100% found this document useful (1 vote)
389 views44 pages

SAIMM Tailings Presentation

"Dewatering Tailings for Dry Stacking: Rapid Water Recovery by Means of Centrifuges" - presented at the 2018 SAIMM Copper/Cobalt conference in Livingstone, Zambia

Uploaded by

Nils Schwarz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
389 views44 pages

SAIMM Tailings Presentation

"Dewatering Tailings for Dry Stacking: Rapid Water Recovery by Means of Centrifuges" - presented at the 2018 SAIMM Copper/Cobalt conference in Livingstone, Zambia

Uploaded by

Nils Schwarz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 44

Dewatering Tailings for Dry Stacking:

Rapid Water Recovery by Means of Centrifuges

Presented by

Nils Schwarz
Schwarz Global Consulting
Introduction

 Mine tailings – typically mud-like material

 Disposal presents a major environmental issue

 Tailings containment facilities among world’s largest man made structures

Tailings Dam Evaporation

Gravity Liquid
Recovered
Water Dam
Solids
Tailings

Drainage
Introduction (contd)
 There is a shift towards “dry-stack” tailings disposal, especially where:
 Water is scarce
 Earthquakes are frequent
 Space is limited
 Environmental concerns preclude wet tailings disposal
 In “dry-stack” solids are dewatered and deposited in lined pits – similar
to modern, sealed landfill
 Takes up less space
 No risk of dam rupture.
Introduction (contd)
 Initial costs are higher
 Tailings must be dewatered
 Solids transported by truck or conveyor
 Deposition of solids adds logistical complexity and cost

 Used where:
 Wet tailings disposal is not an option
 Process water recovery is desirable

 Long term maintenance requirements much less than for wet disposal
 Where material dewaters well and rainfall is scarce no retention
bunding is required – eg. La Coipa in Chile
Introduction (contd)
Dewatering of Tailings – Available Technologies
 High-capacity Thickeners

 Belt filter press

 Chamber filter press

 Centrifuges
Effect of Using Centrifuges - Space Requirement

Chamber Filter Press Vacuum Belt Filter Press Centrifuge


(120 t) (65 t) (16 t)
Effect of Using Centrifuges - Utilities

Decanter Centrifuge

Labour
Effect of Using Centrifuges - Dewatering and Separation

Vol. %
Effect of Using Centrifuges - Dewatering and Separation
Case Study 1 – Lipari, Brazil
Case Study 1 – Lipari, Brazil
 Lipari’s Braúna diamond mine - 400 km NW of Salvador de Bahia.

 Very arid area of operation – water control is critical

 Initially lost order to competitor who offered a 600 mm


centrifuge to handle up to 10 t DS/h.

 Comissioned in 2013, the centrifuge never achieved these values,


and the equipment was very hard to control.

 In Feb 2017 Flottweg given opportunity to test Z92-4/459 SP 4.3

 Able to run a solid content in excess of 20 t DS/h, with clear


centrate and maximum solids throughput of >40 t DS/h
Case Study 1 – Lipari, Brazil
Case Study 1 – Lipari, Brazil
Case Study 1 – Lipari, Brazil
Operating parameters for centrifuge at Braúna Diamond Mine.

Feed flow rate Up to 70 m3/h


Solids loading 45%
Solids feed rate Up to 36.7 t/h
Drum speed 930 rpm
Centrifugal force 445 x g
Solids recovery >99.9%
DS contents in solid discharge >60–65%
Operational power consumption 30 kW bowl, 25 kW scroll
Flocculent consumption 0.2– 0.6 kg/t DS
Water Recovery (overall process) >95%
Case Study 1 – Lipari, Brazil
Case Study 1 – Lipari, Brazil

 Centrifuge operating continuously for > 8 000 h/a

 No deviation in performance

 Dewatering is possible at a force of only 440 x g

 Minimal wear on scroll at this low force


Case Study 2 – Buenaventura - Uchucchacua, Peru
Case Study 2 – Buenaventura, Peru
 Buenaventura’s Uchucchacua Mine in Peru - gold and silver
mine 200 km northeast of Lima, altitude of 4 400 m.a.s.l.

 Tailings currently sent to dam to settle out

 Excess process water flows down the mountain

 Practice environmentally unacceptable

 Buanventura faced with building USD 30 million tailings dam


extension or dry stacking in alternative location
Case Study 2 – Buenaventura, Peru
 Uchucchacua opted for dry stacking

 Flottweg invited to run pilot trials to assess tailing dewatering

 A Z92-4/459 SP 4.3 was installed and the results satisfied the


mining company's engineer.

 Specifically noted that centrate was clear and could be re-used


in the process plant.
Case Study 2 – Buenaventura, Peru
Case Study 2 – Buenaventura, Peru
Case Study 2 – Buenaventura, Peru
Case Study 2 – Buenaventura, Peru
Operating parameters for centrifuge at
Buenaventura’s Uchucchacua Mine.
Feed flow rate Up to 120 m3/h
Solids loading 8-23%
Solids feed rate Up to 24.7 t/h
Drum speed 1 300 rpm
Centrifugal force 860 x g
Solids recovery >99.9%
DS contents in solid discharge 72 – 79%
Operational power consumption 75 kW bowl, 50 kW scroll
Flocculent consumption 0.3–0.6 kg/t DS
Case Study 2 – Buenaventura, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
 After successful performance at Uchucchacua , Buenaventura
requested that the pilot plant be moved to Tambomayo

 Mine is near Arequipa, at altitude of 4 800 m.a.s.l.

 Space is very limited

 Environmental agency closely monitors water consumption


and discharge quality

 Chamber filter presses used to dewater tailings for dry


stacking
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
 2 Presses supposed to handle 1 500 t DS/d

 Each press has 91 plates 3 m x 3 m each

 Cycle time was supposed to be 17 min – 5 min load, 5 min


press, 7 min discharge.

 Cloths to be washed once a week

 One operator supposed to be needed per shift


Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
 Reality did not meet the claims

 Each press could only handle 20 t DS/h each – 1 000 t/d total

 Cycle time increased to 22 min

 Cloths had to be washed twice per day

 10 operator were required to discharge the cake

 Mine had to cut production to be in line with filter capacity


Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
 Centrifuge moved to new site and commissioned in 3 weeks

 Installed on a 2 m high steel structure

 Feed with 49 % DS was taken from nearby thickener

 Centrifuge discharged 67 – 70% solids with clear centrate

 Solid transported by two belt conveyors to truck loading site

 Nominal capacity was 600 t DS/day

 With one centrifuge the mine could return to full capacity


Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Operating parameters for centrifuge at
Buenaventura’s Tambomayo Mine.
Feed flow rate Up to 100 m3/h
Solids loading 45%
Solids feed rate Up to 39.5 t/h
Drum speed 925 rpm
Centrifugal force 440 x g
Solids recovery >99.9%
DS contents in solid discharge >67–70%
Operational power consumption 35 kW bowl, 30 kW scroll
Flocculent consumption 0.05 – 0.15 kg/t DS
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
 Minimal requirement for civils and small footprint meant
centrifuge could be deployed very quickly

 Machine was very easy to operate by inexperienced staff

 Nominal output exceeded that of 1 filter press

 When both presses were down for maintenance throughput


was increased to handle the feed to both presses.

 Tambomayo planning to install 2 centrifuges in 2019 to


eliminate the need for the filter presses
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Comparison at equal capacity / day
Chamber filter press Centrifuge
Process Discontinuous Continuous (24/7)
Filtration area (m²) 819 –
Filtration volume (m³) up to 20 up to 1
Capacity (t DS/h) up to 100 up to 30
Investment cost 100% 60%
Space 100% 20%
Structural support 100% 20%
Extras (crane, etc.) 100% 20%
Cycle time (min) 17–22 continuous
Operating personal (per 8 h) 4–8 1
Maintenance Regular maintenance Regular maintenance
Washing of filter cloths 1–2 x/day –
Change of filter cloths 2–4 x/year –
Maintenance downtime (days/a) 30 5
Maintenance costs 100% 5%
Instrumentation (Qty) >50 5
Exposure to workers Yes No
Feed pump pressure (bar) 6–15 1–2
Required flocculant 100% 100%
Dewatering results 75 % DS 70 % DS
Compressed air supply Yes No
Fresh water supply (day) 100% 0–5%
Required power (kW) 100% 100%
Outdoor installation possible No Yes
OPEX (USD/t DS) 4–6 2–4
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Case Study 3 – Buenaventura - Tambomayo, Peru
Thank you for your attention

Agent for Southern Africa Schwarz Global Consulting


Contact person: Nils Schwarz
Tel.: +27 11 475 7555
Fax: +27 86 552 1175
Mobile: +27 82 851 0625
Skype: schwarzglobal
E-mail: nils@sgconsulting.co.za

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy