Human Resource Management Cia 2: by Anjali Nambiar Iibbma 0911030
Human Resource Management Cia 2: by Anjali Nambiar Iibbma 0911030
Management
CIA 2
By
Anjali Nambiar
II BBM A
0911030
General and Operations Managers
Plan, direct, or coordinate the operations of companies or public and private
sector organizations. Duties and responsibilities include formulating
policies, managing daily operations, and planning the use of materials and
human resources, but are too diverse and general in nature to be classified
in any one functional area of management or administration, such as
personnel, purchasing, or administrative services. Includes owners and
managers who head small business establishments whose duties are
primarily managerial.
Job description:
Desktop computers
Knowledge :
Administration and Management — Knowledge of business and
management principles involved in strategic planning, resource allocation,
human resources modeling, leadership technique, production methods, and
coordination of people and resources.
Skills
Active Listening — Giving full attention to what other people are saying,
taking time to understand the points being made, asking questions as
appropriate, and not interrupting at inappropriate times.
Abilities
Oral Comprehension — The ability to listen to and understand information
and ideas presented through spoken words and sentences.
Job details :
Getting Information — Observing, receiving, and otherwise obtaining
information from all relevant sources.
Work Context
Telephone — How often do you have telephone conversations in this job?
Contact With Others — How much does this job require the worker to be
in contact with others (face-to-face, by telephone, or otherwise) in order to
perform it?
Job Zone
Title Job Zone Three: Medium Preparation Needed
Education Most occupations in this zone require training in vocational
schools, related on-the-job experience, or an associate's
degree.
Interests
Interest code: ECS
Cooperation — Job requires being pleasant with others on the job and
displaying a good-natured, cooperative attitude.
Work Values
Relationships — Occupations that satisfy this work value allow employees
to provide service to others and work with co-workers in a friendly non-
competitive environment. Corresponding needs are Co-workers, Moral
Values and Social Service.
Working Conditions — Occupations that satisfy this work value offer job
security and good working conditions. Corresponding needs are Activity,
Compensation, Independence, Security, Variety and Working Conditions.
EMPLOYMENT PLANNING IS ''HR PLANNING''
-------------------------------------------------------------
mergers
present opportunities and hazards for both the company and the HR manager. A
KPMG study showed that 83% of mergersand acquisitions failed to produce any
benefits - and over half actually ended up reducing the value of the companies
involved.
That number is only astonishing when one considers how many mergers
occur in a year, and how few companies seem to think matters through
(particularly cultural and systems methods) and consider alternatives.
There are also opportunities. For every eight failures, there is a case where
both companies emerge stronger. These are the cases where people in each
organization show that the value the other, and actively work together to
bring out the best values in each.
The role of HR
HR may be in a unique position to question assumptions about the nature
of assets and synergies. Investment bankers have a narrower training, and
are rewarded for making deals; human issues tend to get lost or overlooked.
Even at the highest level of the company, HR can have a role. The new
leadership team will need to work together on a daily basis, despite cultural
and personality differences, power issues, and other barriers. HR can act as
a facilitator, and also as a coach to individual executives. Personal and team
assessments can be helpful in enabling team members to work together
constructively.
Opportunities for HR
Mergers and acquisitions are often planned and executed based on
perceived cost savings or market synergies; rarely are the “people” and
cultural issues considered. Yet, it is the people who decide whether an
acquisition or merger works. opyright © 2001-05 Toolpack Consulting,
LLC. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without written permission. The
opportunity for HR lies in the fact that customer and employee reactions
determine whether the newly combined company will sink or swim.. If a
convincing argument is made to senior leaders, HR may gain more power
to increase the effectiveness of the organization, and may be able to mold
the cultural changes instead of being pushed along by them.
Hazards for HR
One result of many mergers is the consolidation of staff departments.
Eliminating one of the HR departments is sometimes stated up front as a
justification for the merger.
For the “losing” department, layoffs tend to be a fact of life. The “winning”
department may find a substantially higher workload. If both HR
departments are kept, there may be issues of interdependence and
autonomy, and hard decisions about which policies and services should be
shared and which should stay separate.
In many cases, the parent company has taken on a great deal of debt
to finance an acquisition. The next logical step is to cut costs — and HR is
often the first department on the block. Thanks to outsourcing agencies,
even HR people in formerly indispensible functions such as benefits
administration can now be replaced for shortterm gains (and, sometimes,
long-term losses — but since the stock market rewards cuts in head count,
this may not be an overriding issue for leaders). Internal OD consultants
may be the first to be cut, since they are not clearly required to keep
products or services rolling out. This makes it particularly important for
HR managers to make a strong value case to the senior leadership.
Before the merger takes place, the leaders of both organizations - at least, of
the dominant firm - should have a strategy mapped out, including
communications to employees and customers, where layoffs will take place
(if any do), and how the cultures should be merged. A SWOT (strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities,
Sometimes this will be obvious in some aspects -e.g. one culture values
teams and bottom-up innovation, the other favors command-and-control
tactics - but not in others, such as how and whether individuals and teams
are rewarded for innovations, how failure is dealt with, whether confiict is
addressed openly, etc. This will prevent disconcerting delays between the
announcement and the implementation of the merger/takeover.
Some questions to ask the leaders, in person or via open-ended survey, are:
One way to get the answers to these questions is to have an outside agency
speak with senior leaders, one at a time — or, if that is not possible, to have
them circulate a brief confidential survey and present the results at a
facilitated meeting. Difficult questions, for example whether there are
alternatives to a merger, should be raised as early as possible.
The HR manager may need to raise the issue of culture - how people work,
how they think, what they value, and, of some importance, how they view
the other organization. If the acquired (or acquiring) organization is viewed
with disdain, these issues must be addressed up front. Likewise, severe
cultural differences must be addressed. They can be overcome with
attention and work.
Some cultural differences are obvious (e.g. one culture values teams and
bottom-up innovation, the other favors command-and-control tactics) but
others may be subtle (e.g. how and whether individuals and teams are
rewarded for innovations). Will acquiring a company, or merging with it,
destroy the properties or drive away the talent that made it worth having? If
the real purpose of the merger is to acquire another company’s assets, in
terms of a particular product or brand, its factories or patents, etc., that
should be acknowledged and dealt with up front. If employees are fooled at
first by pleasant words, they will react more strongly when those words
become taunts.
Individual HR staffers need to understand their current skills and may need
to update their knowledge or practice with role playing to ensure that they
are working as constructively as possible. Process consulting skills are
essential.
Communication.
As people look inwards to try to find their place in the merged company and
attempt to see their future in it - or outside it - productivity drops. The
grapevine can become a major source of headaches. Constant, consistent,
and honest communication from leaders and HR is essential.
It is essential to bring confiict out to the surface and deal with power issues
honestly. If one group is obviously in charge, that should be admitted early
on so people don’t waste time with second-guessing. Often, people get
wrapped up in turf wars which are destructive to both sides, rather than
trying to figure out roles for both sides and have a win-win situation.
Culture
Operations
Ideally, processes can be examined to see where true synergies lie. In many
mergers and takeovers, power relationships determine operational changes,
rather than actual efficiencies or quality concerns. By making changes with
facilitated cross-platform teams, HR can help to ensure that the best of the
two organizations are preserved.
• Exploring options - are there other ways to accomplish the same goals
without a merger?
Stretch targets: a relatively high target, above what one would normally expect to
be able to achieve, and designed to motivate people for higher performance by
raising expectations
Synergy: where the whole is more than the sum of its parts due to economies of
scale, brand visibility, etc.
Aside from the political and personal influence moves which are outside the
scope of this article, there are some steps you can take. First, you should
have a good, clear picture of how your department adds value to the
organization, described in terms the CEO and other powers would resonate
with. What is your contribution to the bottom line? Can you provide a brief
presentation of problems you have seen in the organization, and steps you
have taken to resolve them? Do you have cost savings of interventions your
department has undertaken, e.g. quality initiatives, cultural change,
employee survey-based change, facilitated process reengineering, etc.?
One way to justify not only your department’s existence, but also its leading
role in the merger integration, is to link key results to human issues.
Having a consulting firm statistically link employee survey results (possibly
from existing data) with operational, customer, or financial datacan pack a
powerful punch. “Not only do we know internal communication is
important, but we know raising it by ten points increases customer
retention by 5%. That leads to a $600,000 increase in revenue!” Similar
analyses can be used to predict employee retention.
More significantly, the writers show how employee retention has a strong
impact on customer retention, which in turn has a strong impact on both
profit and revenue. This “bottom- line” argument can both position you as
having a strategic mindset, and give more weight to the “people issues”
which are key to a smooth, productive integration.
The key here, and you probably have guessed this by now, is to show how
much value your department adds, using as many quantifi- able metrics as
you can.
Find all cost savings, efficiency increases, and other positive outcomes that
you can, and show how your department is a profit center, not a cost center.
It’s not a guarantee, and it may not even work as well as forging strong
personal relationships, but it can be very convincing, and a show of good
faith (and a demonstration that you, personally, understand “real business
issues.”
Wrapping it up
By knowing what makes mergers succeed, keeping an eye on the human
issues as well as the financials, and using appropriate tools, companies can
make mergers work.
The most important step may be to sell the process - because the best
change plans are useless unless they are implemented.