ALM/GAP Management: Commercial Banking Operation: Md. Saif Noman Khan Faculty IBA. University of Dhaka
ALM/GAP Management: Commercial Banking Operation: Md. Saif Noman Khan Faculty IBA. University of Dhaka
Main Risks
Credit Risk
Liquidity Risk
Reinvestment Risk
Refinance risk
Interest Rate risk
FX Risk
Country/Sovereign Risk
Technology Risk
Reputation Risk or Franchise Risk
Organizational Structure
Some Recap
The Gap is the gap created by the difference between the size of
the Interest sensitive assets interest insensitive liabilities
Asset Liability
Interest GA Interest
Sensitive/
P Insensitive/Fixed
Floating Rate LT
Rate LT Deposits
Loans
11
Existing Procedure and Guidelines for approval of Foreign Private Loan.
With a view to promote foreign investment in the private sector through easier long term
financing of industrial project at lower cost of fund and to lessen the pressure on foreign
currency reserve, the Government of Bangladesh has been allowing foreign borrowing duly
approved by the Scrutiny Committee.
The Existing guidelines for borrowing from abroad are set out below:
Industrial enterprises in private sector incorporated under the Companies Act 1994 and
registered with BOI are eligible;
(ii) Foreign Borrowings;
Foreign borrowings refer to commercial loan including financial loans, bank loans,
buyer's credit, supplier's credit from institutions or individuals and debt issues in the
capital market abroad etc;
(iii) Recognized Lenders;
Borrowers can raise the foreign borrowings from internationally recognized sources such
as (i) international banks, international capital markets, multilateral financial institutions
(such as IFC, WB, ADB, CDC, DEG, FMO, OPIC, OPEC Fund etc). (ii) export credit
agencies and (iii) suppliers of equipment and (iv) apart from these approval of borrowing
from foreign equity holders and their connected interests will be accorded sparingly, only
by way of short term bridging arrangements.
(iv) All-in-cost ceilings;
All-in-cost includes rate of interest and other annualized fees and expenses such as
commitment fee, syndication fee, front-end fee, project appraisal fee, legal fee etc.
payable in foreign currency except pre-payment fee and fees payable in Bangladesh Taka.
The interest rate and other charges related to the foreign borrowing should be reasonable
compared to the prevailing lending rates at the international markets in the concerned
currencies for the relevant tenure. Normally, the interest rate should be based on
prevailing govt treasury bond rate in that currency for that tenure plus a reasonably
moderate country risk premium; excessive high risk premium margins will invite
additional rigour in the scrutiny of the approval process. The foreign borrowings must be
at competitive rates and that the all in cost level should be in line with prevailing
borrowing costs in the international market.
(v) End use;
(a) Foreign borrowing will be allowed only for investment (such as import of capital
goods for new projects, modernization/expansion of existing production units) in
industrial sector including small and medium enterprises (SME) as well as
infrastructure and priority sector as defined in Industrial Policy announced from time
to time;
(b) Utilization of foreign loan proceeds is not permitted exclusively for working capital
purpose and investment in capital market by corporate;
(vi) Guarantees;
Guarantee/stand by letter of credit or letter of comfort by banks, financial institutions
relating to foreign borrowing is usually not permitted. However providing of such
guarantee/stand by letter of credit or letter of comfort etc is subject to existing
prudential regulations of Bangladesh Bank;
(vii) Prepayment;
Prepayment of approved foreign borrowings shall be subject to concurrence of
Bangladesh Bank before being submitted for approval of the BOI Scrutiny
Committee.
(viii) Refinance of existing approved foreign borrowings;
Refinancing of outstanding foreign loan by borrowing fresh loans at lower cost is
permitted with prior approval of the Scrutiny Committee. In such case, the maturity
of the fresh loan should not be less than the outstanding maturity of original loan;
(ix) Payment of arrears (if any):
Payment of arrears (if any) for interest and principal should be made in installments
as approved by the Scrutiny Committee.
(x) Quality/Commercial viability of the project;
To determine the quality/commercial viability of the project feasibility report
alongwith the following financial analysis are required;
a) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the project
b) Pay back period
c) Break-even point at what capacity and what period of year
d) Sensitivity analysis in terms of IRR.
e) Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR)
(xi) Indebtedness and creditworthiness of the borrowing company;
To determine the existing indebtedness structure and creditworthiness of the borrowing
company as well as its sponsors;
(a) CIB report : CIB report will be required for processing of all proposals. BOI will collect
the CIB report from Bangladesh Bank.
(b) Bank certificate: Existing indebtedness structure and creditworthiness of the sponsors
concerned duly certified by their bankers will be required for approval process of
foreign borrowings. The nominated bank will submit the relevant inquiry forms and
undertaking from the Sponsor Directors of the borrowing company to BOI.
(xii) Repayment period: Approval requests should normally be for medium and longer term
borrowing and that short term borrowing approvals will be considered only sparingly by
way of bridging arrangements.
2. Criteria for foreign borrowing
i. Debt equity ratio;
Debt-equity ratio based on proposed borrowing should be sector wise at a tolerable level.
The debt-equity ratio of the borrowing enterprise should reflect sufficient equity stake of
the entrepreneurs, with moderate rather than high leveraging and also that while
relatively higher debt levels may be warranted for long gestation infrastructure projects,
total debt including the proposed borrowing should not breach 70:30 debt equity ratio
even for these projects;
ii. Liabilities to the Government;
There should be absolutely no liability either in Taka or in foreign exchange for the
Government of Bangladesh and any of its entities or Bangladesh Bank.
iii. Status of implementation & utilization report of approved foreign borrowing;
The borrowing company should submit the status of implementation and utilization
report of the approved loan as per prescribed format to the BOI on semi annual basis.
iv) Quality, price and economic life of capital machinery and equipments to be procured;
The capital machinery and equipments to be procured with the proposed borrowing
should eigther be brand new; or in case there are reconditioned should be of such
sufficient useful life as required by the Governments Import Policy Order.
v) Validity of the approval;
Approval of the foreign borrowing given by the Scrutiny Committee will be valid upto
6(six) months from the date of approval letter issued by BOI.
vi) Common Terms;
a) The borrowing company shall have to abide by the rules and regulation of Bangladesh
Bank in respect of utilization and repayment of the said loan and interest thereon.
b) The borrowing company shall have repayment of the said loan alongwith interest out of
their own sources.
c) The borrowing company shall have to bring in the proceeds of the loan through any
Authorized Dealer(AD) bank only operating in Bangladesh as nominated in application
for approval of foreign borrowing.
d) The borrowing company shall have to submit the certified/attested copy of the final
agreement made between the borrower and non-resident lender of the approved loan to
the Director (R&I-I), Board of Investment, Jiban Bima Tower, 10, Dilkusha CIA, Dhaka,
General Manager, Statistics Department, Bangladesh Bank, Head Office, Dhaka and
other concerned agencies.
Fully documented proposals will be placed before the Scrutiny Committee headed by Governor,
Bangladesh Bank for final approval.
Trade Finance & Services
0
Course Outline
Introduction
Product - basics
Imports
Exports
Guarantees
1
TRADE
Concept of self-sufficiency
Extinction of the Barter System due to usage of Money
Developments in transport and hence expansion of the
Economy
2
TRADE PROBLEMS -
SELLER
3
TRADE PROBLEMS -
BUYER
4
Requirements - Buyer and
Seller
Contract fulfillment
Convenience
5
What happens when .?
6
INCOTERMS
contd...
Cost of Merchandise
SELLERS BUYERS
FACTORY PREMISES
Transportation
to Dock
CFR CIF
DOCK OF FOB DOCK OF
TRANSPORTATION IMPORTATION
Loading onto Ocean Freight Marine
Vessel Insurance
7
Payment Methods
Advance Payment
Open Account
Documentary Collection
Letter of Credit
8
Advance Payment
9
CASH IN ADVANCE
10
Open Account
11
OPEN ACCOUNT
contd...
12
Documentary Collections
Risk Remains the same as in open account but the bank gets
the documents without any liability on its part to pay
13
COLLECTIONS
Definition-
14
COLLECTIONS
contd...
Clean Collection-
Collection of financial documents not
accompanied by commercial documents
Documentary Collection-
Collection of:
Financial documents accompanied by commercial
documents
Commercial documents not accompanied by financial
documents
15
Collections -
Document Flow
Seller
Remitting
Bank
Title Docs
Buyer
Collecting
Presenting
Title Docs Bank
17
Documents against
Acceptance
18
Collections -
Funds Flow
Seller
Remitting
Bank
Buyer
Collecting
Presenting
Bank
Seller has no assurance from either the Remitting Bank or the Collection/
Presenting Bank that payment will be made
19
COLLECTIONS
contd...
PARTIES TO A COLLECTION:
The Principal- party entrusting the handling of a collection
to a bank (Exporter)
The Remitting Bank- bank to which the principal has
entrusted the handling of a collection
The Collecting Bank- any bank, other than the remitting
bank, involved in processing the collection
The Presenting Bank- the collecting bank making
presentation to the drawee
The Drawee- is the one to whom presentation is to be
made in accordance with the collection instruction
(Importer)
20
Documentary Collections -
Seller
Risks
Delay in Payment
Buyers Refusal of Shipment
Buyers Bankruptcy
Adverse Effect of Local Customs Regulations
Exchange Control Delays
Considerations
Commercial Risk
Country Risk
Control of Merchandise
21
The Letter of Credit...
22
Letter of Credit -
Advantages
Seller
Creditworthiness of bank replaces that of buyer
Shift the sovereign risk of the buyers country
to a bank
Financing options
Buyer
Seller will not be paid unless his documents
conform to terms and conditions of the LC
Flexible payment terms
23
Letter of Credit -
Risks (1)
Seller
Sellers documents must conform exactly to
the terms and conditions of the letter of credit
to ensure payment.
Buyer
Letters of Credit deal only in documents, not
in goods. The goods may not be as
represented in the documentation
24
Letter of Credit -
Risks (2)
Credit Risk
This is the principle risk in the product, and arises
on the grounds that the importer does not make
payment on the due date. This risk is mitigated as:
LC facilities are a part of the aggregate non
fund based facilities and are extended only
after a detailed Credit Approval process
all documents (unless the Credit Team
approves the exception) are consigned to the
order of the bank, and a full set of documents
are called for under the letter of credit.
25
Letter of Credit -
Risks (3)
26
The Last Word...
27
Parties to an LC
Applicant
Beneficiary
Issuing (opening) Bank
Advising Bank
Paying Bank
Negotiating Bank
Confirming Bank
28
Applicant
29
Beneficiary
Seller
Party or parties in whose favour the LC is
issued.
The recipient of the funds
30
Opening or Issuing bank
31
Advising Bank
32
Paying Bank
33
Negotiating Bank (1)
34
Negotiating Bank (4)
35
Confirming bank
36
Key Terms and
Conditions in an LC
Beneficiary
Amount
Expiration
Last date of shipping
Last date for presentation
37
LC Opening :
Basic Rules
38
LC Opening :
Flow
39
LC RETIREMENT :
FLOW
(6) Docs
NEGOTIATING BANK
ISSUING BANK
(3)
LC Issuance
40
COMMERCIAL DOCUMENTS
contd..
Contains:
A. Date
B. Name and address of the seller and the buyer
C. Order number / contract number / proforma invoice
or LC details
D. Description, quantity and quality of the goods.
E. Terms of sale
F. Port of shipment and port of destination
G. Value of goods, and any adjustments like advance/
discount and the total payment to be made
H. Shipping marks or number on packages identical to those given
in other documents
41
FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
contd...
42
Common discrepancies
during retirement
no evidence of documents
goods shipped on inconsistent
board LC expired
shipments to ports LC overdrawn
other than those in Documents not
LC presented in time
BL not clean late shipment
Insurance does not documents not
cover risks specified endorsed correctly
in LC
benes name /
under-insured address differs
description of goods
in invoice differs
43
Documents in an LC
Commercial Invoice
Bill of Exchange
Insurance
Bill of Lading / Airway Bill
Other - Certificate of origin; Packing List;
Inspection Certificate
44
Liquidity Risk at Banks: Trends and Lessons Learned
from the Recent Turmoil
Jim Armstrong (Bank of Canada) and Gregory Caldwell (Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions)
The market turmoil that began in late 2007 underscored the Liquidity-risk management seeks to ensure a banks ability to
importance of liquidity to the functioning of financial markets continue to perform this fundamental role. While some out-
and the banking sector. Prior to the turmoil, asset markets flows are known with certainty, risk arises from the need to
were buoyant, and low-cost funding was readily available. The meet uncertain cash flow obligations, which depend on exter-
reversal in market conditions illustrated how quickly liquidity nal events and on the behaviour of other agents.
can evaporate, and that illiquidity can last for an extended
period (Basel Committee 2008b). Banking systems around The liquidity situation of an individual bank is ultimately a
the world came under severe stress, necessitating central function of confidence: the confidence of counterparties and
bank actions to support both the functioning of money mar- depositors in the institution and its perceived solvency or cap-
kets and, in some cases, individual institutions. ital adequacy. A liquidity shortfall at a single institution can
have system-wide repercussions, since a withdrawal of confi-
Bank supervisors regularly review the liquidity positions and dence in one institution can spread to others that are per-
liquidity-risk-management practices of banks and provide ceived to be exposed to it or to similar problems.1
banks with liquidity guidelines. The recent turmoil revealed
certain weaknesses in these practices that are now being The distinction is frequently made between funding liquidity
addressed by supervisors globally. risk and market liquidity risk (IIF 2007). Funding liquidity
risk is the risk that the firm will not be able to efficiently meet
Central banksas the ultimate source of liquidityare taking both expected and unexpected current and future cash flows
an enhanced interest in liquidity risk. The recent events have and collateral needs without impairing the daily operations or
highlighted the central bank as key stakeholder in this area. the financial condition of the firm. Market liquidity risk is the
Both the Financial Stability Forum (FSF 2008) report and the risk that a firm cannot easily offset or eliminate a position
September 2008 Basel Committee report on liquidity risk rec- without significantly affecting the market price of the security,
ommend that central banks take a more active role in the area because of inadequate market depth or market disruption. The
of liquidity riskincluding reviewing the liquidity contingency focus of this article is on funding liquidity risk.
plans of banks.
What is unique about liquidity risk?
BANKS AND LIQUIDITY RISK
Prominent economist Charles Goodhart has noted that,
It has been said that liquidity is easier to recognize than Liquidity and solvency are the heavenly twins of banking, fre-
define (Crockett 2008) and that it can be an elusive concept. quently indistinguishable. An illiquid bank can rapidly become
In its barest essentials, however, liquidity is about having insolvent, and an insolvent bank illiquid (Goodhart 2008).
access to cash when you need it. A specific definition of Even though strong capital positions reduce the likelihood of
liquidity pertaining to banks is that it represents the capacity liquidity pressure, apparently solvent banks can experience
of a bank to fund increases in assets and meet obligations as liquidity problems. Although problems with funding liquidity
they come due, without incurring unacceptable losses (Basel at banks can arise at any time, they will be most severe in an
Committee 2008a).
1. It is important to note that significant progress in risk-proofing systemically
important clearing and settlement systems in Canada, such as the LVTS,
The fundamental role of banks typically involves the transfor- CDSX, and CLS Bank, has virtually eliminated the risk that default by one insti-
mation of liquid deposit liabilities into illiquid assets such as tution would spread to others as a result of transactions conducted through
these systems.
loans; this makes banks inherently vulnerable to liquidity risk.
What is a sufficient amount of bank liquidity? This is a difficult At times of severe market stress, sophisticated wholesale
question that depends on a variety of factors. Clearly, there is investors tend to exhibit heightened risk aversion. This was
an opportunity cost to holding liquid assets because they offer made very apparent by the severe funding problems experi-
a very low return, reflecting their low risk and the high demand enced in 2008 by major U.S. investment banks that lacked a
for collateral in the market. Indeed, there is an adage in the stable retail deposit base. At such times, investors can
banking worlda lack of liquidity can kill a bank quickly, demand higher compensation for risk and greater discounts to
whereas too much liquidity can kill a bank slowly. Normally, collateral assets with uncertain cash flows, require banks to
banks hold sufficient liquid assets to stand up to all potential roll over liabilities at considerably shorter maturities, or refuse
cash demands resulting from high-probability, low-severity to extend financing. In these cases, refinancing sources must
events, and to some, but not all, low-probability, high-severity be found quickly to replace the loss of funding.5
2. The broad categories of financial risk that banks are subject to include credit
and counterparty risk, market risk, operational and legal risk, and liquidity risk.
See Aaron, Armstrong, and Zelmer (2007) for an overview of these risks and
their management at the major Canadian banks. 4. These strategies are usually established by the Board of Directors and are exe-
cuted by management and various delegated committees.
3. The severe difficulties and eventual demise of the U.K. bank, Northern Rock, in
2007 (and some other cases globally), underlined how a precipitous loss of 5. Of course, investors must put their funds somewhere during such periods.
confidence in an institutions funding strategy can bring liquidity risk to the They may acquire risk-free assets such as treasury bills, being content to earn a
forefront. Thus, at times, liquidity risk can become a first-order risk. lower return until the crisis subsides.
30 30
Chart 2 shows that, for the major banks, pledged liquid assets
as a share of total liquid assets have risen considerably in
20 20
recent years.
10 10 Chart 2
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Pledged Liquid Assets: Six Major Canadian Banks
Percentage of total liquid assets
Source: OSFI
32 32
30 30
28 28
Securitization
26 26
Canadian banks had tended to rely relatively less on securiti- While the use of collateral mitigates counterparty credit risk, it
zation as a funding source than, for example, their U.S. coun- can aggravate funding liquidity risk because counterparties
terparts. In addition, the government-sponsored Canada have to provide additional collateral at short notice if condi-
Mortgage Bond (CMB) Program for securitizing residential tions change. The more widely collateralization is used, the
mortgages has functioned very well through the turmoil. more significant this risk becomes, especially as market price
movements in hedged portfolios result in changes in the size
Some Canadian banks, however, provided support to some of of counterparty credit exposures. During the recent turmoil,
their own bank-sponsored ABCP that could not be success- shortages of high-quality collateral emerged, prompting
fully refinanced. Some experienced liquidity pressures from special operations by some central banks.7
difficulties with other off-balance-sheet entities such as third-
party ABCP, structured investment vehicles, and other struc- Cross-border flows and global liquidity management
tures that they occasionally chose to support for reputational
reasons.6 Another financial innovation that can complicate the manage-
ment of liquidity risk is the extent of cross-border flows. Large
global financial institutions are increasingly seeking to manage
6. On balance, these developments proved manageable for Canadian banks. This
was because the Canadian banks were in sound financial condition before the
crisis and were able to fund themselves successfully in a range of capital mar- 7. Having access to high-quality collateral did not always guarantee that troubled
kets. See the June 2008 FSR (pp. 21 and 23) for more detail on these develop- institutions could maintain access to wholesale funding, as evidenced by the
ments. case of Bear Stearns.
In September 2008, the Basel Committee published its Prin- Stress testing
ciples for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision.
This report is a major update of a 2000 report that was During the turmoil, many banks failed to consider the possibil-
already under way prior to the crisis, but was refocused to ity of a market-wide stress event, such as the inability to fund
highlight the lessons of recent events. It is expected to have an in either unsecured or secured markets. Stress tests and con-
important impact on supervisory practice in the area of liquid- tingency funding plans (CFPs) were designed under an
ity risk. The report sets out 17 fundamental principles for the assumption that a liquidity crisis would be relatively short-
management and supervision of liquidity risk. Here, we note lived. Furthermore, there was a weak connection between
some of the highlights. stress-test results and the shaping of banks CFPs. The Com-
mittee recommends the use of market-wide scenarios cover-
The first principle of liquidity-risk management (LRM) delin- ing longer time horizons in stress tests, as well as the explicit
eates a balance of responsibilities between banks and linkage of stress-test results to CFPs.
supervisors. The bank is responsible for LRM and should have
a risk-management framework that ensures the availability of Disclosure
a stock of liquid assets sufficient to survive a stress environ-
ment.9 The Basel Committee also recommends improved disclosure,
both quantitative and qualitative, of a banks liquidity-risk
Product pricing profile and management framework.
As the crisis unfolded, it became apparent, in many cases, that THE ROLE OF CENTRAL BANKS
banks had not been properly pricing in the costs of liquidity
risk pertaining to certain products and business strategies. By definition, the central bank is the ultimate provider of
liquidity. Central banks provide liquidity in various contexts to
8. The March 2008 Senior Supervisors Group Report on global risk-management promote the stability and efficient functioning of the financial
practices found that, during the turmoil, some financial institutions had trouble system (Chapman and Martin 2007).
identifying their global liquidity position, and others had overly optimistic
assumptions about the availability of foreign exchange swap markets.
9. Bank boards are responsible for establishing the firm-wide risk tolerance; they Indeed, central banks played a key role following the events of
delegate to senior management the powers to establish an infrastructure nec- August 2007 in facilitating the overall level of and distribution
essary to maintain that risk tolerance. Supervisors are responsible for assess-
ing that framework and should intervene in a timely fashion to address of liquidity in the system. During normal times, central banks
observed deficiencies. tend to focus on the aggregate level of liquidity provided to