100% found this document useful (1 vote)
527 views1 page

Grading Criteria For Midterm Oral Examinations in PRPROG

The document outlines grading criteria for a midterm oral examination in a PRPROG course. It provides criteria in 5 categories - Pronunciation & Intonation, Fluency, Grammatical Accuracy, Depth & Quality of Answer, and Structure & Coherence. Each category is graded on a scale from excellent to poor performance.

Uploaded by

Jay R MV
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
527 views1 page

Grading Criteria For Midterm Oral Examinations in PRPROG

The document outlines grading criteria for a midterm oral examination in a PRPROG course. It provides criteria in 5 categories - Pronunciation & Intonation, Fluency, Grammatical Accuracy, Depth & Quality of Answer, and Structure & Coherence. Each category is graded on a scale from excellent to poor performance.

Uploaded by

Jay R MV
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Grading Criteria for Midterm Oral Examinations in PRPROG

TOTAL = 25 20 15 10 5
Pronunciation, Near-native; accurate Mostly accurate and Accpetable with, some Flat intonation and poor Pronunciation and
Intonation and varied; varied; flaws; pronunciation intonation are an
obstacle to
Excellent to high Very good to good Reasonable degree of Lacking fluency; obvious communication
Fluency degree of fluency range of syntactic fluency. hesitation.
throughout. structures. No fluency, very halting.
Grammatical Complete command No recurrent basic A satisfactory grasp of A fair to just acceptable Major shortcomings in
accuracy of sentence errors; a few minor basic grammar; several grasp of basic grammar; basic elements of
structures errors do not formal errors, but frequent formal errors grammar; errors are
interfere with rarely interfering with disrupt communication obtrusive and seriously
communication. communication. and may compromise it. compromise
communication.
Depth and Very knowledgeable Wide coverage; most Reasonable coverage Superficial coverage Information is
quality of of topic with enough points covered in with some depth. with no depth at all. insufficient or e even
answer independence to depth. non-existent; clearly did
develop ideas in an not listen to discussions
advanced state. and lectures.
Structure and Extremely coherent; Very coherent with Some evidence of Some progression of Ideas are introduced in
Coherence good steady pace in clear links between structure and linking; ideas, but structure not no apparent order.
presenting answer. ideas; reasonably easy to always clear.
follow when presenting
answer.

Name: _________________________________________________________

Section: _________________

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy