0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views70 pages

Water Catchment Analysis

This document provides the design of a water catchment and reservoir system. It analyzes the annual and monthly water demand of the project area based on population data. It then assesses the available water from rainfall on the catchment area. Using the mass curve and iterative methods, it sizes the reservoir at 75 cubic meters to meet demand. Pipeline hydraulic analysis criteria include handling peak flow, minimum pressures, maximum velocities, and flow per connection. The optimal pipe sizes, layout and potential tank locations will be determined.

Uploaded by

jay-ar Maravilla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views70 pages

Water Catchment Analysis

This document provides the design of a water catchment and reservoir system. It analyzes the annual and monthly water demand of the project area based on population data. It then assesses the available water from rainfall on the catchment area. Using the mass curve and iterative methods, it sizes the reservoir at 75 cubic meters to meet demand. Pipeline hydraulic analysis criteria include handling peak flow, minimum pressures, maximum velocities, and flow per connection. The optimal pipe sizes, layout and potential tank locations will be determined.

Uploaded by

jay-ar Maravilla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 70

Water Catchment Design Planning and Design WS

Annex 2

Name of Sub-Project
Sub-project Type Water Catchment Source WS
Municipality
Province
Region

I DESIGN OF RESERVOIR:

A. Annual and Monhtly Water Demand

Criteria:
Particular Description Data Unit
Number of Household Actual number of household beneficiaries 16 HH
Average Household Member 6 members 5 No.
Total Population (No. of HH)(Ave. HH Member) 80 No.
Average Population Growth Rate Percent annualy 0.02 %
Design Lifespan No. of years 10 Years
Design Population (Total Popln)(1+PGR)^life span 98 No.
Average Daily Water Demand liters per capita per day 7 Liter
per Capita per Day
Annual Demand in liters (Design population)(ADWD/capita/day)(3 249,162.46 Liter
Average Monthly Demand in liters AD/12 20,763.54 Liters
20.76 CuM
B. Available Water Assessment from Rainfall Data

Rainfall Data in Roof Area (19 m % to be


Month mm x 10.5m) collected Total Available Water
January 115.8 199.5 0.8 18,481.68
February 50.5 199.5 0.8 8,059.80
March 38.1 199.5 0.8 6,080.76
April 45 199.5 0.8 7,182.00
May 86.7 199.5 0.8 13,837.32
June 185.6 199.5 0.8 29,621.76
July 197.9 199.5 0.8 31,584.84
August 174 199.5 0.8 27,770.40
September 182.7 199.5 0.8 29,158.92
October 229.9 199.5 0.8 36,692.04
November 178.5 199.5 0.8 28,488.60
December 120.2 199.5 0.8 19,183.92
Total 256,142.04

C. Demand Supply Analysis (Mass Curve Method)


Cumulative Monthly
Available Water Cumulative Supply Less
Month Supply Demand Demand Remarks
January 18,481.68 20,763.54 (2,281.86)
February 26,541.48 41,527.08 (14,985.60)
March 32,622.24 62,290.61 (29,668.37)
April 39,804.24 83,054.15 (43,249.91)
May 53,641.56 103,817.69 (50,176.13) Basis for Reservoir Size
June 83,263.32 124,581.23 (41,317.91)
July 114,848.16 145,344.77 (30,496.61)
August 142,618.56 166,108.31 (23,489.75)
September 171,777.48 186,871.84 (15,094.36)
October 208,469.52 207,635.38 834.14
November 236,958.12 228,398.92 8,559.20
December 256,142.04 249,162.46 6,979.58

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT
Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----1of 2
Water Catchment Design Planning and Design WS

D. ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Reservoir dimension

(r.cap.)^
Dimension 1/3 = 3.69 cum
use
Length 3.69 = 3.69 m. 4.00 m.
Breadth 3.69 = 3.69 m. 4.00 m.
Height 3.69 = 3.99 m. 4.00 m.
Freeboard 0.20
Dead vol. Ht. 0.10

Therefore width length height


Use reservoir dimension = 4.00 4.00 4.00
Actual reservoir capacity = 59.20 cu.m.

E. Demand Supply Analysis (Iterative Method)

Trial 1 Trial 2

Available Water Monthly Water Surplus/Deficit


Month Supply (liters) Demand (liters) (cum) 41,527.08 53,290.66
January 18,481.68 20,763.54 (2,281.86) 39,245.22 51,008.80
February 8,059.80 20,763.54 (12,703.74) 26,541.48 38,305.07
March 6,080.76 20,763.54 (14,682.78) 11,858.70 23,622.29
April 7,182.00 20,763.54 (13,581.54) (1,722.84) 10,040.75
May 13,837.32 20,763.54 (6,926.22) (8,649.05) 3,114.53
June 29,621.76 20,763.54 8,858.22 209.17 11,972.75
July 31,584.84 20,763.54 10,821.30 11,030.47 22,794.05
August 27,770.40 20,763.54 7,006.86 18,037.33 29,800.92
September 29,158.92 20,763.54 8,395.38 26,432.71 38,196.30
October 36,692.04 20,763.54 15,928.50 42,361.21 53,290.66
November 28,488.60 20,763.54 7,725.06 50,086.28 53,290.66
December 19,183.92 20,763.54 (1,579.62) 48,506.66 51,711.04

Trial 1 Assume volume to be twice the average monthly required volume which is 20.76 cum x 2 equals 41.53 cum.
Trial 2 Assume volume would be the highet deficit (in May) plus the desired retention volume of about 10 to 15% and the sum
is then added to the first trial volume. Trial 2 assume volume = 8.65 + 3.11 + 41.53 equals 53.29 cum.

Retention Volume 20,763.54 15% 3,114.53

Reservoir dimension

(r.cap.)^
Dimension 1/3 = 3.76 cum
use
Length 3.76 = 3.76 m. 4.00 m.
Breadth 3.76 = 3.76 m. 4.00 m.
Height 3.76 = 4.06 m. 5.00 m.
Freeboard 0.20
Dead vol. Ht. 0.10

Therefore width length height


Use reservoir dimension = 4.00 4.00 5.00
Actual reservoir capacity = 75.20 cu.m.

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT
Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----2of 2
Water Catchment Design Planning and Design WS

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT
Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----3of 2
Water Catchment Design Planning and Design WS

Remarks

Surplus

about 10 to 15% and the sum

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT
Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----4of 2
Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis
Planning and Design WS

ANNEX 1

II -PIPELINE DESIGN ANALYSIS:

Design criteria

The pipeline must be designed to handle the maximum hour demand or Peak Flow (PF)=2.5ADD of the area to be served
Minimun pressure at the remotest end of the system should be 3.0 meters (Approx. 4.26 psi) and 7.0 meters at the
mainline
Maximum Velocity of flow in the pipes:
a. Main pipes… 3.0 meters per second
b. Distribution pipes… 1.5 meters per second
Water flow per tapstand ranges from 0.125 lps to 0.225 lps

Additional: Consider most economical pipe size and layout

Additonal: Best location of tank ( if any)

A. Pipeline Design Input/Output


Pipeline Section Household Peak Node Pipe Pipe Headloss Actual
Section Node Length Served Flow Elev. Diameter Diameter per Headloss
from to Difference Option 100 m.
(m) (no.) (lps) (m) (mm) (mm) (m) (m)
a b c d e f g h i j k
a 1 2 500 10 0.012 4 7.9337 25 1.2775 6.3875
b 2 3 10 6 0.007 0.5 4.4829 13 14.55 1.455
c 2 4 1200 16 0.020 16 8.6448 25 3.072 36.864
d 4 5 20 10 0.012 1 5.4992 19 5.15 1.03
e 4 6 240 26 0.032 13 7.9312 25 7.565 18.156
f 6 7 320 12 0.015 23 5.5011 19 7.25 23.2
g 7 8 200 6 0.007 1 7.1050 25 0.5 1
h 6 9 60 38 0.047 2 10.1726 31 11.715 7.029
i 9 10 100 12 0.015 5 5.9153 19 7.25 7.25
j 9 11 710 Reservoir 0.118 15 16.1170 19 2.872 20.3912
50
B. Pipeline Analysis
Branch Node Remarks Residual Remarks
No. of Household Total Headloss Compare Elev Head Accept Head (Hr)
1-2 10 6.3875 > 4 ? (2.39) critical
2-3 6 1.455 > 0.5 ? (0.96) critical
2-4 16 36.864 > 16 ? (20.86) critical
1-2-4 16 43.2515 > 20 ? (23.25) critical
2-3-4 16 38.319 > 16.5 ? (21.82) critical
4-5 10 1.03 > 1 ? (0.03) critical
4-6 26 18.156 > 13 ? (5.16) critical
1-2-4-6 26 61.4075 > 33 ? (28.41) critical
2-3-4-6 26 56.475 > 29.5 ? (26.98) critical
4-5-6 26 19.186 > 14 ? (5.19) critical
6-7 12 23.2 > 23 ? (0.20) critical
7-8 6 1 = 1 ? - critical
6-7-8 12 24.2 > 24 ? (0.20) critical
6-9 38 7.029 > 2 ? (5.03) critical
6-7-8-9 38 31.229 > 26 ? (5.23) critical
1-2-4-6-9 38 68.4365 > 35 ? (33.44) critical
2-3-4-6-9 38 63.504 > 31.5 ? (32.00) critical
4-5-6-9 38 26.215 > 16 ? (10.22) critical
9-10 12 7.25 > 5 ? (2.25) critical
9-11 Reservoir 20.3912 > 15 ? (5.39) critical
Recommendation:
For all the branch nodes, the total headloss is greater than the elevation head. It is therefore
recommended to increase the diameter of pipe to effect efficient flow in the system.(?) reject

Column Description:
Column Description
a Pipe section under consideration
b-c Node section under consideration
d Length of pipe section under consideration (meter)
e Number of household served
f Computed Peak Flow (liter per second)
g Difference in elevation between nodes under consideration (meter)
h Computed Pipe Diameter (mm), using the Darcy Weisbach Formula
i Nominal Diameter available in the market (mm)
j Headloss per 100 meters (refer to table 9.1 or 9.2)
k Actual Headloss

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis for Annex 1 5of 4


Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis
Planning and Design WS

Formula:

Column f:

PF = 2.5 x GRF x N x Average Household Size x PCWC / 86,400

Where:

PF = Peak flow.
GRF = Growth rate factor (1+GR)^life span
N = Total number of household served by the pipe section.
PCWC = Per capita water consumption.

Column h:

HF = (8)(f)(L)(Q)^2/D^5(g)(pi)^2
D^5 =(8)(f)(L)(Q)^2/HF(g)(pi)^2

Where:

HF = Headloss or the difference in elevation between the pipe in


consideration.
F = Coefficient of friction (approximately 0.02).
L = Length of pipe section in consideration.
Q = Water discharge.
D =Pipe diameter (mm).
g =gravitational value (9.81)
pi =3.1415

Simplifying:

D^5 = (0.00165(L)(Q/1000)^2/HF)(1000) (mm)


= (0.00165(Column d)(Column f/1000)^2/(Column g))(1000)

Column j:

From table 9.1 or 9.2, (interpolate when necessary).

Column k:

Actual Headloss = (Headloss per 100 M)(Section Length)/100 (m)


= (Column j)(Column d)/100

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis for Annex 1 6of 4


Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis
Planning and Design WS

III -PIPELINE DESIGN ADJUSTMENT:

A. Pipeline Design Input/Output


Pipeline Section Household Peak Node Pipe Pipe Headloss Actual
Section Node Length Served Flow Elev. Diameter Diameter per Headloss
from to Difference Option 100 m.
(m) (no.) (lps) (m) (mm) (mm) (m) (m)
a b c d e f g h i j k
a 1 2 500 10 0.012 4 7.9337 31 0.4525 2.2625
b 2 3 10 6 0.007 0.5 4.4829 19 1.96 0.196
c 2 4 1200 16 0.020 16 8.6448 31 1.036 12.432
d 4 5 20 10 0.012 1 5.4992 25 1.2775 0.2555
e 4 6 240 26 0.032 13 7.9312 31 2.5655 6.1572
f 6 7 320 12 0.015 23 5.5011 25 1.795 5.744
g 7 8 200 6 0.007 1 7.1050 31 0.1725 0.345
h 6 9 60 38 0.047 2 10.1726 38 2.1155 1.2693
i 9 10 100 12 0.015 5 5.9153 25 1.795 1.795
j 9 11 710 Reservoir 0.118 15 16.1170 25 0.7 4.97

B. Pipeline Analysis (checking by comparing the Total HL and Elevation Head and check Minimum Residual Head)
Branch Node Remarks Residual Remarks
No. of Household Total Headloss Compare Elev Head Accept Head (Hr)
1-2 10 2.2625 < 4 OK 1.74 critical
2-3 6 0.196 < 0.5 OK 0.30 critical
2-4 16 12.432 < 16 OK 3.57
1-2-4 16 14.6945 < 20 OK 5.31
2-3-4 16 12.628 < 16.5 OK 3.87
4-5 10 0.2555 < 1 OK 0.74 critical
4-6 26 6.1572 < 13 OK 6.84
1-2-4-6 26 20.8517 < 33 OK 12.15
2-3-4-6 26 18.7852 < 29.5 OK 10.71
4-5-6 26 6.4127 < 14 OK 7.59
6-7 12 5.744 < 23 OK 17.26
7-8 6 0.345 < 1 OK 0.66 critical
6-7-8 12 6.089 < 24 OK 17.91
6-9 38 1.2693 < 2 OK 0.73 critical
6-7-8-9 38 7.3583 < 26 OK 18.64
1-2-4-6-9 38 22.121 < 35 OK 12.88
2-3-4-6-9 38 20.0545 < 31.5 OK 11.45
4-5-6-9 38 7.682 < 16 OK 8.32
9-10 12 1.795 < 5 OK 3.21
9-11 Reservoir 4.97 < 15 OK 10.03
The total headloss is less than the elevation head and therefore accept adjusted size but there are still critical nodes
with < 3m residual head (Hr)

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis for Annex 1 7of 4


Planning and Design WS
Schematic Diagram/Project Area Map

ANNEX 1

Schematic Diagram of
_________________________________Subproject

SPRING BOX
11 (elev = 750 m) (PUROK /SITIO_______)

710 m.
j
F6
i 10 (elev = 730 m)
100 m. HH = 12
RESERVOIR
(elev = 735 m) 9
60 m.
h
6 (elev = 733 m)

f
320 m. 240 m.
e
(elev = 709 m) 7 (elev = 710 m)
HH = 6 8 HH = 6 d
F5 g 200 m. F4 (elev = 720 m) 4 20 m. 5 F3
F3
(elev = 719 m)
HH = 10
(PUROK/SITIO__________)

c 1,200 m.

10 m.
(elev = 704 m) 2 b 3 F2
(elev = 703.5 m)
Preparation of schematic diagram as basis for pipeline design: HH = 6
Steps:
1. Locate tapstand and name it F1…n starting from farthest
to the reservoir and or water source.
2. Determine the number of nodes and name it in numbers a 500 m.
starting from farthest to the reservoir and or water source.
3. Determine the number of sections and name it in letters
starting from farthest to the reservoir and or water source. (PUROK/SITIO_____)
4. Indicate the number of HH per tapstand, the elevation of
the nodes, the length of the sections from survey results. HH = 10
5. Design for the pipe diameter of the sections (see pipeline analysis) 1 (elev = 700 m)
and indicate final pipe sizes in the schematic diagram.
F1

KALAHI-CIDSS Subproject Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.


PROJECT SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
Sheet Title
Location Checked Schematic Diagram
Scale Sheet No.
NTS

KALAHI-CIDSS
Planning and Design WS
Schematic Diagram/Project Area Map

ANNEX 1

PROJECT AREA MAP

Prepare a map showing the area to be served and the location of the source(s) of water. It should be drawn to a
convenient scale or with measurements of distance between important structures along roads and pathways.
Include elevation. Indicate houses, schools, churches, markets, existing water systems, public faucets, reservoir
and other important land features.

Legend

House
School
Church

Public faucet
Existing pipeline
Proposed pipeline
R Reservoir
Gate valve
Check Valve
Reducer
Clinic
Contours
º123 Elevations
S Spring Box

KALAHI-CIDSS Subproject Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.


PROJECT Project Area Map
Sheet Title
Location Checked Project Area Map
Scale Sheet No.
NTS

KALAHI-CIDSS
PUMP DESIGN

Pump Water Horse


Data Capacity Power Brake Horse
Design Parameters Parameters lps Power
a b c d e
1.Drawdown (m) 2
2.Static Water Level (SWL) (m) 8
3.Pumping Water Level (drawdown+SWL) (m) 10
4.Height of Discharge Point Level (m) 8
5.Suction and transmission Discharge Friction
Headloss (HL) 24.71
TDH (3+4+5) 42.71 2.17 1.22 3.05
Pump operation (hours) 12
Number of Household 149
Ave. person per HH 6
Growth Rate Factor 0.03
Design Period 10
Design Population 1,201.46
Water Consumption per capita per day 60
Average Daily Demand (ADD) (lit/day) 72,087.67
Maximum day demand (lps) * 1.3 1.08

Data from Georesistivity Survey or from Pumping Test Result of Existing Wells or from Newly Bored Well:

1. Target Well Discharge (lps) 3


2. Total Dynamic Head (m) 10.3
3. Well depth (m) 12

Design Consideration:
Case I : Fixed maximum well yield and target household, adjust pumping hour.
Case II: Fixed maximum pumping hour to 12 and target household, locate sufficient well yield on site.
Case III: Fixed maximum well yield and 12 hour pumping, adjust target household.
Formula:
1. Pump Capacity: Q=maximum day demand* 24 hours / 12 hours pumping
2. Break Horsepower: BHP= Q * TDH * g/ e / 0.746 / 1000
3. Actual Discharge: Qactual= BHP * e * .746 *1000 / g / TDH

Where : g = gravitational factor 9.81


e = pump efficiency 40%

4. Height of discharge point is the difference in elevation of reservoir (maximum water level) and the pump

5. The headloss computation will be referred to table 9.1 & 9.2


Solve for initial size of transmission pipe Q=AV
assume V= 3 m/s
A=1/4 (pie) d^2

d= (4*Q/3.14*V)^.5
Q (lps) V (m/s) d (mm)
2.17 3 30.34

Refer to headloss table per 100 meters and equivalent length of connection accessories:

Headloss/10 Length of
Q (lps) d (mm) 0 (m) Pipe (m)
2.17 38 8.4 50

Equivalent
Length per
For 13 mm diameter Accessories Connection Type Number pc
Elbow 45 deg 3 0.24
90 deg 5 0.55
Tee 1.04
Faucet 4.88
Gate Valve 0.11
Globe Valve 4.88
Angle Valve 2.56
Foot Valve 1.22
Check Valve 1.16
Strainer 3.05
Total

Equivalent
Length per
For 25 mm diameter Accessories Connection Type Number pc
Elbow 45 deg 0.41
90 deg 0.84
Tee 12 1.77
Faucet 0
Gate Valve 0.18
Globe Valve 8.23
Angle Valve 4.57
Foot Valve 1.83
Check Valve 1.98
Strainer 4.27
Total
Note: insert for the other sizes

Analysis:
Compare the Design Pump Discharge and the Well Capacity if there is a need for reservoir.

Equivalent Length of Connections for the Computation of Headlosses


Nominal
Diameter in
mm 90 deg Elbow 45 deg Elbow Tee
13 0.55 0.24 1.04
19 0.69 0.3 1.37
25 0.84 0.41 1.77
32 1.14 0.52 2.29
38 1.36 0.61 2.74
50 1.62 0.76 3.66
63 1.98 0.91 4.27
75 2.5 1.16 4.88
100 3.35 1.52 6.71
150 5.03 2.04 9.76
Type of Pump
f g h
TDH Q (actual) BHP

42.71 1.07 1.5


Equivalen Total
t Length Length Total HL
(elbows) (m) (m)
24.71 74.71 627.564

Equivalen
t Length
(elbows)
0.72
2.75
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.47

Equivalen
t Length
(elbows)
0
0
21.24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21.24

utation of Headlosses
Faucet Foot Valve Check
Gate Valve Globe Valve Angle Valve Fully Fully Valve
Fully Open Fully Open Fully Open Open Open Strainer Fully open
0.11 4.88 2.56 4.88 1.22 3.05 1.16
0.14 6.4 3.66 6.4 1.52 3.66 1.58
0.18 8.23 4.57 1.83 4.27 1.98
0.24 11.28 5.49 2.13 4.88 2.74
0.29 13.71 6.71 2.44 5.49 3.35
0.38 16.76 8.54 2.74 6.1 4.27
0.43 19.61 10.06 3.05 6.71 5.18
0.53 25.9 12.8 3.66 7.62 5.79
0.7 33.54 12.8 4.57 9.15 7.62
1.01 48.78 24.39 6.42 12.21 11.59
Fricstion Headloss Table Planning and Design WS

Q PIPE SIZE (mm)


LPS 13 19 25 31 38 50 63 75 100 150
0.01 0.1
0.02 0.4
0.03 0.8 0.11
0.04 1.4 0.19
0.05 2.1 0.3
0.06 3 0.41 0.1
0.07 4 0.5 0.13
0.08 5 0.65 0.17
0.09 6.3 0.82 0.22
0.10 7.6 1.06 0.26
0.11 9.1 1.18 0.31 0.11
0.12 10.7 1.5 0.36 0.13
0.14 2 0.48 0.17
0.15 2.1 0.55 0.18
0.16 2.5 0.62 0.22
0.18 3.1 0.77 0.27 0.101
0.20 3.8 0.94 0.32 0.131
0.25 5.8 1.42 0.48 0.2
0.30 2 0.67 0.23
0.40 3.4 1.15 0.47 0.12
0.50 5.1 1.74 0.71 0.18
0.60 7.2 2.4 1 0.25
0.70 3.2 1.33 0.33 0.11
0.80 4.1 1.7 0.42 0.14
1.00 6.3 2.6 0.64 0.21 0.089
1.20 8.8 3.6 0.89 0.3 0.124
1.40 4.4 1.2 0.4 0.165
1.50 4.9 1.35 0.44 0.187
1.60 5.5 1.52 0.51 0.211
1.80 7.35 1.88 0.64 0.262
2.00 8.4 2.3 0.77 0.32 0.079
2.50 3.5 1.2 0.48 0.119
3.00 4.95 1.65 0.68 0.166
3.50 6.95 2.19 0.9 0.221
4.00 9.2 3 1.15 0.284
4.50 11.85 3.6 1.43 0.353
5.00 4.5 1.74 0.429 0.06
6.00 6.2 2.44 0.6 0.09
7.00 8.6 3.2 0.8 0.11
8.00 4.15 1.2 0.14
10.00 6.5 1.55 0.21

FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN METERS PER 100 METERS


PLASTIC PIPE - PVC, PE, PB

TABLE 9.1
FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN PLASTIC PIPES

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reference for Annex 1-----16of 3


Fricstion Headloss Table Planning and Design WS

Q PIPE SIZE (mm)


LPS 13 19 25 31 38 50 63 75 100 150
0.01 0.2
0.02 0.8
0.03 1.6 0.22
0.04 2.8 0.38
0.05 4.2 0.6
0.06 6 0.82 0.2
0.07 8 1 0.26
0.08 10 1.3 0.34
0.09 12.6 1.64 0.44 0.15
0.10 15.2 2.12 0.52 0.18
0.11 18.2 2.36 0.62 0.22
0.12 21.4 3 0.72 0.26
0.14 4 0.96 0.34 0.13
0.15 4.2 1.1 0.36 0.15
0.16 5 1.24 0.44 0.16
0.18 6.2 1.54 0.54 0.202
0.20 7.6 1.88 0.64 0.262 0.7
0.25 11.6 2.84 0.96 0.4 0.1
0.30 4 1.34 0.46 0.14
0.40 6.8 2.3 0.94 0.24
0.50 10.2 3.48 1.42 0.36 0.12
0.60 14.4 4.8 2 0.5 0.17 0.7
0.70 6.4 2.66 0.66 0.22 0.91
0.80 8.2 3.4 0.84 0.28 0.117
1.00 12.6 5.2 1.28 0.42 0.177
1.20 17.6 7.2 1.78 0.6 0.248
1.40 8.8 2.4 0.8 0.33
1.50 9.8 2.7 0.88 0.374
1.60 11 3.04 1.02 0.422 0.104
1.80 14.7 3.76 1.28 0.524 0.129
2.00 16.8 4.6 1.54 0.64 0.157
2.50 7 2.4 0.96 0.238
3.00 9.9 3.3 1.36 0.332
3.50 13.9 4.38 1.8 0.442
4.00 18.4 6 2.3 0.368
4.50 23.7 7.2 2.86 0.706
5.00 9 3.48 0.858 0.12
6.00 12.4 4.88 1.2 0.17
7.00 17.2 6.4 1.6 0.22
8.00 8.3 2.4 0.28
10.00 13 3.1 0.42

FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN METERS PER 100 METERS


GALVANIZED IRON PIPE (GIP)

TABLE 9.2
FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN GI PIPES

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reference for Annex 1-----17of 3


Fricstion Headloss Table Planning and Design WS

RESISTANCE OF VALVE AND FITTINGS*

13 0.55 0.24 1.04 0.11 4.88 2.56 4.88 1.22 3.05 1.16
19 0.69 0.3 1.37 0.14 6.4 3.66 6.4 1.52 3.66 1.58
25 0.84 0.41 `1.77 0.18 8.23 4.57 1.83 4.27 1.98
32 1.14 0.52 2.29 0.24 11.28 5.49 2.13 4.88 2.74
38 1.36 0.61 2.74 0.29 13.71 6.71 2.44 5.49 3.35
50 1.62 0.76 3.66 0.38 16.76 8.54 2.74 6.1 4.27
63 1.98 0.91 4.27 0.43 19.61 10.06 3.05 6.71 5.18
75 2.5 1.16 4.88 0.53 25.9 12.8 3.66 7.62 5.79
100 3.35 1.52 6.71 0.7 33.54 12.8 4.57 9.15 7.62
150 5.03 2.04 9.76 1.01 48.78 24.39 6.42 12.21 11.59
EQUIVQLENT LENGTH STRAIGHT PIPE METERS

*WHEN THE LENGTH OF PIPE IS GREATER THAN 1000 TIMES ITS DIAMETER, THE LOSS OF HEAD DUE TO VALVES AND
AND FITTINGS MAYBE DISREGARDED.

EQUIVALENT LENGTH OF PIPE FITTINGS, VALVES, ETC.

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reference for Annex 1-----18of 3


Fricstion Headloss Table Planning and Design WS

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reference for Annex 1-----19of 3


Fricstion Headloss Table Planning and Design WS

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reference for Annex 1-----20of 3


Fricstion Headloss Table Planning and Design WS

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reference for Annex 1-----21of 3


CONSTANT DISCHARGE AQUIFER PUMPING TEST DATA

Name of Sub-project :
Location :
Well No./Name :
Well Depth :
Pump Type :
Pump Setting :
Static Water Level :
Time Pump Started :
Time Pump Stopped :

CLOCK Time After FLOW WATER DRAW SPECIFIC REMARKS


READING Pump Started (Q) LEVEL DOWN CAPACITY
min. lps m m lps/m
0
0.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
14
16
18
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
420
480
540
600
660
720
780
840
900
960
1020
1080
1140
1200
1260
1320
1380
1440

Pumping Test Conducted by: Noted:


RECOVERY TEST DATA

Name of Project :
Location :
Well No./Name :
Well Depth :
Static Water Level :
Recovery Started :
Recovery Stopped :

CLOCK Time After Time After WATER RESIDUAL REMARKS


RATIO
TIME Pump Started Pump Stopped LEVEL DDOWN
t(minutes) t' (minutes) (t/t') m m
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1452
1454
1456
1458
1460
1465
1470
1475
1480
1485
1490
1500
1510
1520
1530
1540
1550
1560
1590
1620
1650
1680
1710
1740
1770
1800
1860
1920
1980
2040
2100
2160
2220
2280
2340
2400
2460
2520
2580
2640
2700
2760
2820
2880
2940

Recovery Test Conducted by: Noted:


Detailed Estimates

ANNEX 1a
FORMAT OF DETAILED COST ESTIMATES

The presentation of the materials, labor and equipment in details is helpful when implementing the subproject by community force
account.
ITEM RESERVOIR ( 8 cu.m. )

A. MATERIALS
1) Computation of Quantities and Costing
Particular Compu Material Quantity Unit TOTAL
Description Specs. Factor ted Compu- Say Unit Cost Cost
Volume ted (P) (P)
Concrete Class "A" (1:2:4) 3.26 cu.m
Plaster (1:2) 0.3 cu.m
Portland cement 40 kg. 38 bag 140.00 5,320.00
Sand 0.5 2.13 cu.m 250.00 532.50
Gravel 1 3.3 cu.m 350.00 1,155.00
Sahara compound D.C. 35 pack 22.00 770.00
RSB 10 mm x 6 m D.C. 41 pc. 70.00 2,870.00
12 mm x 6 m D.C. 23 pc. 77.00 1,771.00
G.I. wire Gauge # 16 D.C. 3 kg. 43.00 129.00
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' D.C. 18 sheet 375.00 6,750.00
Rough lumber 2" x 2" x 8' D.C. 50 pc. 53.00 2,650.00
Common nails #4 D.C. 25 kg. 30.00 750.00
# 1-1/2 D.C. 3 kg. 35.00 105.00
TOTAL 22,802.50

B. LABOUR COST
Productivity rate ( Excavation ) 1.6 cu.m./m-day
Productivity rate ( Concrete works ) 0.14 cu.m./m-day
Particular Quantity Gang Activity Duration Rate Total
Description Manpower Required Output Compu- Say per Day Labour
ted Cost
Excavation 3.76
Supervisor 1 12.8 0.29375 1 250.00 250.00
Laborer 8 1 150.00 1,200.00
Form works
Supervisor 1 6 250.00 1,500.00
Carpenter 2 6 225.00 2,700.00
Laborer 8 6 150.00 7,200.00
Steel works
Supervisor 1 3 250.00 750.00
Steelperson 2 3 225.00 1,350.00
Laborer 8 3 150.00 3,600.00
Concrete works 3.26
Supervisor 1 1.4 2.328571429 3 250.00 750.00
Mason 2 3 225.00 1,350.00
Laborer 8 3 150.00 3,600.00

TOTAL 13 24,250.00

C. SUMMARY OF ITEM COST


Work No. of No. of Funding TOTAL Percent
Particular Duration Manpower MD Inkind CASH Weight
(P) (%)
MATERIALS
Lumpsum - 22,802.50 22,802.50 48%
LABOUR
Skilled 3 - 8,650.00 8,650.00 18%
Unskilled 8 - 15,600.00 15,600.00 33%
TOTAL 13 11 - 47,052.50 47,052.50 100%

Note: cost not current

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT 26 of 7
Detailed Estimates

ITEM SPRING BOX ( Improvement )

A. MATERIALS
1) Computation of Quantities and Costing
Particular Compu Material Quantity Unit TOTAL
Description Specs. Factor ted Compu- Say Unit Cost Cost
Volume ted (P) (P)
Concrete Class "A" (1:2:4) 0.224
Portland cement 40 kg. 9 2.016 2.5 bag 140.00 350.00
Sand 0.5 0.112 0.15 cu.m 250.00 37.50
Gravel 1 0.224 0.25 cu.m 350.00 87.50
Sahara compund D.C. 2 pack 22.00 44.00
RSB 10 mm x 6 m D.C. 6 pc. 70.00 420.00
G.I. Tie wire Gauge # 16 D.C. 0.5 kg. 43.00 21.50
Forms Re-use from reservoir construction
Common nail Re-use from reservoir construction
TOTAL 960.50

B. LABOUR COST
Particular Quantity Gang Activity Duration Rate Total
Description Manpower Required Output Compu- Say per Day Labour
ted Cost
Form works
Supervisor 1 1 250.00 250.00
Carpenter 1 1 225.00 225.00
Laborer 4 1 150.00 600.00
Steel works
Supervisor 1 1 250.00 250.00
Steelperson 1 1 225.00 225.00
Laborer 4 1 150.00 600.00
Concrete works
Supervisor 1 2 250.00 500.00
Mason 1 2 225.00 450.00
Laborer 4 2 150.00 1,200.00
Removal of old pipe,
installation of new
Supervisor 1 1 250.00 250.00
Mason 1 1 225.00 225.00
Laborer 4 1 150.00 600.00
Ditching
Supervisor 1 1 250.00 250.00
Laborer 4 1 150.00 600.00

TOTAL 6 6,225.00

C. SUMMARY OF ITEM COST


Work No. of No. of Funding TOTAL Percent
Particular Duration Manpower MD Inkind CASH Weight
(P) (%)
MATERIALS
Lumpsum - 960.50 960.50 13%
LABOUR
Skilled 2 - 2,625.00 2,625.00 37%
Unskilled 4 - 3,600.00 3,600.00 50%
TOTAL 6 6 - 7,185.50 7,185.50 100%

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT 27 of 7
Detailed Estimates

ITEM PIPELINE

A. MATERIALS
1) Computation of Quantities and Costing
Particular Pipeline Section Quantity Unit Total
Unit Section/ Length Compu- Cost Cost
Description Specs. Location ted Say
(m) (P) (P)
Pipes and fittings
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. a 500 83.33 84 550.00 46,200.00
G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. a 7.33 8 88.00 704.00
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. a 75 32.00 2,400.00
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. a 1 42.00 42.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 13 mm pc. a 1 30.00 30.00
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. a 1 20.00 20.00
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. a 0.5 184.00 92.00
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. a 1 12.00 12.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 13 mm pc. a 2 15.00 30.00
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. a 1 65.00 65.00

G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 19 mm pc. b 1 28.00 28.00


G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 19 mm x 6 m pc. b 10 1.67 2 285.00 570.00
G.I. Coupling 19 mm pc. b 1 20.00 20.00
G.I. Union patente 19 mm pc. b 1 47.00 47.00
G.I. Tee 19 x 19 mm pc. b 1 24.00 24.00
G.I. Plug 19 mm pc. b 1 8.00 8.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 19 x 13 mm pc. b 1 20.00 20.00
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. b 0.5 184.00 92.00
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. b 1 12.00 12.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 13 mm pc. b 2 15.00 30.00
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. b 1 65.00 65.00

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. c 1,200 200.00 200 468.00 93,600.00


G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. c 19.00 19 88.00 1,672.00
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. c 180 32.00 5,760.00
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. c 1 42.00 42.00

G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 25 mm pc. d 1 26.00 26.00


G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. d 20 3.33 4 332.00 1,328.00
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. d 1 62.00 62.00
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. d 2 24.00 48.00
G.I. Tee 25 x 25 mm pc. d 1 32.00 32.00
G.I. Plug 25 mm pc. d 1 12.00 12.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 25 x 13 mm pc. d 1 25.00 25.00
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. d 0.5 184.00 92.00
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. d 1 12.00 12.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 13 mm pc. d 2 15.00 30.00
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. d 1 65.00 65.00

G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 31 mm pc. e 1 32.00 32.00


G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. e 240 40.00 40 468.00 18,720.00
G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. e 3.00 3 88.00 264.00
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. e 36 32.00 1,152.00
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. e 1 30.00 30.00

G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 25 mm pc. f 1 34.00 34.00


G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. f 320 53.33 54 332.00 17,928.00
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. f 4.33 5 62.00 310.00
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. f 48 24.00 1,152.00
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. f 1 32.00 32.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 25 mm pc. f 1 26.00 26.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 13 mm pc. f 1 30.00 30.00
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. f 0.5 184.00 92.00
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. f 1 12.00 12.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 13 mm pc. f 2 15.00 30.00
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. f 1 65.00 65.00

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT 28 of 7
Detailed Estimates

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. g 200 33.33 34 468.00 15,912.00


G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. g 2.33 3 88.00 264.00
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. g 30 32.00 960.00
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. g 1 42.00 42.00
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. g 1 20.00 20.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 13 mm pc. g 1 30.00 30.00
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. g 0.5 184.00 92.00
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. g 1 12.00 12.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 13 mm pc. g 2 15.00 30.00
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. g 1 65.00 65.00

Brass Gate valve 38 mm pc. h 1 205.00 205.00


G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 38 mm x 6 m pc. h 60 10.00 10 550.00 5,500.00
G.I. Union patente 38 mm pc. h 1 116.00 116.00
G.I. Coupling 38 mm pc. h 8 41.00 328.00
G.I. Tee 38 x 38 mm pc. h 1 52.00 52.00

Brass Gate valve 25 mm pc. i 1 102.00 102.00


G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. i 100 16.67 17 332.00 5,644.00
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. i 0.67 1 62.00 62.00
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. i 15 24.00 360.00
G.I. Tee 25 x 25 mm pc. i 1 32.00 32.00
G.I. Plug 25 mm pc. i 1 12.00 12.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 25 x 13 mm pc. i 1 25.00 25.00
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. i 1 184.00 184.00
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. i 1 12.00 12.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 13 mm pc. i 2 15.00 30.00
G.I. Elbow, 45 degrees 25 mm pc. i 2 35.00 70.00
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. i 1 65.00 65.00

Brss Gate valve 25 mm pc. j 1 102.00 102.00


G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. j 710 118.33 119 332.00 39,508.00
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. j 10.83 12 62.00 744.00
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. j 106 24.00 2,544.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 25 mm pc. j 3 35.00 105.00

G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 38 mm pc. at reservoir overflow 2 60.00 120.00


Brass Gate valve 50 mm pc. drain at spring box & res. 2 245.00 490.00
G.I.Nipple, sched. 40 50 mm x 0.3 m pc. drain at spring box & res. 4 44.00 176.00
Perforated PVC Pipe 25 mm x 0.3 m pc. strainer at inlet of spring box 1 27.00 27.00
Brass Faucet 13 mm pc. faucet at tap stands 6 65.00 390.00

Others (tools to be turned-over to the (BWSA) association)


Teflon seal tape 3/4 inch roll accessories 100 20.00 2,000.00
Pipe wrench 12 inches long unit tools 1 550.00 550.00
Pipe wrench 14 inches long unit tools 2 650.00 1,300.00
Pipe threader 13, 19, 25, set tools 1 6,000.00 6,000.00
31, 38 mm
Hack saw unit tools 1 85.00 85.00
Hack saw blade pc. tools 5 40.00 200.00
TOTAL 3,360 277,793.00

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT 29 of 7
Detailed Estimates

B. LABOUR COST
Particular Quantity Gang Activity Duration Rate Total
Description Manpower Required Output Compu- Say per Day Labour
ted Cost
Pipe Threading 559.5
Supervisor 1 200 2.7975 3 250.00 750.00
Plumber 2 3 225.00 1,350.00
Laborer 8 3 150.00 3,600.00
Excavation, Laying
& Installation and
Backfilling 559.5
Supervisor 1 60 9.325 10 250.00 2,500.00
Plumber 2 10 225.00 4,500.00
Laborer 8 10 150.00 12,000.00
TOTAL 13 24,700.00

C. SUMMARY OF ITEM COST


Work No. of No. of Funding TOTAL Percent
Particular Duration Manpower MD In Kind CASH Weight
(P) (%)
MATERIALS
Pipes & fittings 277,793.00 - 277,793.00 92%
LABOUR
Skilled 13 - 9,100.00 9,100.00 3%
Unskilled 13 - 15,600.00 15,600.00 5%
TOTAL 13 277,793.00 24,700.00 302,493.00 100%

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT 30 of 7
Detailed Estimates

ITEM CREEK / RIVER CROSSING ( 2-Suspended type, 2-Submerged type)

A. MATERIALS
1) Computation of Quantities and Costing
Particular Compu Material Quantity Unit TOTAL
Description Specs. Factor ted Compu- Say Unit Cost Cost
Volume ted (P) (P)
Concrete Class "A" (1:2:4) 0.48
Portland cement 40 kg. D.C. 5 bag 140.00 700.00
Sand D.C. 0.25 cu.m. 250.00 62.50
Gravel D.C. 0.5 cu.m. 350.00 175.00
G.I. Wire Gauge # 4 D.C. 1 roll 1,500.00 1,500.00
Gauge # 16 D.C. 2 kg. 43.00 86.00
RSB 12 mm x 6 m D.C. 10 pc. 77.00 770.00
16 mm x 6 m D.C. 8 pc. 103.00 824.00
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 D.C. 2 pc. 250.00 500.00
x 1/8 x 6 m
TOTAL 4,617.50

B. LABOUR COST
Particular Quantity Gang Activity Duration Rate Total
Description Manpower Required Output Compu- Say per Day Labour
ted Cost
(suspended)
Form & steel works
Supervisor 1 1 250.00 250.00
Laborer 6 1 150.00 900.00
Concrete casting
Supervisor 1 1 250.00 250.00
Laborer 6 1 150.00 900.00
Installation
Supervisor 1 3 250.00 750.00
Laborer 6 3 150.00 2,700.00
Instn. (submerged)
Supervisor 1 1 250.00 250.00
Laborer 6 1 150.00 900.00

TOTAL 6 6,900.00

C. SUMMARY OF ITEM COST


Work No. of No. of Funding TOTAL Percent
Particular Duration Manpower MD Inkind CASH Weight
(P) (%)
MATERIALS
Lumpsum - 4,617.50 4,617.50 40%
LABOUR
Skilled 6 1 - 1,500.00 1,500.00 13%
Unskilled 6 6 - 5,400.00 5,400.00 47%
TOTAL 6 7 - 11,517.50 11,517.50 100%

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT 31 of 7
Detailed Estimates

ITEM TAP STAND ( 6 Units )

A. MATERIALS
1) Computation of Quantities and Costing
Particular Compu Material Quantity Unit TOTAL
Description Specs. Factor ted Compu- Say Unit Cost Cost
Volume ted (P) (P)
Concrete Class "B" (1:2.5:5) 1.218
Portland cement 40 kg. 7.5 9.135 9.5 bag 140.00 1,330.00
Sand 0.5 0.609 0.7 cu.m. 250.00 175.00
Gravel 1 1.218 1.3 cu.m. 350.00 455.00
RSB 10 mm x 6 m D.C. 15 pc. 70.00 1,050.00
G.I. wire Gauge # 16 D.C. 1.5 kg. 43.00 64.50
Forms Re-use from reservoir construction
Common nails Re-use from reservoir construction
TOTAL 3,074.50

B. LABOUR COST
Particular Quantity Gang Activity Duration Rate Total
Description Manpower Required Output Compu- Say per Day Labour
ted Cost
Concrete 1.218
Supervisor 1 1.5 0.812 1 250.00 250.00
Mason 1 1 225.00 225.00
Laborer 4 1 150.00 600.00
Form, Steelwork,
Excavation
Supervisor 1 3 250.00 750.00
Carpenter 1 3 225.00 675.00
Laborer 4 3 150.00 1,800.00

TOTAL 4 4,300.00

C. SUMMARY OF ITEM COST


Work No. of No. of Funding TOTAL Percent
Particular Duration Manpower MD Inkind CASH Weight
(P) (%)
MATERIALS
Lumpsum - 3,074.50 3,074.50 42%
LABOUR
Skilled 4 2 - 1,900.00 1,900.00 26%
Unskilled 4 4 - 2,400.00 2,400.00 33%
TOTAL 4 6 - 7,374.50 7,374.50 100%

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT 32 of 7
Isometric View of tapstand

KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.


Project TAP STAND
Sheet Title
Location Checked Isometric View
Scale Conc. Mix Sheet No.
NTS "B"(1:2.5:5 1 of 3
Plan and Reinforcement Detail of tapstand

KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.


Project TAP STAND
Sheet Title
Location Checked Plan and Reinforcement Details
Scale Conc. Mix Sheet No.
NTS "B"(1:2.5:5 2 of 3
BAR SCHEDULE
Total Quantity of 6-meter
Bar Diagram Dia. Spacing Length Quantity Length lenght Bar
10 mm 12 mm
(mm) (m) (m) (m) (pcs.) (pcs.)

A 10 0.3 1 4 4

B 10 0.3 1.5 3 4.5

C 10 - 0.75 4 3

D 10 0.3 0.7 3 2.1

TOTAL 13.6 2.5

TABLE OF QUANTITIES
Particular Unit Quantity Remarks
Description Specs.
For one tap stand
Concrete "B" (1:2.5:5) cu.m. 0.2 Concrete Class "B"
Portland Cement 40 kg. bag 1.5
Sand cu.m 0.1 (5 cans)
Gravel cu.m 0.2 (10 cans)
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 2.5
G.I. wire Gauge # 16 kg. 0.25
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 0 Re-use from reservoir
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 0 Re-use from reservoir
Common nails kg. 0 Re-use from reservoir

KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.


Project TAP STAND
Sheet Title
Location Checked Table of Quantities
Scale Conc. Mix Sheet No.
NTS "B"(1:2.5:5 3 of 3
RESERVOIR WS

2.20

0.10 1.30 0.10 0.60 0.10

Handle

0.10
0.10 max. W. L. L
Screened
Inlet pipe overflow pipe
(25 mm) (38 mm)
A B

C
2.00

Gate valve

min. W. L. Outlet pipe


0.10 slope (38 mm)
Drain pipe
0.10 (50 mm)
0.20 ground level
H E
0.10
G F
0.30 0.30

KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.


Project RESERVOIR (8 m3)
Sheet Title
Location Checked Section and Reinforcement Detail
Scale Conc. Mix Sheet No.
NTS "A" (1:2:4) 1 of 3

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir details for Annex 1b


RESERVOIR WS

2.20
0.10 0.10
1.40 0.60

0.10

K 0.70

0.60 2.20

0.70

0.10

J
A

KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.


Project RESERVOIR (8 m3)
Sheet Title
Location Checked Plan and Reinforcement Detail
Scale Conc. Mix Sheet No.
NTS "A" (1:2:4) 2 of 3

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir details for Annex 1b


RESERVOIR WS

BAR SCHEDULE
Total Quantity of 6-meter
Bar Diagram Dia. Spacing Length Quantity Length lenght Bar
10 mm 12 mm
(mm) (m) (m) (m) (pcs.) (pcs.)

A 12 0.23 2.8 33 92.4 16

B 12 0.23 2.75 3 8.25 2

C 10 0.23 2.35 44 103.4 18

D 10 0.23 2.35 20 47 8

E 12 0.23 0.8 36 28.8 5

F 10 - 2.55 4 10.2 2

G 10 - 2 4 8 2

H 10 0.23 0.35 36 12.6 3

I 10 0.24 2.35 9 21.15 4

J 10 0.23 1.6 4 6.4 2

K 10 0.23 1 6 6 1

L 10 0.24 0.85 8 6.8 1

TOTAL 41 23

TABLE OF QUANTITIES
Particular Unit Quantity Remarks
Description Specs.

Concrete (1:2:4) = (9:0.5:1) cu.m 3.26 Concrete Class "A"


Plaster (1:2) cu.m 0.3
Portland Cement 40 kg. bag 38
Sand cu.m 2.13 (107 cans)
Gravel cu.m 3.3 (165 cans)
Sahara compound Waterproofing compound pack 35
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 41
12 mm x 6 m pc. 23
G.I. Wire # 16 kg. 3
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 18
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 50
Common nails #4 kg. 25
# 1-1/2 kg. 3

KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.


Project RESERVOIR (8 m3)
Sheet Title
Location Checked Table of Quantities
Scale Conc. Mix Sheet No.
"A" (1:2:4) 3 of 3

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir details for Annex 1b


KALAHI-CIDSS
Project

Sub-Project Name

Elevation and Reinforcement of Spring Box


Location

Drawing Title
SPRING BOX

Sheet Title
Elevation and Reinforcement

Scale Concrete Mix


1 : 20 meters "A" (1:2:4)

Prepared

Checked

Sub-Project No. Sheet No.


1 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project

Project Name

Plan and Reinforcement of Spring Box

Location

Drawing Title
SPRING BOX

Sheet Title
Plan and Reinforcement

Scale Concrete Mix


1 : 20 meters "A" (1:2:4)

Prepared

Checked

Sub-Project No. Sheet No.


2 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project

Sub-Project NameSub-

Manhole cover

Location

Drawing Title
SPRING BOX

Sheet Title
Manhole Cover

Scale Concrete Mix


1 : 20 meters "A" (1:2:4)

Prepared

Checked

Sub-Project No. Sheet No.


3 of 4
BAR SCHEDULE-SPRING BOX
Total Quantity of 6-meter KALAHI-CIDSS
Bar Diagram Dia. Spacing Length Quantity Length lenght Bar Project
10 mm 12 mm
(mm) (m) (m) (m) (pcs.) (pcs.)

A 10 0.2 1.3 4 5.2 1

B 10 0.2 1.2 4 4.8 1 Sub-Project Name

C 10 0.2 0.6 3 1.8 1

D 10 0.2 0.3 3 0.9 1 Location

E 10 0.24 0.85 8 6.8 2 Drawing Title


SPRING BOX

TOTAL 6 Sheet Title


Elevation and Reinforcement

TABLE OF QUANTITIES Scale Concrete Mix


Particular Unit Quantity Remarks "A" (1:2:4)
Description Specs.
Concrete "A" (1:2:4) cu.m 0.224 Concrete Class "A" Prepared
Portland Cement 40 kg. bag 3
Sand cu.m 0.15 (7 cans)
Gravel cu.m 0.25 (12 cans)
Sahara compound pack 2 Checked
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 6
G.I. wire Gauge # 16 kg. 0.5
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 0 Re-use from reservoir
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 0 Re-use from reservoir Sub-Project No. Sheet No.
Common nails kg. 0 Re-use from reservoir 4 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.
Project CREEK / RIVER CROSSING
Sheet Title
Location Checked Profile (Suspended type)
Scale Sheet No.
NTS 1 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.
Project CREEK / RIVER CROSSING
Sheet Title
Location Checked Profile (Submerged type)
Scale Sheet No.
NTS 2 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.
Project CREEK / RIVER CROSSING
Sheet Title
Location Checked Concrete Post Reinforcement Detail
Scale Sheet No.
NTS 3 of 4
TABLE OF QUANTITIES
Particular Unit Quantity Remarks
Description Specs.

Suspended crossing
Concrete Class "A" (1:2:4) cu.m. 0.48 For the two concrete posts
Portland cement 40 kg. bag 5
Sand cu.m. 0.25(13 cans)
Gravel cu.m. 0.5(25 cans)
RSB 12 mm x 6 m pc. 6For stirrups
16 mm x 6 m pc. 8For vertical bars
G.I. Wire Gauge # 16 kg. 2As tie wire
Gauge # 4 roll 1As suspension wire
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 x pc. 2To hold the pipeline and where the
1/8 x 6 m suspension wire is attached to
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 0 Re-use from reservoir
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 0 Re-use from reservoir
Common nails kg. 0 Re-use from reservoir
Submerged crossing
RSB 12 mm x 6 m pc. 4 To anchor pipeline to river bed when
crossing under water. (One hook = 1 m)

KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.


Project CREEK / RIVER CROSSING
Sheet Title
Location Checked Table of Quantities
Scale Sheet No.
4 of 4
(REHABILITATION / IMPROVEMENT)

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


PROGRAM OF WORK

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


DETAILED ESTIMATE

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


DRAWINGS

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


RESERVOIR CAPACITY DESIGN
and
PIPELINE DESIGN and ANALYSIS

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


SPRING BOX

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


RESERVOIR

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


TAPSTAND

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


RIVER / CREEK CROSSING

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


BAR CHART

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


SUMMARY OF MATERIALS

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


UNIT COST OF MATERIALS

PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT


SUMMARY OF MATERIALS

Particular
Description Specs. Unit Qty. Remarks

A. Pipes and fittings


G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 38 mm x 6 m pc. 10
31 mm x 6 m pc. 358
25 mm x 6 m pc. 194
19 mm x 6m pc. 2
13 mm x 6 m pc. 3
G.I. Union patente 38 mm pc. 1
31 mm pc. 33
25 mm pc. 18
19 mm pc. 1
G.I. Coupling 38 mm pc. 8
31 mm pc. 321
25 mm pc. 171
19 mm pc. 1
13 mm pc. 6
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 38 mm pc. 2
25 mm pc. 3
13 mm pc. 12
G.I. Elbow, 45 degrees 25 mm pc. 2
G.I. Tee 38 x 38 mm pc. 1
31 x 31 mm pc. 5
25 x 25 mm pc. 2
19 x 19 mm pc. 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 31 mm pc. 1
38 x 25 mm pc. 1
31 x 25 mm pc. 2
31 x 19 mm pc. 1
31 x 13 mm pc. 3
25 x 13 mm pc. 2
19 x 13 mm pc. 1
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. 2
25 mm pc. 2
19 mm pc. 1
Brass Gate valve 50 mm pc. 2
38 mm pc. 1
25 mm pc. 1
13 mm pc. 6
Brass Faucet 13 mm pc. 6
G.I. Nipple sched. 40 50 mm x 0.3 m pc. 4
Perforated PVC pipe 31 mm x 0.3m pc. 1

B. Accessories
Teflon sealing tape 3/4 inch roll 100

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Summary of Materials - page 60 of 70


C. Tools
Pipe Wrench 12 inches long pc. 1
14 inches long pc. 2
Pipe Threader 13, 19, 25, set 1
31, 38 mm
Hacksaw pc. 1
Hacksaw blade pc. 5

D. Others
Portland cement 40 kg. bag 55
Sahara compound pack 37
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 18
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 50
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 x 1/8 x 6 m pc. 2
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 62
12 mm x 6 m pc. 33
16 mm x 6 m pc. 8
G.I. Wire Gauge # 16 kg. 7
Gauge # 4 roll 1
Common nails #4 kg. 25
# 1-1/2 kg. 3
Sand cu.m. 3.23
Gravel cu.m. 5.35

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Summary of Materials - page 61 of 70


UNIT COST OF MATERIALS

Particular Unit Unit Remarks


Description Specs. Cost

A. Pipes and Fittings


G.I. Pipe sched. 40 38 mm x 6 m pc. 550.00
do 31 mm x 6 m pc. 468.00
do 25 mm x 6 m pc. 332.00
do 19 mm x 6 m pc. 285.00
do 13 mm x 6 m pc. 184.00
G.I. Union patente 38 mm pc. 116.00
do 31 mm pc. 88.00
do 25 mm pc. 62.00
do 19 mm pc. 47.00
G.I. Coupling 38 mm pc. 41.00
do 31 mm pc. 32.00
do 25 mm pc. 24.00
do 19 mm pc. 20.00
do 13 mm pc. 12.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 38 mm pc. 60.00
do 25 mm pc. 35.00
do 13 mm pc. 15.00
G.I. Elbow, 45 degrees 25 mm pc. 35.00
G.I. Tee 38 x 38 mm pc. 52.00
do 31 x 31 mm pc. 42.00
do 25 x 25 mm pc. 32.00
do 19 x 19 mm pc. 24.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 31 mm pc. 32.00
do 38 x 25 mm pc. 34.00
do 31 x 25 mm pc. 26.00
do 31 x 19 mm pc. 28.00
do 31 x 13 mm pc. 30.00
do 25 x 13 mm pc. 25.00
do 19 x 13 mm pc. 20.00
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. 20.00
do 25 mm pc. 12.00
do 19 mm pc. 8.00
Brass Gate valve 50 mm pc. 245.00
do 38 mm pc. 205.00
do 25 mm pc. 102.00
do 13 mm pc. 65.00
Brass Faucet 13 mm pc. 65.00
G.I. Nipple, sched. 40 50 mm x 0.3 m pc. 44.00
Perforated PVC Pipe 25 mm x 0.3 m pc. 27.00

B. Accessories
Teflon sealing tape 3/4 inch wide roll 20.00

KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT Unit Cost of Materials - page 62 of 70


C. Tools
Pipe Wrench 12 inches long unit 550.00
do 14 inches long unit 650.00
Pipe Threader Set (one handle, set 6,000.00
one 13 mm (1/2),
one 19 mm (3/4),
one 25 mm (1),
one 31 mm (1-1/4),
one 38 mm (1-1/2))
Hacksaw unit 85.00
Hacksaw Blade pc. 40.00

D. Others
Portland cement 40 kg. bag 140.00
Sahara compound pack 22.00
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 375.00
Rough lumber 2"x 2' x 8' pc. 53.00
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 x 1/8 x 6 m pc. 250.00
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 70.00
12 mm x 6 m pc. 77.00
16 mm x 6 m pc. 103.00
G.I.Wire Gauge # 16 kg. 43.00
Gauge # 4 roll 1,500.00
Common nail #4 kg. 30.00
# 1-1/2 kg. 35.00

KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT Unit Cost of Materials - page 63 of 70


PROGRAM OF WORK WS

OFFICE OF THE BARANGAY SUB-PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE


Barangay ____________________________
Municipality of __________________________
Province of ____________________________

SUB-PROJECT PROGRAM OF WORKs

Sub-Project Title
Category
Physical Target
Total Sub-Project Cost

Project Description: Sub-Project Duration


Equipment Needed
Technical Personnel
Scope of Work %
Item No. Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
(Direct Cost) Wt.

Total
Breakdown Estimated Sources of Fund
Project Cost KALAHI-
Community Local Gov't.Units Other Source Total Cost
CIDSS Grant
A. Direct Cost
Materials Cost
Equipment Rental
Labor Cost:
a. Skilled
b. Unskilled

KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT 1 of 2


PROGRAM OF WORK WS

Sub-Total A

KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT 1 of 2


PROGRAM OF WORK WS

B. Indirect Cost
Pre-Engineering
Supervision
Contractor's Profit
Taxes
Hand Tools
Material Testing
Admin and Overhead
Sub-Total B
TOTAL (A+B)
ADD: Contingency
%
Total Estimated Cost
ADD: O&M (Other amenities)
Grand Total
Prepared by: Approved by:

Sevice Provider/Municipal Engineer BSPMC Chairperson

Reviewed by: Concurred by:

Deputy Area Coordinator Barangay Chairperson

Noted:
Municipal Mayor
Regional Infrastructure Engineer

Note: Costing to be used on the MIBF will be the Total Estimated Cost

KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT 1 of 2


IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE WS

BARANGAY SUB-PROJECT WORK SCHEDULE & PHYSICAL PROGRESS REPORT


For the Month of __________________, 200___

Name of Sub-project: ___________________________________ Total Sub-Project Cost:_______________________ Labor Ave.


Physical Target: _____________________________ Direct Cost: Generat Total No. of Days Rate/Da
ed y
Region: __________________________________ Indirect cost: Male
Skilled
Province : __________________________________ Date Started:________________________________ Female
Municipality : _______________________________ Target Completion Date: ______________________ Male
Unskilled
Barangay: __________________________________ Mode of Implementation: Female
TOTAL

I. To be filled up by Deputy Area Coordinator


WEIGHT Physical Previous DURATION
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT AMOUNT
(%) Target Cumm. Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

II To be filled up by Deputy Area Coordinator


PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (PLANNED) CUMULATIVE
PHYSICAL PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (ACTUAL) CUMULATIVE
PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (PLANNED) CUMULATIVE
CASH FLOW PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (ACTUAL) CUMULATIVE

III. Major Issues Encountered: IV. Recommendations

Prepared by: _____________________________ Concurred by: _____________________


PIT Chair/Skilled Person/Contractor Monitoring Team Leader Municipal Engineer

Noted:
Approved by: _____________________________ _____________________
BSPMC Chairperson Deputy Area Coordinator Regional Infrastructure Engineer

Note: Attach Material Records Sheet if physical accomplishment lags behind financial disbursements.

KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT 67 of 1


ECONOMIC ANALYSIS WS

Municipality/Province:
Name of Subproject:
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS:

A. Summary of Program of Work

Investment Cost 2,759,112.68


Material Cost 1,715,616.20
Labor Cost 554,953.58
Supervision Cost 488,542.90
2,759,112.68
Maintenance Cost 303,502.39

B. Basic Data and Assumptions


Assumptions Factors Financial Economic
Values Values
Investment Cost 2,759,113 2,321,057
Material Cost as a percent of investment 75% 1,715,616 1,921,490
Foreign component 60% 1,029,370 1,235,244
Local component 40% 686,246 686,246
Unskilled labor 70% 388,468 233,081
Skilled labor 30% 166,486 166,486
Maintenance Cost per Year 303,502.39 297,432
Material Cost as a percent of maintenance 50% 151,751 169,961
Foreign component 60% 91,051 109,261
Local component 40% 60,700 60,700
Unskilled labor 40% 60,700 36,420
Skilled labor 60% 91,051 91,051
Adjustment factor for Forex 1.2
Adjustment factor for Unskilled labor 0.6
Benefits
Population in the area directly serviced by the PWS 1,530 1,530
Average household size 6 6
Water fee per household 40 40
Percent economically active population 72%
Daily wage rate 75 45
Number of working days a year 315 315
Annual wage rate 23,625 14,175
Wage rate per hour 9 6
Mortality rate 0.13%
Morbidity rate 3.97%
Number of days inactive due to water borne illness 5 5
Average medical expenses 500 500
Hours per year for fetching water without project 730 730
Hours per year for fetching water with project 183 183

KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT 68 of 2


ECONOMIC ANALYSIS WS

C. Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis

Investment Cost Total Economic Reduction Reduction Savings in Time Total Incremental
Year Materials Unskilled Skilled Maintenance Cost Water in in Medical Savings5 Benefits Benefits
Labor Labor Cost Revenue1 Mortality2 Morbidity3 Expenses4
0 1,921,490 233,081 166,486 2,321,057 - (2,321,057)
1 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
2 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
3 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
4 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
5 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
6 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
7 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
8 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
9 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
10 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
11 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
12 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
13 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
14 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976
15 297,432 297,432 122,400 20,300 9,914 13,219 602,575 768,409 470,976

1/ (Served population/average household size) x Water fee per household x 12 months NPV at 15% P 432,915
2/ (Served population x Mortality rate x LFPR x Annual wage rate x 60%) EIRR 19%
3/ Served population x Morbidity rate x LFPR x Daily wage rate x days inactive x 60% B/C Ratio 1.11
4/ Served population x Morbidity rate x LFPR x medical expense x 60%
5/ (Served population/average household size) x LFPR x (Hours fetching water w/o project - Hours
fetching water w/ project) x Wage rate per hour

Prepared by:

KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT 69 of 2

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy