Scribd
Upload
72 views4 pages

Chi-Square Test

The document summarizes the results of several statistical tests conducted to analyze data about a company's recruitment process: 1) A chi-square test was conducted to examine the relationship between a candidate's age and which interview processes they participated in. The results showed a significant relationship between these variables. 2) Correlation and contingency coefficient tests showed a significant relationship between a candidate's educational qualifications and whether they met certain specifications in the recruitment process. 3) A one-way ANOVA test found no significant difference in what attracts candidates to join the organization based on the duration of their face-to-face interview.

Uploaded by

eswari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
72 views4 pages

Chi-Square Test

The document summarizes the results of several statistical tests conducted to analyze data about a company's recruitment process: 1) A chi-square test was conducted to examine the relationship between a candidate's age and which interview processes they participated in. The results showed a significant relationship between these variables. 2) Correlation and contingency coefficient tests showed a significant relationship between a candidate's educational qualifications and whether they met certain specifications in the recruitment process. 3) A one-way ANOVA test found no significant difference in what attracts candidates to join the organization based on the duration of their face-to-face interview.

Uploaded by

eswari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

CHI-SQUARE TEST

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
age * 130 100.0% 0 0.0% 130 100.0%
participatedinanyoftheb
elowinterviewprocess

age * participatedinanyofthebelowinterviewprocess Crosstabulation


Count
participatedinanyofthebelowinterviewprocess Total
Telep Written Video Face to Face Face to Face Group Physical Fitness
honic Examinati Conferenc Personal Technical Discussi / Medical Check
Enqu on e Interview Interview on up
iry Interview
below 0 3 2 1 1 6 2 15
25
26-30 6 6 8 3 0 5 6 34
age 31-35 2 1 3 6 3 6 9 30
36-40 1 2 10 4 6 6 7 36
above 0 1 1 4 1 6 2 15
40
Total 9 13 24 18 11 29 26 130

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 36.848a 24 .045
Likelihood Ratio 39.012 24 .027
Linear-by-Linear 2.368 1 .124
Association
N of Valid Cases 130
a. 26 cells (74.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 1.04.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx.
Sig.
Nominal by Contingency .470 .045
Nominal Coefficient
N of Valid Cases 130

CORRELATION METHOD

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
educationalqualificatio 130 100.0% 0 0.0% 130 100.0%
n*
candidatespecifications
intherecruitmentproces
s

educationalqualification *
candidatespecificationsintherecruitmentprocess Crosstabulation
Count
candidatespecificationsinthe Total
recruitmentprocess
yes no
SSLC 10 18 28
HSC 7 8 15
educationalqualificati
Diploma 27 13 40
on
Graduate 16 11 27
post graduate 4 16 20
Total 64 66 130

Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Approx.
Errora Tb Sig.
Nominal by Contingency .325 .004
Nominal Coefficient
Interval by .012 .087 .134 .894c
Pearson's R
Interval
Spearman .020 .090 .222 .825c
Ordinal by Ordinal
Correlation
N of Valid Cases 130
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

ONE WAY ANOVA TEST

ANOVA
attractsyoutojointhisorganization
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between 7.227 2 3.613 .991 .374
Groups
Within Groups 463.081 127 3.646
Total 470.308 129

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: attractsyoutojointhisorganization
Tukey HSD
(I) (J) Mean Std. Sig. 95% Confidence Interval
durationoftheFacetoF durationoftheFacetoF Difference Error Lower Upper
aceinterviewprocess aceinterviewprocess (I-J) Bound Bound
>10 min and <20 min -.56098 .42174 .381 -1.5611 .4392
Less than 10 min
More than 30 min -.44055 .40608 .525 -1.4036 .5225
Less than 10 min .56098 .42174 .381 -.4392 1.5611
>10 min and <20 min
More than 30 min .12043 .40608 .953 -.8426 1.0834
Less than 10 min .44055 .40608 .525 -.5225 1.4036
More than 30 min
>10 min and <20 min -.12043 .40608 .953 -1.0834 .8426
attractsyoutojointhisorganization
Tukey HSDa,b
durationoftheFacetoFac N Subset for
einterviewprocess alpha = 0.05
1
Less than 10 min 41 4.1220
More than 30 min 48 4.5625
>10 min and <20 min 41 4.6829
Sig. .363
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are
displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 43.095.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic
mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error
levels are not guaranteed.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy