Aggregate Planning: National Institute of Technology Calicut Department of Mechanical Engineering
Aggregate Planning: National Institute of Technology Calicut Department of Mechanical Engineering
AGGREGATE PLANNING
PROBLEMS
Problem 1.
ABC Corporation has developed a forecast for a group of items that has the following
seasonal demand pattern.
Quarter Demand Cumulative
Demand
1 220 220
2 170 390
3 400 790
4 600 1390
5 380 1770
6 200 1970
7 130 2100
8 300 2400
1. Plot the demand as a histogram. Determine the production rate required to
meet average demand, and plot the average demand forecast on the graph.
2. Plot the actual cumulative forecast requirements over time and compare them
with the available average forecast requirement. Indicate the excess
inventories and backorders of the graph.
3. Suppose that the firm estimates that it costs Rs.100 per unit to increase the
production rate, Rs.150 to decrease the production rate, Rs.50 per quarter to
carry the items on inventory, and an incremental cost of Rs.80 per unit if
subcontracted and Rs. 20 per unit if overtime is used.
Compare the cost incurred if pure strategies are used.
4. Given these costs, design a mixed strategy solution for this problem.
The histogram and the cumulative requirements graph show how the forecast
deviates from the average requirements (see Figures 1 and 2). Using pure
strategies, it is possible to come up with several plans as follows:
Production rate units/quarter
Forecast requirements
Average Forecast
300 requirements
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Figure 1 Histogram of forecast and average requirements
Actual forecast
Backorders
Average forecast
requirements
Inventory
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Periods (Quarters)
Figure 2 Cumulative and average forecast graph
Plan 1: Varying the Workforce Size. Demand can be met exactly by varying the
workforce size. The plan involves hiring and firing as necessary. The
production rate will equal the demand. The cost of this plan is Rs.138,000, as
computed in Table 1. Notice that inventory and backorders are both zero in
each quarter, and the resulting costs for those are zero.
Plan 2: Changing Inventory Levels. Suppose that a firm wants to avoid frequent
hiring and layoffs. It might choose a production level equal to its average
demand and meet the variations in demand by holding inventory. The cost of
such a plan is computed in Table 2. The plan incurs a maximum shortage of
270 units during period 5. Since a certain amount of uncertainty is involved in
any forecast, the firm might decide to carry the inventory from the beginning
of period 1. Adjusted inventories and cost of carrying inventories are shown.
The total cost of the plan is Rs.96,500. Notice, however, that if the item in
question is high-fashion apparel the firm might not want to carry unnecessary
inventory, even though Plan 2 is less costly than Plan 1.
Table 1: Varying the Workforce size to meet the demand
Adjusted
Inventory
Demand
Production
Quarter
Forecast
Level
Cost of
Inventory
Cumulative Cumulative Holding
with 270 at
Demand Production Inventories
Beginning
(Rs. 1000s)
of Period 1
1. 220 220 300 300 80 350 17.5
2. 170 390 300 600 210 480 24.0
3. 400 790 300 900 110 380 19.0
4. 600 1390 300 1200 -190 80 4.0
5. 380 1770 300 1500 -270 0 0
6. 200 1970 300 1800 -170 100 5.0
7. 130 2100 300 2100 0 270 13.5
8. 300 2400 300 2400 0 270 13.5
96.5
Plan 3: Subcontracting. A firm might prefer to produce an amount equal to its lowest
requirements and meet the rest of the demand by subcontracting. The cost of
such a plan amounts to Rs.108,000, as computed in Table 3. Again, it may not
always be feasible or desirable to subcontract. This decision leads us to a
fourth plan, involving a mixed strategy.
Plan 4: Mixed Strategy. As a compromise, a firm might combine the pure strategies,
thus designing a mixed strategy. This mixed strategy varies production
capacity slightly up or down as aggregated demand varies. Drastic changes in
production capacity are curtailed, and frequent hiring and lay off situations are
avoided. For example, based on past experience and available personnel,
management may decide to maintain a constant production rate of 200 per
quarter and permit 25% overtime when the demand exceeds the production
rate. To meet any further demand, the firm chooses to hire and layoff workers.
Remember, in a mixed strategy, a host of other alternatives exist. Trial-and-
error computations of such a plan can be carried out step by step, as shown in
Table 4.
Incremental
Demand Production Subcontract Cost at
Quarter
Forecast Units Units Rs.80 per
Unit (Rs.)
1. 220 130 90 7,200
2. 170 130 40 3,200
3. 400 130 270 21,600
4. 600 130 470 37,600
5. 380 130 250 20,000
6. 200 130 70 5,600
7. 130 130 0 0
8. 300 130 170 13,600
108,800
Note:- All the above cost calculated are incremental cost. They are the cost incurred over the regular time production cost. That is, the total cost of
a plan is the plan cost shown above plus the cost incurred if all the requirements are produced in regular time.
Problem 2.
1. Produce to exact production requirements by varying the size of the work force on
regular hours. Assume there are 250 workers available in January.
3. Produce with a fixed work force of 500 on regular time and subcontract all excess
demand over the period of production. Inventory will increase when production
exceeds demand; no stockouts are permitted.
Each of the three plans is tabulated in Table 5, and a comparison is made in Table 6.
Plan 2 with the constant work force and production rate with variable inventory and
stockouts result’s the lowest incremental cost, Rs.102,176. There are obviously many
other plans that could be evaluated.
Plan 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Production Available Workers No. of No. of Hiring cost Layoff cost
Production
hours hours per required workers workers [(col.5)xRs. [(col.6)xRs.
required
hireda laid offa
Month
Plan 2
1 2 3 4 5 6
Production
Unit Units Inventory
hours available Ending Stockout
Month Production produced holding
[(no. of days ) x Inventoryb costd
required [(col.2)/4] costc
8x518]
Jan. 11,000 91,168 22,792 11,792 Rs. 23,584 0
Feb. 15,500 78,736 19,684 15,976 31,952 0
Mar. 31,500 87,024 21,756 6,232 12,464 0
Apr. 26,700 87,024 21,756 1,288 2,576 0
May 30,300 91,168 22,792 (-6,220) 0 31,100
Jun. 14,600 82,880 20,720 (-100) 0 500
Rs. 70,576 Rs. 31,600
Plan 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Inventory
Production Subcontr-
Unit Units Units holding
hours available Ending acting cost
costd
Month
a
lf the difference (col. 4)t+1 - (col.4)t is positive, it represents the number of workers hired. If negative,
it represents the number laid off.
b
Ending inventory is (beginning inventory) + (units produced) - (unit production required).
C
lnventory holding cost is the positive ending inventory balance times 2.
d
Stockout cost is the negative ending inventory balance times 5. -
e
Ending inventory is (beginning inventory) + (units produced) - (unit production required). When a
negative number is obtained for ending inventory, it represents the units subcontracted, and ending
inventory is recorded as zero.
Problem 3.
What is the optimum production plan for the next 12 months (assume beginning
inventory is zero, desired ending inventory is zero, and no stockouts can be
tolerated)?
6. 16 0 16(6), 1(11) 1
7. 12 1 12(7), 7(11) 8
8. 10 8 10(8), 6(10), 3(11) 17
9. 18 17 18(9), 1(10) 18
10. 26 18 19(10) 11
11. 30 11 19(11) 0
12. 15 0 15(12) 0
a
The quantity to be produced is entered in the row associated with the production
time period. The parentheses immediately after the production quantity indicate the
time period in which it will be demanded.
b
The beginning and ending inventory columns are determined after all the strategy
variables are assigned.
Problem 4.
An organization with a stable work force uses inventory, overtime, and subcontracting
to meet demand requirements. No shortages are permitted, and demand must be
satisfied through in-house production or subcontracting. The following data are
available for the upcoming periods:
The beginning inventory at the start of period 1 is 200 units and the desired ending
inventory for period 6 is 100 units. The relevant cost data are as follows:
Determine the production plan that will satisfy demand at minimum cost. Use the
transportation method of linear programming.
last row (demand). On an incremental cost basis, the regular cost per unit of Rs.100 is
assigned a zero value; the overtime cost becomes Rs.25/unit, and the subcontract cost
becomes Rs.30/unit. The appropriate incremental costs are added to each feasible cell
in the table. The next step is to assign available capacity to meet the demand
requirement at the least cost. When all the demand has been satisfied without
violating the capacity constraints, the problem is solved. The optimum production
plan is contained in Table 9.
The following should be noted while preparing the linear programming tableau:
Regular Overtime
Subcontract Total production
Period production production
production (units) costa
(units) (units)
1. 600 180 20 Rs. 85,100
2. 500 0 0 50,000
3. 600 180 0 82,500
4. 650 200 0 90,000
5. 600 180 10 83,800
6. 600 180 200 108,500
3,350 920 230 Rs. 499,900
a
Total production cost does not include holding cost, which is 4(70*) + 6(10*) + 2(50*)
+ 2(10*) = Rs.460. Thus total cost is Rs.499,900 + Rs.460 = Rs.500,360.
*These quantities can be obtained from linear programming table.