Trieste v. Sandiganbayan, 145 SCRA 508
Trieste v. Sandiganbayan, 145 SCRA 508
ACCUSED: The SolGen under a “Manifestation for Acquittal”, concluded that: (1) petitioner has divested his
interest with Trigen; (2) Sales of stocks need not be reported to Sec; (3) Prosecution failed to prove charges;
(4) No evidence to prove petitioner approved payment; (5) Testimonial and documentary evidence confirms
that petitioner signed vouchers after payment; etc.
HELD: No violation. Petitioner has divested his interest with the company. Petitioner established that before
he assumed office as mayor he had already sold his shares of the company to his sister. The sale was made by
corresponding indorsements to her stock certificate which was duly recorded in the stock and transfer book
of the corporation.
In as much as Treasurer Vega signed and paid the vouchers after the materials were delivered, petitioner's
signature on the vouchers after payment is not, we submit, the kind of intervention contemplated under
Section 3(h) of the anti-graft law is the actual intervention in the transaction in which one has financial or
pecuniary interest in order that liability may attach. The official need not dispose his shares in the
corporation as long as he does not do anything for the firm in its contract with the office. For the law aims to
prevent the dominant use of influence, authority and power.
There is absolutely no evidence that petitioner had, in his capacity as Mayor, used his influence, power, and
authority in having the transactions given to Trigen.