Community Involvement in Curriculum: William M. Alexander
Community Involvement in Curriculum: William M. Alexander
in Curriculum
William M. Alexander
in providing resources and agenda for it. The usually been accompanied by strong com
various community school movements, the munity support. On the other side of the
use of school-community councils of several coin, teacher and student strikes, bussing and
types, lay participation in curriculum devel other population shifts, sex education, drug
opment programs and projects, cooperative abuse, and violence have also aroused com
work-experience programs, community study munity groups. Participation in the usual
and service efforts, widespread utilization types of curriculum study groups has been of
of community resources, even community- less interest.
centered curriculum designs, have long been
Second, community involvement is
urged and also reported in curriculum writ
most real and personal at the individual
ings. Yet such current efforts are sometimes
school level. Seeking full participatory repre
hailed as new or revolutionary, and genuine
sentation in educational decision making in
community involvement seems widely lack
Battle Creek, Michigan, in the late 1940's,
ing. Not only, it sometimes seems, are educa
Superintendent Virgil M. Rogers organized
tors unaware of the antecedents of current
an Educational Advisory Council with two
practice, but they may be ignoring principles
lay representatives (president of the school
that could be perennial. Two such principles
PTA and one other parent of the opposite
are suggested here.
sex) of each school in the city. This
First, community involvement is most predominantly lay organization paralleled a
widespread and effective when the issues curriculum council including one teacher
are real and personal. P arents are concerned representative from each school.
about the educational progress of their own Although today one might prefer to
children. People in general are concerned merge these organizations, we found that
about the goals of their schools, what and they worked well in Battle Creek then,
how well the schools do to achieve them, and especially as communication channels be
what education costs. They become con tween the schools. Review of various types
cerned about specific curriculum issues, of councils operating elsewhere during the
building plans, teacher salaries, and zoning past 25 years confirms my belief that district-
arrangements as these matters touch on their wide organizations not based on individual
primary concerns. Successful community school representation tend to lack the vitality
involvement efforts have focused on primary and problem-solving focus of such represen
concerns. tative councils.
When the people of communities in the These observations lead this writer to
South were faced with the problems of a conclude that the starting point for effective
greatly depressed economy in the 1930's, they community involvement in curriculum de
even went to school with their children to velopment is in the real and personal con
learn to cope with the real problems of un cerns of parents and other persons in relation
employment, food preservation, and nutri to a particular school. Whether its students
tion. Victory Gardens and Corps, salvage and live in the neighborhood or are bussed in
rationing, wartime preinduction, and man from a rural area or across the city, the
power training programs were vigorously population is defined and its parents can be
supported in World War II. The turns to identified and consulted. They can be orga
emphases on national defense priorities, nized through homerooms, teams, grades,
physical fitness, compensatory education, and or other arrangements into groups from
other highly publicized social needs have which can be drawn agenda items of concern.