spill response
Increasing collaboration among partner agencies.
Types of Crises
1. Crises caused by acts of nature. These can further be divided into the
following sub-categories:
1. Climatic events: cyclones and storms (associated sea erosion), floods
and drought
2. Geological events: earthquakes, tsunamis, landslides and avalanches;
2. Crises caused by environmental degradation and disturbance of the
ecological balance;
3. Crises caused by accidents. These, again, can be further classified into:
industrial and nuclear mishaps and fire related accidents;
4. Crises caused by biological activities: public health crises, epidemics etc;
5. Crises caused by hostile elements: war, terrorism, extremism, insurgency etc;
6. Crises caused by disruption/failure of major infrastructure facilities
including communication systems, large-scale strikes etc; and
7. Crises caused by large crowds getting out of control.
Life Cycle Approach to Crisis Management
1. A crisis does not emerge suddenly; it has a life cycle, which may take days, months
or even decades to develop. A crisis, therefore, needs to be examined in terms of
its management cycle. This life cycle of crisis management may be divided
broadly in three phases - pre-crisis, during crisis and post crisis.
World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction, Yokohama, 1994
1. Risk assessment is an important initial step.
2. Disaster prevention and preparedness are next important steps and should be
included at the planning level itself.
3. Capacity development is next important step.
4. Early warning systems should be installed and steps taken for fast and wide
warning information dissemination.
5. Local community involvement is important.
6. Education and training to the whole community is important.
7. International sharing of technology is important.
8. Environmental protection is important and poverty alleviation is imperative.
9. Needs of developing countries should be kept in mind in disaster management
efforts.
Yogyakarta Declaration
1. Hoyogo Framework for Action: This is the agreement reached in 2005 between
countries on disaster management. It runs form 2005 to 2015. It was a roadmap
for the government and other players.
2. Yogyakarta declaration includes calls to integrated local knowledge and climate
change into disaster management plans, political commitment, accountability,
awareness and education, and to build local capacity.
Disaster Risk Reduction Framework
1. A policy framework has to be drawn up backed by the legal and
institutional mechanisms that focuses on risk reduction as the major priority in
disaster management.
2. Assessment of risk including hazard analysis and community vulnerability.
3. Risk Awareness and Preparation of Plans for Risk Mitigation.
4. Implementation of the Plan.
5. Early Warning Systems.
6. Development of systems for processing and sharing of disaster related
information.
INDIAS KEY HAZARDS, VULNERABILITIES AND THE CRISIS RESPONSE MECHANISM:
1. Almost 85% of the country is vulnerable to single or multiple disasters and about
57% of its area lies in high seismic zones. Approximately 40 million hectares of the
countrys land area is prone to flood, about 8% of the total land mass is vulnerable
to cyclone and 68% of the area is susceptible to drought.
2. There is no reason why so much loss happens in India whereas earthquakes of
similar measurements in USA or Japan have had relatively little impact.
3. Post monsoon cyclones are usually more intense both in numbers and intensity.
Cyclone Shelters
1. In densely populated coastal areas, where large scale evacuations are not always
feasible, public buildings can be used as cyclone shelters.
2. These buildings can be so designed, so as to provide a blank face with a minimum
number of apertures in the direction of the prevailing winds. The shorter side of
the building should face the storm, so as to impart least wind resistance.
3. Green belts can be used in front of these buildings to reduce the impact of the
storm.
Traditional Knowledge for Disaster Management
1. If tribals in the Andamans could survive the tsunami, it was because their existing
warning systems worked well in comparison to our non-existent modern systems.
2. The fact that traditional houses of wood and stone survived the Uttarkashi
earthquake not so long ago while modern buildings collapsed offered a similar
lesson.
3. In the flood-prone rural North-East, one can find houses on bamboo stilts that
allow flood waters to flow under them rather than through or over!
Flood Control and Management
1. There should be a master plan for flood control and management for each flood
prone basin.
2. Adequate flood-cushion should be provided in water storage projects. In highly
flood prone areas, flood control should be given overriding consideration
in reservoir policy even at the cost of sacrificing some irrigation or power benefits.
3. While physical flood protection works like embankments and dykes will continue
to be necessary, increased emphasis should be laid on non-structural measures
such as flood forecasting, flood plain zoning and flood proofing.
4. There should be strict regulation of settlements in the flood plain zones along
with flood proofing.
Landslides and Avalanches
1. The Himalayas comprise of tectonically unstable younger formations and often
the slides are huge, and in most cases, the overburden along with the underlying
lithology is displaced during sliding. In contrast, the Western Ghats
are geologically stable and the slides are usually confined to the over
burden without affecting the bedrock beneath.
2. Structural measures:
1. Planting (Avalanche Prevention Forest)
2. Stepped Terraces
3. Avalanche Control Fence
4. Other protection structures
3. Non-structural measures - removing snow deposits on slopes by blasting,
predicting avalanches and evacuating people from vulnerable areas.
Industrial Disasters
1. In the pre-Bhopal Gas Tragedy era, industrial safety was governed by legislations
like the Factories Act, 1948 and the Explosives Act, 1884. These laws proved to be
inadequate to provide safety to workers as well as to the people living in the
surrounding areas. After the Bhopal Gas Tragedy, a new chapter was inserted in
the Factories Act, 1948 dealing with hazardous processes. The Environment
Protection Act, 1986 was enacted. More importantly, several Rules were
promulgated under the Act.
Rail Disaster Management
It is an integral part of railway safety. However, earlier the disaster management was
confined to reacting to the railway accidents. After the NDMA, 2005 the Railway
ministry has developed an integrated disaster management plan. As per this plan,
1. The railway zones and railway divisions have been made the nodal agencies
for planning, mitigation and relief within their zones.
2. The Plan is not focused towards reacting to the accidents only, but it also
includes, terrorist attacks, natural disasters affecting the railways, crowd
management during festivals or natural calamities. It heavily relies on
modern technology like CCTVs, ACDs, satellite communications, upgraded
signaling systems, self propelled accident relief vans, modern cranes,
luggage scanners.
3. It emphasizes in relief during golden hours (first hour of the accident) i.e.
reach the spot within 1 hour. Training is done at Bangalore in the disaster
relief operations.
4. The Railway Protection Force is developing a rapid action team to be trained
by NSG to respond to the terrorist attacks on railway trains and assets.
5. Railway officials to maintain contact with the general administrative
authorities in their areas for prompt relief in case of the disasters.
Creeping Emergencies
1. Disasters can also be classified as slow onset disasters and rapid onset
disasters. Earthquakes, cyclones, floods, tsunamis would fall under the category of
rapid onset disasters; climate change (global warming), desertification, soil
degradation, and droughts, would fall under the category of slow onset disasters.
Slow onset disasters are also termed as Creeping Emergencies.
Sea Erosion
1. The landward displacement of the shoreline caused by the forces of waves
and currents is termed as erosion.
2. The impact of the event is not always seen immediately, but it is equally
important when we consider loss of property that it causes. It takes months or
years to note the impact. So, this is generally classified as a long term coastal
hazard.
3. Anthropological effects that trigger beach erosion are: construction of artificial
structures, mining of beach sand, offshore dredging, or building of dams.
Traditional Disaster Management Architecture in India
The Response Mechanism
1. Field level response
1. The community is the first responder in a disaster. Field level response in
rural areas is by the nearest police station and the revenue functionary; in
urban areas the response is by agencies like the civic authorities, the fire
brigade and the local police station.
2. At present, panchayats do not have the capacity to react in any
effective manner and it is the district administration with the Collector
playing a pivotal role. He has the authority to mobilize the response
machinery and has been given financial powers to draw money.
3. All departments including the police, fire services, public works, irrigation
etc. work under the leadership of the Collector during a disaster, except in
metropolitan areas where the municipal body plays a major role.
4. The District Collector also enjoys the authority to request for assistance from
the Armed Forces if circumstances so demand.
2. Role of state government
1. The basic responsibility to undertake response measures rests with the
State Governments.
2. The entire structure of crisis administration in the State Governments
has been oriented towards post disaster relief and rehabilitation.
3. Most of the states have Relief Commissioners. The Relief Commissionerate is
usually an adjunct of the Revenue Department. In some states, the Revenue
Secretary is also the ex-officio Relief Commissioner.
4. This has the advantage of providing a direct chain of command to the district
Collectors and the Tehsildars, but the focus on crisis prevention and
mitigation or even of preparedness is missing.
5. Every state has a Crisis Management Committee under the Chief Secretary,
consisting of secretaries of concerned departments, which reviews crisis
situations on a day-to-day basis, coordinates the activities of all departments
and provides support to the district administration.
6. At the ministers level, a Cabinet Committee on Natural Calamities under the
Chief Minister takes stock of situations and is responsible for all important
policy decisions.
3. Role of Union Government
1. It plays a key supportive role with resources and providing complementary
measures such as early warning and co-ordination of efforts of all Union
ministries, departments and organizations.
2. At the apex level, a Cabinet Committee on Natural Calamities reviews
the crisis situations.
3. A High Level Committee of Ministers under the chairmanship of Minister of
Agriculture deals with the issue of financial support to be provided to
the State Governments.
4. Matters relating to nuclear, biological and chemical emergencies are looked
after by the Cabinet Committee on Security.
5. The Cabinet Secretary heads the National Crisis Management Committee.
Secretaries of ministries and departments concerned and heads of other
organizations are members, which reviews and monitors crisis situations on
a regular basis and gives directions to the Crisis Management Group.
6. The Central Relief Commissioner in the Ministry of Home Affairs is the
Chairman of the Crisis Management Group (CMG) consisting of nodal
officers from various concerned ministries. The CMGs functions are to
review annual contingency plans formulated by various ministries,
measures required for dealing with a natural disaster, coordinate the
activities of the Union Ministries and State Governments. In the event of a
disaster, the CMG meets frequently to review relief operations and extends
assistance required by the affected states.
The Finance Mechanism
1. Schemes for financing expenditure on disaster management are governed by the
recommendations of the Finance Commission.
2. Under the existing scheme, each state has a Calamity Relief Fund (CRF)
administered by the Chief Secretary. The size of the corpus is determined with
reference to the expenditure normally incurred by the state on relief and
rehabilitation over the past ten years.
3. In case the funds under CRF are not sufficient, State Governments can
seek assistance from the National Calamity Contingency Fund (NCCF) - the
approval for which is granted by the High Level Committee of Ministers.
4. Both these funds, as the names suggest, are meant for relief and rehabilitation
and do not cover either mitigation or reconstruction works, which have to
be funded separately.
Evolution of Disaster Management Architecture
Following the Gujarat earthquake, the Government of India took important policy steps
for revamping the disaster management system in the country. These
1. Disaster management with reference to rapid onset disasters was moved from the
purview of the Ministry of Agriculture to the Ministry of Home Affairs. The
Ministry of Agriculture retains the responsibility for droughts, pest attacks and
hailstorms.
2. State Governments were advised to reorganize their Relief &
Rehabilitation Department into a separate Disaster Management Department.
3. State Governments were further advised to constitute State
Disaster Management Authority under the Chairmanship of State Chief Ministers
and the District Disaster Management Committee under the Chairmanship
of District Collectors.
4. National Disaster Response Force to be constituted.
5. A fail-proof disaster communication network to be set up.
6. The National Institute of Disaster Management was set up for training, capacity
building, research and documentation.
7. Disaster management to be included in education system at all levels starting
from schools.
The Disaster Management Act, 2005
The National Disaster Management Authority (PM Level Body)
1. To lay down policies on disaster management.
2. Lay down guidelines to be followed by the states in drawing up the State Plan and
the union ministries to draw up their plans.
3. Approve the National Plan and plans prepared by various union ministries.
4. Coordinate the implementation of the plans for disaster management.
5. Recommend provision of funds for the purpose of mitigation.
6. Provide support to other countries.
7. Lay down broad policies and guidelines for the functioning of the
National Institute of Disaster Management.
The National Executive Committee (Secretary Level Body)
1. Act as the national level coordinating and monitoring body for disaster
management.
2. Prepare the National Plan to be approved by the NDMA.
3. Monitor and evaluate the preparedness level, the implementation of the national
policy, guidelines laid down by NDMA, national plan, plans of various union
ministries.
4. Provide necessary technical assistance to the states for preparing their disaster
management plans and carry out other functions under this Act.
5. Promote general education and organize special training programmes in relation
to disaster management.
6. Coordinate response in the event of any disaster. Require any department or
agency to make available men or material resources for emergency response.
7. Lay down guidelines for, or give directions to union ministries and
states regarding measures to be taken by them in response to any threatening
disaster situation or disaster.
The State Disaster Management Authority (CM Level Body)
1. Lay down the State disaster management policy.
2. Lay down guidelines to be followed by the state ministries.
3. Approve the State Plan and plans prepared by various state ministries.
4. Coordinate the implementation of the state plan and other state ministries' plans.
5. Recommend provision of funds for mitigation and preparedness measures.
The State Executive Committee (Chief Secretary Level Body)
1. Lay down guidelines for preparation of plans by the various state ministries and
the DDMAs.
2. Monitor the implementation of the national policy, the national plan, the state
plan and the plans prepared by various state ministries and the DDMAs. Also
monitor the implementation of guidelines laid down by the SDMA and evaluate
the level of preparedness.
3. Provide necessary technical assistance or give advice to DDMAs and state
ministries.
4. Coordinate response in the event of any disaster. Give directions to any
Department or agency regarding response actions to be taken.
5. Promote general education and community training.
6. Advise the State Government regarding all financial matters in relation to
disaster management.
7. Examine the vulnerability of different parts of the state and specify measures to
be taken.
8. Examine the construction in any area and if it is of the opinion that the standards
for the prevention of disaster have not been followed, may direct the DDMA to
take needed action.
9. Ensure that communication systems are in order and the disaster
management drills are carried out periodically.
The District Disaster Management Authority (Collector Level Body)
1. Collector as ex officio Chairperson, elected representative of the local authority as
the ex officio co-Chairperson, the Superintendent of Police, Chief Medical Officer
and maximum two other district level officers to be appointed by the State
Government, as members.
2. It acts as the district planning, coordinating and implementing body for disaster
management and takes all measures according to the guidelines laid down by the
NDMA and the SDMA.
The National Disaster Management Plan (Prepared by NEC and approved by NDMA)
1. Measures to be taken for the prevention and mitigation.
2. Measures to be taken for integration of mitigation measures in the
development plans.
3. Measures to be taken for preparedness and capacity building to effectively
respond.
4. Roles and responsibilities of different ministries.
The State Disaster Management Plan (Prepared by SEC and approved by SDMA)
1. The vulnerability of different parts of the State to different forms of disasters.
2. The measures to be adopted for prevention and mitigation of disasters.
3. Measures to be taken for integration of mitigation measures in the development
plans.
4. Measures to be taken for preparedness and capacity building to effectively
respond.
5. The roles and responsibilities of different state ministries.
The District Disaster Management Plan (Prepared by DDMA)
1. Every office of the government having office at district level shall prepare a
disaster management plan in accordance with the district plan and submit a copy
of the plan to the DDMA.
2. The areas in the district vulnerable to different forms of disasters.
3. The measures to be taken, for prevention and mitigation of disaster.
4. The capacity-building and preparedness measures to effectively respond.
5. The response plans and procedures, in the event of a disaster, providing for-
1. Allocation of responsibilities to the departments and the local authorities in
the district.
2. Prompt response to disaster and relief.
3. Procurement of essential resources.
4. Establishment of communication links.
5. Dissemination of information to the public.
The National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM)
1. It will function within the broad policies and guidelines laid down by the NDMA.
2. It will be responsible for promoting research in the area of disaster management.
3. It will be responsible for documentation of the disasters and their management
cases.
4. It will be responsible for the development of a national level information base.
The National Disaster Response Force
1. The general superintendence, direction and control of the Force shall vest in the
NDMA
The National Disaster Response Fund & The National Disaster Mitigation Fund
1. The response fund will be made available to the NEC and the mitigation fund to
the NDMA.
2. Besides, every ministry shall make provisions in its annual budget, for funds for
actions set out in its disaster management plans.
Other Salient Features of the Act
1. The Central Government can issue directions to any authority (union or
state) to assist in disaster management.
2. Any officer or authority shall have to make available such manpower as requested
by NEC, SEC or DDMA.
3. If it appears to the NEC, SEC or DDMA that provisions of any rule regulation etc.
need to be made or amended for purposes of prevention and mitigation of
disasters, it may require to do so.
4. The NDMA, the SDMA or a DDMA may recommend to the Government to give
direction to any person in control of any media or means of communication to
carry out any warnings or advisories regarding disasters.
5. The NDMA shall prepare an annual report to the Central Government which shall
cause it to be laid before Parliament.
6. Actions taken under this law will be immune from court challenges.
India's Disaster Preparedness
Analytical Issues in Disaster Management in India
Constitutional Provision - is there need for a separate entry for Disaster Management in
the 3 Lists?
1. Disaster management doesn't figure in any of the 3 lists. So the parliament has
the competence to legislate on this subject. However, by practice and
convention the primary responsibility for managing disasters rests with the State
Governments
2. The Disaster Management Act, 2005 was enacted by invoking entry 23 namely
Social security and social insurance, employment and unemployment in
the Concurrent List even though all aspects of crisis management cannot be said
to be covered by this entry.
3. There are already various entries in the three lists, which deal with some aspect or
other of disaster management. Public order finds a place in the State List, as
does Public Health. Entries 14 and 17 in the State List deal with Agriculture and
Water respectively. Environment and Social Security are included in the
Concurrent List. Atomic energy and Railways are part of the Union List.
4. Due to the cross cutting nature of activities that constitute disaster
management and linkages required which involve coordination between
the Union, State and local governments on the one hand and a host of
government departments and agencies on the other; setting up of a broadly
uniform institutional framework at all levels is of paramount importance.
5. There is need to ensure congruence and coherence with regard to the division of
labor among the agencies at the Union, State and other levels. This could best be
achieved if the subject of Disaster Management is placed in the Concurrent List of
the Constitution.
What should a law on crisis management provide?
1. Centralization versus decentralization
1. A totally centralized or totally decentralized mechanism would be ineffective
because while the response should be made from the local level, the level of
coordination required necessitates involvement of the central government.
It is best if certain functions of disaster management are centralized while
others are decentralized down to the lowest level.
2. Immediate rescue, relief and then rehabilitation should be the responsibility
of the level of government closest to the affected population. This logically
has to be the district administration and the local self-governments.
3. The district administration is part of the State Government and the primary
responsibility for managing any disaster is with the State Governments.
4. The resources of states being limited they seek and get assistance from the
Union Government. This arrangement of bottom-up responsibilities
regarding implementation is appropriate and has worked well in the past
and should not be disturbed.
5. On the other hand, disaster management planning requires wider
perspective and expertise. Developments in science and technology,
specialized manpower and equipment, repository of best practices, early
warning systems, standard capacity building and awareness generation
programmes call for an agency to coordinate efforts at the state and the
national levels.
6. Thus, the legislation needs to create agencies at all levels. The responsibility
and the authority assigned to each one of these have to be distinct. National
level planning, research, analysis and adoption of best practices,
development of standard operating procedures (national level),
development of training and capacity building programmes, administration
of early warning systems and formulating policy on disaster management
are best entrusted to a national body. Local planning and the actual work of
implementation are better left with State Governments, local governments
and the district administration with support from the Union Governments
implementing agencies.
2. Mobilization of resources: The law needs to empower authorities handling
disasters to requisition such resources for specified periods and the issue of
compensation should not be a hindrance in crisis management efforts.
3. Information dissemination: Even with good early warning technologies, the
human element involved in the transmission process is crucial. Prompt
transmission of information should be made a statutory duty of each concerned
functionary and SoPs devised. Responsibilities of citizens should also be defined in
the process.
4. Misutilization of funds: Funds meant for disaster relief often tend to get misused
as normal procedures are not followed because of urgency. While
enforcing stringent procurement procedures may become a hurdle in the disaster
management effort, the penalty for misutilization of funds meant for disaster
relief should be stringent and could form part of the law itself.
1. International border is a line which separates two sovereign nations and both the
nations have agreed that this is the line separating them. Maps are exchanged and
features are marked on the ground.
2. The rule is that no armed forces shall be posted on the international borders. So the
police forces from either sides are posted. Police forces come under MIA and thus
maintaining the tranquility along the international borders is the sole responsibility of
MIA and not MoD.
Role of Interlocutors
1. They are people who have no formal position in the government or any formal
authority to speak on behalf of the government. Whatever they speak are their
personal views. However, communications via interlocutors are very useful in
conveying information and ideas. They generally don't include active politicians or
serving government servants.
2. They try to find out what are the views of the other parties and gives the feedback
to the government. Such a feedback is not binding on the government, it is only
an additional information in the decision making.
3. They are people generally on who both the parties have confidence.
4. They are different from the negotiators in the sense that the negotiators have
more powers and official backing to make concessions and convey the official line.
Moving governance of tribal areas in central India from the Fifth to the Sixth Schedule
will help address the demand for autonomy
Bastar district in Chhattisgarh is governed by the Fifth Schedule, but it wants to move
into the Sixth Schedule. The Fifth Schedule on the other hand fails because it has never
been applied.
PESA was considered the most logical step in the Fifth Schedule areas to ensure tribal
welfare and accountability. But, alas, it has not been properly implemented.
Tribal communities have progressively been denied self-government and rights to their
communities natural resources that should have been provided under the legislation.
In its 1997 Samatha decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fifth Schedule enjoined
Governors to bar purchase of tribal land for mining activity by any entity that was not
state-owned. This judgment however, led to an opposite reaction from the Ministry of
Mines, and subsequent appeals from the Andhra Pradesh government claiming that
Samatha would have an adverse effect not only on the mining sector but also on non-
agricultural activities especially industrial activity and hence would impact the
economic development throughout the country. In response, the Governors were then
given unfettered authority in the transfer of Scheduled Tribe land to the government
and allotment to non-tribals, altering the balance of power and undermining the stated
goal of tribal autonomy.
Other examples abound, including the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest
Rights Act of December 2006, which ostensibly recognises the right of communities to
protect and manage their forests (as does PESA), but only if the state decides whether a
certain region is denoted as Village Forest or Reserved Forest. In this process, many
communities are evicted without a proper channel of rehabilitation.
Evolution and Current Status of LWE
1. Various groups of Naxalites started resurfacing in various parts of India during the
early 1980s. The naxalites of Andhra Pradesh regrouped as the CPI-ML
(Peoples War Group/ PWG); likewise the Bihar Naxalites rechristened themselves
as the Maoist Communist Centre (MCC).
2. PWG of Andhra Pradesh
1. It turned out to be the most active not only in Andhra Pradesh but also in
Orissa, in the tribal belt (Bastar-Dandakaranya) of Madhya Pradesh (now
mostly in the State of Chhattisgarh) and Maharashtra, causing considerable
violence in these States.
2. It succeeded in mobilising a fairly large section of the rural population in the
outlying districts and also in the urban areas. It also succeeded in enlisting
the support of a vocal section of the civil society. It openly started holding
Praja Courts in which complaints against land-owners, money-lenders and
even against government officials were being entertained and swift justice
meted out. Even elected representatives were being given directives by
such courts, which were generally obeyed.
3. When police action started, it created a sense of insecurity among sections
of the Maoist cadres which prompted them to resort to brutal murders and
tortures of villagers on the slightest suspicion of being police informers. This
created alienation among the local villagers.
4. At a later stage, Greyhounds operations were launched and PWG pushed
out of Andhra.
3. Chattisgarh
1. Here they developed expertise in the use of landmines and IEDs which
caused significant casualties.
2. Another significant development was the creation of Salwa Judum and its
subsequent dismantling.
4. MCC of Bihar
1. Here the naxalites found that their greatest adversary was not so much the
administration and the police but the armed gangs (senas ) of the landlord
class - the Ranbir Sena. Here instead of assuming the characteristics of class
struggle as propagated by Maoist ideologues, the skirmishes took the shape
of caste warfare.
5. West Bengal
1. Here the Naxalites seem to be repeating some of their tactics of the 1969-72
period. Thus they have started targeting specific CPM party functionaries at
local levels. Their targets are not confined to the known Naxalite affected
districts of West Midnapore, Purulia and Bankura only. A number of CPM
party functionaries have been attacked and killed in the districts of Nadia,
Burdwan, Birbhum, Murshidabad etc.
6. Consolidation
1. It was completed with the formation of the CPI (Maoist) on 21 September
2004. This was followed by their increasing militarisation and acquisition of
sophisticated firearms and ammunitions.
2. Their arsenal now boasts of self loading rifles (SLRs), AK series of rifles and
INSAS rifles. It is believed that currently the Maoists have also gained access
to the technology of fabricating rockets and rocket launchers. The threat
from the Maoists has increased on account of their developing expertise
in fabricating and detonating Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). Unlike in
J&K where landmines are detonated with remote-controlled device, the
Naxalites so far have been using wire-controlled detonations which cannot
be neutralised electronically.
Recent Strategy Decisions to Counter Naxalism
1. Security response
1. To enhance the level of central forces and focus on surgical operations to
take out the top leadership. State police to continue taking the lead role.
2. Good thing is that LWE is gaining importance in the policy circles and recent
years have witnessed more than tripling of the numbers in central forces
deployed in the naxalite areas.
3. To follow the Andhra Pradesh model.
4. To increase inter state cooperation and conduct cross-border raids.
2. Administrative response
1. Development funds are often diverted to the Naxalites. The political parties/
political leaderships too pay protection money to the Naxalites. Poor
governance has led to increase in Naxalite activities. The states delivery
mechanism has to be revamped. The state has to penetrate into remote
tribal areas.
2. The only way forward is to build infrastructure and add to the manpower.
Teachers, nurses, doctors should want to go there.
The Andhra Model
1. Security response
1. Use of specialized and dedicated police force called the Greyhounds.
2. Strengthening the intelligence gathering and intelligence based operations.
3. Enhancing the role of local police stations in operations.
4. Making efforts to infiltrate the Maoist hierarchy.
5. Effective surrender and rehabilitation policy.
6. Victim reassurance policy including civil and police rehabilitation.
2. Political response
1. The political leadership was initially not sensitive enough to the impending
Naxalite challenge. This changed and a consensus had emerged among the
political formations by about 1996-97 that the rebels had to be taken
headlong, in all possible ways.
2. Thus a consensus was evolved over the counter naxalism strategy.
3. Developmental response
1. Twice development programmes have been launched in the State with the
particular objective of bringing in rapid socio-economic development in
Naxalite-affected areas. The first initiative was known as Remote Areas
Development Programme; and the second is known as Remote and Interior
Areas Development Programme.
The Greyhounds
1. They are an elite commando force in Andhra Pradesh created to combat left wing
extremists. Only the best policemen make it to the Greyhound squad, which is
one of the highest paid in the country.
2. The force, which numbers around 2,000 in the state, moves around in small bands
of 15-25 commandos. They are specially trained for deep forest pursuit and
combat.
3. Greyhounds is maintained as a youthful force by drawing personnel from various
departments of AP police for a fixed tenure
Roshni
1. A new skill development scheme for rural youth from 24 most critical LWE
affected districts. It aims at skilling and placement of 50,000 youth from
these districts. It will be implemented at a cost of Rs 100 crore over the next
three years. At least 50% of the candidates shall be women and special
efforts will be made to proactively cover tribals.
2. Projects shall be funded jointly by the central and state governments in the
ratio of 75:25. Training will be imparted through public-private and public-
public partnerships.
3. National level agencies shall be designated to act as monitoring and
coordinating agencies.
FDI in Defence
1. Opposing the FDI
1. Defence sector must be the monopoly of the defence public sector
undertakings.
2. Relaxing the ceiling would make the Indian defence sector hostage to
foreign companies, jeopardising our national security.
2. Supporting the FDI
1. No large nation is so dependent on imports as India is. The so called
indigenous defence industry is non existent, has been non existent for the
past 60 years. Any continuation of the same policies based on above
arguments given by FDI opposition will keep our country perpetually
dependent on imports.
2. Higher imports hurt our security more than higher foreign equity of some
defence companies may.
3. To develop even the indigenous private sector capabilities an ecosystem
needs to be created. The technology and competition accompanying the
higher FDI will only help in creating such ecosystem. The JVs will give
requisite experience to the domestic players to develop their own
capabilities as well. Brazil has done this successfully through liberalization of
its defence sector.
4. 26% FDI is too small to attract major players. 26% equity holding only lets
them block special resolutions. It does not give them the freedom to appoint
directors. It also limits the profit of such companies. Why then should a
company transfer technology and create competition for the parent
companies?
3. What needs to be done?
1. Have no limit on FDI. Vary the limit on a case-to-case basis depending on
what a company may be proposing to establish in India. If the technology is
necessary to fill critical gaps in Indian technology, allow even 100% and
impose conditions such as the hiring of Indian engineers and sourcing
components indigenously. This would help the development of ancillary
industries.
2. Assure continuing orders for a decade or so in the form of repeat orders.
Impose conditions necessitating technology upgradation when they are
available with the parent company.
3. Encourage the firms to gradually transfer their holdings to Indian firms.